7/1/14
THE FAKE SOUND OF MEDIA MORALITY
"Save your sympathy.
Who'd you think you're fooling?
Everything is dead
Now you welcome me
to A Town Called Hypocrisy"
"Here in the UK, that we have lived through an eye-opening couple of years is undeniable. For those of us still able to stop, think for ourselves and engage in cognitive thinking, life has been become a pretty incredulous experience. This wouldn't be so bad if 'thinking' wasn't becoming such an old-fashioned concept. For those of us with a degree of intellect, warning signs are flashing away at us madly. I largely eschewed the printed propaganda of the so-called newspapers years ago, last I knocked watching 'mainstream TV' on the head on account of it being utterly dire. The use of online 'social networking' may well be next to go for me - it's soul destroying watching 'The Descent Of Man' unfurl before my eyes, grown adults reduced to reactionary rants purloined from the gutter press or 'sharing' infantile pictures and/or 'jokes'."
http://retardedkingdom.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-fake-sound-of-media-morality.html
Showing posts with label Power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Power. Show all posts
Tuesday, 7 January 2014
Thursday, 19 December 2013
Mark Williams-Thomas Makes A Meal Of Mr Watkins, Like Only He Could - Incorrectly, Exaggerated And With False, Sombre, Platitudes
Ian Watkins is a v dangerous predatory paedophile. As are the 2 mothers who were overcome by his influence to abuse/facilitate own children
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) December 19, 2013
Thank you for the very kind tweets - the details of Ian Watkins & his co - offenders abuse is some of the worst I have ever heard.
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) December 19, 2013
Did person who carried out risk assessment know full facts of #Watkins offending. If she did then she should not be undertaking assessments
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) December 18, 2013
A@ incredibly long day Covering #Watkins case & hearing the horrific abuse he & the 2 women inflicted on the children will b with me forever
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) December 19, 2013
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
Tuesday, 17 December 2013
Mr W, Ms B and Ms P - Like Lambs To The Slaughter
http://www.courtserve.net/courtlists/current/crown/cardi_T131218.01.htm
*****
Posted: 18/12/2013 09:35 GMT | Updated: 18/12/2013 11:17 GMT
IW, Lostprophets Singer To Be Sentenced Today For Child Sex Offences
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/12/18/ian-watkins-lostprophets-singer-sentenced-today-child-sex-offences_n_4464179.html?1387365449&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000008
18 Dec 2013 11:21
Live updates: IW to be sentenced over child sex offences
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/live-lostprophets-ian-watkins-sentenced-6415935
12:06pm UK, Wednesday 18 December 2013
IW Sentencing: Live Updates
http://news.sky.com/story/1184144/ian-watkins-sentencing-live-updates
Dec 18, 2013 12:55
IW sentencing: Live updates as Lostprophets singer faces lengthy jail term for child sex offences
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ian-watkins-sentencing-live-updates-2937760
6 minutes ago
Lostprophets singer IW to be sentenced
http://www.itv.com/news/story/2013-12-18/lostprophets-singer-ian-watkins-sentenced/
*****
Dec 18, 2013
IPCC update on IW related matters
http://www.ipcc.gov.uk/news/ipcc-update-ian-watkins-related-matters
*****
Very good, live, coverage from ...
Rupert Evelyn @rupertevelyn
https://twitter.com/rupertevelyn
Marcus Edwards @c4marcus
https://twitter.com/c4marcus
*****
18/12/2013
IW sentenced – 35 years imprisonment
"We covered the case of IW (and two women, named as A and B) who pleaded guilty on 26th November 2013 to various child sex offences. His case was adjourned for sentence. We had said that (on the information that was in the news reports) that the likely sentence was in the region of 20-25 years, and that he was in line for a sentence of life imprisonment."
