Showing posts with label IPP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPP. Show all posts

Friday, 12 July 2013

SARNwich Anyone?

July 2013

The non-sense of prison psychology

"Anthony Boden uncovers the inconsistencies of a ‘pseudoscience’

I am a post-tariff IPP. Along with many others in the same position to say that I am frustrated by this sentence would be a gross understatement. My biggest complaint is the government-prescribed, psychological abuse delivered in the form of Offending Behaviour Programmes. There is no scientific basis behind OBPs, which are nothing more than psychological experiments. This country condemned the Nazi’s for conducting psychological experiments on prisoners during World War II, and yet we allow this travesty to continue upon our own shores and in our own prisons. Every intelligent being should ask themselves how this inexcusable position has arisen and what can be done to resolve the issue. I have already formulated my own theories, which I will explain with the help of some of the greatest minds in history.

It was Marie Curie who said, ‘Nothing in life is to be feared, only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more so that you may fear less ...’"

http://www.insidetime.org/articleview.asp?a=1515&c=the_nonsense_of_prison_psychology

*****

4/7/2013

"As a forensic (though not prison) psychologist, I have a great deal of sympathy with Anthony's frustrations. However, quoting Feynman is a bit risky, partly because he wasn't a psychologist, and partly because his views must be somewhat out of date as he is somewhat dead (25 years ago this year). Also, he is somewhat wrong - for example, in stating that psychological experiments don't get repeated. Anyway, none of this actually bears on the scientific status (or otherwise) of present day UK risk assessment.

There has actually been some respectable scientific investigation of risk assessment techniques. For example, a couple of studies have recently investigated the SARN, and demonstrated that the allegedly "dynamic" factors assessed do not have any predictive power over and above that of the static factors of the Risk Matrix 2000. In other words, if someone is assessed using the SARN, this cannot tell us anything at all about his risk before "treatment", his risk after "treatment", or any improvement during it. Therefore, assessments of alleged "unmet treatment needs" which depend upon the SARN are scientifically invalid. I have seen such an assessment successfully challenged in a parole hearing (the man was released) and am astonished that no one has apparently challenged it in the High Court. This is even more astonishing, because studies have been available for as long as 15 years showing that certain "risk factors" routinely assessed in sex offenders are in fact not risk factors at all. A 2005 study concluded: “Many of the variables commonly addressed in sex offender treatment programs (e.g., psychological distress, denial of sex crime, victim empathy, stated motivation for treatment) had little or no relationship with sexual or violent recidivism.Yet people carry on as if nothing had happened.

Another practice which has been scientifically investigated, and shown to be invalid, is the practice of "adjusting" static risk assessments in the light of clinical information. For example, saying something like "the Risk Matrix 2000 says this man is low risk, but in the light of XYZ I would estimate his risk as medium". A number of studies have shown that altering a static risk assessment in this way reduces its accuracy. Always. This is mathematically inevitable, because clinical estimation of risk has been scientifically demonstrated to be very poor, and mixing a poor predictor with a better one reduces the overall accuracy to the level of the poor one. Static risk predictors are not fantastic, but they are about 65 to 70% accurate, which may sound impressive until you realise that you can get 50% accuracy by tossing a coin. Still, they do better than chance.

What worries me is that those doing the risk assessment seem very often not to be aware of how limited it is. They should be."

http://www.insidetime.org/articleview.asp?a=1515&c=the_nonsense_of_prison_psychology

SARN and SOTP useless: Official

https://sites.google.com/site/forpsychadvice/home/anns/sarnandsotpuselessofficial

Friday, 15 February 2013

IPPididoodah

14/02/2013

IPP sentences - ECHR ruling stands as Grand Chamber rejects Government's application to appeal

"The ECtHR Grand Chamber confirmed yesterday that they have declined the government’s request to review the Court’s judgment in the leading IPP case; James, Wells and Lee v UK. The unanimous decision of the ECtHR, which held there had been a violation of Article 5(1), therefore became final on 11 February 2013."

