Showing posts with label 'AVP'. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 'AVP'. Show all posts

Friday, 4 July 2014

Once Again, Ms Keenan Attacks The Disabled And The Vulnerable

(Embedded Tweets - click date). 

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Yes, We Do Have 'Child Porn', Here, Too

Wooooshhhhh.

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Sexual Offences Act 2003 

"2003 c. 42; Part 1; Abuse of children through prostitution and pornography

48 Causing or inciting child prostitution or pornography

49 Controlling a child prostitute or a child involved in pornography

50 Arranging or facilitating child prostitution or pornography

51 Sections 48 to 50: interpretation

[(1) For the purposes of sections 48 to 50, a person is involved in pornography if an indecent image of that person is recorded; and similar expressions, and “pornography”, are to be interpreted accordingly."

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/part/1/crossheading/abuse-of-children-through-prostitution-and-pornography

*****

... and, all the while, in the background, the devious and lying zealots, the dysfunctional and worse, plot and plan ...
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

On the primary issue ...

3 March 2014 Last updated at 00:56

Labour calls for tougher action against cyber crime

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26411083

One word

*****

Wednesday, 5 March 2014

AVP and Legislation.

"A bit of an uphill struggle getting the UK Media and others to understand AVP - especially when it appears in UK Legislation. Here is my interpretation of what it shows now, and what it should show in "Richard's world".

I won't bore you with the reasoning's behind this - earlier posts from 2013 will explain this & you will probably have read these already."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/avp-and-legislation.html

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

2 April 2014 Last updated at 02:57

Child-grooming loophole must be closed, says charity

"Among its recommendations, it called for the phrase "child prostitution" to be removed from all legislation."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26841181

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

2014 

The use of tactical polygraph with sex offenders 


http://www.childabuseactionnetwork.com/Download-document/9-Tactical-Polygraph.html

Friday, 6 December 2013

Ms Shy Keenan - You Were, Unfortunately, Both - They Are Equivalent



*****

Posted: 05/12/2013 17:41

Am I a Child Prostitute or a Prostituted Child? 

[As you are well aware, this has been dealt with, here]

*****

A reminder ...

The rule is ...

[noun] [noun], is equivalent to, ... [noun] ... [verb[ed]] (i.e. intransitive, transitive etc):

*****

e.g.

Chocolate spread, is equivalent to, chocolate, which was spread.

Ice lolly, is equivalent to, a lolly, which was iced.

Adult prostitute, is equivalent to, an adult, which was prostituted.

Child prostitute, is equivalent to, a child, which was prostituted.

*****

"Shy Keenan - UK's lead [decided by whom? - provide evidence] Anti-Victim Prejudice (AVP) [a false construct, created by you] consultant [credentials and outcomes?]

"I was sold for sex from a very early age by the adults in my life. [not a rarity, at that location, at that time, but, unacceptable, nonetheless - the guilty have paid the price, in full]. I didn't want or like what they did but I was powerless to stop them. [well, perhaps we should return to your written words, later?] I couldn't comprehend any of the long-term lifelong problems it would cause [prove causality] ... I just knew it was bad horrible and I wanted it to stop. [this is your 'recollection', at this time]

I had no clue when they filmed and photographed their sex crimes against me all those years ago [what images? - provide evidence], that I would be abused and haunted by them for the rest of my life... worse still, that they would be used to hurt others. [emotive, un-evidenced, clap-trap].

Social grooming: 

Paedophiles [not] invented the phrase 'child porn' to downplay the crime, to undermine victim justice and because they were struggling to sell [sic] 'child abuse images' on the 'PAEDOPHIL£$' [sic] Darkenet.

[This is absolute drivel. The term was first used, at the latest, in the 1970s, by USA and UK, politicians and law makers.]

Paedophile [not] propaganda: [your propaganda and lies]

The Online Sex Offender Community (or #OSC) [a term created, by you, for anyone that does not agree with you] simply rebranded the actual crime from indecent/child abuse images to 'child porn' [when was the term, 'IIOC' first coined? ... the mid-to-late-1970s] and without really thinking it through and despite the harm/offence it causes actual victims, the worldwide society and its media embraced this victim offensive/offender friendly phrase and blindly rolled on with it. [complete and utter bullshit ... in-passing, as you well know, we prefer the term 'IIOC', unless they are IIOC which is child pornography, in the correct context]

[More to follow]

*****

The harm done: 

Once we got society over the whole 'is it art - is it child abuse/exploitation?' argument, years on from Operation Ore, offenders are still being given police cautions for making/possessing/sharing selling child abuse images.

