Showing posts with label AoC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AoC. Show all posts

Monday, 5 September 2016

What Goes Around ...

We are back, gentle readers. Reasons will always follow :)

For now, why not spread your wings :) ...

http://onlymapinthevillage.blogspot.co.uk/

Vigilante Banishment In The Age Of Post-Enlightenment
 
Posted by at 1 comment:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 29 November 2014

Chloe Returns, Exercising Her Towering Intellect and Judgement

Published on Nov 26, 2014

Big bank bastards

  

Prelude - @14:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tmOG32VV_o

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

 The Paedophile (Very Unlikely To Be One) Next Door

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/the-paedophile-very-unlikely-to-be-one.html

*****

Published on Nov 29, 2014

Top tossers & top troopers of the week 29.11.14


The Analysis - @ 2:08

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YT5qnsl5vA

*****

Irrelevant.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 13 November 2014

Stupid Is, As Stupid Asks

 
  
Quite Legit

*****

Nov 13, 2014 10:28  

The Home Office allegedly funded a paedophile group in the 1970s. Why?

"The Home Office may have covered up historic child abuse allegations - but what of the "Paedophile Information Exchange" group that was allegedly funded by the department?"

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/home-office-allegedly-funded-paedophile-4613058

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)


Sophie Warnes @SophieWarnes https://twitter.com/SophieWarnes

*****

Sophie Warnes

http://www.independent.co.uk/biography/sophie-warnes

http://uk.linkedin.com/in/sophiewarnes

http://journalisted.com/sophie-warnes

http://about.me/sophiewarnes

http://www.theguardian.com/profile/sophie-warnes

Anna Leach

Anna Leach @annajleach https://twitter.com/annajleach

http://uk.linkedin.com/in/annaleach

http://www.theguardian.com/profile/leach-anna

http://annaleach.net

http://annaleach.net/about-me

*****


https://whatcanidoaboutit.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/mary-whitehouse-versus-pie-the-home-office-1978/#more-205

https://whatcanidoaboutit.wordpress.com/2013/01/21/further-pie-research 

*****

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/theresa-may-secretary-of-state-for-conspiracy-theories/16192#.VGdSemffekR

http://www.gayleft1970s.org/issues/issue07.asp

http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/left-behind.html

*****

2014

Independent Investigation into the Alleged Payment of Home Office Funding to the Paedophile Information Exchange; Final Report 


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/372927/Annex_F_-_Review_2.pdf 

November 12, 2014 

Errors and Omissions in the Wanless/Whittam Report

http://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2014/11/12/errors-in-the-wanlesswhitam-report

*****

8:16PM GMT 15 Nov 2014

Westminster 'paedophile ring': now where does the investigation go?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11232988/Westminster-paedophile-ring-now-where-does-the-investigation-go.html

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Published: 22:06, 15 November 2014 | Updated: 23:44, 15 November 2014

Revealed: How Gordon Brown was duped into aiding the founder of vile paedophile group who infiltrated gay rights rally

">Gordon Brown was duped into backing an event by PIE founder Ian Dunn,
>Former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook and Brown sponsored the congress,
>PIE was trying to piggy-back gay rights conference In Edinburgh in 1974,
>The vile group planned to use the event to push its disturbing agenda,
>Paedophiles were secretly invited to the conference from around the world,
>Delegates were invited to attend a planned paedophilia 'workshop',
>Former PM says he did not know PIE were at the congress 40 years ago,
>Links between Labour grandees and PIE were revealed earlier this year."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2836107/How-Gordon-Brown-duped-aiding-founder-vile-paedophile-group-Paedophile-Information-Exchange-infiltrated-gay-rights-rally-hoodwinking-future-PM.html

******

1980 - Revised e-edition 2014.

Paedophilia - The Radical Case - Tom O'Carroll

https://www.ipce.info/host/radicase

Monday, 14 July, 2014 

PIE spy, with my tabloid eye…

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/pie-spy-with-my-tabloid-eye

Heretic TOC; Not the dominant narrative - PIE 

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/tag/paedophile-information-exchange
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 22 August 2014

Yes Chloe, There Is, Clearly, Something Wrong With Your Brain - Beware Of Slander And Language Content

Published on Aug 11, 2014

Harman pt2



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-k-yfAGQvs&feature=youtu.be 

Published on Aug 11, 2014 

Dear Harriet Harman



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEsJIo_GkRg&list=UUhUnNa1m57uu8v05wMPkcIw

*****

July 28, 2014 - 4:45pm

Chloe George has Important Questions

http://www.ukcolumn.org/forum/alternativefree-media/chloe-george-has-important-questions

*****

About

"Asking the big questions to the elite criminals, paedophiles & corrupt.

Danielle La Verite / Chloe George tackles those who need to answer for their crimes.

Catch me on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/LaVerite8?fref=nf

Subscribe on YouTube & google+"

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChUnNa1m57uu8v05wMPkcIw/about

Chloe George

"About

Tagline Asking the BIG questions

Introduction

I've an ongoing series of videos, asking questions to the corrupt, paedo, elite establishment."

https://plus.google.com/102059096137272620147/posts

Danielle La Verite 

Danielle La Verite @mslaverite8 https://twitter.com/mslaverite8/with_replies

https://www.facebook.com/LaVerite8?fref=nf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NoohTvRF8o

http://www.daniellelaverite.com
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 28 March 2014

On Persecution And Colleges

*****

20 March 2014 Last updated at 11:35

 Sex offender expelled from Dundee and Angus College

"A convicted sex attacker managed to enrol on a college course despite being banned from contact with teenagers.

CD was banned from unsupervised contact with anyone under the age of 17 after sexually assaulting a young woman while driving a taxi.