http://www.gcnchambers.co.uk/index.php/gcn/news/ipp_sentences_echr_ruling_stands_as_grand_chamber_rejects_government_s_application_to_appeal

February 15, 2013

European Court awards damages to prisoner after Parole Board backlog

"BETTERIDGE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM – 1497/10 – HEJUD [2013] ECHR 97 – Read judgment

On 29 January the Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held that convicted rapist Samuel Betteridge’s Article 5(4) rights had been breached due to delays in his cases being considered by the Parole Board, and awarded him damages for his ‘frustration’. The media furore, at varying degrees of accuracy, here and here."

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2013/02/15/european-court-awards-damages-to-prisoner-after-parole-board-backlog/#more-17236

Sunday, 20 January 2013

Victim Support

Sunday 20 January 2013

Prisoners win big payouts for parole delays

"A backlog in sentence reviews has led to compensation claims of up to £9,000 each
Murderers, rapists and kidnappers [that will be, victims] have received compensation totalling hundreds of thousands of pounds from the Government after complaining that delays in their parole hearings breached their human rights.

The Parole Board has admitted that a backlog of cases has forced it to pay out more than £300,000 in the past three years to compensate scores of prisoners for "distress" caused by the delays.

The total bill for compensation in 2012 was more than £100,000 and includes a £9,000 payout to a murderer who sued the authorities when they missed the deadline for deciding whether he should be freed on parole.

The Parole Board yesterday blamed the soaring costs on the increased workload caused by Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences introduced in 2003. But a Conservative MP said the figures were "an indictment" of the justice system. "The public will be astonished that people like murderers and rapists [that will be, victims] can make a profit from proceedings designed to help them get out of prison early," said the Shipley MP Philip Davies. "This is not about wrongful imprisonment. [yawn]""

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/prisoners-win-big-payouts-for-parole-delays-8458769.html

Thursday, 6 December 2012

Because IPPs and Life Are Just Not Enough

8:14am UK, Thursday 06 December 2012

Sex Offences: Tougher Sentences To Be Imposed

"Judges will be urged to consider the damage caused to victims of sex offences under tougher sentencing guidelines.

Judges will be urged to consider the psychological and long-term damage [alleged] to victims of sex offences [them being doctors, and all] when passing sentence on perpetrators under new sentencing guidelines.

The new proposals, which will go out to public consultation, will also ensure the judiciary takes into account other aggravating factors, such as filming or photographing sex attacks.

They would see sentences brought up to date with advances in the technology and tactics used by offenders."

http://news.sky.com/story/1021322/sex-offences-tougher-sentences-to-be-imposed

Tougher sex offence sentences proposed

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20619590

No let-off for perverts [offensive and inflammatory]: Tougher sentencing guidelines will see paedophiles [sic] locked up for longer 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tougher-sentencing-guidelines-will-see-paedophiles-1475526

'One-off' rapists could be given up to 19 years

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-12-06/tougher-sentences-would-see-sex-offenders-locked-up-for-longer/

Bid to update sex attack sentencing

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/bid-to-update-sex-attack-sentencing-16246991.html

Bid to update sex attack sentencing

http://www.itn.co.uk/UK/63333/bid-to-update-sex-attack-sentencing

http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/national/news/10090935._/

Bid to update sentencing for sex attacks

http://www.thisisdorset.co.uk/story-17515346-detail/story.html

http://www.crosbyherald.co.uk/news/crosby-breaking-news/2012/12/06/68459-32372661/

Tougher sex offence sentences proposed

http://www.policeprofessional.com/news.aspx?id=15580

Sex attackers who film victims 'face tougher sentences'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/9726316/Sex-attackers-who-film-victims-face-tougher-sentences.html

Tougher sex attack sentencing guidelines proposed

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/tougher-sex-attack-sentencing-guidelines-proposed-8388958.html