The victims are viewed as ink on paper, dots on a screen, unsaveable lost souls with no rights, no voice and no choices.

Pornography is a legitimate business that sells consenting adult sex. Child abuse images are crime scene photographs.

Because of this appalling phrase the actual victims in these child abuse images don't get the help, support, judicial recognition or protection they need and deserve, they are instead the 'hardcore ignored' prejudicially socially excluded... so you can guess who is winning this war.

I was never a child prostitute, I was a prostituted child and until you can see/feel the difference, you will never really turn this paedophile tide.

It is said that the only way that bad people prevail, it when good men and women do nothing and all I am asking you to do it to stop calling it 'child porn'. Many thanks for listening."

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/shy-keenan/child-sex-abuse_b_4383485.html?utm_hp_ref=uk

*****

More to follow ... including proof, of how Ms Keenan encroaches into serious, online, discussions, about rape, so as to sell her books and fantasies.

Watch this space.

The OSC 

*****

Addendum (16:20)

Ms Keenan's strategy, to attempt to silence her legally-acting critics ...


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Addendum (7/12/13; 11:15 am)


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

Sunday, 1 December 2013

We Are In For A Treat, Today - Today, We Are In For A Treat - From A Leading Consultant


*****


Comment:

To follow.


Comment:

To follow.


Comment:

To follow. 


Comment:

To follow.


Comment:

To follow. 


Comment:

To follow. 

For now, go and listen to Rihanna.

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Heh, don't forget to buy the books !!! 

*****

Addendum (2/12/13; 8:27 am)

Ms Keenan (assisted, by the exploited, Ms Payne) had another go, today. 

We have archived it, but, as usual, it is, predominantly, a collection of prejudicial, unqualified, false claims, lies and emotional manipulation, exaggerating and exploiting a current public case, in a bid to collect cash, under false pretenses.

Here is the disgusting upshot ...



 
https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Heh, don't forget to buy the books !!!

Sunday, 10 November 2013

Saturday, 26 October 2013

Richard Bougeard Confuses (Purposefully, Of Course) Logic, Facts, Sexual Orientation, Mental Health, Crimes etc etc To Very Poor And Dangerous Effect

Saturday, 26 October 2013

The Continued Attempted Grooming of Society [sic] to Normalise Paedophilia [sic]

"Why also, are these views being allowed to be aired in public, by those who are known sex offenders? People like Paul Christiano, spokesperson for B4U-ACT and known sex offender. Known sex offenders who are allowed to share their distorted views on public platforms like Blogs, Facebook and Twitter. Sex offenders who try to legitimise what they do. Sex offenders who try to justify, for example, that IIOC is a victimless crime. Sex offenders who are more than happy to try to groom us into believing that everyone has an element of paedophilia in them. Sex offenders who promote all the above, knowing that it is a criminal offence to abuse children. Should sex offenders who try to normalise crimes like this, who try to justify crimes like this by trying to decriminalise their acts, be allowed to speak so freely like this?

Would we allow for example, adult rapists to organise conferences to try to justify and legitimise their acts? Would we let them have a free speech on public platforms like Blogger, Facebook & Twitter to spread their views and argue that they have some sort of mental disorder or that what they have is a sexual orientation that makes them unable to control what they do.. (aaah poor rapists, it's not their fault, it's just the way they are, they can't help it) ?

Of course we wouldn't, so why exactly are we allowing paedophiles and child sex offenders such a public platform?

Isn't it about time that we stopped allowing paedophiles and child sex offenders to have this free-reign public voice to make pathetic excuse after excuse about why they do what they do? After all, no-one puts a gun to their head and tells them to abuse a child, or to download/distribute IIOC, they have self-control like everyone else does. Free speech is one thing, but when it is making up excuses to promote or justify the sexual abuse of children and the actions of the people who abuse them, (either physically or by IIOC), this goes too far."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-continued-attempted-grooming-of.html

Where to start? - nowhere, the persecutory rant speaks for itself.

Now that is real prejudice and discrimination.

*****

Saturday, 2 November 2013

Whopping Pedophilia 'Sexual Orientation' Error Sparks Common Sense Freakout

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/whopping-pedophilia-sexual-orientation.html

Sunday, 22 September 2013

You Have Had Your Instructions, Ms Keenan

***** Here *****



Twitter - 22/9/13



(click to enlarge)

OSC EMail - 22/9/13


(click to enlarge)

OSC EMail - 22/9/13


The Phoenix Post


https://twitter.com/ThePhoenixPost 

Phoenix ChiefAd min

https://twitter.com/PhoenixChiefAd

*****

Comment:

More harassment and abusive behaviour ... we have reported it, to Twitter, but, we have explained, that we respect 'legal', free speech (even lies), so these (and related) posts should be allowed to stand, for now.

