Saturday 31 May 2014

"When One Considers The Crimes" - Looking At Pictures ... No Victims Here (Well, Perhaps One, And His Family) ... Move Along



Ms Susan Jones MP/AS 

Horrified, That She Will Miss The Paedocard, Vote, Gravy Train 

Knowledge Base and Sensitivity Assessment = 'Pitiful and Inadequate'

*****

23 May 2014

DI had 255,000 indecent child images on his computer

http://www.susanelanjones.co.uk/dennis-igo-had-255000-indecent-child-images-on-his-computer

Published: 18:51, 29 May 2014 | Updated: 08:07, 30 May 2014

Pervert [offensive, derogatory and inflammatory] with 250,000 child porn images goes free because he was depressed

>DI, 53, admitted making and possessing indecent images
>Spared jail and given suspended sentence, plus community service
>Court told I 'in a very dark place' as wife was undergoing cancer treatment
>MP Susan Elan Jones slams sentence as 'pitiful and inadequate'

"Ms Jones, Labour MP for Clwyd South, has asked the Attorney General for an urgent review of the sentence.

In the letter, she said: 'Mr I has pleaded guilty to some extremely disturbing charges and I feel that the sentence awarded is totally inadequate when one considers the crimes that have been committed.

'I urge you to take action on this matter and to review this case in depth. On behalf of the victims involved in Mr I's 'collection' and the local community which I represent, I ask that you take whatever action is available to you to see that justice is done in this case ...'

She later added: 'I have heard from many constituents in B over the weekend and they are all as horrified as I am. It's relatively unusual for an MP to ask the Attorney General to review an individual case but I will not let this matter rest.'

Ms Jones said she was horrified that the same judge recently gave a two-year custodial sentence for a currency scam, which she said seemed to be a discrepancy."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2642968/Businessman-spent-four-hours-day-looking-collection-250-000-child-porn-images-escapes-jail.html

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

Susan Elan Jones MP/AS(shole)

http://www.susanelanjones.co.uk

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/24720/susan_elan_jones/clwyd_south

http://www.labour.org.uk/mp/susan_jones/829

http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/susan-elan-jones/3956

Thursday 29 May 2014

A Gathering Of The Born Again Child Savers - Must Be The Weather


"If it hadn't have been, for those pesky, busy-body, not-my-fault-gov, child savers ..."

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date) 

*****

Many of the present, drooping, crop ... all in one thread !!!

Scant in evidence, knowledge and experience, resplendent in bullshit, emotion and blind allegation.

They will pass, as always.

The OSC

Wednesday 28 May 2014

There Are None So Blind ...

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

Monica Rey-Bailey 

Monica Rey Bailey @monicaraileybay https://twitter.com/monicaraileybay

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/monica-rey-bailey/6/b98/740

http://www.tba.org/profile/monica-rey-bailey

*****

Updated 4:02 am, Sunday, May 25, 2014

Board wants to remove low-risk sex offenders from registr

"The state board that oversees California's sex offender registration laws wants to thin out and overhaul the registry because they say it has grown too big and does not help law enforcement or the public differentiate between offenders who pose significant risks and those not likely to reoffend."

http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Board-wants-to-remove-low-risk-sex-offenders-from-5503219.php

Hate For All, Or Hate For None

28th May 2014
28 May 2014
28 May 2014

Hate Crime: Should the Current Offences be Extended?

"OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT LAW 1.4 

At present, the police and the Crown Prosecution Service (“CPS”) record as a “hate crime” any crime perceived by t he victim or another person to have been motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or transgender identity.

Although “hate crimes” are recorded for all five of these “protected characteristics”, the criminal offences that specifically deal with hate crime only cover some of the characteristics."

"CHAPTER 6: DEFINING THE AGGRAVATED OFFENCES 8.7 

We recommend that the definition of disability in any new aggravated offences should be the definition in section 146(5) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: “any mental or physical impairment”."

http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc348_hate_crime.pdf

http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc348_hate_crime_english_summary.pdf

http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc348_analysis_of_responses.pdf

*****

http://www.crimeline.info/news/hate-crime-should-the-current-offences-be-extended 

*****

28 May 2014

UK Law Commission Wants Hate Crime Law Extended To Transsexuals And Disabled

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/05/28/The-Law-Commission-Proposes-Extension-Of-Hate-Crime

*****

However, even in confirming this, the 'review', does not go, even half-way, to re-balancing the situation.

