Showing posts with label MAA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MAA. Show all posts

Monday, 5 September 2016

What Goes Around ...

We are back, gentle readers. Reasons will always follow :)

For now, why not spread your wings :) ...

http://onlymapinthevillage.blogspot.co.uk/

Vigilante Banishment In The Age Of Post-Enlightenment
 

Friday, 5 December 2014

Intelligent Humanity Shines Through


More Progress - Excellent

CC Simon Bailey @CCNorfolkPolice https://twitter.com/CCNorfolkPolice

(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

5 December 2014 at 5:36am 

Police chief: 'Non-contact' paedophiles [sic] should be treated, not prosecuted

http://www.itv.com/news/2014-12-05/police-chief-non-contact-paedophiles-should-be-treated-not-prosecuted/

Dec 05, 2014 07:48

Perverts [offensive and inflammatory] who view child sex images [sic] online 'should be HELPED not prosecuted' says top policeman 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/perverts-who-view-child-sex-4751197?ICID=FB_mirror_main 

Friday 5 December 2014

Top police officer: many viewing child abuse images [sic] should be treated on NHS

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/dec/05/top-police-officer-many-viewing-child-abuse-images-treated-nhs

December 05, 2014 5:46PM

UK cop wants child porn viewers counselled

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/uk-cop-wants-child-porn-viewers-counselled/story-fn3dxix6-1227146337261 

Published: 18 minutes ago (5/12/14; 12:13)

Top cop: Help paedos [sic] who only look at pics

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/6154736/Top-cop-Help-paedos-who-only-look-at-pics.html?CMP=spklr-119078164-Editorial-TWITTER-TheSunNewspaper-20141205-News

1 hour 43 minutes ago (5/12/14; 13:16)

Child sex image [sic] viewers 'need help' 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/help-paedos-just-look-top-cop-052050043.html#boGyfMO

 
">Chief constable Simon Bailey has suggested alternative to punishment,
>Claims at least half of those looking at images pose no threat to children,
>He says mental health services should work with those offenders instead,
>NSPCC say people who view child abuse images are a threat to children,
>Police have database of 50,000 people who have viewed child sex images."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2861958/Officer-says-view-child-porn-dont-abuse-helped.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2861765/Help-paedos-just-look--cop.html

1:45PM GMT 05 Dec 2014

Half of paedophiles [sic] 'need medical help' and not jail, says chief constable

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11275577/Half-of-paedophiles-need-medical-help-and-not-jail-says-chief-constable.html

6 December 2014 Last updated at 08:01

Child abuse viewers [sic] need medical help - police chief

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-30358284

Friday, December 5, 2014

Some people viewing online child sex images [sic] should receive treatment rather than face court - Norfolk police chief

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/crime/some_people_viewing_online_child_sex_images_should_receive_treatment_rather_than
_face_court_norfolk_police_chief_1_3876264


Published time: December 05, 2014 14:58; Edited time: December 05, 2014 21:20

Child porn possessors to be medically treated [sic], not punished – UK police overwhelmed

http://rt.com/uk/211803-radical-reform-child-abuse

22:22 05.12.2014 (updated 22:32 05.12.2014)

Not Everyone Who Looks At Child Porn Should Face Prison: British Policeman

http://sputniknews.com/europe/20141205/1015551129.html

5th December 2014, 08:15

Norfolk: Chief Constable Calls For Health Care For Paedophiles [sic]

http://www.heart.co.uk/eastanglia/news/local/norfolk-chief-constable-health-care-paedophiles

*****

Now the logically-disabled zealots and ignorant, lie, smear and disinform ...


*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

December 5, 2014

Viewing images of child sexual abuse is child sexual abuse.

"We were horrified by the comments of Simon Bailey, Chief Constable of Norfolk police & the Association of Chief Police Officers’ lead on child protection and abuse investigations in the Guardian this morning suggesting that men who look at images of children being sexually abused, raped and tortured were “not all were an immediate threat”.

Men who look at these images or videos online PAY to do so fueling an industry which is based on the sexual exploitation and torture of children. No one “accidentally stumbles” on images of child sexual abuse, rape and torture. They have to search for these images and, then, they pay for them. This is without getting into the issue of “pay-per-view” child sexual abuse where men pay to watch another man torture a child live.

Images of children being sexually abused, tortured and raped are a growth industry because men PAY to see these images and videos. They look at the images knowing the children are being abused. They look at them because they don’t care. They believe they are entitled to watch these images of children being tortured – some as young as a day old.

These men need to be held criminally liable for participating in the sexual exploitation, rape and torture of children.