But he won a place at Dundee and Angus College alongside 16-year-old girls without disclosing his criminal past."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-26664221

20 March 2014 8.00am.

Convicted sex offender thrown out of Dundee college

"A convicted sex offender has been expelled from a course at Dundee & Angus College which he secured without revealing his criminal record.

CD was able to mingle with 16-year-old female students despite being on the sex offenders register and banned from having unsupervised contact with teenagers under 17.

His presence at the Gardyne campus in Dundee, where he had enrolled on a computer course, came to the attention of his victim’s family. D was convicted of the offence in 2012."

http://www.eveningtelegraph.co.uk/news/local/convicted-sex-offender-thrown-out-of-dundee-college-1.276226

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 2 March 2014

Kiss Us At The Paedogate

Sunday, 2 March, 2014

Paedogate puts the past in the pillory

"You know when a scandal has made it to the news big league when it gets the “gate” tag, like Watergate. Well, the last ten days or so in the UK have given us Paedogate, in which the rabid right wing Daily Mail launched a sustained campaign to expose left wing support for the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) when I was its Chair back in the 1970s.

The aim was clearly to embarrass and undermine three leading figures in the Labour party. It worked. Initially dismissed as old hat because the story had been around for years as vague internet gossip, the Mail’s detailed trawl through publicly accessible archives and their own newspaper cuttings library paid off. At last, the rest of the national media finally sat up and paid attention in a big way. The Labour trio who were under fire, thanks to their work for the National Council of Civil Liberties (NCCL), to which PIE was affiliated, were forced to respond publicly. Harriet Harman, now Deputy Leader of the Labour party, angrily denounced the Mail. She had been an NCCL legal officer. Patricia Hewitt, a former cabinet minister in Tony Blair’s government, had a tougher hand to play because she had been NCCL’s General Secretary and had been closely associated with the organisation’s own very radical policy on the age of consent. She was forced into an apology in which she disowned this policy and also wrote ..."

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2014/03/02/paedogate-puts-the-past-in-the-pillory

*****

Paedophilia - The Radical Case

"Chapter 11: The Beginnings of Radical Paedophilia in Britain"

http://www.ipce.info/host/radicase/chap11.htm
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 1 March 2014

So Correct (Almost Totally, In Fact), We Will Reproduce It All

*****

“If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, 
we don't believe in it at all.”
 Noam Chomsky
*****

26 February 2014

The NCCL was right to affiliate with PIE

"If civil liberties groups won't defend free speech for the unpopular, what's the point of them?

To see the parlous state of moral and political debate in twenty-first-century Britain, look no further than the Harriet Harman / PIE scandal.

Here, in this resuscitation of old claims and smears about the relationship between the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL) and the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), we had an opportunity for a serious debate about freedom of speech and association, about whether even the most unpopular groups in society - and what could be more unpopular than an organisation of self-defined paedophiles? - should have the right to exist and to give voice to their ideology.

But instead, we’ve ended up with yet another shrill clash of competing paedo smears, with the Daily Mail suggesting that Harman (who was legal officer of the NCCL from 1978 to 1982) was a friend of perverts, and Harman’s backers in the press countering that actually it’s the Daily Mail that ‘sexualises children’. All matters of principle in the old NCCL / PIE relationship have been brutally elbowed aside by every side in this smear-fest disguised as a debate, where the national sport of ‘Hunt the paedo’ has trumped measured discussion of rights, freedom, and unpopular causes.

You’d never know it from the media frenzy, but there are some important principles at stake in this flashback to the old ties between the NCCL and PIE - primarily the principle that even the most unpopular people in a society should be free to associate with each other and to propagate their ideas and advocate for legal change. No, not free to abuse children or plan to abuse children, as some individual PIE members were arrested for doing, but free to express an outlook, however warped that outlook might appear to the rest of society.

The truth is that the NCCL was right both to have PIE as an affiliate and to defend its members against charges of ‘corrupting public morals’. Why? Because a key role of any civil liberties group worth its name is to defend the rights of association of the most loathed sections of society, to ensure that even the profoundly unpopular enjoy the same liberties, most importantly freedom of speech, as the respectable and the right-on.

For all its faults, the NCCL of the 1970s and early 1980s was a pretty good civil liberties organisation, certainly in comparison with the aloof, lawyerly outfit it has become in recent years under its new name of Liberty. Indeed, its willingness to have PIE as an affiliate, and to defend its members against the ‘crimes’ of publishing a non-pornographic magazine and posting private letters to each other containing sexual fantasies, shows just how serious it was about civil liberties, and that it possessed that key belief that should motor all defenders of freedom - that the freedoms of speech and association are universal and must extend even to those we hate or simply do not understand.

Reading the smearing articles about Harman - and also Patricia Hewitt and Jack Dromey, two other Labour bigwigs who were leaders of the NCCL when it had PIE as an affiliate between 1975 and 1983 - you could be forgiven for thinking that the NCCL had helped to facilitate actual acts of paedophila. It didn’t, of course. What it did was protect the freedom of individuals to promote the idea of paedophila and to define themselves as an association of paedophiles. And anyone who truly believes in freedom of thought and speech must, as an absolute bottom line, appreciate the fundamental moral difference between acts and ideas. Acting on paedophilic thoughts is a crime, as some PIE members discovered; having and voicing paedophilic thoughts is not, or at least shouldn’t be. There is a profound difference between breaking the law against child sex and campaigning for a change in the law on the age of consent, however perverse the reasoning for that campaign might seem. It is to the NCCL’s credit that it recognised this.

The NCCL’s involvement with PIE consisted primarily of defending its right to propagate its ideas and to exist as an organisation. It did not fight for the ‘right’ of PIE members to rape children, but rather defended PIE’s right to lobby, to publish a magazine with paedophilic ideas, to advocate for the abolition of the age of consent, and to post private letters to one another describing fantasies. Incredibly, some PIE members were actually arrested for doing that, for ‘sending obscene material by mail’ by writing personal letters to one another that were not publicly disseminated. If you do not recognise that as a pretty tyrannical assault on freedom of thought, then you need to go back to school and retake Liberty 101. The NCCL’s defence of PIE’s right to exist and its right to share ideas and information was correct and admirable.

