Thursday, 20 February 2014

This Is Guy Adams - He Loves Old 'News' About 'Paedophiles'


Firstly, The Historical Truth ...

Daily Mail, 2nd September 1983


Then poor, young, Guy stumbles (or is pushed) in ...


Guy Adams - On occasion, so little need be said

Guy Adams @guyadams


Not all bad, though ... Guy has, gormlessly, collected some more, very useful materials, for us ;)

Guy Adams, just another stupid, spineless kid, who will, eventually, pass through the shit-stained tabloid S-bend, of the water closet of time.


The OSC.

(Embedded tweets - click date)


PUBLISHED: 23:20, 20 February 2014 | UPDATED: 04:53, 21 February 2014

Surprise, surprise, the BBC has ignored our expose [sic] of Labour's [sic] links to a child sex scandal [sic]. QUENTIN LETTS imagines its reaction if those involved were Tory

PUBLISHED: 01:03, 21 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:03, 21 February 2014

How can Harriet call herself a feminist after this?

PUBLISHED: 00:25, 21 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:27, 21 February 2014

Inexcusable: Leading abuse charity [sic] demands [really?] apology from Labour trio with links to vile [sic] paedophile [sic] group


Quentin Letts, Jan Moir and NAPAC - say no more 


Now, they attempt to bring in other old, establishment, guard and professional victims, to try to polish a turd ...


8:40PM GMT 21 Feb 2014

The 'right’ to sleep with children was one 'civil liberty’ that NCCL supported

8:50PM GMT 21 Feb 2014

'We on the Left lacked the courage to be branded 'homophobic’, so we just ignored it. I wish I hadn’t'

PUBLISHED: 02:18, 22 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:19, 22 February 2014

Apologists for paedophilia [sic]: As the Mail exposes more links between senior Labour figures and a vile paedophile group [sic], one man who was abused as a child asks them: why won't you admit you were wrong?

(Embedded tweet - click date)

PUBLISHED: 02:18, 22 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:19, 22 February 2014

Apologists for paedophilia [sic]: As the Mail exposes more links between senior Labour figures and a vile paedophile group [sic], one man who was abused as a child asks them: why won't you admit you were wrong?

 (Embedded tweets - click date)

 (Embedded tweet - click date)

Sunday 23 February 2014

Labour trio can't stay silent on this paedophile claim

(Embedded tweets - click date)

Feb 22, 2014 20:00

Senior Labour figures have serious questions to answer about past links to vile paedophile support group

Published: 23 February 2014 

Tell us more about your paedophile chums, Harriet

PUBLISHED: 23:24, 19 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:25, 20 February 2014

Now say sorry! Ex-Yard chief calls on Labour trio to admit backing paedophilia [sic] was a 'huge mistake'

PUBLISHED: 23:19, 23 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:50, 23 February 2014

How much longer can paedophilia apologists [?] stay silent? Even Left demands answers from senior Labour trio over links to child sex group


Friday, 21 February, 2014

A dam smart way to divert attention

"PS: Briefly, as I have a plane to catch, I guess I should mention a rather less interesting propaganda issue than the Itaipu dam film. The Daily Mail has emailed me several times in the last few days asking for a comment on their latest misleading crap about supposed Labour government support for PIE in the 1970s.

I see no point in responding, as anything I say would merely serve as another angle to keep the story going.

Not that they need my help. They have already run the story in various versions before, and will no doubt do so again at the slightest excuse, whether they have anything new to say or not. They know what keeps their punters happy, so they cannot be accused of incompetence in terms of generating sales. However, so far as this particular repetitious saga is concerned they are beginning to resemble the Daily Express, which constantly recycles a handful of stories (death of Princess Diana, disappeared toddler Madeleine McCann, miracle cure for arthritis, stormy weather ahead) to its elderly readership, who are presumably so far gone in senility they cannot remember they read the same thing only a few days before.

The Mail can take the downmarket Express route if they wish. It may be successful in sales terms, but it is hardly a recipe for respected journalism."

(Embedded tweet - click date)


Oh, but no, the mindless, conspiracy-dribbling and knuckle-dragging, does not stop there ...


Published on Feb 19, 2014 

Meet the Pedo Supporting British MP's Sex With 4 Yr old Babies !!

Published on Feb 19, 2014 

UK Column Live - 19th February 2014


24 February 2014 Last updated at 17:30

Harriet Harman condemns paper's 'smear campaign'

Monday 24 February 2014 16.58 GMT

Ed Miliband rejects claims of Labour trio's links to paedophile campaign

Friday, 21 February 2014

PIE - Questions that need answering

(Embedded tweet - click date)



NCCL Statement

"In recent days I have been the subject of a politically-motivated smear campaign by the Daily Mail.