It’s incredibly frighting that the ACPO lead on child protection and abuse investigations doesn’t get this – that he confuses paedophilia, a psychological condition which very few have, with the vast majority of perpetrators who CHOOSE to sexually abuse children. And, that Bailey doesn’t understand that those who are clinically diagnosed as paedophiles are still making a choice.

We suggest that ACPO sign up Bailey and all of their members for some proper training on child sexual exploitation from an organisation who understand that viewing images of children being sexually abused, raped and tortured is a crime. That these men are financially supporting an industry which is based entirely on the rape, sexual abuse and torture of children."

http://everydayvictimblaming.com/evb-analysis/viewing-images-of-child-sexual-abuse-is-child-sexual-abuse

So much emotive, incorrect, BS ... we will just let it lie, for now. 



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2861958/Officer-says-view-child-porn-dont-abuse-helped.html

Why are you all, so blatantly, lying?

*****

Have You Learned Nothing? - Causality and Correlation of Owning Images

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/have-you-learned-nothing.html

Greater Than 30% Of IIOC Viewers Are 'Hands-On Paedos' - How Did This Mythology Arise?

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/greater-than-30-of-iioc-viewers-are.html

When Judges Talk Rubbish - Voodoo Obiter Dicta

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/when-judges-talk-rubbish-time-to-start.html

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)

"Jim Gamble: questioned the message being put out by police."



Even Then

Friday 1 June 2007 06.28 EDT 

Paedophiles [sic] 'need treatment, not prison' Jim Gamble says not all offenders should go to jail. 

""Viewing" paedophiles should be treated in the community rather than be sent to jail, the head of the national police child protection unit said today."

"Jim Gamble, head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), said too many people were being convicted of child sex offences to be dealt with in the criminal justice system.

He proposed that lower risk offenders, such as those convicted of downloading abusive images of children, should receive a police caution and then be managed in the community.

"We shouldn't be sending everyone that ever commits an offence - particularly of the viewing kind - to prison," Mr Gamble told BBC Radio 4's Today programme."

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/jun/01/prisonsandprobation.ukcrime

*****

05/12/2014

The World Tonight 

"The UK's leading policeman on child abuse - Simon Bailey - suggests that at least 50% of people who view images of children online should not go to prison - and need to be dealt with by the NHS."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04t6t96

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)


http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/5lnews

http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/5live/5lnews/5lnews_20141207-1604a.mp3

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)

*****

October 2014

Sex Offenders - time to step outside the anger?

http://issuu.com/thepsychologist/docs/psy10_14issu/12

https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-28/january-2015/tackling-child-sexual-abuse-lesson-germany

*****

19/12/14

Virtuous Pedophiles Exist 

"It is a commonly held belief that individuals with a sexual interest in children (that is, pedophiles) are at an extremely high risk of committing (or to have already committed) a sexual offence against a child. When people hear ‘pedophiles’, most immediately think ‘child molester’, ‘predator’, or ‘sex offender’.

Most overlook an important distinction: pedophiles are those who hold a sexual interest in children whereas sex offenders against children are those who have committed a sexual offence against a child.

These terms are not synonymous. Indeed, a large body of research has found that not all pedophiles are sex offenders, and not all sex offenders are pedophiles (Seto, 2008). Some pedophiles only have a sexual interest in children (exclusive pedophiles), whereas other pedophiles have a sexual interest in both children and adults (nonexclusive pedophiles)."

http://nextgenforensic.wordpress.com/2014/12/19/virtuous-pedophiles-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-119

***** 

If you are affected, by any of the issues, raised, here ...

MAPs - you are not alone - very much, not alone ... www.annabelleigh.net

http://www.lucyfaithfull.org.uk - stopitnow.org.uk - circles-uk.org.uk - http://www.virped.org - http://b4uact.org

http://preventell.se/?lang=en - http://www.nemup.de/index_eng.html - https://1in6.org - www.boychat.org

Tuesday, 28 January 2014

Who Is Distorted?

March 2006, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 5

Do child molesters hold distorted beliefs? What does their memory recall tell us?

"Abstract

Do child molesters hold distorted beliefs (or cognitive distortions) that support their sexual offending? To test this hypothesis, we asked 28 child molesters and 20 inmate controls to read a description of child molestation. Within this vignette, we planted 10 ambiguous descriptions. If child molesters’ information processing were driven by cognitive distortions, we hypothesized that they would use this knowledge to disambiguate and cognitively distort each description.

This was tested by examining participants’ free recall of the vignette. Chi-square tests of association showed that both child molesters and inmate controls had various memory distortions for the vignette, but could not be differentiated based on the numbers of cognitive distortions in their recall classifications.