If civil liberties organisations won’t defend the freedoms of speech and association of unpopular groups, then what is the point of them? Respectable groups don’t find their freedoms curtailed. The Women’s Institute is not prevented from publishing its ideas; Labour Party members aren’t arrested for what they write in private letters. It is only the moral outliers of a society who have their right to propagate their beliefs hammered by the authorities, whether it’s gay pornographers, the hard left, Nazis or self-confessed paedophiles. It is the freedom of speech of these deeply unpopular causes that true civil libertarians must defend, firstly because we recognise that freedom of speech means nothing unless it extends to everyone; and secondly because if we allow the state to define a certain outlook as so foul that it ‘corrupts public morals’ and thus must be extinguished, then we set a very dangerous precedent that might one day reach to us and call into question the acceptability of the views we hold, too.

In the US, where there is a far healthier attitude to freedom of speech, civil libertarians have for a long time asserted that it is entirely possible to defend a group’s right to exist, speak and publish (not to abuse, I reiterate) while simultaneously finding what that group says to be outrageous and grotesque. So the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has defended the right of American Nazis to hold a march in a predominantly Jewish town - not because it likes Nazis (some of the ACLU’s leading figures are Jews whose forefathers were obliterated in the Holocaust) but because it recognises that a serious commitment to political freedom means defending it even for the ‘enemies of freedom’.

Indeed, the ACLU has also defended the speech and association rights of paedophilic groups. In a court case in the early 2000s, it represented the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) in a civil suit in which the association was being sued by the parents of a 10-year-old boy who was raped and murdered by two paedophiles. The parents claimed NAMBLA’s (non-pornographic) website fuelled the outlook of the two paedophiles. The ACLU argued that there was no evidence to back this up and defended the right of NAMBLA to continue publishing its ideas and campaigning for the abolition of the age of consent.

Why did the ACLU do this? Not because it is pro-paedophile, of course, but because it is pro-freedom of thought – consistently and seriously. It recognised how extremely unpopular NAMBLA is; in her book Free for All: Defending Liberty in America Today, Wendy Kaminer, a leading member of the ACLU at the time of the NAMBLA case, and today a contributor to spiked, said ‘virtually no group of people is more unpopular’ than paedophiles and revealed that ‘the ACLU [was] excoriated by many and lost considerable support’ over its decision to defend NAMBLA. But it was the right thing to do, she wrote, because a ‘simple appreciation of freedom of thought and expression’ should make it clear that we must have freedom even for ‘offensive, unpopular speech’.

‘The notion that pubescent or prepubescent children may enter into consensual, mutually beneficial sexual relationships with adults seems deeply flawed to me, but so do a lot of ideas I don’t share’, wrote Kaminer. If libertarians ‘only protected sensible speech, we’d inhabit a very quiet nation indeed’, she said. That, right there, is a principled commitment to freedom of thought and expression, where it is recognised that even ideas we find flawed or foul should not be censored, and the groups who espouse them should not be broken up. The NCCL once took a similar Voltairean approach to freedom of speech and organisation, and it is now lambasted for doing so.

There have been two responses to the return of the NCCL / PIE scandal: the illiberal side says the NCCL was disgusting and crazy; the other, pro-Harman side is little better, saying, ‘Look, the Seventies were weird and sexual liberation went too far, so you can’t blame the NCCL for stupidly having PIE as an affiliate’. Both sides avoid the question of principle, the question of whether - regardless of PIE’s perverted ideas and massive unpopularity - it was right for civil libertarians to defend its right to exist and to speak and organise. The fundamental thing that was different in the Seventies was less the out-of-control sexual liberation stuff than the fact that civil liberties groups genuinely believed in civil liberty. It is the ditching of that core commitment to freedom in recent years, not least by Liberty itself, which means so many can now look back in horror at the fact that libertarians defended the right even of paedophiles to publish words and arguments. The coming back to life of the NCCL / PIE scandal really confirms how alarmingly illiberal, how disconnected from true freedom of thought and Voltairean ideals, modern Britain has become.

It’s easy to have a pop at Harriet Harman, even easier to mock the Daily Mail for being hypocritical. But that’s enough easy posturing. Let’s now ask some hard questions. Do you support the right of paedophiles to set up an organisation (no, not a child sex ring, but a campaigning organisation)? Do you support the right of paedophiles to publish their ideas and their written fantasies? Do you support the right of paedophiles to campaign for a reduction in the age of consent? Do you support these rights even though you find the content of the material being published and the arguments for a lower age of consent to be deeply immoral and perverse? I answer yes to those questions. How about you?

Brendan O’Neill is editor of spiked."

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-nccl-was-right-to-affiliate-with-pie/14718  

*****

Compare it, to this dangerous, repressive, ill-informed, ignorant and prejudicial tripe ...

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

10 March 2014

 In defence of the dark Seventies

"E is for ENLIGHTENMENT.

They might have had some trouble keeping the lights on in the 1970s, but in other ways the ‘dark decade’ looks quite enlightened. Of course, in much of Seventies Britain racism was not so much acceptable as obligatory. But building on the gains of the 1960s, big strides were made in the struggle for female emancipation and gay liberation, and for rights and freedom of expression more widely. It was in this pro-freedom atmosphere that, as Brendan O’Neill has argued on spiked, it would have been weird if a civil-liberties group such as the NCCL had not defended free speech for the odious Paedophile Information Exchange (which is in no way the same thing as defending child-sexual abuse).

