Ms Shy Keenan - Just Cannot Stop Her 'PTSD Blurting' - Perhaps She Should Get It Treated?

 Not The Actions, Of A Stable, Suffering, Private, Person

A Lead Consultant, on a non-existent construct

*****

"As a high profile [sic, Ester Ranzten says "who?"] social injustice campaigner/law maker/victims advocate [sic] I've been described by some [by yourself, we expect] as three times stronger than any household bleach - because it's true [evidently, it is not] - but I'm also a living breathing human being with thoughts, feelings and opinions that I share on my blog, please do feel free to join me. [thank you, we will]"

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/shy-keenan/shy-keenan-anti-victim-prejudice_b_4356255.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/shy-keenan

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan [all welcome, Ms Keenan tells us]

*****

Comment:

So 'strong', Ms Keenan runs to whomever she can, every time her confusions, lies and disinformation are challenged.

Same old bullshit, fabrications, lies and free associations - different web page ... with one, sure, element of truth ...

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

Nothing new to see there, move along.

The OSC 

*****

Addendum (1/12/13; 4:09 am)

More Gamble-assisted 'Blurting' (aka Bullshit) ...

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

However, Ms Keenan, you are correct, in that, you are certainly poisonous, to those who are good and true. 

Oh ... and then a couple of thrall wannabes, chip-in ...

What 'exploiting the internet', can possibly mean, we have no idea.

John Ward Finally Shows His True Colours

John Ward - Talking Offensive and Dangerous Bollocks In 4D

We had to wait a little time ...

"I have only ever interviewed three convicted paedophiles [sic - please name them, John]. You have to have done this to realise what we ['we'? John, are you, somehow, special?] are dealing with here.

Child molesters [ah, not Paedophiles, then, John] tend [sic] to have no remorse about their activities [incorrect, some do not, same for any type of offender]. They shun attempts at redemption [incorrect, some do not, same for any type of offender], and as yet no system or method of curing [there is no disease, John] their delusional [incorrect] illness [there may be a 'disorder', but, that is not what you mean, is it, John?] has been found. [there is no disease, John, do not hold your breath on that one - then again, perhaps you should ;)]

Paedophiles [sic] believe that they are right and we are wrong [about what John? ... but, then, such are moral decisions], and that the children usually [sic] enjoy the sexual activity [like any activity, it ranges from glorious pleasure, through ambivalence, to disgust - such are human beings].

Having seen pictures of abuse given to me by helpful police [!?  - perhaps you would like to share their identities, John?] in the past (and the ordinary ranks are full of disgusted and dedicated coppers) I can assure you that only a seriously deranged mind* [sic] could believe the children enjoy it [ah, because, the cherry-picked images, you were shown, are representative of most images (and most experiences), right, John?].

The rate of suicide before the age of 35 among abuse victims is horrendous [we are sure, if it exists, you can point us to any evidence (we know you cannot provide proof) of a causal connection - can you John?]

Paedophiles [sic] are usually sadistic sexual psychopaths [offensively incorrect, a tiny minority are, same for any type of offender], and they destroy lives wherever they go. [we are sure, if it exists, you can point us to any evidence (we know you cannot provide proof) of a causal connection - can you John?]

Establishments throughout the world need to be shaken very hard [how does that work, John?], and made [?] to realise that those they protect [who, John?] are – at least indirectly – killers [now you are just ranting, John]. Some senior Conservative and Labour politicians are, right now, accessories to murder. [ditto]

As long as we in Britain fail to deal with this [with what, John?] ruthlessly and without favour [oh dear, sounds like a cull], we have no right to use the term ‘civilised’ about ourselves."[so, what are your detailed recommendations, John?]

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2013/03/28/the-paedofile-a-conflict-of-interest-waiting-to-become-a-scandal/

We will direct John to this thread, of course, but, we expect that he will fail to allow our blog reply; such are the ignorant and dangerous, moral entrepreneuristic zealots.

Always best to out them, though.

The OSC

*****

* Underage and Having Sex - July 2010

"Around one in three British young people will lose their virginity before their 16th birthday. Underage and Having Sex offers a frank and uncensored young person's view of one of Britain's most controversial dilemmas."

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/underage-and-having-sex

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/last-nights-tv-dive-bbc2br-underage-and-having-sex-channel-4br-homes-from-hell-itv1-2022115.html

Good Try, No Banana

PUBLISHED: 15:25, 14 February 2013 | UPDATED: 15:26, 14 February 2013

Will Google be forced to police online comments? Judge in Blogger.com libel case 'opens door' for internet giant being required to monitor users' posts

"Google says Blogger is blank wall and it isn't responsible for writings online,

But appeal court hears it's arguable Google is 'publisher' in defamation law,

Legal expert: 'Another court could run with these comments in the future',

Long-running case involves student Payam Tamiz who was vilified online."

"‘The court did rule that it was arguable that Google was a "publisher" in defamation law, and therefore responsible for defamatory comments once notified of them.

‘Google in fact won this case, because even if it had been potentially liable under defamation law, the offending comment only had a "trivial" effect.

‘The ruling does, however, open the door for a future case where a court might take up the comments of the Court of Appeal in this case and run with them.

‘But we are not there yet. In the meantime, Google and other similar companies will rightly be worried that they may be liable in similar future cases.’

A Google spokesman told MailOnline: 'Google helps spread knowledge, enabling people to find out about almost anything by typing a few words into a computer.

'And services like Blogger, YouTube and Google+ help users to express themselves and share different points of view. Where content is illegal or violates our terms of service we will continue to remove it.'"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2278657/Blogger-com-libel-case-opens-door-Google-required-monitor-users-posts.html