Professional Validator - Tessa Munt MP - 'Jet-Propelled'

"... those who have a [possible] history of having been sexually
 abused should not practice in the area of sexual abuse."

*****

LISTEN: @carolynquinncq talks to @tessamunt as she reveals that she is a survivor of child sex abuse. https://t.co/2eRnM2tGBb
— Joanna Carr (@jocarr) July 7, 2014

@jocarr @carolynquinncq @tessamunt Well done Tessa. Right from the heart. @reeves3915 @IanMcFadyen1966 @rights_victims @ComingUpTheHill
— Sunnyclaribel (@Sunnyclaribel) July 7, 2014

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

Listen: Lib Dem MP Tessa Munt reveals her experience of child abuse

http://www.newstatesman.com/staggers/2014/07/listen-lib-dem-mp-tessa-munt-reveals-her-experience-child-abuse

Tessa Munt MP: 'I was a victim of sexual abuse'

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28202861

'I am a survivor of child sex abuse': Lib Dem MP Tessa Munt speaks publicly for the first time about her trauma

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2683646/I-survivor-child-sex-abuse-Lib-Dem-MP-Tessa-Munt-speaks-publicly-time-trauma.html

We need brave MPs to share their personal tales of woe

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/10953218/Sex-abuse-survivor-Tessa-Munt-We-need-brave-MPs-to-share-their-personal-tales-of-woe.html

https://audioboo.fm/boos/2308728-tessa-munt-reveals-her-experience-of-child-abuse

*****

Tessa Munt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tessa_Munt

http://www.tessamunt.org.uk 

http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/commons/tessa-munt/4089

*****

Identifying and Dealing with "Child Savers" 

"The profession should establish as a standard of practice that those who have a history of having been sexually abused should not practice in the area of sexual abuse. As pointed out by Gardner (1991), many professionals are attracted to the field because they themselves were molested. And many then become validators. This was underscored by Kenneth Lanning, the FBI expert, who noted that these professionals often have a hidden agenda, which is to recruit the children they question "to the brotherhood and sisterhood of the sexually abused" (as quoted in Wexler, 1995, p. 157)."

Thomas D. Oellerich, 1998

http://criticalestoppel.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/recreated-in-full-for-later-reference.html

Sunday, February 21, 2010

DCYF/CPS Investigative Techniques

"The social workers and counselors are so eager to find child abuse or neglect. The bottom line is you give a lot of people a stick and they are going to swing it."

Judge Ralph Adam Fine, Wisconsin Court of Appeals

http://unhappygrammy-grandparentsblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/dcyfcps-investigative-techniques.html

****

Same challenge, to you, Ms Munt, as Ms Crocombe.

The OSC

In Almost Every Instance It Is The Police Who Are Doing The Seducing, The Alluring And The Enticing

Posted: Jan 06, 2014 2:23 AM GST Updated: Jan 06, 2014 2:23 AM GST

Sex Sting Backlash

"PENSACOLA, Florida - Two and a half years ago Escambia County deputies arrested 25 men in operation Blue Shepherd. Officials said the men were looking for sex with minors after chatting online. One of those men was TG.

“Once you're labeled a pedophile that sticks with you for an eternity,” says G. He's innocent in the eyes of the law--but his life has ground to a halt. This past fall his guilty plea was thrown out on appeal--the higher court saying investigators were the ones who were talking about sex with a minor--not him--G thought he was chatting with a college age woman. He says he still hasn’t fully recovered.

“For nearly three years now there hasn't been much of an improvement if I wasn't a veteran probably very bleak, probably homeless,” says G. When he’s not at school he spends much of his free time on the computer--fighting back against internet sex stings. He has built a couple of websites dedicated to the cause where he’s working with other men arrested in these stings. In most cases police post ads on adult sites like Craigslist saying they're adults--but once they start one-on-one chats the officer claims he's underage.

“In almost every instance it is the police who are doing the seducing, the alluring and the enticing,” says defense lawyer Peter Aiken. He works in Florida and specializes in defending men arrested in these stings. “The problem with the stings is they're catching 5% of the predators and they're destroying 95% of the lives of innocent men.”