The Seventies brought the last set-piece showdowns between the old moral pillars of the British Establishment and the new wave unleashed in the Sixties. The two most notorious of these were the 1971 obscenity trial of the editors of the alternative publication, Oz – which involved the spectacle of the children’s cartoon character, Rupert Bear, standing trial after Oz pictured him having sex with a naked granny – and the 1977 private prosecution for blasphemy brought by Mary Whitehouse against Gay News, over a poem in which a Roman centurion fantasised about having sex with the crucified Jesus Christ. Both trials initially went the way of the prosecution – the Oz editors were jailed, the Gay News editor given a suspended prison sentence – but in the longer run, the public response to the harsh sentences served only further to discredit the old censorious laws.

The irony is that while these battles for freedom of expression were being won, in the student unions the new strand of politically correct No-Platform censorship was growing. Twenty years later, those student union prigs were running the country."

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/in-defence-of-the-dark-seventies/14764#.UybxVc5vAQd

*****

2 April 2014

‘Everything should be open to question’

"‘You want to set up social institutions that accept that everything is open to question. Individuals don’t have to be open to doubt, but the system always should. It should always be checking and looking for mistakes. That’s institutionalised doubt, and it’s what liberal society fundamentally does. It looks for mistakes. It’s a constant, 24-hour, worldwide hunt for error. And all it asks of people is not that they be individually doubtful or squishy or moderate; all it asks is that they acknowledge the legitimacy of a social system that is based on doubt.’

Or, as the motto chosen by the Royal Society of London in 1660 put it, ‘Nullius in Verba’ (On the word of no one).

This is why the right not to be offended is so dangerous; it threatens the process by which we, as a society, develop knowledge. As The Kindly Inquisitors puts it: ‘The truth is that liberal science [Rauch’s term for knowledge production] demands discipline as well as licence, and to those who reject or flout its rules, it can be cruel. It excludes and restricts as well as tolerates… It does not give a damn about your feelings and happily tramples them in the name of finding truth… Self-esteem, sensitivity, respect for others’ beliefs, renunciation of prejudice are all good as far as they go. But as primary social goals, they are incompatible with the peaceful and productive advancement of human knowledge. To advance knowledge, we must all sometimes suffer. Worse than that, we must inflict suffering on others.’"

http://www.spiked-online.com/freespeechnow/fsn_article/everything-should-be-open-to-question#.Uz692qLm2uN
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 27 February 2014

Hahahahaha - Better Late Than Never, Murdoch !!!

(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

Last Updated: 28th February 2014

Labour chiefs: It’s OK to have sex with 10-yr-olds

"Sun exposes full horror of paedophile plan."

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/5475224/labour-chief-patricia-hewitt-sorry-for-backing-paedo-plan.html

******

28 February 2014

Hewitt apologises over PIE links 

"An NCCL press release published in March 1976 with only Ms Hewitt's name on it called for both the age of consent to be lowered to 10 and for incest to be legalised, according to The Sun.

The document, the newspaper claims, says: "NCCL proposes that the age of consent should be lowered to 14, with special provision for situations where the partners are close in age, or where consent of a child over ten can be proved."

Referring to an NCCL report on reforming sex laws, it reportedly says: "The report argues that the crime of incest should be abolished. It says, 'In our view, no benefit accrues to anyone by making incest a crime when committed between mutually consenting persons over the age of consent'."

The Sun also claimed to have seen minutes of an NCCL executive committee meeting in London in January 1976 which proposed reforms saying that a person under the age of 10 in a sexual relationship is incapable of giving consent.

But, the minutes said, if a sexual partner is over 10 and under 14, while there is a "rebuttable presumption" that no consent was given, a defendant "should have to prove that the child consented and understood the nature of the act to which consent was given".

Ms Hewitt, a former health secretary, acknowledged that it had been NCCL policy to cut the age of consent - although she said the proposal to do so had not been hers.

"I do not support reducing the age of consent or legalising incest," Ms Hewitt said. "As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.""

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/hewitt-apologises-over-pie-links-30049478.html

*****

Friday 28 February 2014 

PIE controversy: Hewitt 'Backed age of consent as low as 10'

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/pie-controversy-shadow-police-minister-jack-dromey-denies-supporting-call-for-age-of-consent-to-be-lowered-to-10-9160362.html

PUBLISHED: 19:16, 27 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:09, 28 February 2014

Explosive new evidence links Patricia Hewitt to paedophile group's calls for age of consent to be lowered to just 10 and that incest should not be a crime

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2569570/Patricia-Hewitt-breaks-silence-groups-links-National-Council-Civil-Liberties-boss.html

Friday 28 February 2014 09.52 GMT

Harriet Harman should never have been the target of this non-debate 

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/28/harriet-harman-non-debate-pie-nccl?CMP=twt_gu

 This article originally appeared in T&S Issue 33, Summer 1996

Weasel Words: Paedophiles and the Cycle of Abuse

http://www.troubleandstrife.org/articles/issue-33/weasel-words-paedophiles-and-the-cycle-of-abuse/

28:2:14: about 5 hours ago

Patricia Hewitt 'called for age of consent to be lowered to 10'

http://www.itv.com/news/story/2014-02-27/patricia-hewitt-apologises-over-paedophile-group

10:10am UK, Friday 28 February 2014 

Hewitt 'Backed Age Of Consent As Low As 10' 

http://news.sky.com/story/1218818/hewitt-backed-age-of-consent-as-low-as-10

Friday 28 February 2014 20.00 GMT

Patricia Hewitt backed NCCL policy of lowering age of consent 

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/28/patricia-hewitt-age-of-consent
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Last updated: February 28th, 2014

NCCL paedophilia scandal: Harriet Harman and Jack Dromey will have to resign
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100261647/nccl-paedophilia-scandal-harriet-harman-and-jack-dromey-will-have-to-resign

Mar 01, 2014 12:01

Ex-health secretary Patricia Hewitt DID 'back plan to lower age of consent to 14 and 10'

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ex-health-secretary-patricia-hewitt-back-3194538

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

Wednesday 18 June 2014 13.49 BST

The report exonerating Lord Justice Fulford should be published

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/jun/18/report-lord-justice-fulford-published

Update 18 June

Lord Justice Fulford

http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/latest-news.htm
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 20 February 2014

This Is Guy Adams - He Loves Old 'News' About 'Paedophiles'

*****

Firstly, The Historical Truth ...