Sex offence sentencing guidelines call for update

http://www.channel4.com/news/sex-offence-sentencing-guidelines-call-for-update

Tougher sentences for child sex gangs who groom girls in care

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9724068/Tougher-sentences-for-child-sex-gangs-who-groom-girls-in-care.html

I welcome this consultation on changes to sentences for serious sexual offences - Khan

http://www.labour.org.uk/welcome-consultation-on-sentences--for-serious-sexual-offences,2012-12-06?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LabourPartyNews+%28The+Labour+Party+-+Latest+news%29

Sex crime sentences ‘should be increased’

http://metro.co.uk/2012/12/06/sex-crime-sentences-should-be-increased-3304031/

Judges urged to take into account impact of sex attacks in new guidelines

http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/2012/12/05/55578-32368356/

Jail sex offenders for longer, proposes review of sentencing guidelines

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/dec/06/jail-sex-offenders-longer-sentencing-guidelines

New guidelines urge tougher sex offence sentences

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-12-06/tougher-sex-offence-sentences-urged/

Sentencing Council consults the public:that means YOU!

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/sentencing-council-consults-the-publicthat-means-you/ 

*****

Public given 14 weeks to respond to recommendations

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-12-06/public-given-14-weeks-to-respond-to-recommendations/

New proposals give greater focus to impact of sex offences on victims 

http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/media/858.htm 

Sentencing for sexual offences – consultation launched

http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/consultations-current.htm

Introduction to sexual offences guidelines consultation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=H-UZFP8RnLM

*****

Child pics pervert [offensive and inflammatory] MM is freed [sic] by judge softy [sic]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4869580/judge-frees-child-pics-pervert.html

Sunday, 28 October 2012

Attempted Rape Of A Deceiving Detective

10:30 am - October 25, 2012 — Updated: 10:30 am - October 25, 2012

Quick guilty verdict in Facebook sting case

"It took jurors less than 30 minutes to find a 35-year-old Snohomish man guilty of attempting to rape an Elma boy he met on Facebook. He now faces life in prison without the possibility of parole.

JRA was convicted of first-degree attempted rape of a child after trying to meet what he thought was an 11-year-old boy for sex in an Elma park bathroom. He had actually been corresponding on Facebook with a Washington State Patrol detective and was arrested at the park. A was already a Level 2 sex offender after a 2001 conviction for second-degree rape of a child.

Because this is A’s second conviction of a Class A sex crime, Washington State’s “two strikes” law for such offenses mandates he receive a life sentence. Barring any contests, that’s likely what will be handed down at A’s Dec. 3 sentencing hearing."

http://thedailyworld.com/sections/news/local/quick-guilty-verdict-facebook-sting-case.html

Thursday, 18 October 2012

Few Give A Damn

Thursday, October 18, 2012 

Inspectors give their verdict on conditions for sex offenders at HMP Bure in Norfolk

"The annual report into Norfolk’s prison for sex offenders has again highlighted “inappropriate” care and facilities for elderly and disabled prisoners.

For the third consecutive year, the issue has been flagged up in the Independent Monitoring Board (IMB) report about HMP Bure, which opened in 2009 at the former RAF Coltishall.

It also highlights “totally unacceptable” handling of prisoners with indefinite sentences. A “serious lack of opportunity to complete programmes” means they are held “far beyond a release date that they would otherwise have achieved”.

The IMB report clears the prison managers of any blame, and urges the government to suspend the sentencing exercise to allow a “more robust structure” to be put in place across the country.

The prison houses up to 523 category C male sex offenders, largely from the eastern region."

http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/news/inspectors_give_their_verdict_on_conditions_for_sex_offenders_at_hmp_bure_in_norfolk_1_1660654

Here Is Some Gold, Would You Like It?