The OSC 

Nothing And No One To Fear! I Really Mean It!



Tuesday 27 May 2014

Lies, Dehumanisation, Mob Mentality, Ad Hominem, Devaluation, False-Flagging, Ignorance, Stupidity - The Sure Signs Of The 'Child Saver' Bigot And Zealot


Twitter Residents, 2014

*****
Of course, following a slap-down session, Jim ran away on the challenge (all archived).
Before, Babs?
Publicly dealt with? - like 'Niggers and Nigger Lovers', Babs?
Ignorant Liar.
Legal links, legally.
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

... and most of them never will.


*****

Addendum (a little time later)
(Embedded Tweet - click date)
 
Hahahahaha - Do it, you spineless, exploiting, manipulative, buffoon.

Except, you won't - you never have and never will - too many skeletons. 
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

The inner children speak ...
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Sad, sad, newbies. 

*****
Correct, on one count.
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

... it would be amusing, if it were not so concerning, how ignorant, dangerous and stupid, some adults can be ... and we allow them to vote !!! 

Ongoing.

Monday 26 May 2014

To Begin To Measure One's Sexual Self Against All That It Might Offer

Received: 16 Aug 2013, Accepted: 25 Oct 2013, Published online: 21 Mar 2014

The ‘problem’ of sexual fantasies

"Abstract

This essay explores the nature and implications of sexual fantasies. The essay begins from the apparent paradox that while it [pornography] is frequently condemned for its absolute explicitness (‘leaving nothing to the imagination’) it is at the same time condemned for arousing ‘uncontrollable fantasies’.

Several strands of theorization are reviewed, attending in particular to their shared assumption that such fantasies are essentially compensatory – making up for either stored-up problems from childhood or signs of inadequacy in a person's sexual maturation.

Challenging these accounts, the essay draws on evidence from a major investigation into the meanings and pleasures of pornography conducted in 2011, which garnered more than 5000 responses to a complex online questionnaire combining quantitative and qualitative questions.

Ten motivations for using and enjoying sexual fantasies are distinguished, within which five distinct ways of understanding the relations between pornography and fantasy are outlined: as magnifying glass, as mirror to self, as emporium, as journey, and as alternative self.

These are understood as productive of new sexual possibilities."

Martin Barkera, Porn Studies, Volume 1, Issue 1-2, 2014, DOI: 10.1080/23268743.2013.863656

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23268743.2013.863656#.U4MfWHaa_sQ

Friday 23 May 2014

One Word, Just One ... You Will Be Found And You Will Be Dealt With


You know who you are, so do we

Anything, any repercussions, at all - consequences ensue. We never make idle threats.

No other warnings, on this issue.

The OSC

*****

Data Protection Act, Journalism and the PCC Code  

"Are there any other rules on obtaining personal information?

The DPA also regulates the lawful disclosure of information. This note does not deal with how that might be relevant to disclosure to the media, or how journalists might use DPA information rights, or the DPA’s inter-relation with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, for which the Information Commissioner also has responsibility.

However, it is important for journalists to understand that in addition to the Act’s requirements about the way that personal data can be used, the rights of data subjects and the exemptions to them, it contains some other controls and prohibitions on the way that information can be obtained and disclosed.

There is a specific criminal offence of unlawful obtaining of personal data. A person must not knowingly or recklessly, without the consent of the data controller, obtain or disclose personal data or the information that it contains, or procure the disclosure to another person of the information contained in personal data.

Both individuals and companies can be prosecuted at the instigation of the Information Commissioner or the Director of Public Prosecutions. It is also an offence to sell or offer to sell information that has been obtained without consent."

http://www.pcc.org.uk/news/index.html?article=ODg

Data Protection Act 1998

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents

Mr McFadyen - Grooming, Slipping And Sliding ... Like a Slippery 'Un - Again

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Chronologically, perhaps.

 *****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****  

So ...

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Allow us, Ian ...

"... we need to be careful in how we conceptualise and manage [sic] these people [sic] in the community.  Whilst many [sic] paedophiles may go on to commit sexual offences, some [sic] will not.

At the same time, it should be acknowledged that whilst many [sic] people who commit child sex offences are paedophiles, the vast majority do not fit that description.

Once we understand these facts, and they are widely, openly, and fairly discussed within the popular media, we can begin to move forward with a pragmatic approach to child sex offending, and a sensible, proportional public response to match."