They have accused me of being an apologist for child sex abuse, of supporting a vile paedophile organisation, of having a relaxed attitude to paedophilia and of watering down child pornography laws. These are horrific allegations and I strongly deny them all of them.

This is not the first time the Daily Mail has made this horrible and untrue allegation. And, this is not the first time the Daily Mail has attacked me. The editor and proprietor of the Daily Mail are entitled to their political views and they are of course entitled to oppose what I stand for but they are not entitled to use their newspaper to smear me with innuendo because they disagree with me politically and hate my values.

I sincerely hope people won't believe these smears - I suspect even the Daily Mail doesn't believe them to be true. But given the seriousness and the aggression with which the Daily Mail are pursuing me, I feel that I need to put the facts in the public domain.

1. Allegation that I supported the lowering of the age of consent to 10

This is not true. I supported the equalisation of the age of consent (as set out in NCCL document “priorities and strategy for the executive committee June 1981") by making the age of consent the same for homosexual as well as for heterosexual sex.

2. Allegation that I opposed the law on incest

This is not true. The document they refer to was written by NCCL in 1976 before I started to work there.

3. Allegation that I was seeking to water down a proposed ban on child pornography.

This is not true. I supported the Protection of Children Bill 1978. At the start of the document it makes clear that “The NCCL deplores the exploitation of children whether in the form of use in commercial pornography or as victims of sexual assaults"

The submission argued for some amendments to guard against unintended consequences including:

- Parents being criminalised for taking pictures of their children on the beach or in the bath

- The use of pictures in sex education being criminalised

- We also proposed that the definition of indecent was too wide and instead proposed "obscene" as indecent was very broadly defined and could include Page 3 of the Sun.

The Mail have tried to make me guilty by way guilt by association.

NCCL was an organisation which anyone could apply to join and indeed any organisation could apply to be "an affiliate" on payment of a fee. When I was at NCCL there were around 6,000 members and nearly 1,000 affiliated organisations of which PIE was one.

Members and affiliates decided the organisation's policy at the AGM from year to year.

I was aware that because NCCL opposed censorship and supported gay rights, paedophiles had sought to exploit that and use NCCL as a vehicle to make their arguments. But by the time I came to work for NCCL this vile organisation had already been vigorously challenged within the organisation. Jack Dromey was instrumental in that challenge when he took over the chair of NCCL in 1976

The reason I decided to go to work for NCCL was because I actively supported the work they had done and in particular the work of their women's rights committee on the Equal Pay Act, on the introduction of the Sex Discrimination Act and for greater protection of victims of domestic violence and against race discrimination.

Since being elected to the House of Commons in 1982 and during my times in Ministerial Office I have always championed the rights of those subjected to sexual abuse - especially women and children.

I hope The Daily Mail will stop this campaign of smear and innuendo against me. I have done nothing wrong and am guilty of none of their grotesque allegations."

February 24, 2014 6:35 pm

Harman issues statement on NCCL allegation – says she has been the victim of a “politically-motivated smear campaign”

(Embedded tweets - click date)

(Embedded tweets - click date)


History ..

October 19th, 2012

How Hattie’s friends defended paedophilia [sic]

7:00AM GMT 09 Mar 2009

Harriet Harman under attack over bid to water down child pornography law

Nov 11, 2012 09:11

Abuse scandals probe widens: The man who may hold key to UK's biggest paedophile network ever

(Embedded tweets - click date)


Including Harriet Harman on the tabloid paedophile row, Ukraine, and Cameron in Scotland

First broadcast: 24 Feb 2014


Harman paedophile row and no trial for alleged IRA bomber. With Jeremy Paxman

First broadcast: 25 Feb 2014

Laura Kuenssberg @bbclaurak


PUBLISHED: 22:41, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 08:14, 25 February 2014

But they still won't say sorry: Labour's Harman and Dromey finally break their silence over links to paedophile group

PUBLISHED: 23:02, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:33, 24 February 2014

Not one hint of remorse: Harman and Dromey's statements, and the Mail's replies

PUBLISHED: 01:01, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:01, 25 February 2014

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Amid the obfuscation, one word is missing

8:09PM GMT 24 Feb 2014

Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey, Patricia Hewitt and the Paedophile Information Exchange