Daily Mail, 2nd September 1983

*****

Then poor, young, Guy stumbles (or is pushed) in ...

 

Guy Adams - On occasion, so little need be said

Guy Adams @guyadams


*****

Not all bad, though ... Guy has, gormlessly, collected some more, very useful materials, for us ;)

Guy Adams, just another stupid, spineless kid, who will, eventually, pass through the shit-stained tabloid S-bend, of the water closet of time.

Plop.

The OSC.

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

PUBLISHED: 23:20, 20 February 2014 | UPDATED: 04:53, 21 February 2014

Surprise, surprise, the BBC has ignored our expose [sic] of Labour's [sic] links to a child sex scandal [sic]. QUENTIN LETTS imagines its reaction if those involved were Tory

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2564334/QUENTIN-LETTS-From-Today-Newsnight-Beebs-frenzy-Can-evil-Tories-survive-scandal.html

 PUBLISHED: 01:03, 21 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:03, 21 February 2014

How can Harriet call herself a feminist after this? 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2564409/JAN-MOIR-How-Harriet-call-feminist-this.html

PUBLISHED: 00:25, 21 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:27, 21 February 2014

 Inexcusable: Leading abuse charity [sic] demands [really?] apology from Labour trio with links to vile [sic] paedophile [sic] group

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2564397/Inexcusable-Leading-abuse-charity-demands-apology-Labour-trio-links-vile-paedophile-group.html

*****

Quentin Letts, Jan Moir and NAPAC - say no more 

*****

Now, they attempt to bring in other old, establishment, guard and professional victims, to try to polish a turd ...

****

8:40PM GMT 21 Feb 2014

The 'right’ to sleep with children was one 'civil liberty’ that NCCL supported

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10653944/The-right-to-sleep-with-children-was-one-civil-liberty-that-NCCL-supported.html

8:50PM GMT 21 Feb 2014

'We on the Left lacked the courage to be branded 'homophobic’, so we just ignored it. I wish I hadn’t' 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/10653950/We-on-the-Left-lacked-the-courage-to-be-branded-homophobic-so-we-just-ignored-it.-I-wish-I-hadnt.html

PUBLISHED: 02:18, 22 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:19, 22 February 2014

Apologists for paedophilia [sic]: As the Mail exposes more links between senior Labour figures and a vile paedophile group [sic], one man who was abused as a child asks them: why won't you admit you were wrong?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2565352/Apologists-paedophilia-As-Mail-exposes-links-senior-Labour-figures-vile-paedophile-group-one-man-abused-child-asks-wont-admit-wrong.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)


PUBLISHED: 02:18, 22 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:19, 22 February 2014

Apologists for paedophilia [sic]: As the Mail exposes more links between senior Labour figures and a vile paedophile group [sic], one man who was abused as a child asks them: why won't you admit you were wrong?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2565352/Apologists-paedophilia-As-Mail-exposes-links-senior-Labour-figures-vile-paedophile-group-one-man-abused-child-asks-wont-admit-wrong.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

 (Embedded tweets - click date)

*****
 (Embedded tweet - click date)

Sunday 23 February 2014

Labour trio can't stay silent on this paedophile claim

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/23/harriet-harman-patricia-hewitt-pie-nccl-paedophile-claims


(Embedded tweets - click date)

Feb 22, 2014 20:00

Senior Labour figures have serious questions to answer about past links to vile paedophile support group

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/carole-malone-labours-harriet-harman-3174026

Published: 23 February 2014 

Tell us more about your paedophile chums, Harriet 

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/comment/columns/rodliddle/article1378585.ece

PUBLISHED: 23:24, 19 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:25, 20 February 2014

Now say sorry! Ex-Yard chief calls on Labour trio to admit backing paedophilia [sic] was a 'huge mistake'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2563377/Now-say-sorry-Ex-Yard-chief-calls-Labour-trio-admit-backing-paedophilia-huge-mistake.html

PUBLISHED: 23:19, 23 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:50, 23 February 2014

How much longer can paedophilia apologists [?] stay silent? Even Left demands answers from senior Labour trio over links to child sex group

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2566273/How-longer-paedophilia-apologists-stay-silent-Even-Left-demands-answers-senior-Labour-trio.html

*****

Friday, 21 February, 2014

A dam smart way to divert attention

"PS: Briefly, as I have a plane to catch, I guess I should mention a rather less interesting propaganda issue than the Itaipu dam film. The Daily Mail has emailed me several times in the last few days asking for a comment on their latest misleading crap about supposed Labour government support for PIE in the 1970s.

I see no point in responding, as anything I say would merely serve as another angle to keep the story going.

Not that they need my help. They have already run the story in various versions before, and will no doubt do so again at the slightest excuse, whether they have anything new to say or not. They know what keeps their punters happy, so they cannot be accused of incompetence in terms of generating sales. However, so far as this particular repetitious saga is concerned they are beginning to resemble the Daily Express, which constantly recycles a handful of stories (death of Princess Diana, disappeared toddler Madeleine McCann, miracle cure for arthritis, stormy weather ahead) to its elderly readership, who are presumably so far gone in senility they cannot remember they read the same thing only a few days before.

The Mail can take the downmarket Express route if they wish. It may be successful in sales terms, but it is hardly a recipe for respected journalism."

