Wednesday, 13 March 2013

Only So Much One Can Milk The Salty Cow

March 11, 2013 8:00 pm

Child pornography victim loses restitution appeal

"A child pornography victim [sic] seeking nearly $1 million in restitution from a Lincoln man caught with pictures of her on his computer in 2010 lost an appeal Monday of the judge's $3,333 award.

In November 2010, a search of RF's Lincoln address turned up 26 digital images and 23 videos on his computer after Lincoln police investigators discovered them using file-sharing software."

Child porn victim loses appeal seeking restitution

Split Eighth Circuit panel weighs in on child porn restitutution issues

"Sentencing Policy Adjudication and Empiricism" with a focus on federal child porn sentencing

Sentencing Policy Adjudication and Empiricism


Ex-Irvin High School teacher ordered to pay victims in child porn case


D.C. Circuit Weighs Child Pornography Restitution Case


"The Case for Full Restitution for Child Pornography Victims"

The Case for Full Restitution for Child Pornography Victims


2013-July-1 16:38:13, Monday

Motion to Proceed

"Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to the following question: What, if any, causal relationship or nexus between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages must the government or the victim establish in order to recover restitution under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2259?

What they really should be asking is;

What, if any, causal relationship or nexus between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages must the government establish in order to charge the defendant with a crime?""

Doyle Randall Paroline, Petitioner v. United States, et al.


Pa. child porn victim sues viewers for $150k each


17 Tuesday Dec 2013

‘I am a real victim of child pornography and it affects me every day and everywhere I go’

"‘Amy’ was a victim of sexual abuse by her uncle as a child. He uploaded images of the abuse on to the internet, they became known as the ‘Misty Series’. These images have been globally trafficked since the late 1990s and are the most widely viewed in the child pornography world, according to the New York Times.

Amy is now 24; she gets notifications through the US Justice Department every time someone views the ‘Misty Series’ video. So far she has 1800 notifications and the video has already featured in 3200 criminal cases. Next month in a landmark case, the US Supreme Court will decide how much a child porn victim can demand from the people who viewed a video of her being abused."


Published: November 23, 2014

Victim: Viewing child porn isn’t harmless

"But for those who look at child pornography in the privacy of their homes, Reynolds says, they should know better.

“Shame on you,” she said.”

For victims, she said, “it’s psychologically damaging. It’s not fair. People think victims of child pornography are not touched. It’s not like rape. It’s just overlooked. … They don’t realize what we’re doing when we have to send those pictures. We’re doing it ourselves. We’re forced to. ... We could not say no.”

Reynolds said the people who look at the pictures “are dads and brothers and sons.” She wants to tell them, “This could be your sister.”

They are creating the demand, the marketplace that is being catered to by the child pornography producers and extortionists.

“You’re contributing to it. You can’t be a law-abiding citizen if you’re contributing to extortion,” Reynolds said. “People send out those pictures and make them public because of people who view them.”"

No comments:

Post a Comment