In other words, our findings did not support the widely held cognitive distortion hypothesis a finding which could promote substantial revision of both how we view child molesters’ ‘‘cognitive distortions’’, and how we treat them."

Journal of Sexual Aggression"

http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Do_Child_Molesters_Hold_Distorted_Beliefs__What_Does_Their_Memory_Recall_Tell_Us.pdf

*****

Wednesday, 1 January, 2014

Cognitive ‘distortions’ and dissonance

"Such dangerously heretical thoughts nowhere find overt expression in the paper, but the exercise must have sown confusion. While it demonstrated that MAPs were not shown to think in a cognitively distorted way, it also indicates that the researchers were suffering from another interesting mental condition, cognitive dissonance i.e. psychological conflict when presented with data at odds with one’s beliefs. Given the conservative nature of their starting point, this offers the hope that they may actually be moving forwards a little, as they struggle, perhaps painfully, to accommodate the new information and make a new beginning."

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2014/01/01/cognitive-distortions-and-dissonance/comment-page-1/#comment-2620

29/7/2013

Content Analysis of Cognitive Distortions in Pedophiles' [sic] Online Forum Posts 

"Historically, sexual encounters between adults and children were rarely reported to authorities, and thus considered a rare problem. However, as many as 33% of girls and 14% of boys experience sexual encounters with adults and as a result may experience consequences such as aversive feelings regarding the act of sex, substance abuse, and self-mutilation. Such consequences lead research to examine pedophile’s cognitive distortions.

This exploratory study examined pedophiles’ website forum posts to determine if any posters demonstrated cognitive distortions. Four independent raters used content analysis to determine which cognitive distortions were demonstrated by the examined pedophiles.

Results suggested that cognitive distortions were not prominently demonstrated by those posting on the examined forum. Results may also suggest that cognitive distortions are not evident in a supportive environment. Results cannot be generalized to the entire pedophilic population and future research could analyze posters’ cognitive distortions over a period of time and examine which cognitive distortions have altered over time."

http://dspace.rowan.edu/handle/10927/869

Monday, 27 January 2014

Reformed Peter File Stars On ITV This Morning ... MW-T Assists


11:32 - 27 Jan 2014

Interview with a convicted paedophile [no such offence]

"Today we are joined by a man called John (not his real name) [Peter?] who has been convicted twice of possessing indecent images of children. [ah, OK ... not possessing, actually]

He has agreed to talk to This Morning in order to highlight what he thinks is a lack of help for paedophiles [true, but he is not one], which he believes increases their chances of reoffending. John, 43, has taken measures to rehabilitate himself including no longer owning a computer, reducing the risk of him downloading [potentially] illegal material again. [good for 'John', let us hope it was not cathartic]

The interview will be pre-recorded and voiced-over by an actor to maintain John's anonymity.

We are also joined by investigative journalist and former policeman Mark Williams-Thomas, best known for exposing [not] Jimmy Savile as a paedophile." [not]

http://www.itv.com/thismorning/hot-topics/interview-with-convicted-paedophile

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Comment:

So, what do we think about John, and his performance, on This Morning?...

(1) We are delighted, that the ITV have begun to ask many pertinent questions,

(2) We are delighted, that the ITV did so, in a measured and sensitive manner,

(3) We are delighted, that MW-T has brought these issues forward, in a reasonable manner,

(4) We thank John, for his brave (if indirect) performance,

(5) What happened to the iSOTP?

(6) John is not a 'child sex offender', for a number of reasons and measures,

(7) We are very disappointed, that the term 'Paedophile' was used, time-and-time again, when ...

   (a) John is, clearly, attracted to girls, in the way, most men are,

   (b) A psychiatrist determined that John was quite 'normal' - i.e. not a Paedophile.

Overall then, 8/10 ... and certainly an excellent move, in the right direction, so as to enable desistance and understanding.

For these reasons, and others, you will not see much, positive, about this show, in the MSM.

The OSC

*****

Monday 27 Jan 2014 2:20 pm

This Morning causes controversy as Phil and Holly interview convicted paedophile [not]

http://metro.co.uk/2014/01/27/this-morning-causes-controversy-as-phil-and-holly-interview-convicted-paedophile-4278950

January 27th, 2014

This Morning’s Phillip Schofield & Holly Willoughby interview paedophile [not] & Theresa May responds VIDEO

http://primetime.unrealitytv.co.uk/mornings-phillip-schofield-holly-willoughby-interview-paedophile-theresa-may-responds-video

27 January 2014 12:33 GMT

Crime Week: This Morning interview Theresa May and a convicted paedophile [not]

http://shows.stv.tv/this-morning/real-life/261855-crime-week-this-morning-interview-theresa-may-and-a-convicted-paedophile

*****

Oh dear, oh dear ...