http://ukcriminallawblog.com/2013/12/18/ian-watkins-sentenced
22/08/2013
Extended Determinate Sentences (New 2012 extended sentences)
http://ukcriminallawblog.com/2013/08/22/2012-extended-sentences-extended-determinate-sentence
18 Dec 2013 14:38
I W sentenced to 29 years in prison for sexually abusing children
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/ian-watkins-sentenced-29-years-6422696
Wednesday 18 December 2013 14.40 GMT
IW jailed for 35 years for child sex crimes
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/18/ian-watkins-jailed-child-sex-crimes?CMP=twt_gu
Wednesday, Dec 18 2013
35 years in prison: Lostprophets paedophile [not] IW shakes in the dock as he is sentenced for attempting to rape a baby and mothers who helped him abuse their children are jailed for 14 and 17 years each
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2525722/Lostprophets-paedophile-Ian-Watkins-described-child-sex-abuse-crimes-mega-lolz.html
*****
R v IW and Others
http://www.crimeline.info/case/r-v-ian-watkins
Wednesday, December 18th, 2013
Statements released by South Wales Police in relation to the case of IW
http://www.south-wales.police.uk/news/statement-released-south-wales-police-relation-ian-watkins-case
*****
Comment:
Mr Ian Watkins - not a Paedophile - not one harmed 'victim' - another 'victory', of hysteria, over natural justice, truth and reality.
*****
19/12/13
Ian Watkins victims are sadly not unique, writes @NSPCC chief @PeterWanless in today's @DailyMirror http://t.co/RLT1JkbWfP
— Daily Mirror (@DailyMirror) December 19, 2013
Statements from South Wales Police & PCC Alun Michael following the sentencing of Ian Watkins & co-defendants http://t.co/i75XA7CnxF
— South Wales Police (@swpolice) December 18, 2013
(Embedded Tweets - click date)Comment:
No harm (well, not to any 'victim'). Not Paedophiles. Just the usual, money-grabbing hyperbole, scaremongering, lies, propaganda and exploitation, from the NSPCC and DM.
*****
More to follow.
*****
Ian Watkins Court Trial
http://ianwatkinscourttrial.createaforum.com/index.php
*****
Related Garbage
http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiratard/comments/1t9vqj/ian_watkins_was_set_up
Thursday, 28 November 2013
Welcome To ...
LOSTPROPHETS - A Town Called Hypocrisy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZzgN7efCoE
*****
Male Genital Mutilation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision
Female Genital Mutilation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
Children And War
https://www.google.com/search?q=Children+war&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=-weXUrfzCIKd7Qbz6oDoCw&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=860
*****
You know who you are.
The OSC
Tuesday, 25 June 2013
Every Relationship (For All Intents And Purposes) Is A Balance Of Power, Whatever The Relative Ages
Monday 24 June 2013 16.38 BST
JF: child protection experts warn against romanticising case
"NSPCC says media must be careful [sic] of presenting relationship between teacher and pupil as love story [which is exactly what it is]
JF, who was jailed for five and a half years after starting a sexual relationship with a child.
To glance at some headlines, a reader might think this was a conventional love story: "I still love him"; "He's wonderful, I'll fight for him". But this was, child protection professionals agree, a relationship built around abuse [sic].
JF, a maths teacher who turns 31 on Tuesday, was jailed for five and a half years last week for beginning a sexual relationship with a pupil shortly after her 15th birthday and escaping to France with the girl when their connection was discovered.
Post-verdict coverage has shone a spotlight on the many ethical and regulatory difficulties of such cases. While newspapers have remained condemnatory of F himself, interviews with the girl, now 16 [legal age], and with F's family, traced a distinctly romantic narrative, with talk of her visiting her ex-teacher in prison, sticking by him and even future marriage.
Beyond the unequal basis of their relationship, the court heard that the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is psychologically vulnerable [sic] and from a difficult background [sic]. Her decision to side with F and his family has seen her cut contact altogether with her own mother.
Stories, primarily in the Sun and Mail titles, detailing her feelings for F, including reprints of emotionally charged letters, were "a concern", said Jon Brown, who leads on child protection issues [sic] for the NSPCC charity. "There's an awful lot of work that still needs to be done with the media in explaining [lying to] and, in a sense, educating [brainwashing] journalists so they do have a better understanding [sic] of the reality [sic] of these relationships," he said.""
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/24/jeremy-forrest-child-protection-experts
*****
JUNE 25, 2013
The NSPCC – Suppressing the Truth
"They are deeply upset.
Journalists need re-programming ’educating’, so that they don’t report what people say to them.
Reporting factual statements is unhelpful to the NSPCCs agenda.
This morning they are waving clause 6 of the PCC code, not to mention clause 16, in front of the terrified journalists and warning of the direst consequences. The Guardian is so upset on their behalf that they are providing links to both the Daily Mail and The Sun (unheard of!) so that their readers can see exactly what such irresponsible journalism looks like without the Guardian having to sully itself by printing similar off-message words.