Now, make sure you do it, Ian - TY.

The OSC

****

p.s. see you are now fishing for the ghost-writer ... all on-schedule ...

*****

Addendum (23/5/14)

Bog-standard, ignorant, dangerous, zealot ... as predicted ...

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Indicators Of Antisociality

2014 Mar 14

Online Child Pornography Offenders are Different: A Meta-analysis of the Characteristics of Online and Offline Sex Offenders Against Children

"Abstract

The current meta-analysis compared the characteristics of online child pornography-only offenders, typical (offline) sex offenders against children, and offenders with both child pornography and contact sex offences against children (mixed).

Based on 30 unique samples (comparison ns ranging from 98 to 2,702), the meta-analysis found key differences between groups. Offenders who committed contact sex offences were more likely to have access to children than those with only child pornography offences.

In contrast, offenders who used the internet to commit sexual offences had greater access to the internet than those with contact sex offenders.

Differences between the groups, however, were not limited to differential opportunities. Sex offenders against children and mixed offenders were found to score higher on indicators of antisociality than online child pornography offenders (CPOs).

CPOs were also more likely to have psychological barriers to sexual offending than sex offenders against children and mixed offenders (e.g., greater victim empathy).

Mixed offenders were found to be the most pedophilic, even more than CPOs.

The findings suggest that offenders who restricted their offending behavior to online child pornography offences were different from mixed offenders and offline sex offenders against children, and that mixed offenders were a particularly high risk group."

Babchishin KM, Hanson RK, Vanzuylen H., Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Mar 14 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627189

Wednesday 21 May 2014

Don't Vote UKIP !!!

(Embedded Tweets - click date).

What If?

May 16, 2014 • 10:30 AM

What If We Admitted to Children That Sex Is Primarily About Pleasure?

"And I was off thinking: How funny that we can’t bring ourselves to tell our children the most fundamental truth about sex, that most of the time we have sex, we have it for pleasure.

As I watched my son chomp on his peanut butter bagel, I was struck by the thought that I sure have learned from him how a single act of sex can give you pleasure for years to come.

I can’t believe he’s supposed to give me a present for Mother’s Day. Many days, I can’t even fathom that he came from sex. He just seems magical."

http://www.psmag.com/navigation/health-and-behavior/admitted-children-sex-primarily-pleasure-81691

If It Wasn't For Those Sexy Kids ...



Wednesday 21 May 2014

Paedophiles' brains are 'abnormally tuned' [not for a MAP, it is not abnormal] to children's faces, new study claims

"Paedophiles’ brains are “abnormally tuned” to find the face of a child more attractive than that of an adult, according to a study published today.

The results mean that it may be possible in future to “diagnose” [sic] potential paedophiles [sic] at a young age by studying their responses to the faces of adults and children, scientists said.

Researchers at the University of Kiel in Germany studied the brains of 56 adults, 23 of whom were male paedophiles and the remainder either heterosexual or homosexual men. While their brains were being monitored by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, they were briefly exposed to pictures of men’s, women’s, boys’ and girls’ faces.

In the individuals attracted to adults of either sex, the regions of the brain associated with facial processing and sexual desire lit up when the faces of adults were shown. But in the brains of the paedophiles, images of children’s faces prompted the same regions to respond.

The scientists said their findings, published in the journal Biology Letters, confirmed previous studies showing that human beings process faces according to the sexual orientation of the observer.

“The critical new finding is that face processing is also tuned to face cues revealing the developmental stage that is sexually preferred,” they wrote.

We found no evidence to suggest that paedophiles recruit a different brain network when exposed to faces of the preferred sex and age than individuals showing a normal preference for adults do… the same network is activated by the sexually preferred face, but the main difference is that in paedophiles that network is abnormally tuned [sic] to sexual immaturity [sic].”

Dr Jorge Ponseti of the University of Kiel’s Medical School, the study’s lead author, told The Independent his team now hoped to carry out further research into whether paedophilia could be detected using only a subject’s responses to children’s faces.

He added that if this works, it should eventually be possible to assess whether someone might be a paedophile based on their brain’s responses to studying children’s faces.

“We could start to look at the onset of paedophilia, which is probably in puberty at about 12 or 14 years [old],” he said.[ah, like any sexual orientation, then?]