This Morning - INTERVIEW WITH A CONVICTED PAEDOPHILE [not]

https://www.facebook.com/ThisMorning/posts/10152279148967122?stream_ref=10

Wednesday, 22 January 2014

On Feminism, Professional Victims, Vested Interests, Denial, Harm And Sexuality

(Embedded Tweet - click date).

Sunday, 12 January 2014

Medical And Psychological Interventions

Published 9 August 2013

Preventing sexual abusers of children from reoffending: systematic review of medical and psychological interventions

"Abstract

Objective 

To evaluate the effectiveness of current medical and psychological interventions for individuals at risk of sexually abusing children, both in known abusers and those at risk of abusing.

Design 

Systematic review of interventions designed to prevent reoffending among known abusers and prevention for individuals at risk of sexually abusing children. Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies were eligible. Primary outcomes were arrests, convictions, breaches of conditions, and self reported sexual abuse of children after one year or more.

Results

After review of 1447 abstracts, we retrieved 167 full text studies, and finally included eight studies with low to moderate risk of bias. We found weak evidence for interventions aimed at reducing reoffending in identified sexual abusers of children. For adults, evidence from five trials was insufficient regarding both benefits and risks with psychological treatment and pharmacotherapy. For adolescents, limited evidence from one trial suggested that multisystemic therapy prevented reoffence (relative risk 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.73); lack of adequate research prevented conclusions about effects of other treatments. Evidence was also inadequate regarding effectiveness of treatment for children with sexual behavioural problems in the one trial identified. Finally, we found no eligible research on preventive methods for adults and adolescents who had not sexually abused children but were at higher risk of doing so (such as those with paedophilic sexual preference [sic]).

Conclusion

There are major weaknesses in the scientific evidence, particularly regarding adult men, the main category of sexual abusers of children. Better coordinated and funded high quality studies including several countries are urgently needed. Until conclusive evidence is available, realistic clinical strategies might involve reduction of specific risk factors for sex crimes [sic], such as sexual preoccupation, in abusers at risk of reoffending.

BMJ 2013; 347 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4630; Cite this as: BMJ 2013;347:f4630"

http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4630

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Saturday, 11 January 2014

Consent, Compulsion and Sexual Offenders: The Compulsory Treatment of Sex Offenders - But, Not All, It Appears

10/1/14

Funding success for Northumbria Law School

Northumbria Law School wins prestigious seminar funding

"Professor Chris Ashford and senior lecturer, Nicola Wake have been awarded funding from the Modern Law Review to run a seminar on ‘Consent, Compulsion and Sexual Offenders: The Compulsory Treatment of Sex Offenders’ to be held in March 2014.

This is only the second time this award has gone to a new university, the first time also being Northumbria in 2010 for a seminar on Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings.

This event will be run jointly by the School’s Centre for Evidence and Criminal Justice Studies and the Gender, Sexuality and Law Research Group. It aims to bring a new dimension to the approach of legal academics and legal practitioners to the “treatment” of sex offenders. It will bring together academics and practitioners for the first time to enable an inter-disciplinary dialogue on this topical area of criminal law and to develop a sustainable international research network.

The Gender, Sexuality and Law Research group was launched in 2013. It draws together established, early career academics and postgraduate students from a range of disciplines across the University aligned with the core theme of gender, sexuality and law. The group acts a point of focus for this growing community of scholars, and organizes a seminar series together with a range of activities to support and develop a community of academic inquiry. In the first six months of operation, the group has successfully attracted funding to explore LGBTQ law student identities, LGBTQ ‘communities’ within law schools (with Bradford University), and to explore conceptions of privacy in the context of mobile ‘dating’ Apps such as the popular Grindr and Scruff products (with Newcastle University).

For more info on the seminar or the work of the Gender, Sexuality and the Law Research Group, contact Chris Ashford"

http://research.northumbria.ac.uk/support/2014/01/10/funding-success-for-northumbria-law-school/ 

Professor Chris Ashford; Professor of Law and Society 

http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/law/staff/chrisashford 

Nicola Wake

http://www.northumbria.ac.uk/sd/academic/law/staff/nicolawake

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

SLSA 2014

http://lawandsexuality.wordpress.com/2013/12/08/call-for-papers-slsa-2014-gender-sexuality-and-law/
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Tuesday, 31 December 2013

Jailbait Are Them

(Embedded Tweet - click Date)

*****

d0ct0r dOom @d0ct0r__dOom

https://twitter.com/d0ct0r__dOom

https://twitter.com/_Th3W0lf

Them Gays Got Short Memories


(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Wednesday, 25 December 2013

Happy Holidays

Bizley's Break: Standing up for Pedophiles 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zec7oZUrGg8&feature=youtu.be

*****

Compassion for Children, Compassion for Pedophiles


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ_S8iSE1ZU

*****

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Monday, 23 December 2013

Mr Alan Turing, The Mr Ian Watkins, Of His Day - Think On It

Please do ...