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Lewiston man charged with child porn possession

"In its sting operation, the USPIS mailed ads from a fictitious company that offered catalogs of child pornography movies.

Around mid-May in 2009, the operatives mailed Bernard a phony catalog to a local address. About a week later, the operatives received a request from Bernard's address for two "hard-core" child pornography catalogs. A week after that, Bernard was mailed the USPIS catalogs, free previews and an order form."

http://www.sunjournal.com/city/story/985131

7:15 PM, Oct 17, 2012

Michigan Senate OKs bills attacking child pornography

"The Michigan Senate has unanimously passed three Republican-introduced bills that supporters say would make it easier to prosecute people for child pornography.

The bills approved Wednesday go to the state House for consideration.

Attorney General Bill Schuette says the bills help update laws written in the 1990s when he says “the Internet was still in its infancy.”

A bill by Tom Casperson of Escanaba amends criminal procedures to make it easier for prosecutors to use evidence gathered in undercover police operations against child predators [sic] at sentencing.

A bill by Goeff Hansen of Hart restricts who has access to child pornography during the discovery phase of criminal trials.

And a bill by Dave Hildenbrand of Lowell Township expands the definitions of producing and making pornography to include creating new copies."

http://www.lansingstatejournal.com/viewart/20121017/NEWS04/310170042/Michigan-Senate-OKs-bills-attacking-child-pornography

Man bailed after 'mother and daughter' sex sting 

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/man-bailed-after-mother-and-daughter-sex-sting-20121018-27t5i.html

Keep aware of your children online, police warn

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/national/15152369/

Saturday, 13 October 2012

Just What Does It Take For Entrapment?

10:14 p.m. CDT, October 12, 2012

Police: Man thought he was arranging sex with 16-year-old

"A 44-year-old man was arrested after finding two detectives, a sergeant, and a tactical officer at a Tinley Park restaurant instead of the 16-year-old girl [sic] he was trying to arrange a sexual encounter with over the Internet, police said today.

MGW 44, of Palos Park, was arrested Thursday and charged with indecent solicitation of a child over the Internet, according to a police report from Tinley Park Police.

The investigation began Monday when police posted an ad in the “Casual Encounters” section of Craigslist. It was titled: “Later in the week? Wild child looking.”

In the post, police wrote: “Hello, it looks like I will be free later in the week on Thursday. I am young but don’t feel young. I need an adventure. I am 5-foot-8, and athletic, want to know more?” the report said.

Later that day, investigators received a response to the post, which they said turned out to be from Whitlock.

Investigators continued to communicate via email with him and, on Wednesday at 9:26 p.m. an investigator told him he was a “16-year-old girl’’ who attends Lincoln Way North High School, and Whitlock then asked to have sex with her, the report said.

Investigators even exchanged photographs with Whitlock, giving him a photo of a female police officer when she was 16 years old, the report said."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-police-man-thought-he-was-arranging-sex-with-16yearold-20121012,0,7290529.story

Tuesday, 25 September 2012

More Shenanigans

Monday, September 24, 2012

Undercover operations to curb prostitution renewed

"A SENIOR garda has issued a strong warning that the force is to revitalise recently successful undercover operations targeting those seeking the services of prostitutes.

Supt Frank O’Brien, of Limerick’s Henry Street Garda station, said Garda stings would be set up again following recent concerns expressed by the business community in parts of the city.

Earlier this month two men were convicted at Limerick District Court of soliciting undercover gardaí for sexual services.

The men were arrested by gardaí as part of Operation Freewheel, which saw more than 20 men detained and charged with soliciting or importuning for the purposes of prostitution on dates between November 11th and December 4th, 2011.

The operation sparked controversy, with some of the men claiming entrapment. However, this was rejected by the courts.

Following the undercover sting, street prostitution in Limerick seemed to decline.

However, Supt O’Brien said the activity had since resurfaced {not successful then] and was causing concern among the public."

