They Walk Amongst Us

*****

Understand the true evil people amongst us .. pic.twitter.com/0Q1MbYKtID

— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 5, 2017

https://t.co/QUkReO97PQ pic.twitter.com/WToV4X4eW6

— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 5, 2017

https://t.co/onP9cduVjV

— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 5, 2017

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

June 01, 2017

Hull Mecca Bingo worker Paul Hayes killed himself before sex offences court case

"A man accused of being a paedophile [sic] committed suicide before he could be sentenced, an inquest heard. Paul Hayes, 46, of  [redacted], west Hull, was found hanging from his loft at home by police.

The Mecca Bingo worker was due in Hull Magistrates Court after indicating a guilty plea on two counts of possessing indecent images of children and one count of making indecent images of children.

The case was cancelled after he was found deceased at his home on December 27 last year."

http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/hull-mecca-bingo-worker-paul-hayes-killed-himself-before-sex-offences-court-case/story-30365078-detail/story.html

https://www.facebook.com/DarkJusticeUK -  fraudulent, feeders of haters ...

... and then there is Mr Hayes, who never harmed anyone, but himself.

Oh, the irony of these comments.

— Brendan O'Connor (@MrBOConnor) June 5, 2017

How vile! And you are absolutely right, THESE are the evil people, celebrating the suicide of a fellow human being 😢😢😢😢😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡 https://t.co/WFUp4TlXyu

— INFP🌺🤗😘🕊🌈💞😇💜 (@33ang3lcuddles) June 5, 2017

So bloody inhumane. It's this kind of 'them and us' ideology that allowed Nazism, and is responsible for terrorism today😢

— INFP🌺🤗😘🕊🌈💞😇💜 (@33ang3lcuddles) June 5, 2017

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

RIP Mr Hayes.

The OSC

On Twitter - Trolling, Hating, False-Flagging, Spamming And The Response To Them

*****

I do love to piss off a registered sex offender . Then they blog about me ! http://t.co/8wWDz73ayz
— Ian Mcfadyen (@IanMcFadyen1966) April 9, 2014

(Embedded Tweet - click date) 

***** 

As an opener, we should like to refer readers, to our comment, in January 2014 ...

"We expect, Bruce will have his minions and lawyers, scurrying around, doing his best to get the OSC removed from Twitter - he is, after all, a Sales Director. They are a private company, that is their choice, within the law. We understand this - profit is all, to these people.

We find Twitter useful, but, would find it just as useful, without an account."

The Ignorant And Dangerous Unite, Again (2) - That Pesky Report Button - The Irony

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-ignorant-and-dangerous-unite-again.html

*****

Published: 19:23, 12 May 2014 | Updated: 19:24, 12 May 2014

Fed up with your friend's annoying updates? Twitter launches mute button to temporarily silence annoying tweeters

">Muting a user on means their Tweets and Retweets will no longer be visible

>Users also no longer receive push or SMS notifications from that user

>Muted user will not know that you’ve muted them"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2626469/Fed-friends-annoying-updates-Twitter-launches-mute-button-annoying-tweeters.html#ixzz31WlnrKhQ

*****

More to follow, just confirming a few things.

More Madness In The USA

July 25, 2012 1:04 am

Counting Crimes When Defendants Possess Many Images of Child Pornography on Several Devices

"Imagine a defendant in a child pornography case has two computers in his home. Each computer contains twenty images of child pornography. Has the defendant committed one single crime of possessing forty images? Or has he committed two crimes of possessing twenty images each? Alternatively, has the defendant committed forty distinct crimes of possession? Put another way, should the number of crimes be determined by the number of images, the number of physical devices, or simply grouped together as a single offense?

Courts have answered these questions by considering the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which instructs that “nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Under this provision, a defendant cannot be punished twice for the same act. The difficult question is, what exactly is the “act” prohibited by child pornography laws? Courts have answered this question by undertaking careful and sometimes hypertechnical readings of the different laws that punish possession of child pornography. As a result, there is no one answer to the question. Under recent cases, at least, the answer depends on the specific statute.

"[T]he legislature intended these statutes to criminalize each image that constitutes child pornography because its very existence harms the victim it depicts [sic]. Even identical images, therefore, result in separate prosecution and punishment."

http://www.volokh.com/2012/07/25/counting-crimes-when-defendants-possess-many-images-of-child-pornography-on-several-devices/

Do Not Believe The Facts Stop Them

This entry was posted on May 29, 2012 

Sexual Myths: Ammunition in the War On Science

"The Internet

Myth: The Internet is a hotbed of sexual predators, and children are at terrible risk.

Science: The overwhelming majority of the “unwanted sexual solicitation” on the Internet reported by young people is from their peers, and is generally benign. According to the state-of-the-art Harvard/Berkman Institute report, the main risk faced by minors on the Internet is bullying, not sexual predation."

https://sexualintelligence.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/sex-ammunition-in-the-war-on-science