Monday 23 December 2013
  
Alan Turing gets his royal pardon for 'gross indecency' – 61 years after he poisoned himself

"He was the father of modern computing whose work on the Enigma code at Bletchley Park is said to have shortened the Second World War.

But he was also gay and in those less enlightened times was chemically castrated by an ungrateful nation after being convicted of “gross indecency” with a man in 1952."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/alan-turing-gets-his-royal-pardon-for-gross-indecency--61-years-after-he-poisoned-himself-9023116.html

WW2 code breaker Alan Turing is pardoned

http://www.itv.com/news/story/2013-12-23/code-breaker-alan-turing-pardoned

Alan Turing's pardon is wrong

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/24/alan-turing-pardon-wrong-gay-men?CMP=twt_gu

Turing's Pardon: Not the way to recognise 'genius'

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/political-science/2013/dec/24/turings-pardon-not-the-way-to-recognise-genius?CMP=twt_fd

Alan Turing: a strain’d quality of irrational and arbitrary mercy

http://www.headoflegal.com/2013/12/24/alan-turing-straind-quality-of-irrational-and-arbitrary-mercy

Putting right the wrong done to Alan Turing

http://www.newstatesman.com/david-allen-green/2013/07/putting-right-wrong-done-alan-turing

Alan Turing Pardon – what does it mean?

http://ukcriminallawblog.com/2013/12/24/alan-turing-pardon-what-does-it-mean

Alan Turing: codebreaker and imagineer hounded by the state

http://blogs.channel4.com/paul-mason-blog/alan-turing-codebreaker-imagineer-hounded-state/209#more-209

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
 *****

Reasoning, in these ...

*****

Sorry for slight hiccup (now fixed) .... No-argument Numpties, false-flagging, as usual ;)

Full copy of relevant Tweets ...


*****

BTW - we love Dr Turing - our kinda guy :) 

*****

March 20, 2014  

Government to Set Up Institute in Honour of Convicted Child Abuser Alan Turing 

"He had illegal sex with a 19 year old labourer when he was a 42 year old professor of mathematics.

The age of majority at the time was 21 - so the 19 year old was legally a child and seen as a victim."

http://theantifeminist.com/government-to-set-up-institute-in-honour-of-conicted-child-abuser-alan-turing

One Of The Last, Ignorant, Bastions, Stormed - The Sun Says, That Paedophilia Is A Sexual Orientation - LGBTP Victory !!!

Even the 'mighty' fall

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/sun_says/5340783/The-Sun-says.html


*****

LGBTP Victory !!!

*****

Sunday, 22 December 2013

Of Course It Is James, It Is Just A Matter Of Socio-Political Timing, Like Being Gay, Right?

Sun Dec 22 2013

Is pedophilia a sexual orientation?

"Dr. James Cantor of CAMH has shown pedophilia is like a sexual orientation — a deep attraction that cannot change. Now, pedophiles who have never molested children are seeking social acceptance.

Dr. James Cantor of the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health has spent the last decade on research suggesting that pedophilia is a deep-rooted, unchangeable predisposition."

http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2013/12/22/is_pedophilia_a_sexual_orientation.html

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

Posted by James Cantor on 2013-December-22 15:14:22, Sunday

"For those interested."

http://www.boychat.org/messages/1372690.htm *****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

December 27, 2013

Pedophilia: Doctor Claims It’s A Sexual Orientation

http://www.westernjournalism.com/doctor-proclaims-pedophilia-sexual-orientation

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

No, Many More Are, Depending On What You Mean By 'Children'

November 18, 2013 3:28 pm

Are One In Ten Men Sexually Attracted To Children?

"So say Colorado-based researchers Sandy K. Wurtele and collegues in a new paper in the journal Sexual Abuse:

"Nearly 10% of males and 4% of females reported some likelihood of having sex with children or viewing child pornography."

"The study is an interesting attempt to probe the darkest depths [sic] of human nature, and raises questions about self-awareness.

"Wurtele et al recruited 435 participants who completed a fully anonymous online survey. They were either undergraduate psychology students or came via Amazon’s MTurk."