The NSPCC welcomed the research. Jon Brown, the charity’s lead on tackling sexual abuse, said: “There is never any excuse for sexually abusing a child, but any research that could help improve child protection practice is welcome. [you tool - a wooooshh again].

“For example, understanding why some people have a sexual interest in children could help to develop new treatment programmes [sic] that aim to control and change a paedophile’s behaviour [sic]. It’s also important to remember that not everyone who has a sexual interest in children will go on to act on their impulses.” [and don't you forget it].

Previous research also involving MRI scans has suggested that paedophilia may be the result of faulty connections in the brain. In 2007, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto reported that the brains of paedophiles contained much less “white matter” – responsible for wiring different parts of the brain together – than those of non-sexual criminals." [sic]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/paedophiles-brains-are-abnormally-tuned-to-childrens-faces-new-study-claims-9405707.html

Paedophiles' brains are abnormally tuned to be attracted to children's faces shocking [what?] study finds

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/paedophiles-brains-abnormally-tuned-attracted-3579446

Is paedophilia an illness? [eh, we keep telling you] Brains are wired differently in offenders [offenders? it says paedophiles], study claims

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2634045/Is-paedophilia-illness-Brains-wired-differently-offenders-study-claims.html

http://www.ablxboston.com/national/57505-is-paedophilia-an-illness-brains-are-wired-differently-in-offenders-study-claims.html

>>>>>We see no reference, to offenders, in this sample.<<<<<

Pedophiles: Another view on faces 

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.wissenschaft.de/home/-/journal_content/56/12054/3645194/P%25C3%25A4dophile%253A-Anderer-Blick-auf-Gesichter/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DbtO%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official

Discovered link between facial recognition and sexual age preference: Sexual Medicine

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.idw-online.de/en/news588116&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DbtO%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official

(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

*****

Published 21 May 2014

Human face processing is tuned to sexual age preferences 

J. Ponseti, O. Granert, T. van Eimeren, O. Jansen, S. Wolff, K. Beier, G. Deuschl, H. Bosinski and H. Siebner


"Abstract

Human faces can motivate nurturing behaviour or sexual behaviour when adults see a child or an adult face, respectively. This suggests that face processing is tuned to detecting age cues of sexual maturity to stimulate the appropriate reproductive behaviour: either caretaking or mating [are they mutually-exclusive?].

In paedophilia, sexual attraction is directed to sexually immature children [sic - you mean reproductively]. Therefore, we hypothesized that brain networks that normally are tuned to mature faces of the preferred gender show an abnormal tuning to sexual immature faces in paedophilia.

Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test directly for the existence of a network which is tuned to face cues of sexual maturity [sic - you mean reproductively]. During fMRI, participants sexually attracted to either adults or children were exposed to various face images.

In individuals attracted to adults, adult faces activated several brain regions significantly more than child faces. These brain regions comprised areas known to be implicated in face processing, and sexual processing, including occipital areas, the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and, subcortically, the putamen and nucleus caudatus.

The same regions were activated in paedophiles, but with a reversed preferential response pattern."

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/5/20140200

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/5/20140200.full.pdf+html

*****

Wednesday 21 May, 2014

EXPERT REACTION: Paedophiles brains prefer children's faces (Biology Letters*)

Professor James Ogloff is Director of the Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science and Legal Studies at Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria 

 "The results need to be treated with caution.

The sample sizes are small, and very little information is provided regarding the clinical characteristics of the sample or about the task used (number of trials etc.).

From a technical perspective, the findings are relatively minimal. There is little practical value of the results. As the authors note, because of the cross-sectional design, it is not possible to determine how any differences develop.

Moreover, as with other studies that investigate paedophilic preferences [sic], the fact that a person is sexually attracted by a person regardless of age does not mean that they will act on that preference.

I think the authors make too much of the data in the discussion given the significant limitations of the study.

The previous imaging study they reference re. sexual preference and fMRI activation to faces is also based on small sample sizes (10 in each group) and uncorrected data analysis."

* Human face processing is tuned to sexual age preferences, Ponseti et al., Biology Letters, 2014, <a href="http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/5/20140200">http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200

http://www.smc.org.au/2014/05/expert-reaction-paedophiles-brains-prefer-childrens-faces-biology-letters

*****

Be careful what you look for, you may just find it.