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2014/02/21/a-dam-smart-way-to-divert-attention

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)

*****

Oh, but no, the mindless, conspiracy-dribbling and knuckle-dragging, does not stop there ...

*****

Published on Feb 19, 2014 

Meet the Pedo Supporting British MP's Sex With 4 Yr old Babies !!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rb6Cfj6IXE4

Published on Feb 19, 2014 

UK Column Live - 19th February 2014


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqGRTrZeemA&feature=c4-overview&list=UUr_dQZ0irQdRiwVatkuHPcA

*****

24 February 2014 Last updated at 17:30

Harriet Harman condemns paper's 'smear campaign'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26320942

Monday 24 February 2014 16.58 GMT

Ed Miliband rejects claims of Labour trio's links to paedophile campaign

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/24/ed-miliband-labour-links-paedophile-information-exchange?CMP=twt_fd

Friday, 21 February 2014

PIE - Questions that need answering

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/pie-questions-that-need-answering.html

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)

*****

24/02/2014

NCCL Statement

"In recent days I have been the subject of a politically-motivated smear campaign by the Daily Mail.

They have accused me of being an apologist for child sex abuse, of supporting a vile paedophile organisation, of having a relaxed attitude to paedophilia and of watering down child pornography laws. These are horrific allegations and I strongly deny them all of them.

This is not the first time the Daily Mail has made this horrible and untrue allegation. And, this is not the first time the Daily Mail has attacked me. The editor and proprietor of the Daily Mail are entitled to their political views and they are of course entitled to oppose what I stand for but they are not entitled to use their newspaper to smear me with innuendo because they disagree with me politically and hate my values.

I sincerely hope people won't believe these smears - I suspect even the Daily Mail doesn't believe them to be true. But given the seriousness and the aggression with which the Daily Mail are pursuing me, I feel that I need to put the facts in the public domain.

1. Allegation that I supported the lowering of the age of consent to 10

This is not true. I supported the equalisation of the age of consent (as set out in NCCL document “priorities and strategy for the executive committee June 1981") by making the age of consent the same for homosexual as well as for heterosexual sex.

2. Allegation that I opposed the law on incest

This is not true. The document they refer to was written by NCCL in 1976 before I started to work there.

3. Allegation that I was seeking to water down a proposed ban on child pornography.

This is not true. I supported the Protection of Children Bill 1978. At the start of the document it makes clear that “The NCCL deplores the exploitation of children whether in the form of use in commercial pornography or as victims of sexual assaults"

The submission argued for some amendments to guard against unintended consequences including:

- Parents being criminalised for taking pictures of their children on the beach or in the bath

- The use of pictures in sex education being criminalised

- We also proposed that the definition of indecent was too wide and instead proposed "obscene" as indecent was very broadly defined and could include Page 3 of the Sun.

The Mail have tried to make me guilty by way guilt by association.

NCCL was an organisation which anyone could apply to join and indeed any organisation could apply to be "an affiliate" on payment of a fee. When I was at NCCL there were around 6,000 members and nearly 1,000 affiliated organisations of which PIE was one.

Members and affiliates decided the organisation's policy at the AGM from year to year.

I was aware that because NCCL opposed censorship and supported gay rights, paedophiles had sought to exploit that and use NCCL as a vehicle to make their arguments. But by the time I came to work for NCCL this vile organisation had already been vigorously challenged within the organisation. Jack Dromey was instrumental in that challenge when he took over the chair of NCCL in 1976

The reason I decided to go to work for NCCL was because I actively supported the work they had done and in particular the work of their women's rights committee on the Equal Pay Act, on the introduction of the Sex Discrimination Act and for greater protection of victims of domestic violence and against race discrimination.

Since being elected to the House of Commons in 1982 and during my times in Ministerial Office I have always championed the rights of those subjected to sexual abuse - especially women and children.

I hope The Daily Mail will stop this campaign of smear and innuendo against me. I have done nothing wrong and am guilty of none of their grotesque allegations."

http://www.harrietharman.org/nccl-statement---24022014

February 24, 2014 6:35 pm

Harman issues statement on NCCL allegation – says she has been the victim of a “politically-motivated smear campaign”

http://labourlist.org/2014/02/harman-issues-statement-on-nccl-allegation-says-she-has-been-the-victim-of-a-politically-motivated-smear-campaign

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

History ..

October 19th, 2012

How Hattie’s friends defended paedophilia [sic]

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100261018/harriet-harman-the-nccl-and-paedophilia-my-article-from-2012/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

7:00AM GMT 09 Mar 2009

Harriet Harman under attack over bid to water down child pornography law

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/4949555/Harriet-Harman-under-attack-over-bid-to-water-down-child-pornography-law.html

Nov 11, 2012 09:11

Abuse scandals probe widens: The man who may hold key to UK's biggest paedophile network ever

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile-scandal-charles-napier-could-1430365#.UwzZOdpdliQ.twitter

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

24/02/2014

Including Harriet Harman on the tabloid paedophile row, Ukraine, and Cameron in Scotland

First broadcast: 24 Feb 2014

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03wsyqm

25/02/2014

Harman paedophile row and no trial for alleged IRA bomber. With Jeremy Paxman

First broadcast: 25 Feb 2014

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03wtcx4

 Laura Kuenssberg @bbclaurak

https://twitter.com/bbclaurak

*****

PUBLISHED: 22:41, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 08:14, 25 February 2014

But they still won't say sorry: Labour's Harman and Dromey finally break their silence over links to paedophile group

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567054/But-wont-say-sorry-Labours-Harman-Dromey-finally-break-silence-links-paedophile-group.html

PUBLISHED: 23:02, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:33, 24 February 2014

