Apr 24 2013, 10:05pm GMTDT
Fifth Amendment shields child porn suspect from decrypting hard drives
"Judge says forcing man to unlock files would amount to self-incrimination.
A federal judge refused to compel a Wisconsin suspect to decrypt the contents of several hard drives because doing so would violate the man's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Judge William E. Callahan's Friday ruling ultimately labeled the issue a "close call."
Courts have wrestled with how to apply the Fifth Amendment to encrypted hard drives for several years. According to past rulings, forcing a defendant to decrypt a hard drive isn't necessarily self-incriminating, but forcing a defendant to decrypt a hard drive can amount to self-incrimination if the government can't otherwise show that the defendant has the password for the drive. In that case, forced decryption amounts to a forced confession that the defendant owns the drive."
Should the Fifth Amendment Stop Child Porn Suspects From Decrypting Their Hard Drive?
Encrypted files complicate St. Louis probe of terrorist sympathies, child porn
Child-Porn Suspect Ordered to Decrypt His Own Data