The OSC (full meaning, never stated, by us). 

*****

Addendum (15:39)

You come into our domains, by choice. You are welcome.

Feel free to spread our content and existence, wherever you choose. Please, just don't look so stupid and inept, in doing so.

Like the true Phoenix, we always return.

The OSC (full meaning, never stated, by us).

Sunday, 18 August 2013

Child Sexual Activity (CSAc; Minor - MSAc, is more correct), With A Minor-Attracted Person (MAP)

Friday, 16 August 2013

Media AVP again - Male & Female Paedophiles


Woman 'had an eight-month sexual relationship with son, 11, of family friend'

"A 35-year-old woman has been charged with 20 counts of rape and sodomy after she allegedly had an eight-month sexual relationship with an 11-year-old boy, it emerged today."

The media, (rightly or wrongly), describes anyone who sexually assaults or sexually abuses children under the age of consent as a paedophile. Ignoring the literal translation [literal, where, Richard?] - which we all [sic] know, relates to pre-pubescent children - I have no issues with this."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/media-avp-again-male-female-paedophiles.html

So, what do YOU mean by a 'paedophle', Richard? 

What do YOU have no issues with?

*****

"Words are powerful. Be careful how you use them because once you have pronounced them, you cannot remove the scar they leave behind."   Vashti Quiroz-Vega

Saturday, 3 August 2013

This Should Not Exclude Them From The Same Critical Analysis

Posted on August 3, 2013

“Sun Justice” and Crime Propaganda


"The Sun recently unveiled their new crime-fighting team - Dr Sara Payne and Shy Keenan – as the nation’s salvation when it comes to issues of criminal justice and victimisation.

Dr Payne, now with a high-ranking prefix to her name as though to present an image of authority, has recently gone on record as suggesting that the Press is a shining ‘bastion of hope’, citing the example of the News of the World’s shameful ‘Name and Shame’ campaign of outing convicted child sex offenders in 2000, leading to a formal campaign (which was ultimately successful) to introduce Sarah’s Law [sic] – a community notification scheme whereby parents can access information about convicted sex offenders living in their areas.

Payne stresses how this cause was close to her heart following the murder of her daughter, Sarah, by a previously convicted sex offender, Roy Whiting, but doesn’t address that the new legislation wouldn’t have prevented this tragic event, given that Whiting lived some distance away from the Payne’s family home.

Shy Keenan is a public face in the field of child protection, having been the victim of sexual abuse throughout her childhood. This puts her in a unique position as a very high profile voice for victims groups.

Whilst I sympathise with both of these women for the horrific events that they have experienced over the years, this should not exclude them from the same critical analysis that would befall any columnist working in the mainstream popular press, so here goes…"

http://craigaharper.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/sun-justice-crime-propaganda/

Counterblast: Punitive Payne, Justice Campaigns, and Popular Punitivism – Where Next for ‘Public Criminology'?

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hojo.12012/abstract

*****



https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Esther Rantzen on ITV This Morning on Shy Keenan - 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilYcx0Fpd2E&feature=youtu.be

Why, Ms Keenan, why? 

Addendum (13/8/13)

Yes, this is of interest - Thank you.

Shy Keenan on Esther Rantzen/Savile - 2012 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUaWiOQ7moE&feature=youtu.be

Monday, 17 June 2013

This Deserves Longer Than We Can Give, Presently, Richard

Sunday, 16 June 2013

Media AVP (Anti Victim Prejudice) 4 - "Child Sex"

"The more you look at how the media reports on child abuse, the more you realise just how prejudicial [why prejudicial?] and "dumbing down" [well, if you will read The Sun] their reporting is.

"As well as calling child abuse images [sic] "Porn" [which most is, by formal definitions], children who are prostituted out to paedophiles [sic] "child prostitutes" and the devious activities [sic] of paedophiles [sic] as merely "having an affair", the other thing that really bugs me is the repetitive way that abuse is referred to a "child sex" "[yes, we agree ... we prefer the neutral and clearer term, Child Sexual Activity - CSAc; Minor Sexual Activity is even better, but the 'Minor' may be misinterpreted, just as ‘Abuse’ is, in Child Sexual Abuse - CSA]

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/media-avp-anti-vivtim-prejudice-4-child.html 

Comment:

We will return to this, later, Richard.

The OSC 

Friday, 14 June 2013

Easy One Richard

Thursday, 13 June 2013

Media AVP (Anti Victim Prejudice) 3 - "Affairs"

"A brief posting tonight, on another way the media downplays the crime of child abuse [sic].