According to G's analysis only a few suspects are caught with child porn. Opponents say the stings are motivated in part by the good PR they generate and also money. There’s money from cars seized from suspects and federal funding they get from the Internet Crimes Against Children division of the Department of Justice. G and others argue some police are violating the rules set out by the feds when it comes to sex stings.

“What we want to happen in Florida is the same thing that's happened in Georgia, we want the stings down, we want them investigated and to find the violations,” says G."

http://www.wkrg.com/story/24369062/sex-sting-backlash

According To Court Records

September 16, 2013, 5:00 a.m.

Samantha Geimer tells her side of story in Roman Polanski case

"Samantha Geimer, who recounts the case in a new memoir, 'The Girl,' has long held a nuanced view of what happened to her as a 13-year-old in 1977, preferring not to see herself as a tragic figure.

Samantha Geimer, now a 50-year-old mother, who was the victim at the center of the Roman Polanski sexual assault case in 1977.

Roman Polanski rape victim's memoir features controversial cover Roman Polanski rape victim's memoir features controversial cover.

HENDERSON, Nev. — In 2009, Samantha Geimer was watching the daytime talk show "The View" from her then-home in Hawaii when the panel took up the topic of her encounter at age 13 with director Roman Polanski. Polanski had just been arrested in Switzerland, more than three decades after the day in 1977 that changed both their lives."

"She feels more wounded by what she calls the "victim industry," the lawyers, judge and journalists who she feels sensationalized her case for their own interests."

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-jc-geimer-book-20130916,0,6469747.story

*****

PUBLISHED: 02:17, 14 September 2013 | UPDATED: 13:03, 17 September 2013

'I'm still in touch with Polanski', says victim who was just 13 when she was raped by the film director in Jack Nicholson's jacuzzi

>Polanski expressed concerns at a rumour that the title of the French version of the memoir she will publish next week would mention the word 'rape'.
>Now she regards him as an ally because it 'makes sense to be on the same side'.
>Despite the horrific events, Ms Geimer says what followed was worse than the actual rape.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420509/Im-touch-Polanski-says-victim-just-13-raped-film-director-Jack-Nicholsons-jacuzzi.html

The Likes Of Stinson Hunter's Prey And Sex With 'Kids' - Get A Clue !!!

What's Not To Love? 

*****  

We know, how tempting Lolitas (male or female), are.

We know, that they are out, there.

We know, fantasy, cybersex and contact sex, can be great fun.

We know, fantasy can be perceived (and utilised), as 'reality', by those with vested interests.

*****

Please, bear in mind, the following. Consider the risk versus rewards analysis ...

*****

(1) Stinson, and other entrappers, do not bust younger chatters/cybersexers - whether the cybersexers are doing it legally, or not. They aim for older prey - why this is, only they can tell you.

(2) Almost always, seducing/grooming a person takes time, effort and, in many cases, expense. What are the chances, of you gaining a partner's trust, with a rapid 'flash' of your dick and a hasty arrangement to meet in the Midlands?

(3) '13'-year-old kids will, almost never (and we mean, essentially, never - from online), want to have contact sex with you.

(4) Even if the cybersexer were for real, the contact sex will, almost certainly, be rubbish (probably for both of you).

(5) Stinson, and other entrappers, will rarely (if ever) 'flash' on webcam, or send you pics of themselves - think about it.

(6) If you must fantasy cybersex, (legally, of course - but, beware) make it clear, from stage one (and record it, in some way), that it is a fantasy discussion, and that you believe, beyond reasonable doubt, that you are communicating with an adult (over the age of 18, just to be sure):

Sexual Offences Act 2003

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/15

Note well, a court will decide, if it was reasonable, or not - not you, and any cybersex can be illegal, under the OPA 1959.

By-the-way, 'attempting to' (i.e. being entrapped), is sufficient, for guilt.

(7) For now, Stinson and other entrappers, are acting quite legally (usually) and you are not - think about it.

(8) If you should fall for Stinson's entrapping lies (or anyone's, other than bonafide police officers), say nothing and leave, or remain, if you fear an attack, or a 'Citizen's Arrest' - there are no reasonable alternatives.

(9) For now, being busted will introduce you to a whole 'World Of Shit" - hardly worth it, even if it was real ... never mind a set-up.

(10) If you, really, are on the edge, get some help - it will be painful, initially, little doubt - but, better than a whole "WOS" (unless that is what you want !!!)