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0924/1224324324002.html

Monday, September 24, 2012

Paedophile [sic] caught by undercover policeman

"A KEYNSHAM man who was part of a nationwide paedophile [sic] ring has been jailed for ten years.

Bank manager AF, 54, arranged to meet a man and his ten-year-old daughter for sex in a London hotel, a judge at Reading Crown Court was told.

But F, of WR, was arrested when the "paedophile" [!!!] behind his sick fantasy turned out to be an undercover police officer called "Dave".

F admitted conspiracy to rape a child under 13 years. He admitted 11 counts of making indecent images and one of possessing 290 films of extreme pornography and 51 images. He also admitted arranging or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence.

Nigel Lithman, defending the father of two, said: "He did not meet a child, but is ashamed of his actions."

He added that F was of good character.

F was jailed for ten years in an indeterminate sentence for the protection of the public. He will serve at least five years.

He has also been disqualified from working with children."

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/story-16972866-detail/story.html

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Welcome To The Bandwagon

Published: 5:42PM Tuesday September 18, 2012

High risk sex offenders to be monitored for life

"The Government has moved to placate public concern over high risk sex offenders in the wake of Wanganui's on-going efforts to stop a notorious sex offender from moving into the community.

Justice Minister Judith Collins today announced a new Bill targeted at offenders who pose a high risk of sexual or violent offending once they are released from prison.

The Public Safety (Public Protection Orders) Bill will allow the High Court to order offenders to live in a secure facility within prison grounds until the Court is convinced they pose no threat to the community.

Offenders could potentially be under extended supervision for the rest of their lives."

http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/high-risk-sex-offenders-monitored-life-5091826

Somewhat Worse, They Removed All Hope

Tuesday 18 September 2012 12.03 BST

Strasbourg judges rule indeterminate sentences unlawful

"European court of human rights rules against open-ended sentences being served by 6,000 prisoners in England and Wales

The European court of human rights judges said inmates serving indeterminate sentences had no realistic chance of accessing rehabilitation courses.

The European court of human rights has ruled "arbitrary and unlawful" the operation of indeterminate sentences for the protection of the public (IPPs), currently being served by more than 6,000 prisoners in England and Wales.

The Strasbourg judges said the prison system was "swamped" by prisoners without fixed release dates after the indeterminate sentences were introduced in 2005. They said the three inmates who brought the case had "no realistic chance" of accessing the rehabilitation courses they need to qualify for release.

The new justice secretary, Chris Grayling, told MPs he was disappointed by the judgment, and intended to appeal against it. He said: "It is not an area where I welcome the court seeking to make rulings."

The unanimous ruling by seven judges, including the British judge Sir Nicolas Bratza, awarded up to €8,000 (£6,500) compensation to three prisoners, Brett James, Nicholas Wells and Jeffrey Lee, who have been held up to two years and 10 months longer than the original minimum recommendation of their trial judge. They were also awarded €12,000 costs each."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/sep/18/strasbourg-judges-indeterminate-sentences-unlawful?newsfeed=true

Indeterminate sentences 'breach human rights'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19630617
 
Time is money: Violent prisoners to get human rights payouts after controversial European ruling

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/violent-prisoners-to-get-human-rights-payouts-1330243 

£60m bill fear over ‘unlawful’ jail terms 

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/4545506/Brit-lags-could-pocket-60m-in-compensation-after-European-judges-ruled-indefinite-sentences-breached-their-human-rights.html

Wednesday, 15 August 2012

Should Dangerousness Not Require That Even Some Harm Was Done?

PUBLISHED: 13:59, 15 August 2012 | UPDATED: 14:35, 15 August 2012

Appeal judges are forced to REDUCE jail sentence of 'dangerous' [sic] paedophile [sic] to just 18 months

"Judges have expressed 'great concern' after being forced [sic] to overturn the indefinite sentence imposed on a dangerous [sic] paedophile [sic] who will now serve just 18 months behind bars.