What could have been said to provoke the NSPCC so? Has Harriet the Harridan been advocating paedophilia again? Did David Cameron issue a statement saying the NSPCC were a waste of space? Is Chanel 4 making a new version of ‘I’m a celebrity, get me out of here’ from Lewes prison? Is Haley the only male actor left in Coronation Street? Nothing so minor unfortunately.
A young woman has declared her love for the man in her life. He has been sent to prison and she has stated that she will stand by him, wait for him.
And those dastardly right wing journalists have reported that she said that! Shock horror! This, in the NSPCCs view is reprehensible. It is ‘romanticising’ what could have been a donation winning situation for the NSPCC. It’s, it’s, unethical, that’s what it is, it’s unethical, they splutter…in fact they go so far as to claim that these journalists are only reporting fact – in an effort to sell newspapers. Who-da-thought-it?
“But then there’s an ethical issue which is broader than the code: are papers talking about this in a responsible way?”
Ideally, the NSPCC would have liked to see the young woman, an adult, illustrated by a pixilated image of an eight year old child in a winsomely too long nightdress clutching a teddy bear. JF, for it is he, illustrated by ‘picture posed by an actor’ – preferably a stern faced older man with a slight leer exposing yellow teeth, in mortar and gown, brandishing a cane. If only the regulation existed that they are calling for, they would have supplied the prose, written by a computer programmed to insert the words ‘child abuse’ into every sentence, and liberally sprinkled with keywords like ‘authoritarian figure’ and ‘vulnerable child’.
Unfortunately for them, the regulation does not yet exist, nor is Ms Mega Speech-Impediment (apologies to the young woman, not very PC but it is PCC) minded to go along with their charade."
http://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/the-nspcc-suppressing-the-truth/
JF: child protection experts warn against romanticising case
"NSPCC says media must be careful [sic] of presenting relationship between teacher and pupil as love story [which is exactly what it is]
JF, who was jailed for five and a half years after starting a sexual relationship with a child.
To glance at some headlines, a reader might think this was a conventional love story: "I still love him"; "He's wonderful, I'll fight for him". But this was, child protection professionals agree, a relationship built around abuse [sic].
JF, a maths teacher who turns 31 on Tuesday, was jailed for five and a half years last week for beginning a sexual relationship with a pupil shortly after her 15th birthday and escaping to France with the girl when their connection was discovered.
Post-verdict coverage has shone a spotlight on the many ethical and regulatory difficulties of such cases. While newspapers have remained condemnatory of F himself, interviews with the girl, now 16 [legal age], and with F's family, traced a distinctly romantic narrative, with talk of her visiting her ex-teacher in prison, sticking by him and even future marriage.
Beyond the unequal basis of their relationship, the court heard that the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is psychologically vulnerable [sic] and from a difficult background [sic]. Her decision to side with F and his family has seen her cut contact altogether with her own mother.
Stories, primarily in the Sun and Mail titles, detailing her feelings for F, including reprints of emotionally charged letters, were "a concern", said Jon Brown, who leads on child protection issues [sic] for the NSPCC charity. "There's an awful lot of work that still needs to be done with the media in explaining [lying to] and, in a sense, educating [brainwashing] journalists so they do have a better understanding [sic] of the reality [sic] of these relationships," he said.""
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/24/jeremy-forrest-child-protection-experts
*****
JUNE 25, 2013
The NSPCC – Suppressing the Truth
"They are deeply upset.
Journalists need re-programming ’educating’, so that they don’t report what people say to them.
Reporting factual statements is unhelpful to the NSPCCs agenda.
This morning they are waving clause 6 of the PCC code, not to mention clause 16, in front of the terrified journalists and warning of the direst consequences. The Guardian is so upset on their behalf that they are providing links to both the Daily Mail and The Sun (unheard of!) so that their readers can see exactly what such irresponsible journalism looks like without the Guardian having to sully itself by printing similar off-message words.
What could have been said to provoke the NSPCC so? Has Harriet the Harridan been advocating paedophilia again? Did David Cameron issue a statement saying the NSPCC were a waste of space? Is Chanel 4 making a new version of ‘I’m a celebrity, get me out of here’ from Lewes prison? Is Haley the only male actor left in Coronation Street? Nothing so minor unfortunately.
A young woman has declared her love for the man in her life. He has been sent to prison and she has stated that she will stand by him, wait for him.
And those dastardly right wing journalists have reported that she said that! Shock horror! This, in the NSPCCs view is reprehensible. It is ‘romanticising’ what could have been a donation winning situation for the NSPCC. It’s, it’s, unethical, that’s what it is, it’s unethical, they splutter…in fact they go so far as to claim that these journalists are only reporting fact – in an effort to sell newspapers. Who-da-thought-it?