Last updated: February 25th, 2014

Harriet Harman owes the British public a full explanation about the NCCL's links with paedophile group

25/2/14: 44 minutes ago

Harriet Harman: 'I'm not going to apologise'

25 February 2014 Last updated at 14:18

Harriet Harman expresses 'regret' after Daily Mail claims

2:00PM GMT 25 Feb 2014 

Harriet Harman's regret over civil rights body's paedophile group link

(Embedded tweet - click date)


Stop the Daily Mail sexualising children

(Embedded tweets - click date)

Wednesday 26 February 2014 19.09 GMT

The fight against the sexualisation of children

Harriet Harman tweets Daily Mail website picture of girl aged 12 in bikini


February 25, 2014

LABoraTORY PAEDOPHILIA: Part Two – why the Opposition has nothing much to say on the subject

3:12pm UK, Tuesday 25 February 2014

Harman Denies Colluding With Paedophile Group

25 February 2014

How paedophile campaigners targeted civil liberties group

(Embedded tweets - click date)


February 25, 2014 at 08:23AM

Harriet Harman, the NCCL: Smear Or Legitimate Story?

"Iain takes the Daily Mail to task.

One of the most irritating phrases you will ever hear on television is “the BBC has learnt”. You’d think it meant that due to an original piece of journalism, the BBC has found out something nobody else has. Invariably it means the BBC has switched on Sky News.

Sky use a similar technique by using the phrase “Sky sources have told us.” But in each case it gives the broadcaster cover to hype up a story that might otherwise be considered a little pedestrian. And it perverts the news agenda. But this sort of thing happens every day. Take the current furore about Harriet Harman, the Daily Mail, and the NCCL.

Over the last few days both the BBC and Sky have studiously ignored the front pages of the Daily Mail, which has accused Harriet Harman of, well, I’m not totally sure exactly. It seems they think that because she was legal officer to the NCCL she must have somehow sympathised with the aims and objectives of one of its thousands of members, the Paedophile Information Exchange. It’s a ‘guilt by association’ smear which upon any reasonable examination doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. But day after day the Daily Mail demands that Harman, her husband Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt say ‘sorry’. It’s the same kind of tactic they used on Ed Miliband back in September.

Conservatives have up to now attacked the BBC for not even mentioning the issue, understandably believing that if three Tory politicians had been accused of something similar the BBC might not have been so coy. We’ll never know. However, the BBC could defend its position by pointing out that these allegations are nothing new and were first aired back in 2009. That would be a sustainable editorial position.

But yesterday the game changed when Harriet Harman decided to break cover and respond to the allegations by giving the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg an interview. It turned out to be a bad move. Instead of saying that it was a clear mistake for the NCCL to allow the PIE to be an associate member, she prevaricated and appeared a little shifty. Not only that she compounded her error by accusing the Daily Mail of being hypocritical because it publishes pictures of bikini-clad young women on its website. Women, not girls. So instead of closing down the story, it has merely given all other media outlets the excuse to cover it on the basis that if Harriet Harman has spoken about it, it becomes a legitimate story.

Cue BBC overkill. It’s now leading bulletins on the Today Programme and 5 Live. I haven’t seen Sky News yet this morning, so I can’t comment on what they are doing but as it’s the lead story on their website it’s probable that it is leading their bulletins too.

I’ve steered clear of the story on my LBC show, not because of any desire to be politically correct, but because I genuinely don’t see this as a massive story. I see it as a politically-motivated smear by a newspaper which is besmirching its own good name by running it day after day after day.

Does anyone seriously believe Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt have any paedophile sympathies? No, of course not. They worked for a ramshackle organisation which was run in an anarchic way. Just as anyone with dubious views can join a political party, anyone or any organisation with dubious views could join the NCCL. Does anyone seriously think that Harman, a lowly junior legal officer, had the power to expel a member who had legitimately joined? Presumably to do so would have meant changing the NCCL’s constitution. Perhaps she and her husband tried to do that. Who knows? But remember that one of the NCCL’s aims was to promote freedom of speech for everyone, no matter how vile their views.

The biggest mistake Harriet Harman has made was to give that interview to Newsnight. All it succeeded in doing was fanning the story’s flames and giving other media organisations and newspapers to excuse they needed to cover it. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but the overblown and blanket coverage it is getting is so out of proportion to the lack of coverage it got yesterday, that editors all over the place, but especially the BBC, would do well to examine why they are doing what they are doing. Are they doing this because it is such an important story or because of their collective feeling of guilt that maybe they should have given it some coverage well before today?