SC twice tried to convince a 15-year-old boy to perform a sex act online and shared sickening [sic] images of children with other perverts [offensive and inflammatory], London’s Appeal Court heard.

He was jailed indefinitely for public protection - which is almost identical to a life sentence [it was worse than one] - at Preston Crown Court in March, after computer equipment was seized by police from his home in Fleetwood, Lancashire."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2188694/Appeal-judges-concern-law-forces-reduce-indefinite-sentence-dangerous-paedophile-just-18-months-bars.html#ixzz23dKuJYmV

1:50PM BST 15 Aug 2012

Judges express 'great concern' at shorter sentence for paedophile [sic]

"IPPs, brought in by David Blunkett in 2003, were abolished by the Coalition Government earlier this year. Critics said the tough sentences have been used far more than was planned, boosting the prison population, but were not understood by victims or the public.

It is claimed that only a tiny proportion of those given the sentences have been released so far, remaining in jail long after they would have done on normal sentences. A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: "Sentencing and appeal decisions are purely a matter for the courts as only they have the full facts of a case before them.

"We are replacing the widely criticised and complex IPP scheme with a new regime of tough, determinate sentences. This will see more dangerous criminals given life sentences, and others spending long periods in prison and being supervised for lengthy periods after their release.”"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9477391/Judges-express-great-concern-at-shorter-sentence-for-paedophile.html

Friday, 29 June 2012

No Victim, Lying Police, IPP

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Predatory paedophile [sic] is sent to jail indefinitely

"A "DANGEROUS sexual predator" caught in a police sting operation has been jailed indefinitely.

AL, of Fairacres in Cobham, was handed an "indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for public protection" (IPP) at Guildford Crown Court on Friday.

JAILED: AL was handed an "indeterminate sentence of imprisonment for public protection"

An undercover policewoman posing as the mother of a seven-year-old girl contacted L on the internet after indecent images of children were found on his computer.

In subsequent phone calls, the 56-year-old asked the officer to prepare her daughter for sex with him, before setting up a meeting."

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/story-16461735-detail/story.html

Saturday, 23 June 2012

First Heal Thyself

Friday, June 22 2012

Paedophile DL sentenced

"A depraved paedophile who made sick films of himself abusing three young children and posted them on the internet has been jailed for at least seven years.

Under the sentence of imprisonment for public protection, DL will only be released if the parole board considers he is no longer a danger.

Branding the abuse "appalling", Judge Philip Statman told him: "You would be deluding yourself if you thought you would necessarily be released at the first opportunity of seven years."

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/news/2012/june/21/paedophile_leggett_sentenced.aspx#comments

Kingpin [sic] of international paedophile ring [sic] who raped children and spread videos of the attacks is jailed indefinitely

"Crispian Cartwright, defending, described the offending as 'an absolutely lamentable catalogue and about as depressing to read as anything can be'.

He added: 'This is a man who through his own admission showed he was a paedophile. He faced up to it. He has the terrible misfortune to be cursed with paedophilia.'"

"anyone who can give me a good argument as to why this evil and depraved person shouldn't be executed is just as bad and warped as him!! People like this are prime candidates for the death penalty! Why would anyone want this person to carry on existing as part of society, even inside a cushy jail????

- John H, Bolton, 22/6/2012 13:03"

15 minutes with me in a room and a horse whip...... then he can be locked away for good - Sherlock, Oxon, 21/6/2012 18:04 Join the queue. I won't be using a horsewhip though. Wonder where i could aquire brass knuckles.

- Oli, Braintree, Englishland, 22/6/2012 12:22

He openly admits what and who he is this is a clear cut case!!!!! Bring back the death penalty this would be the easiest decision i have every made - JH, Bournemouth, 22/6/2012 10:23

One would think there may be a consensus of opinion that animals like him should be put down rather than go to the public expense of keeping him in jail. - Alcox, Torrevieja Spain, 22/6/2012 8:52

In any sane society, such a sick and dangerous predator would be destroyed so that he could never harm anyone again. Why do we persist in keeping alive such ever-present dangers to the most vulnerable members of our society ?