Friday 16 May 2014

Why 'Making' (Downloading - POCA 1978)/'Possessing' (CJA 1988) Indecent Images of Children Is Not A Sexual Offence And Never Can Be (Well, Not In A Rational World)

(1) From Home Office Classification


Source:

Trending - Trends of indecent images of children and child sexual offences between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 within the United Kingdom

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/trending.html

Released: 17 October 2013 

Sexual Offences in England and Wales - year ending June 2013 

Part of Crime Statistics, period ending June 2013 Release ...


http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/crime-stats/crime-statistics/period-ending-june-2013/info-sexual-offenses.html

With effect from April 2014

Home Office Counting Rules For Recorded Crime


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/340312/count-crimes-society-july-2014.pdf

*****

(2) From The SOA 2003

2 (a) The Requirement To Notify



Source:

Trending - Trends of indecent images of children and child sexual offences between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 within the United Kingdom

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/trending.html

i.e. for the purposes of notification requirements (i.e. the, so-called, 'sex offender registration') ...

Part 2: Notification and orders; Notification requirements

80 Persons becoming subject to notification requirements

(1) A person is subject to the notification requirements of this Part for the period set out in section 82 (“the notification period”) if—

(a) he is convicted of an offence listed in Schedule 3;

(b) he is found not guilty of such an offence by reason of insanity;

(c) he is found to be under a disability and to have done the act charged against him in respect of such an offence; or

(d) in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, he is cautioned in respect of such an offence.

(2) A person for the time being subject to the notification requirements of this Part is referred to in this Part as a “relevant offender”."

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/2 

SCHEDULE 3

Sexual offences [sic] for purposes of Part 2

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/schedule/3

For the record, not only those who are required to notify, are subject to SOPOs. 

2 (b) What is 'Sexual' About A 'Sexual' Offence?


http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/rape_and_sexual_offences/soa_2003_and_soa_1956


http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/78 

7 February 2003

Sex, crime and seduction - The new Sexual Offences Bill could screw us all. 

"A striking feature of the proposed new legislation is its reliance on the concept of ‘a reasonable person’. According to clause 80: ‘penetration, touching or any other activity is sexual if ..."

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/6776#.VN5VpiyW4pN

1st August 2015 

Kissing a woman’s hand was ‘chivalry’ not sexual assault – the case of Vidas Cernevicius 

"Does this create a precedent? Can I go and kiss womens hands and not get in trouble?

In a word ‘no’. In a few more words ‘of course not, don’t be ridiculous’.

Firstly, as stated above – even if you were to not be convicted of sexual assault, you would still be liable to be found guilty of common assault. This is a serious offence in its own right, for which you can go to prison.

But more importantly, a future court may well not find that there is was no sexual motivation in it all.

In any event, a decision of a Magistrates’ Court is not binding on anybody. It is wrong to see this as anything other than what it is – a decision on its own facts, based on the evidence that Mr Cernevicius gave.

I am not suggesting in any way that Mr Cernevicius is guilty, but he clearly has his own set of beliefs about the world and it is far from guaranteed (to put it mildly) that a different Court would come to the same conclusion with a different person."

http://ukcriminallawblog.com/kissing-a-womans-hand-was-chivalry-not-sexual-assault-the-case-of-vidas-cernevicius

More to follow.

*****

(3) From Reality

Why Owning Indecent Images of Children Is Not A Sexual Offence, In Reality (Part 2) 

http://criticalestoppel.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/why-owning-indecent-images-of-children_19.html

Why Owning Indecent Images of Children Is Not A Sexual Offence, In Reality (Part 1) 

 

click to enlarge

 http://criticalestoppel.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/why-owning-indecent-images-of-children.html

 *****

I Looked 

"I looked at the vicious crowd, pushing and jostling, and I did nothing, now I am a hooligan.

I looked at the calm soldier, slicing his enemy with his bayonet, and I did nothing, now I am a war criminal.

I looked at the disembowelled refugee children, and I did nothing, now I am a participator.

I looked at the stick-like bodies, as they were pushed into the trench, and I did nothing, now I am Nazi.

I looked at the shattered remains of the crash victim, and I did nothing, now I am a manslaughterer.

I looked at the voluptuous body of the seductive model, and I did nothing, now I am a rapist.

I looked at the distant scientists, collecting the remains of the murdered schoolgirl, and I did nothing, now I am a murderer.