Wurtele SK, Simons D, & Moreno T (2013). Sexual Interest in Children Among an Online Sample of Men and Women: Prevalence and Correlates. Sexual Abuse PMID: 24215791

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215791

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/11/18/one-ten-men-sexually-attracted-children


(Embedded Tweet - click date).

*****

There Are, At The Very Least, 372 Million People, Sexually-Attracted To 'Kids', In The World - Are You One Of 'Them'?

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/atsa-conference-chicago-il-nov-3-2013.html

Saturday, 2 November 2013

There Are, At The Very Least, 372 Million People, Sexually-Attracted To 'Kids', In The World - Are You One Of 'Them'?

 


Wurtele SK, Simons D, & Moreno T (2013). Sexual Interest in Children Among an Online Sample of Men and Women: Prevalence and Correlates. Sexual Abuse PMID: 24215791

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215791

http://sax.sagepub.com/content/26/6/546.abstract

 Are One In Ten Men Sexually Attracted To Children? 

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/11/18/one-ten-men-sexually-attracted-children

*****

Sandy K. Wurtele, Ph.D.

http://www.uccs.edu/psych/people/faculty/sandy-wurtele.html

Dominique Simons (UCCS MA Alumnus)

http://www.uccs.edu/psych/archived-news/april-2012.html

*****

Here we go ...

Population of the Earth = 7,162,119,434

Adult Population of the Earth (child = equal to or less than 14 (26%)) = 74% = 5,299,968,381

Given an approximate ratio ...

Men (50.4%) = 2,671,184,064

Women (49.6%)  = 2,628,784,316

*****

10% of Men =  267,118,406 (>267 million)

4% of Women = 105,151,372 (>105 million)

Estimated Total of Minor (equal to or less than 14) -Attracted Adults (MAAs) on the Earth  = 372,269,778 (>372 million)

*****

.... and that is based on self-reporting ...

We expect, that some children (MAMs) will be sexually-attracted to children too ;)

Then, drop in the 14-17.999999999 years olds.

Makes you think, eh?

(happy to correct any maths errors etc - just let us know :) ).

*****

also ...

Nov 21, 2009
 
Pedophile, Minor-Attracted Adult or Merely Human?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_iEKadpaKQ

(00:47 - ca. 396,000,000), from Brett Kahr, F is for fantasy.

*****

Spring 2011 Survey Results: B4U-ACT conducted an online survey of minor-attracted people over a six-week period in March to April, 2011

http://b4uact.org/science/survey/01.htm

Thank you Andrew Gilligan And The Telegraph - Paedophilia Is Not 'Normal' (As Though That Matters), But, Being A Minor-Attracted Person, Certainly Is

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/thank-you-andrew-gilligan-paedophilia.html

"Well Over 20% Of Normal Men Are Probably Pedophiles; The Majority Of Men Are Probably Pedophiles And Hebophiles"

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/well-over-20-of-normal-men-are-probably.html

September 24 , 2014

Every fifth boy and man is pedophilic or hebephilic

Abstract

"A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli.

Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly s exually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents).

Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed."

https://www.ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf

*****

30 July 2014 Last updated at 00:34

How many men are paedophiles?

"It's very common for regular men to be attracted to 18-year-olds or 20-year-olds. It's not unusual for a typical 16-year-old to be attractive to many men and the younger we go the fewer and fewer men are attracted to that age group," says Cantor.

He thinks that if we say that a paedophile is someone attracted to children aged 14 or less, then he estimates that you could reach the 2% figure.

"If we use a very strict definition and say paedophilia refers only to the attraction to pre-pubescent children [then it] is probably much lower than 1%," he says.

The term is often applied to a person who sexually abuses someone below the age of 16, but given that in some countries - and even some US states - you can marry below the age of 16 this definition would clearly not be universally accepted.

There is consensus on the clinical definition. Michael Seto and his colleagues agree that a paedophile is someone who has a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, so typically those under the ages of 11 or 12.

But whether the prevalence using this definition is 0.5%, as James Cantor says or 1%, as Michael Seto says, you can be assured than in any large group of people - whether they be politicians, entertainers, or Catholic clergy - you are likely to find some paedophiles."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28526106

*****

http://web.archive.org/web/20150217085819/http://www.ilovechildren.net

http://www.virped.website

*****


http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2nh1nb/science_ama_series_we_are_alan_sanders_michael/cmds0hy

*****



Adaptive value of (some) paedophilic attraction? 

"Sorry in advance if this post offends anyone but I just want to look at the issue objectively. Paedophilic attraction is seen in all societies and its existence requires an explanation.