“But then there’s an ethical issue which is broader than the code: are papers talking about this in a responsible way?”
Ideally, the NSPCC would have liked to see the young woman, an adult, illustrated by a pixilated image of an eight year old child in a winsomely too long nightdress clutching a teddy bear. JF, for it is he, illustrated by ‘picture posed by an actor’ – preferably a stern faced older man with a slight leer exposing yellow teeth, in mortar and gown, brandishing a cane. If only the regulation existed that they are calling for, they would have supplied the prose, written by a computer programmed to insert the words ‘child abuse’ into every sentence, and liberally sprinkled with keywords like ‘authoritarian figure’ and ‘vulnerable child’.
Unfortunately for them, the regulation does not yet exist, nor is Ms Mega Speech-Impediment (apologies to the young woman, not very PC but it is PCC) minded to go along with their charade."
http://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/the-nspcc-suppressing-the-truth/
Thursday, 20 December 2012
Part Of The Universal Human Condition
December 20, 2012, 3:38 am
Why Do Groups of Men Attack Lone Women?
"The psychologist David Lisak is an expert on violent crime, including murder and rape. He taught courses on the subject at the University of Massachusetts for 22 years, while working as a forensic consultant to universities, the U.S. military and law enforcement officials. He has worked on hundreds of criminal cases.
Dr. Lisak, 58, became a consultant to the United States Air Force Academy after a sexual assault scandal there in 2003. He works with military commanders and officers to educate them about sexual violence and its causes.
India Ink spoke with him after the gang rape of a young woman in Delhi this week, asking about what motivates men to attack women and what governments and law-enforcement officials can do to try to curb these attacks. Dr. Lisak emphasized that he has no expertise in India but said that many aspects of this subject, including power struggles and aggression, are part of the universal human condition."
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/understanding-the-psychology-of-gang-rape/
Why Do Groups of Men Attack Lone Women?
"The psychologist David Lisak is an expert on violent crime, including murder and rape. He taught courses on the subject at the University of Massachusetts for 22 years, while working as a forensic consultant to universities, the U.S. military and law enforcement officials. He has worked on hundreds of criminal cases.
Dr. Lisak, 58, became a consultant to the United States Air Force Academy after a sexual assault scandal there in 2003. He works with military commanders and officers to educate them about sexual violence and its causes.
India Ink spoke with him after the gang rape of a young woman in Delhi this week, asking about what motivates men to attack women and what governments and law-enforcement officials can do to try to curb these attacks. Dr. Lisak emphasized that he has no expertise in India but said that many aspects of this subject, including power struggles and aggression, are part of the universal human condition."
http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/understanding-the-psychology-of-gang-rape/
Saturday, 13 October 2012
So Much Stupid, Ignorance and Denial In One Person - Please meet, Ms Deborah Orr
Saturday 13 October 2012
For those who seek much younger sexual partners, it's about power, not sex
"Relationships of great generational inequality [sic] – even those that are legal – are often exploitative [and, if one is?]
Britain is being engulfed in an avalanche of child abuse claims [well, at least you are correct, there, Debs], not all of them against Jimmy Savile. Others are being named too. While it's tempting to place all these claims in a box marked "historic" [hysterical], that's not good enough. Sure, paedophilia [sic] is a word that has passed into the vernacular, having been obscure [only to the ignorant] in the 1960s and 1970s, when much of this behaviour took place. Stars taking advantage of underage people for sex may not even have identified their own behaviour as paedophilic [sic] at that time of "sexual revolution".
But the only thing that has decisively changed is that there is now clear recognition that it is perverted [welcome to the early 1900s, readers], as well as illegal, to have sex with a person who is under the age of 16. Seventeen-year-old women are still a more archetypal representation of female sexuality than 37-year-old women. This is all put down to the loveliness of very young bodies, when it is really about the loveliness of the ease with which very young people can be placed "in awe" of older people who give them sexual attention. [perhaps it is all these things and more, Debs, and why not?]