When I go into LBC today and we start planning my Drive programme, it will be interesting to see how the story has developed during the day. If I cover it at all – and at the moment my feeling is that I’d rather not – it will be looking at the behaviour of the Daily Mail, more than the behaviour of Harriet Harman. No doubt I will get a shedload of abuse for it, but hey – broad shoulders and all that."


(Embedded tweet - click date)

Feb 25, 2014 17:05

There is a paedophile elephant in the corner of Labour’s living room


Tuesday 25 February 2014 16.02 GMT

PIE, the NCCL and Harriet Harman: why she was right not to apologise

8:17PM GMT 25 Feb 2014

New evidence casts doubt on Harriet Harman's defence over paedophile links

PUBLISHED: 10:55, 26 February 2014 | UPDATED: 11:48, 26 February 2014

Harman and Hewitt 'never tried to kick me out - they didn't want to rock the boat to protect their careers' claims child abuser ex leader of Paedophile Information Exchange

9:55AM GMT 26 Feb 2014

'Harman did not want to rock the boat over links to child sex group'

Wednesday, 26 February, 2014

Home Secretary cheated justice by dying!

 (Embedded tweets - click date)

Tuesday 25 February 2014 20.59 GMT

Harriet Harman demands apology for Daily Mail's paedophile 'smears'

25 February 2014 20:10

Harriet Harman’s messy war with the Mail


The Daily Mail now grasps at ridiculous straws ...

PUBLISHED: 23:43, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:43, 24 February 2014 

BBC's censorship of paedophilia scandal 'reveals its left-wing bias': Corporation accused of refusing to report story to protect the Labour party

PUBLISHED: 23:18, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 09:38, 26 February 2014

The child sex attacker and Soviet spy who was in the vile group legitimised by Harman and chums


26 February 2014 Last updated at 11:43

What is the Harman-Mail row about?

27 February 2014 Last updated at 13:14

How did the pro-paedophile group PIE exist openly for 10 years?
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Wednesday 26 February 2014 

Looking back to the great British paedophile infiltration campaign of the 1970s
(Embedded tweet - click date)

26/2/14: 2 hours ago

Jowell: Harman 'consistent' in opposition to PIE


Uncle Tom still playing his silly little games ...

PUBLISHED: 23:10, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:36, 25 February 2014

Labour MP calls for probe into state cash for Paedophile Information Exchange after claims files that prove it received taxpayers' money have been shredded

Wednesday 26 February 2014

Labour MP Tom Watson admits he would not have touched paedophile rights group PIE 'with a bargepole'
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Feb 25, 2014 19:16

Tories must say sorry for 'covering up child sex abuse' before Harriet Harman has to apologise
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Tuesday 25 February 2014 20.22 GMT

Harriet Harman's handling of the Daily Mail 'smear' has been wholly inept


BBC loves PIE @BBCPropaganda


26 February 2014 18.04 GMT

Harriet Harman: 'The Daily Mail should be apologising, not me'


Wednesday 26 February 2014 23.02 GMT

Harriet Harman rejects claims from paedophile campaigner Tom O'Carroll

Last updated Wed 26 Feb 2014 

Ex-PIE chair 'confident Harman was aware of situation'

Wednesday 26 February 2014 23.41 GMT 

Lobbying by paedophile campaign revealed 


PUBLISHED: 23:32, 26 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:08, 27 February 2014

Harman's pressure group advertised for members in magazine for paedophiles: New evidence links NCCL to PIE while Harriet was legal chief

Last updated: February 27th, 2014 

The Harriet Harman 'paedophilia' scandal is a disaster of Labour's own making

1 March 2014

What’s happened to Harriet Harman?

Wednesday 26 February 2014 23.41 GMT

Lobbying by paedophile campaign revealed

PUBLISHED: 01:36, 27 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:36, 27 February 2014

STEPHEN GLOVER: The Left argue that a sexual free-for-all in the 70s explains their tolerance of child sex abusers. What twisted bunkum



World at One 

"A good deal of sympathy for your objectives"

Duration: 09:06

"Shaun Ley reports on the efforts of the Paedophile Information Exchange to gain support from politicians and links between PIE and the National Council of Civil Liberties."

(Embedded Tweets - click date)


Vol. 2 No. 23: 4 December 1980

Young Love

"Paedophilia: The Radical Case by Tom O’Carroll Peter Owen, 280 pp, £14.95, October 1980, ISBN 0 7206 0546 6"

No comments:

Post a Comment