Paedophilic attraction is normally considered abnormal and maladaptive. The conventional argument runs something like "Girls under age X are infertile and incapable of reproducing. Therefore, any sexual attraction to girls under age X has no biological function and must be the result of brain abnormality, etc". The big problem with this argument is that it only considers a girl's CURRENT fertility but what would have mattered most to a man in ancestral times was a girl's FUTURE fertility.

In all societies most reproduction happens within marriages and long term relationships and we can presume it was the same for ancestral humans. Men must therefore have evolved to choose females on the basis of their ability to give them a supply of offspring over the long term. The females capable of giving men the most offspring would have been those who are at or just prior the beginning of their reproductive lifespan i.e. teenage girls. The overwhelming popularity of teenage girls in the sex industries confirms this prediction.

Girls before puberty wouldn't have been the best wife material since a man would have to wait some years before they could start providing him offspring, during which either partner may die. Reproduction at a later age (for the man) also contributes less to the future population.

Although girls who haven't reached puberty wouldn't have been ideal wives they would still have been better than older females who have already used up some of their fertile years. A 30 year old woman, for example, would have been half way through her reproductive lifespan, whereas an 8 year old would still have had all of her fertile years ahead of her. Even if the "reproductive penalty" of waiting for the 8 year old to reach reproductive age reduced her expected reproductive contribution by 50% (which is a big over-estimate) she would still have given a man just as many offspring as a 30 year old wife. It would have made more biological sense for prehistoric men to chase after 8 year olds than 30 year olds.

Having some sexual attraction to girls before puberty would have been adaptive because it would have motivated men to acquire them as wives. It doesn't matter that having sex with them wouldn't have got them pregnant. As long as any sexual activity they did together didn't reduce a man's reproductive success there would have been no need for evolution to select these behaviours out. Forcible intercourse that injured a girl and compromised her ability to bear offspring would have clearly reduced a man's reproductive success and would have been strongly selected against. Minor sexual acts like kissing and touching wouldn't done any damage to a girl's reproductive ability and so there would have been no reason for evolution to select them out.

It's likely that all men have some paedophilic interest as it would have been adaptive in prehistoric societies. The men that identify as paedophiles probably just have more interest than normal, maybe due to random variations in brain wiring in the population.

Edit:

Instead of asking:

“What would have been the adaptive value in men mating with females before puberty?”

What should be asked is:

“What would have been the adaptive value in men being attracted to females before puberty?”

Then the answer’s simple. Girls before puberty have a high future fertility and being attracted to them would have motivated men to acquire them as wives."

http://www.reddit.com/r/evopsych/comments/33co5z/adaptive_value_of_some_paedophilic_attraction/

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Don't Stand Too Close To Them

Monday 07 October 2013

"Anita Anand explores the taboo topic of teachers having relationships with their students. It should never happen but it does but the law is clear: teachers are in loco parentis and as such cannot have a relationship with a student under the age of 18. Not only is it a criminal offence, it is a fully recognised abuse of the position of trust that the teacher is in - it applies even if the pupil is over the age of consent and the relationship is consensual.

In this documentary Anita hears the views of teachers and head teachers on what happens when a relationship crosses the line to become "inappropriate". She asks what support, if any, is offered to individuals who find themselves involved with those they teach. And have modern teaching methods and a more informal approach made it harder to define the line which should not be crossed by students or teachers?"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03c30cm

*****

Posted on October 8, 2013

Teachers and sexual relationships with students aged 16+

"Sexual relationships between teachers and pupils aged 16 and over have been happening for a long time. Similarly, for a long time, there has been a feeling that, once at the age of consent, a sexual relationship between consenting adults – irrespective of the student/teacher relationship – is not one into which the law should intrude. Parliament has seen otherwise and since 2001, there have been specific ‘abuse of trust’ offences.

Some teachers get into sexual relationships with students who are under the age of 16. This post is not concerned with such cases and is not about revisiting whether sexual activity with children is wrong."

http://thesexualoffenceshandbook.com/2013/10/08/teachers-and-sexual-relationships-with-students-aged-16

Saturday, 7 September 2013

Can’t Condemn People Of An Earlier Era By The Standards Of Ours

Last updated at 12:01AM, September 7 2013

Dawkins under attack for his lenient view of ‘mild’ sex abuse

"Richard Dawkins, author of The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion, has prompted outrage among child protection experts [sic] by suggesting that recent child sex abuse scandals have been overblown.

He said that he could not condemn the “mild paedophilia” [sic] he experienced at boarding school. “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours,” he says in an interview published today in The Times Magazine."