Definition of affair by The Free Dictionary [note the prefix, 'diction']

"A romantic and sexual relationship, sometimes one of brief duration, between two people who are not married to each other."

*****

Teacher jailed for affair with schoolgirl

http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/teacher_jailed_for_affair_with_schoolgirl_1_2214817

*****

The age of consent in the UK is 16 (Age of consent).

Call me picky [no, just incorrect], but when I think of the word "affair", I think of an extra-marital sexual relationship between 2 adults who are not married to each other (one or both being married to other people) [there lies one of your major errors; that is an 'extra-marital affair']."

"What do victims think when their lives have been ruined [sic] by sexual assaults by adults, seeing their abuse [sic] being downplayed and trivialised in the media [because they are not comparable?], by having it described as merely "having an affair""? [they think of the compensation, as they almost always do, Richard]

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/media-avp-anti-victim-prejudice-3.html

*****

Thirteen - Lucky for some.

"Beast beds girl of 13... but it’s not rape

An old story, from November last year, but one where the underlying theme of this story is just as applicable today as it was then. As far as I am aware, nothing has changed.

Under UK Law as defined [sic] by CPS "A boy or girl under the age of 16 cannot consent in law [see that, Richard?], (Archbold 2004, 20-152)"."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/thirteen-lucky-for-some.html

*****

Comment:

This is because, the rich dimensions of life, in all of its wonderful complexity, are much, much larger, than that microcosm construct, described by legal terminology (i.e. victim, assault, legal consent etc. etc.) ... thank goodness, it is.

We hope this assists in your evolution.

The OSC

Saturday, 1 June 2013

Please Mark, You Are Confusing Them With Correct Facts - That Is When They Turn Nasty


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Mark Easton

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/markeaston/

Mark Easton

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Easton

Mark Easton

https://twitter.com/BBCMarkEaston

*****

Not that we agree with you, on all your points, Mark.

*****

April killer Mark Bridger slashed in jail

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/5004041/mark-bridger-attacked-in-prison.html

Tell Us, Ms Keenan ...


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

 ... when did this event take place (nearest year (even decade), if you please)?

Do you have any knowledge of the past, legal, commercial availability, of such material?

Once again, we will assist you, on your journey ...

*****

Remarks of Arnold Burns Before the Florida Law Enforcement Committee on Obscenity, Organized Crime and Child Pornography, December 3, 1987 

"Organized crime involvement in pornography is significant. According to testimony before the Pornography Commission in 1986, organized crime infiltrated the pornography industry in 1969 through well-known crime families. By 1975, organized crime controlled 80 percent of the obscenity industry. Studies indicate that obscenity and child pornography are now regular features of the organized crime profile."

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=109133

New York v. Ferber

"The court in Ferber [1982] found that child pornography, however, may be banned without first being deemed obscene under Miller [1973] for five reasons ..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Ferber

Excerpts From Opinions in Ruling on the Child Pornography Prevention Act [1996/2002]

"We consider in this case whether the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 abridges the freedom of speech. The C.P.P.A. extends the federal prohibition against child pornography to sexually explicit images that appear to depict minors but were produced without using any real children. The statute prohibits, in specific circumstances, possessing or distributing these images, which may be created by using adults who look like minors or by using computer imaging. The new technology, according to Congress, makes it possible to create realistic images of children who do not exist."

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/17/us/excerpts-from-opinions-in-ruling-on-the-child-pornography-prevention-act.html

The OSC

Thursday, 30 May 2013

OK, Let's Squash Another One, Here And Now


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

There has never been any legitimate confirmation, of any type, that you have had indecent images taken of you, as a minor - let alone, that they are in public circulation.

Owning images of crime scenes is not illegal.

We hope this is now clear.

The OSC

p.s.

Child porn star, is equivalent to, a child which starred in child porn.

We agree, you were not one. 

OK, Let's Squash This One, Here And Now


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

The rule is ...

[noun] [noun], is equivalent to, ... [noun] ... [verb[ed]] (i.e. intransitive, transitive etc):

*****

e.g.

Chocolate spread, is equivalent to, chocolate, which was spread.

Ice lolly, is equivalent to, a lolly, which was iced.

Adult prostitute, is equivalent to, an adult, which was prostituted.

Child prostitute, is equivalent to, a child, which was prostituted.

****

Any other interpretation, is one of a biased and confused mind (at least), with vested interests.

We hope this is now clear.