(11) Read THIS.

*****

We know, it is natural and exciting. 

We know, your life may be shite, already.

Take some advice ... read and absorb what we have provided. 

Can it, really, be worth it?

Why bother, at all?

We, really, do not want to see you, here (or anywhere) ...

*****

Stinson Hunter

https://twitter.com/stinsonxhunter

https://www.facebook.com/stinsonhunterofficial

www.youtube.com/mrstinsonhunter

http://www.stinson-hunter.com

*****

Stinson Hunter - Forum introduction

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBneDL5kJvI

https://www.facebook.com/stinsonhunterofficial/posts/195827750589150

http://stinson-hunter.com/forum/

The OSC

*****

September 22, 2013

Should You Take a Risk?

"How to use statistical rather than anecdotal thinking to make better choices."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/happiness-in-world/201309/should-you-take-risk

*****

If you are affected, by any of the issues, raised, here ...

MAPs - you are not alone - very much, not alone ...

http://www.lucyfaithfull.org.uk - stopitnow.org.uk - circles-uk.org.uk - http://www.virped.org - http://b4uact.org - https://www.stopso.org.uk 

http://preventell.se/?lang=en - http://www.nemup.de/index_eng.html - https://1in6.org - www.boychat.org - www.annabelleigh.net - http://www.thepreventionproject.org

Tor versions available, for most downlinks.

Thank you.

The OSC

Now 'Smackdown' The Entrapping Law Enforcement Agencies

20th August 2013

Comcast court docs show Prenda copyright trolls seeded smut then sued

"Top copyright troll Prenda Law has been caught red-handed seeding torrenting sites with pornographic films in an effort to drum up business for its copyright lawyers.

The attorneys at Prenda Law specialize in firing out letters to internet users accusing them of pirating luridly-named pornography (Alexis Texas sucks and fucks at a porn show is unsubtle even by the adult industry's standards) and threatening a very public legal case unless they cough up a few thousand dollars in compensation for their alleged crimes.

These kinds of practices have already inspired one California judge to deliver an epic Star Trek-themed smackdown to Prenda Law and fine them $81,000 (and additional charges for late payment). But the firm, which operates under a host of associate companies across the US, is still litigating – but a new court document in a separate case is going to cause it major problems.""

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/08/20/ip_address_search_shows_prenda_copyright_trolls_seeded_smut_then_sued/

You know it is the right thing to do.

Every Relationship (For All Intents And Purposes) Is A Balance Of Power, Whatever The Relative Ages

Monday 24 June 2013 16.38 BST

JF: child protection experts warn against romanticising case

"NSPCC says media must be careful [sic] of presenting relationship between teacher and pupil as love story [which is exactly what it is]

JF, who was jailed for five and a half years after starting a sexual relationship with a child.

To glance at some headlines, a reader might think this was a conventional love story: "I still love him"; "He's wonderful, I'll fight for him". But this was, child protection professionals agree, a relationship built around abuse [sic].

JF, a maths teacher who turns 31 on Tuesday, was jailed for five and a half years last week for beginning a sexual relationship with a pupil shortly after her 15th birthday and escaping to France with the girl when their connection was discovered.

Post-verdict coverage has shone a spotlight on the many ethical and regulatory difficulties of such cases. While newspapers have remained condemnatory of F himself, interviews with the girl, now 16 [legal age], and with F's family, traced a distinctly romantic narrative, with talk of her visiting her ex-teacher in prison, sticking by him and even future marriage.

Beyond the unequal basis of their relationship, the court heard that the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is psychologically vulnerable [sic] and from a difficult background [sic]. Her decision to side with F and his family has seen her cut contact altogether with her own mother.

Stories, primarily in the Sun and Mail titles, detailing her feelings for F, including reprints of emotionally charged letters, were "a concern", said Jon Brown, who leads on child protection issues [sic] for the NSPCC charity. "There's an awful lot of work that still needs to be done with the media in explaining [lying to] and, in a sense, educating [brainwashing] journalists so they do have a better understanding [sic] of the reality [sic] of these relationships," he said.""

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/24/jeremy-forrest-child-protection-experts

*****

JUNE 25, 2013

The NSPCC – Suppressing the Truth

"They are deeply upset.