This is about power, not sex. [that you believe there is any difference, is laughable, Debs] Young people are taught that an older person's attention is flattering. [are they, where?] It's not. [it is] It's exploitative. [and exploitation is 'bad' or rare, why?] Those who crave much younger partners might as well have a sign round their neck saying: "Emotionally immature." [Oh, Debs, perhaps part of your 'history' is now climbing out? Natural regret about, and loss of, past lovers, can sting, we know]
Yes, love can transcend generations, but when a relationship of generational inequality [sic] starts with sex, it starts as an exploitative relationship. [Love is Sex, Sex is Love, Debs - all part of the same process] People are free to have such relationships, of course. But they need to be seen for what they are. {natural, healthy, widespread and, truth be told, normal - not that the latter matters]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/oct/13/younger-sexual-partners-power-exploitative
Finding young women attractive doesn't mean all men are predators
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/jane-graham/finding-young-women-attractive-doesnt-mean-all-men-are-predators-16223319.html#ixzz29AzF9A7l
For those who seek much younger sexual partners, it's about power, not sex
"Relationships of great generational inequality [sic] – even those that are legal – are often exploitative [and, if one is?]
Britain is being engulfed in an avalanche of child abuse claims [well, at least you are correct, there, Debs], not all of them against Jimmy Savile. Others are being named too. While it's tempting to place all these claims in a box marked "historic" [hysterical], that's not good enough. Sure, paedophilia [sic] is a word that has passed into the vernacular, having been obscure [only to the ignorant] in the 1960s and 1970s, when much of this behaviour took place. Stars taking advantage of underage people for sex may not even have identified their own behaviour as paedophilic [sic] at that time of "sexual revolution".
But the only thing that has decisively changed is that there is now clear recognition that it is perverted [welcome to the early 1900s, readers], as well as illegal, to have sex with a person who is under the age of 16. Seventeen-year-old women are still a more archetypal representation of female sexuality than 37-year-old women. This is all put down to the loveliness of very young bodies, when it is really about the loveliness of the ease with which very young people can be placed "in awe" of older people who give them sexual attention. [perhaps it is all these things and more, Debs, and why not?]
This is about power, not sex. [that you believe there is any difference, is laughable, Debs] Young people are taught that an older person's attention is flattering. [are they, where?] It's not. [it is] It's exploitative. [and exploitation is 'bad' or rare, why?] Those who crave much younger partners might as well have a sign round their neck saying: "Emotionally immature." [Oh, Debs, perhaps part of your 'history' is now climbing out? Natural regret about, and loss of, past lovers, can sting, we know]
Yes, love can transcend generations, but when a relationship of generational inequality [sic] starts with sex, it starts as an exploitative relationship. [Love is Sex, Sex is Love, Debs - all part of the same process] People are free to have such relationships, of course. But they need to be seen for what they are. {natural, healthy, widespread and, truth be told, normal - not that the latter matters]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2012/oct/13/younger-sexual-partners-power-exploitative
Finding young women attractive doesn't mean all men are predators
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/jane-graham/finding-young-women-attractive-doesnt-mean-all-men-are-predators-16223319.html#ixzz29AzF9A7l
Friday, 28 September 2012
Only Before Recess
Sep 26, 2012 3:42pm
Should Teachers Having Sex With 18-Year-Old Students Be Illegal?
"Former high school teacher BNC s is shown during a recess in her trial in Fort Worth, Texas, in this Aug. 14, 2012
Former high school English teacher BC is serving five years in prison for having sex with five of her students — but unlike other teachers who wound up behind bars for having affairs with their underaged pupils, all of C’ teen sex partners were 18 or older.
Still, under Texas law, the sex acts made C, 28 years old and the mother of three small children, a felon: The law prohibits any educator in a primary or secondary school from having sex with an enrolled student of any age.
Assistant District Attorney Elizabeth Beach prosecuted C' case and defended the law in an interview with “20/20.”"
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/09/should-teachers-having-sex-with-18-year-old-students-be-illegal/
Should Teachers Having Sex With 18-Year-Old Students Be Illegal?
"Former high school teacher BNC s is shown during a recess in her trial in Fort Worth, Texas, in this Aug. 14, 2012
Former high school English teacher BC is serving five years in prison for having sex with five of her students — but unlike other teachers who wound up behind bars for having affairs with their underaged pupils, all of C’ teen sex partners were 18 or older.
Still, under Texas law, the sex acts made C, 28 years old and the mother of three small children, a felon: The law prohibits any educator in a primary or secondary school from having sex with an enrolled student of any age.
Assistant District Attorney Elizabeth Beach prosecuted C' case and defended the law in an interview with “20/20.”"
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/09/should-teachers-having-sex-with-18-year-old-students-be-illegal/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)