I looked at the taboo sexual practices of others, and I did nothing, now I live the rest of my life as a child sexual offender,

... and then, I shutdown the computer."

http://web.archive.org/web/20050206085307/http://www.madbadorsad.org/arttherapy.htm

*****

December 26, 2010

"“However, what he didn’t turn his mind to at the time is that merely having possession and viewing images such as this does victimize and hurt the individual portrayed in the image. He appreciates that now.” Senior gets jail time, probation for having single image of child pornography 

We at Human-Stupidity.com fail to appreciate that. Maybe we are too humanly-stupid to understand. Or maybe we do not fall prey to mystical superstitious thinking that is the driving force of the child porn witch hunt."

*****


 click to enlarge

*****

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/watching-child-pornography-victimizes-child-voodoo-science

*****

The Madness of 'Gillotti' (USA)

July 11, 2014 - 7:14 PM 

Sex offender loses bid to reduce rating 

http://www.buffalonews.com/city-region/all-niagara-county/sex-offender-loses-bid-to-reduce-rating-20140711 

Decided on June 10, 2014;

People v. Gillotti 

Summary: 

"Both Defendants in this case were required to register as a sex offenders pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA).

At issue in these cases was the SORA risk assessment guidelines promulgated by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders.

The Court of Appeals held:

(1) guidelines factor 3, which is based on the number of victims [sic] involved in an offender’s crime [sic], permits the scoring of points based on the number of different children depicted in the child pornography files possessed by a child pornography offender;

(2) a position statement issued by the Board on the evaluation of child pornography cases under SORA does not prohibit a SORA court from assigning points to an offender under factor 3 and factor 7 (which accounts for the increased risk of sexual recidivism posed [sic] by an offender whose crime is directed at a stranger [sic]);

and (3) where an offender requests a downward departure in a SORA case the offender must prove the facts supporting a downward departure by a preponderance of the evidence."

http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/court-of-appeals/2014/97-0.html 

***** 


Posted on June 29, 2014

9 Reasons Why Child Porn Laws Are Evil

1. Child abuse images are completely legal, while child porn images are not
2. Child porn is not child abuse
3. Child porn is a thought crime
4. Criminalising any image is an affront to democracy
5. Banning one thing leads to the ‘slippery slope’ effect of banning everything
6. Child porn laws undermine the rule of law
7. Child porn laws are so excessively broad that they effectively rape children of their childhood
8. Banning child porn allows child rapists and child abusers to walk free
9. Those who seek to ban child pornography are all paedophiles themselves anyway

https://holocaust21.wordpress.com/2014/06/29/9-reasons-why-child-porn-laws-are-evil/

*****

21 August, 2014

Banning us from watching this video of a criminal act is a step too far 

"There is a difference between individuals exercising their right not to view or share a video, and companies such as Twitter -- or indeed the police force -- denying people the right to view it."

http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2014/08/james-foley-isis-media-blackout-twitter-met-police/
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

More to follow.

Thursday 15 May 2014

Paedophile? - And The BBC Wonders Why This Has To Happen?

 15 May 2014 Last updated at 13:16

Politician and paedophile [sic] ask Google to 'be forgotten'

"Google has received fresh takedown requests after a European court ruled that an individual could force it to remove "irrelevant and outdated" search results, the BBC has learned.

An ex-politician seeking re-election has asked to have links to an article about his behaviour in office removed.

A man convicted of possessing child abuse images [IIOC] has requested links to pages about his conviction to be wiped.

And a doctor wants negative reviews from patients removed from the results.

Google itself has not commented on the so-called right-to-be-forgotten ruling since it described the European Court of Justice judgement as being "disappointing"."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27423527

What is the 'right to be forgotten'? 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27394751

Who wants right to be forgotten?

"Spent convictions
 
In the UK, the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act allows convictions to be "spent" after a certain period of time. For instance, for anyone sentenced to less than six months in prison, their conviction has become spent after two years. Spent convictions typically do not need to be disclosed to employers, but it's easy to see how a Google search result could void any possible benefit from the act."

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/299916/rehabilitation-of-offenders-guidance.pdf

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-27396981

What ruling says on US/Europe divide 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27421969 

*****

Updated 25 minutes ago (20:48)

Ex-MP and convicted paedophile [sic] ask Google to ‘forget’ them

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/law/article4091128.ece

May 16, 2014 - 9:57AM

Google, Microsoft face take-down request overload after European court ruling

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/digital-life-news/google-microsoft-face-takedown-request-overload-after-european-court-ruling-20140515-zref2.html

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Tuesday 13 May 2014

'Sex Offender' Is A Legal Term, Not A Lifestyle Choice

Apr 15

Once a sex offender, always a sex offender?