Not one hint of remorse: Harman and Dromey's statements, and the Mail's replies

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567098/Not-one-hint-remorse-Harriet-Harman-Jack-Dromeys-statements-Mails-replies.html

PUBLISHED: 01:01, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:01, 25 February 2014

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: Amid the obfuscation, one word is missing

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2567154/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-Amid-obfuscation-one-word-missing.html

 8:09PM GMT 24 Feb 2014

Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey, Patricia Hewitt and the Paedophile Information Exchange

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10659100/Harriet-Harman-Jack-Dromey-Patricia-Hewitt-and-the-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

Last updated: February 25th, 2014

Harriet Harman owes the British public a full explanation about the NCCL's links with paedophile group

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100261019/harriet-harman-owes-the-british-public-a-full-explanation-about-the-nccls-links-with-paedophile-group/

25/2/14: 44 minutes ago

Harriet Harman: 'I'm not going to apologise' 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26335330#TWEET1054627

25 February 2014 Last updated at 14:18

Harriet Harman expresses 'regret' after Daily Mail claims 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26333558#TWEET1054659

 2:00PM GMT 25 Feb 2014 

Harriet Harman's regret over civil rights body's paedophile group link 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10660306/Harriet-Harmans-regret-over-civil-rights-bodys-paedophile-group-link.html

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)

*****

Stop the Daily Mail sexualising children

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/daily-mail-mailonline-stop-the-daily-mail-sexualising-children

(Embedded tweets - click date)

Wednesday 26 February 2014 19.09 GMT

The fight against the sexualisation of children

http://www.theguardian.com/media/shortcuts/2014/feb/26/fight-against-sexualisation-children



Harriet Harman tweets Daily Mail website picture of girl aged 12 in bikini

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/25/harriet-harman-daily-mail-website-girl-bikini?CMP=twt_gu

*****

February 25, 2014

LABoraTORY PAEDOPHILIA: Part Two – why the Opposition has nothing much to say on the subject 

http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/laboratory-paedophilia-part-two-why-the-opposition-has-nothing-much-to-say-on-the-subject/

3:12pm UK, Tuesday 25 February 2014

Harman Denies Colluding With Paedophile Group

http://news.sky.com/story/1216883/harman-denies-colluding-with-paedophile-group

25 February 2014

How paedophile campaigners targeted civil liberties group 

http://www.channel4.com/news/harriet-harman-pie-nccl-daily-mail-labour

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

*****

February 25, 2014 at 08:23AM

Harriet Harman, the NCCL: Smear Or Legitimate Story?

"Iain takes the Daily Mail to task.

One of the most irritating phrases you will ever hear on television is “the BBC has learnt”. You’d think it meant that due to an original piece of journalism, the BBC has found out something nobody else has. Invariably it means the BBC has switched on Sky News.

Sky use a similar technique by using the phrase “Sky sources have told us.” But in each case it gives the broadcaster cover to hype up a story that might otherwise be considered a little pedestrian. And it perverts the news agenda. But this sort of thing happens every day. Take the current furore about Harriet Harman, the Daily Mail, and the NCCL.

Over the last few days both the BBC and Sky have studiously ignored the front pages of the Daily Mail, which has accused Harriet Harman of, well, I’m not totally sure exactly. It seems they think that because she was legal officer to the NCCL she must have somehow sympathised with the aims and objectives of one of its thousands of members, the Paedophile Information Exchange. It’s a ‘guilt by association’ smear which upon any reasonable examination doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. But day after day the Daily Mail demands that Harman, her husband Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt say ‘sorry’. It’s the same kind of tactic they used on Ed Miliband back in September.

Conservatives have up to now attacked the BBC for not even mentioning the issue, understandably believing that if three Tory politicians had been accused of something similar the BBC might not have been so coy. We’ll never know. However, the BBC could defend its position by pointing out that these allegations are nothing new and were first aired back in 2009. That would be a sustainable editorial position.

But yesterday the game changed when Harriet Harman decided to break cover and respond to the allegations by giving the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg an interview. It turned out to be a bad move. Instead of saying that it was a clear mistake for the NCCL to allow the PIE to be an associate member, she prevaricated and appeared a little shifty. Not only that she compounded her error by accusing the Daily Mail of being hypocritical because it publishes pictures of bikini-clad young women on its website. Women, not girls. So instead of closing down the story, it has merely given all other media outlets the excuse to cover it on the basis that if Harriet Harman has spoken about it, it becomes a legitimate story.

Cue BBC overkill. It’s now leading bulletins on the Today Programme and 5 Live. I haven’t seen Sky News yet this morning, so I can’t comment on what they are doing but as it’s the lead story on their website it’s probable that it is leading their bulletins too.

I’ve steered clear of the story on my LBC show, not because of any desire to be politically correct, but because I genuinely don’t see this as a massive story. I see it as a politically-motivated smear by a newspaper which is besmirching its own good name by running it day after day after day.

Does anyone seriously believe Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt have any paedophile sympathies? No, of course not. They worked for a ramshackle organisation which was run in an anarchic way. Just as anyone with dubious views can join a political party, anyone or any organisation with dubious views could join the NCCL. Does anyone seriously think that Harman, a lowly junior legal officer, had the power to expel a member who had legitimately joined? Presumably to do so would have meant changing the NCCL’s constitution. Perhaps she and her husband tried to do that. Who knows? But remember that one of the NCCL’s aims was to promote freedom of speech for everyone, no matter how vile their views.

The biggest mistake Harriet Harman has made was to give that interview to Newsnight. All it succeeded in doing was fanning the story’s flames and giving other media organisations and newspapers to excuse they needed to cover it. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but the overblown and blanket coverage it is getting is so out of proportion to the lack of coverage it got yesterday, that editors all over the place, but especially the BBC, would do well to examine why they are doing what they are doing. Are they doing this because it is such an important story or because of their collective feeling of guilt that maybe they should have given it some coverage well before today?

