consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
An open communication ...
"Dear Sir or Madam,
Re: Sexual Offences Guideline: Indecent images of children (although it could apply to a number of your present projects)
We do not participate in consultations, such as yours (including directly-governmental), as they are, invariably-based, on false, misleading and establishment social control methods; we will not give credence to, by participation in, such farces.
For example, in this case, the incorrect obiter dicta, in Beaney (now, essentially, superseded by Terrell), is a typical example of biased and ill-informed myth (some would say, lies), within such a consultation; for now, we stopped reading, there.
These are the 'facts of the matter', based on actual evidence and research:
*****
1 The Propositions
In this piece, I will work from a number of propositions. Of course, they are much more than that, as they are based on almost 10 years (at least) of thorough research and personal experience.
The propositions, are as follows (others may be added, as I proceed):
(1) Viewing an image, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(2) Owning an image, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(3) Taking of an image of someone, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(4) Selling of an image of someone, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(5) An image is a digital representation of an act, which may, or may not, have occurred,
As such, as a collection of dots, it is not a victim of anything; it is not even a valid proof of reality,
(6) An image is only indecent, by the perception of the viewer,
(7) Indecency does not equate to harm (seriously or otherwise), directly or indirectly.
The first stage, for anyone who wishes to challenge (or support) these propositions (or any of the response), is to provide evidence, at this email. The evidence will then be considered and incorporated, if relevant (and credited, as such).
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/making-every-child-matter-everywhere.html
*****
Feel free to email me, here, if you have ***any*** evidence, to the contrary.
Please feel free to use this communication, if you so desire; it really does not matter to us.
We deal in evidence-based approaches, and do not hide behind populist myth, bad cases and law, and incorrect and disproportionate obiter dicta, so as to approach the truth and natural justice, and then attempt to deal with the terrible results, of their draconian outcomes.
You messed it up so very badly, last time, contributing to the death and suffering of many, many good men, and ruining thousands of lives and families; please do not do so again.
Yours,
Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk
http://criticalestoppel.blogspot.co.uk "
*****
Some moments later ...
*****
"Postmaster@justice.gsi.gov.uk via mail204.messagelabs.com
15:28 (20 minutes ago)
to me
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system.
Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 ."
*****
OK, let's try again (direct copy and paste, check no spaces etc) ...
Some moments later ...
*****
"Postmaster@justice.gsi.gov.uk via mail204.messagelabs.com
15:44 (1 minute ago)
to me
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system.
Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 "
*****
Reported to info@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
Email is, consultation@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk, apparently
Email sent and received.
The OSC
No comments:
Post a Comment