- N.Cockburn, Falkirk, UK, 22/6/2012 7:32

I cannot comprehend what this thing is. They says it is a disease? I do not want to look at like this, yes im ignorant. I want him to suffer the same, especially mentaly. Anguish to the point where he is deprived of his sick thought process and he comes back to rational thought.

- Andy, Ipswich, 22/6/2012 7:12

You can not rehabilitate these people, hanging is the only answer.

- John, God's Country, 21/6/2012 23:58

When will this country wake up. There is no cure for what he has, straight people like the opposite sex, gay people the same sex and this disgusting person is a paedophile and his preference is children. Nothing will change that. Vile waste of oxygen.

- katy, Wales, 21/6/2012 18:24"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2162738/Kingpin-international-paedophile-ring-raped-children-spread-videos-attacks-jailed-indefinitely.html

Chris Wittwer shared a link

"Thursday

Heather Gouveia i would be so so happy to put them on a desert island ! death penalty is just too quick and far to good for people like this !! desert island starving, thirsty, slow death , just what they deserve !!
Thursday at 14:04

Shá Jwáni Háwler Sick monster , makes me just wanna spit at my phone screen , needs more than locking up , he needs a fucking elephants trunk up his arse and more , dirty fucker
Thursday at 13:55"

http://www.facebook.com/stylz123

June 22, 2012 -- Updated 0232 GMT (1032 HKT)

Do pedophiles deserve sympathy?

"Editor's note: James Cantor, an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto, is a psychologist and senior scientist at the Sexual Behaviors Clinic of the Center for Addiction and Mental Health. He is editor in chief of "Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment" and blogs at Sexology Today.

(CNN) -- One cannot choose to not be a pedophile, but one can choose to not be a child molester.

"Pedophilia" was long used as a synonym for "child molestation," and both were often seen as psychological failures of self-control. Child molesters were thought to be acting out their own histories of abuses, reacting to fears of adult relationships, or manifesting a symptom that might be resolved in psychotherapy, after which they would no longer be pedophilic.

Recently, however, a number of studies have starting changing that view. It appears that one can be born with a brain predisposed to experience sexual arousal in response to children.

Cases of child molestation that involve long strings of victims over the course of years illustrate what can happen when someone gives in to, or outright indulges, his sexual interests, regardless of its potential damage on others. It is those cases that dominate headlines and provoke revulsion toward pedophiles.

But they are rare. An untold number of cases merit sympathy.

The science suggests that they are people who, through no fault of their own, were born with a sex drive that they must continuously resist, without exception, throughout their entire lives. Little if any assistance is ever available for them.

Having encountered thousands of cases, it is my experience that the pedophiles who do go on to become actual child molesters do so when they feel the most desperate. Yet, much of what society does has been to increase rather than decrease their desperation
.

If it is the brain's wiring that ultimately determines who will go on to develop pedophilia, can we detect it early enough to interrupt the process? Until we uncover more information, we will do more good by making it easier for pedophiles to come in for help rather than force them into solitary secrecy."

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/21/opinion/cantor-pedophila-sandusky/index.html

Brain Research and Pedophilia: What it Means for Assessment, Treatment, and Policy | James Cantor, Ph.D.

http://vimeo.com/33793616
 
28 July 2009

Why are some of us boylovers? (updated 6/2012 to refute J. Cantor's brain studies)

http://www.cjat.org/ipb/index.php?showtopic=18

June 4, 2012

Constructing Perversions: The DSM and the Classification of Sexual Paraphilias and Disorders

http://www.ejhs.org/volume15/DSM.html

****

Comment:

Dr Cantor really means Paedophiles.

*****