The OSC

*****

Please tell us ... why is Penny Marshall, so, blatantly, dense? - is it some kind of advantage, at ITN? 


https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Addendum (11/6/2013)

Saturday, 8 June 2013

Media and Legal AVP (Anti Victim Prejudice) - "Child Prostitutes" child prostitute ring groomed and then raped vulnerable girls

"'Child' (Wiki) - "The legal definition of child generally refers to a minor, otherwise known as a person younger than the age of majority"

"Prostitute" (Wiki) - "Prostitution is the business or practice of providing sexual services to another person in return for payment. The person who receives payment for sexual services is called a prostitute or sex worker""

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/media-and-legal-avp-anti-victim.html

Comment:

Richard, we will give you some time to reconsider your logical fallacies etc, and then we will correct you.

The OSC

*****

Wednesday, 26 June 2013

AVP 5 - "Rent Boys"

"Rent Boy Scandal Rocks The Vatican"

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/avp-5-rent-boys.html

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

IIOC - The First Question One Must Ask, Is, 'What is Pornography'? (Part 1)

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

The media and "Child Porn"

"Having spent a bit of time thinking about a relevant article in the media that best describes how not to report the crime of downloading / making indecent images of children, one tabloid immediately came to mind. Not that I am singling this particular paper out, but out of all the UK tabloids, this one uses the term that I am highlighting in this post, namely "child porn" on almost a daily basis.

My journey into the hell that is internet child porn - Amanda Platell

I wish the media would stop using this phrase. In reality, these are images of children who have been sexually exploited or abused - "crime scene photos". Using this phrase trivialises this crime hugely by labelling it as just another type of porn. We already have "food porn", "car porn" "poverty porn" - indeed anything and everything can be labelled as "porn". Should we be trivialising pictures and videos of child abuse by labelling them as just another "porn"?"

Here is the (one of a number) fault in the logic (and legal precedent) of the CPI ...

"Pornography is defined [one definition] as "the explicit portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purposes of sexual arousal and erotic satisfaction", however the only people who would actively look at these images and describe it as such are paedophiles [sic]. Why should the media use such paedo-friendly [sic] language in their reporting - facilitating and helping [sic] paedophiles [sic] somehow justify [sic] their crimes? Answer - they shouldn't and they need to stop!"

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-media-and-child-porn.html

Open door: Why the term 'child porn' should not be used

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/06/open-door-term-child-porn

*****

Comment:

The OSC never uses the term 'child porn[ography]', unless the material, under consideration, clearly is so, beyond reasonable doubt.

For images, we prefer 'Indecent Images of Children' (IIOC) - the primary legal term, in our primary jurisdiction. 

If one wishes to use the term CSAI's, then one must first define the term 'abuse' .

We will return, to this issue, later.

The OSC

*****

Addendum (30/5/13)


Jim Gamble

https://twitter.com/Jgineqe


Dr Sara Payne MBE

https://twitter.com/DrSaraPayneMBE


Shy Keenan

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan


Shy Keenan

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

Many good people do so, Ms Keenan, and for very good reasons.


Shy Keenan

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

*****

Fleur Strong (PACE)

https://twitter.com/strong_fleur

Tessa Chapman (ITN5)

https://twitter.com/tessa5news

*****

Addendum (1/6/13)


https://twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas

Please tell us, what is the difference, Mark, and why?

 

https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan

Please tell us, Mark, how CSAI, is any clearer or objective?

*****

Addendum (3/6/13)

Friday, 31 May 2013 

Media AVP (Anti Victim Prejudice) 1, "Indecent Images Of Children - a follow up" 

"Following my first post, (Media Prejudice), now that we all know [sic] that images and films of child abuse and child rape should never be referred to as any sort of "porn" [sic], the question now is what exactly should they be called? [they may be a number of things, porn and not-porn]"

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/media-avp-anti-victim-prejudice-1.html 

*****

Addendum (19/9/13)

Saturday, 14 September 2013

The BBC, the term "Child Porn" and why complaints of this nature are a waste of time

"A brief posting on the BBC's stance on their use of the term "Child Porn". The one organisation I no longer bother to complain to about this - hopefully the below will explain why.

In a nutshell they have no objection to using this phrase in their reporting as long as they also include "indecent images of children" somewhere else in the articles. Not sure why they think this acceptable - by their reasoning one could use the term n****r as well as long as you include the words "black person" - no sense I know, but one that they have used.

Below is a PDF from the BBC Trust complaints section, detailing my complaints and their responses. It is from page 41 to 44, so not that long. It is worth a read, below in blue, to see both my points and their (pretty rubbish to be honest) answers."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/the-bbc-term-child-porn-and-why.html