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article3863140.ece

Dawkins under attack for his lenient view of ‘mild’ sex abuse | The Times

http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2013/9/7/dawkins-under-attack-for-his-lenient-view-of-mild-sex-abuse-the-times#

Richard Dawkins on His Life and Childhood | The Times

http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2013/9/8/richard-dawkins-on-his-life-and-childhood-the-times#

Richard Dawkins defends “mild pedophilia,” says it does not cause “lasting harm”

http://www.salon.com/2013/09/10/richard_dawkins_defends_mild_pedophilia_says_it_does_not_cause_lasting_harm

Richard Dawkins doesn’t get to define sex abuse

http://www.salon.com/2013/09/11/richard_dawkins_doesnt_get_to_define_sex_abuse

"Mild" Paedophilia?

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/mild-paedophilia.html

Child Abuse: a misunderstanding

http://www.richarddawkins.net/foundation_articles/2013/9/11/child-abuse-a-misunderstanding#

Can Pedophilia Ever Be "Mild"?

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-dawn/201309/can-pedophilia-ever-be-mild

Monday, 2 September 2013

We Should Be Delighted To, Richard - Watch This Space ...

Friday, 30 August 2013

Sexual Orientation, Mental Disorder, Disability Or Just Plain Perversion

""Mental disorder", "disability", "sexual orientation", "the result of childhood abuse", a vile "fetish" or something else? Someone tell me please - the world nowadays seems to find an endless supply of excuses for paedophilia [sic], instead of concentrating on dealing with and helping victims of these vile crimes [you see, there is your first error]."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/sexual-orientation-mental-disorder.html

*****

On it soon.

For now, ponder on what you would do and how you would feel, if this happened to you, or someone close to you (it will become relevant, later) ...

*****

Frontal Lobe Tumor causes Pedophilia in a Man

http://mentalhealth.about.com/b/2003/07/29/frontal-lobe-tumor-causes-pedophilia-in-a-man.htm

Brain Damage, Pedophilia, and the Law

http://neuroskeptic.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/brain-damage-pedophilia-and-law.html

Pedophilia and Temporal Lobe Disturbances

http://neuro.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleID=100620

*****

Dr Oldfield's video, is also essential viewing ...

Pedophile, Minor-Attracted Adult or Merely Human?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_iEKadpaKQ

*****

The OSC 

Monday, 26 August 2013

A Little Ego-Dystonic, But Useful - 'He Paedophile'

Aug 26 2013, 9:05 AM ET

I, Pedophile

"The most important thing I've discovered in the 15 months since my arrest isn't the why, but rather what can be done to change the preconceptions and misconceptions that society has when it comes to pedophiles. Most people hear that word and think of the Jerry Sanduskys and abusive Catholic priests of the world. Fewer people think about the millions who grapple with sexual feelings on which they can never act. When someone hears the word “pedophile”, they immediately think of a child molester. Yet the majority of pedophiles do not molest, but instead spend hours looking at child pornography."

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/08/i-pedophile/278921

Aug 26 2013, 9:42 AM ET


What Can Be Done About Pedophilia?

Is it reasonable to be afraid that, if we recognize pedophilia as a sexual orientation, we will have to consider it socially acceptable?

"It is reasonable for questions of social acceptability to be directed at behaviors. People are responsible for their behaviors, not their thoughts or sexual attractions. For example, we very readily acknowledge that a typical heterosexual man will, while just walking down the street, find some women sexually attractive. We would not, however, conclude it is socially acceptable for him to coerce any of those women into sex. Thinking of pedophilia as an innate characteristic that a person did not choose and cannot change can go a very long way in helping society come to a rational response to the problem—one that can help prevent molestation of children."

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/08/what-can-be-done-about-pedophilia/279024/

*****

The Atlantic, for those interested - James Cantor 

http://www.boychat.org/messages/1357330.htm

*****

Judging evil [sic] : what if pedophilia [sic] is an “orientation”?

http://apublicdefender.com/2013/08/27/judging-evil-what-if-pedophilia-is-an-orientation

Judging evil [sic]: Do pedophiles [sic] have free will?

http://apublicdefender.com/2009/12/04/judging-evil-do-pedophiles-have-free-will

*****

Concerning pedophiles [sic]

http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/concerning-pedophiles

Pedophiles [sic] Need Help More Than Handcuffs

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/devon-murphy/rehabilitating-pedophiles_b_3845546.html

Are Some Men Born Pedophiles? New Science Says Yes, But Sexologists Say Not So Fast

http://www.alternet.org/are-some-men-born-pedophiles-new-science-says-yes-sexologists-say-not-so-fast?paging=off

Not All Statutory Rapists Are Pedophiles [duh]

http://www.news-register.net/page/content.detail/id/587267/Not-All-Statutory-Rapists-Are-Pedophiles.html