We Know Judges Can Be Ignorant, Incorrect And Out-Of Touch, But ...

Dismissed: Lord Chief Justice Sir John Thomas, judged that the claims

of sex offender CP had no merit, and that he should be named

*****

PUBLISHED: 19:19, 18 September 2013 | UPDATED: 23:35, 18 September 2013 

Paedophile [sic] named and shamed [?] as High Court rubbishes his claim that sex offender laws 'breach his human rights'

"While his claim was being processed he was granted anonymity by the courts, but the judges said that they 'cannot see any basis' for keeping his identity secret."

"They added: 'As to the contention that the claimant should be anonymised on the basis that he would be identified as a person on the Sexual Offenders Register and his rehabilitation impeded, there is nothing in the evidence before us which suggests that there are any special risks to him or to public order by him being identified.'"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2424572/Paedophile-named-High-Court-rubbishes-claim-sex-offender-laws-breach-human-rights.html

It would be laughable, if it were not so deadly serious ...

RIP GC (not even anywhere near being a 'Sex Offender')

The OSC

*****

Kieran Corcoran

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=Kieran+Corcoran

https://twitter.com/kj_corcoran

http://uk.linkedin.com/in/kierancor

http://journalisted.com/kieran-corcoran

http://thegatewayonline.com/authors/kieran-corcoran

http://kjcorcoran.wordpress.com