"It is a striking task to ask undergraduate students (as well as friends and family members) what they believe is the proportion of convicted sex offenders who recommit a new sexual offence. The typical response is: “most” or, for the more statistically-inclined, “80%, give or take 5%.” Research, however, does not match the public’s view. When based on official statistics (for example: new arrests or convictions for a sexual offence), the rates are disproportionately lower than common expectations: about 7% after 5 years and 12% after 10 years (Helmus et al., 2012) ..."

http://nextgenforensic.wordpress.com/2014/04/15/once-a-sex-offender-always-a-sex-offender
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

Posted: May 12, 2014 - 7:39pm | Updated: May 13, 2014 - 12:16am

Dear Abby: Register for sex offenders covers gamut of offenses

"The reason for this is because of a “one-size-fits-all” approach to punishment, be it a one-time offender or a serial rapist. Most sexual abusers are either members of the family or a close family friend, and most are never reported. Only a small percentage of registered offenders pose a danger and should be under surveillance. The others should be allowed a second chance to continue with their lives without undue harassment.

If “Stunned” reports her co-worker to her employer, she will jeopardize his livelihood, which he needs to redeem his life."

http://lubbockonline.com/life-columnists/2014-05-12/dear-abby-register-sex-offenders-covers-gamut-offenses#.U3Kp1naXtGy

We Note, That Your Slanderous, Logical, Basis Is Flawed



Seahorse HQ @seahorseHQ https://twitter.com/seahorseHQ

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

MAPs - you are not alone - very much, not alone ... www.annabelleigh.net

http://www.lucyfaithfull.org.uk  -    -    -  http://www.virped.org  -  http://b4uact.org

On error - repaste the link into your url box and press return

*****

Seahorse HQ

http://klout.com/seahorsehq

http://www.conferize.com/u/seahorsehq

http://favstar.fm/users/seahorsehq

Monday 12 May 2014

Subbed Out

Published on May 6, 2014 

I am a Registered Sex Offender, Subculture presentation


"For my Social Problems class (sociology class) the assignment was to write a paper about a subculture you are a part of, I chose to do mine about registered sex offenders. Because this is a unique and misunderstood subculture I asked to do a presentation and this is it. The presentation portion is only 6:00 minutes followed by some Q & A. afterward."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YOo2Ry2DJc

http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2014/05/i-am-registered-sex-offender-subculture.html#.U3DG6Xaa_sQ

Yes Ian, You May - But There Is No Need For Any Defence

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

****

20 specimen charges, of making (DL) IIOC, under POCA 1978 - not a Sexual Offence ... much else is unsubstantiated rumour, disinformation and lies.

For the greater good.

Hope that assists.

Nigel, The OSC

Friday 9 May 2014

The 'Survivor' Construct Of 'Truth'



Ian Mcfadyen @IanMcFadyen1966 https://twitter.com/IanMcFadyen1966

*****
 (Embedded Tweets - click date)

https://audioboo.fm/boos/2144007-ian-mcfadyen-discusses-sex-abuse-at-caldicott-school

5 hours ago [18:29]

Caldicott school victim speaks of abuse 

"Some listeners may find the content of this interview disturbing."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27340645

*****

The 'Survivor' Construct Of 'Truth'


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4ejlz54AW4&feature=youtu.be

*****

When the truth 'hurts', futile and puerile attacks, with the usual lies and disinformation, are all they have 


(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

... and there you have it.

*****

Addendum (12/5/14)


*****


The Times, January 20, 2014

Published: 00:02, 12 May 2014 | Updated: 12:59, 12 May 2014

Boarding schools' chief says sorry for child abuse scandals: Teachers' leader to admit revelations 'cast a long shadow' in unprecedented apology

>Ray McGovern is chairman of the Boarding Schools Association

>He is to apologise 'unreservedly' for past incidents of pupil abuse

>128 leading independent schools tainted by child abuse scandal

"Victorian attitudes prevailed that resulted in children being ‘seen and not heard’ and disciplined in line with the belief that ‘sparing the rod’ spoiled the child."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2625823/Boarding-schools-chief-says-sorry-child-abuse-scandals-Teachers-leader-admit-revelations-cast-long-shadow-unprecedented-apology.html

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Needless-to-say, Mr McFadyen could not ...