Journalists need re-programming ’educating’, so that they don’t report what people say to them.

Reporting factual statements is unhelpful to the NSPCCs agenda.

This morning they are waving clause 6 of the PCC code, not to mention clause 16, in front of the terrified journalists and warning of the direst consequences. The Guardian is so upset on their behalf that they are providing links to both the Daily Mail and The Sun (unheard of!) so that their readers can see exactly what such irresponsible journalism looks like without the Guardian having to sully itself by printing similar off-message words.

What could have been said to provoke the NSPCC so? Has Harriet the Harridan been advocating paedophilia again? Did David Cameron issue a statement saying the NSPCC were a waste of space? Is Chanel 4 making a new version of ‘I’m a celebrity, get me out of here’ from Lewes prison? Is Haley the only male actor left in Coronation Street? Nothing so minor unfortunately.

A young woman has declared her love for the man in her life. He has been sent to prison and she has stated that she will stand by him, wait for him.

And those dastardly right wing journalists have reported that she said that! Shock horror! This, in the NSPCCs view is reprehensible. It is ‘romanticising’ what could have been a donation winning situation for the NSPCC. It’s, it’s, unethical, that’s what it is, it’s unethical, they splutter…in fact they go so far as to claim that these journalists are only reporting fact – in an effort to sell newspapers. Who-da-thought-it?

“But then there’s an ethical issue which is broader than the code: are papers talking about this in a responsible way?”

Ideally, the NSPCC would have liked to see the young woman, an adult, illustrated by a pixilated image of an eight year old child in a winsomely too long nightdress clutching a teddy bear. JF, for it is he, illustrated by ‘picture posed by an actor’ – preferably a stern faced older man with a slight leer exposing yellow teeth, in mortar and gown, brandishing a cane. If only the regulation existed that they are calling for, they would have supplied the prose, written by a computer programmed to insert the words ‘child abuse’ into every sentence, and liberally sprinkled with keywords like ‘authoritarian figure’ and ‘vulnerable child’.

Unfortunately for them, the regulation does not yet exist, nor is Ms Mega Speech-Impediment (apologies to the young woman, not very PC but it is PCC) minded to go along with their charade."

http://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/the-nspcc-suppressing-the-truth/

We Don't Use The Word Predatory

Saturday, December 22 2012

Facebook child sex predator CW jailed for five years

"CW, 31, of Hoo, has been jailed for five years after admitting sexual activity with a child

A pervert who preyed on a young girl before meeting her for sexual encounters has been jailed for five years under an extended sentence.

Using a false name, CW, 31, contacted the 13-year-old schoolgirl on Facebook and by text messages before they had what was described as a "consensual relationship".

A judge told the father-of-two, of Hoo: "I don't use the word grooming. It seems your victim required little in the way of persuasion. Your behaviour leading up to the commission of the offences is better described as predatory."

W admitted sexual activity with a child and of causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity."

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway_messenger/news/2012/december/22/craig_woodman.aspx

*****

Aug. 6, 2013

Online Predators Not Distinctively Dangerous Sex Offenders

"A new University of New Hampshire study challenges the view that online predators are a distinctly dangerous variety of sex offender, requiring special programs to protect youth.

The study from the UNH Crimes against Children Research Center finds that sex offenders who target teens increasingly use Internet and cell phone communications to lure teens into sexual relationships. In crimes that involve such communications, offenders who meet and recruit youth online operate in much the same way as offenders who meet and know youth in ordinary offline environments.

"These are all serious crimes," said lead author Janis Wolak, a senior researcher at the UNH Crimes against Children Research Center. "But the so-called 'online predators' are not more insidious.""

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/08/130806111013.htm

Do Not Believe The Facts Stop Them

This entry was posted on May 29, 2012 

Sexual Myths: Ammunition in the War On Science

"The Internet

Myth: The Internet is a hotbed of sexual predators, and children are at terrible risk.

Science: The overwhelming majority of the “unwanted sexual solicitation” on the Internet reported by young people is from their peers, and is generally benign. According to the state-of-the-art Harvard/Berkman Institute report, the main risk faced by minors on the Internet is bullying, not sexual predation."

https://sexualintelligence.wordpress.com/2012/05/29/sex-ammunition-in-the-war-on-science