When I go into LBC today and we start planning my Drive programme, it will be interesting to see how the story has developed during the day. If I cover it at all – and at the moment my feeling is that I’d rather not – it will be looking at the behaviour of the Daily Mail, more than the behaviour of Harriet Harman. No doubt I will get a shedload of abuse for it, but hey – broad shoulders and all that."

http://www.lbc.co.uk/iain-dales-blog-30195/entry/120/9927

*****

(Embedded tweet - click date)

Feb 25, 2014 17:05

There is a paedophile elephant in the corner of Labour’s living room

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/labour-partys-paedogeddon-theyre-never-3182595#.Uwz4EjrL_3E.twitter

*****

Tuesday 25 February 2014 16.02 GMT

PIE, the NCCL and Harriet Harman: why she was right not to apologise

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/25/harriet-harman-daily-mail

8:17PM GMT 25 Feb 2014

New evidence casts doubt on Harriet Harman's defence over paedophile links

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10661251/New-evidence-casts-doubt-on-Harriet-Harmans-defence-over-paedophile-links.html

PUBLISHED: 10:55, 26 February 2014 | UPDATED: 11:48, 26 February 2014

Harman and Hewitt 'never tried to kick me out - they didn't want to rock the boat to protect their careers' claims child abuser ex leader of Paedophile Information Exchange

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568232/Harman-Hewitt-never-tried-kick-didnt-want-rock-boat-protect-careers-claims-child-abuser-ex-leader-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

9:55AM GMT 26 Feb 2014

'Harman did not want to rock the boat over links to child sex group'

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10662047/Harman-did-not-want-to-rock-the-boat-over-links-to-child-sex-group.html

Wednesday, 26 February, 2014

Home Secretary cheated justice by dying!

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2014/02/26/home-secretary-cheated-justice-by-dying/

*****
 (Embedded tweets - click date)

Tuesday 25 February 2014 20.59 GMT

Harriet Harman demands apology for Daily Mail's paedophile 'smears'

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/25/harriet-harman-apology-daily-mail-paedophile-smears?CMP=twt_gu

25 February 2014 20:10

Harriet Harman’s messy war with the Mail

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/02/harriet-harmans-messy-war-with-the-mail/

*****

The Daily Mail now grasps at ridiculous straws ...

PUBLISHED: 23:43, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:43, 24 February 2014 

BBC's censorship of paedophilia scandal 'reveals its left-wing bias': Corporation accused of refusing to report story to protect the Labour party 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567110/BBCs-censorship-paedophilia-scandal-reveals-left-wing-bias-Corporation-accused-refusing-report-story-protect-Labour-party.html

PUBLISHED: 23:18, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 09:38, 26 February 2014

The child sex attacker and Soviet spy who was in the vile group legitimised by Harman and chums

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567991/The-child-sex-attacker-Soviet-spy-vile-group-legitimised-Harman-chums.html

*****

26 February 2014 Last updated at 11:43

What is the Harman-Mail row about?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26335569

27 February 2014 Last updated at 13:14

How did the pro-paedophile group PIE exist openly for 10 years?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Wednesday 26 February 2014 

Looking back to the great British paedophile infiltration campaign of the 1970s 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/looking-back-to-the-great-british-paedophile-infiltration-campaign-of-the-1970s-9155610.html
(Embedded tweet - click date)

26/2/14: 2 hours ago

Jowell: Harman 'consistent' in opposition to PIE

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26350517

***

Uncle Tom still playing his silly little games ...

PUBLISHED: 23:10, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:36, 25 February 2014

Labour MP calls for probe into state cash for Paedophile Information Exchange after claims files that prove it received taxpayers' money have been shredded

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567999/Labour-MP-calls-probe-state-cash-Paedophile-Information-Exchange-claims-files-prove-received-taxpayers-money-shredded.html

 http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5198/police-poised-to-level-charges-in-paedophile-ring-linked-to-mps

Wednesday 26 February 2014

Labour MP Tom Watson admits he would not have touched paedophile rights group PIE 'with a bargepole' 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/labour-mp-tom-watson-admits-he-would-not-have-touched-paedophile-rights-group-pie-with-a-bargepole-9155518.html
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Feb 25, 2014 19:16

Tories must say sorry for 'covering up child sex abuse' before Harriet Harman has to apologise

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tom-watson-tories-must-apologise-3183049
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Tuesday 25 February 2014 20.22 GMT

Harriet Harman's handling of the Daily Mail 'smear' has been wholly inept

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/25/harriet-harman-daily-mail-smear-inept

*****

BBC loves PIE @BBCPropaganda

https://twitter.com/BBCPropaganda

*****

26 February 2014 18.04 GMT

Harriet Harman: 'The Daily Mail should be apologising, not me'

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/26/harriet-harman-daily-mail-apologising-paedophilia?CMP=twt_fd

*****

Wednesday 26 February 2014 23.02 GMT

Harriet Harman rejects claims from paedophile campaigner Tom O'Carroll

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/26/harriet-harman-rejects-claims-from-paedophile-campaigner-tom-ocarroll?CMP=twt_fd

Last updated Wed 26 Feb 2014 

Ex-PIE chair 'confident Harman was aware of situation' 

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-02-26/ex-pie-chair-confident-harman-was-aware-of-situation/

Wednesday 26 February 2014 23.41 GMT 

Lobbying by paedophile campaign revealed 

*****

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/26/lobbying-paedophile-campaign-revealed-hewitt

PUBLISHED: 23:32, 26 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:08, 27 February 2014

Harman's pressure group advertised for members in magazine for paedophiles: New evidence links NCCL to PIE while Harriet was legal chief

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568850/Harmans-pressure-group-advertised-members-magazine-paedophiles-New-evidence-links-NCCL-PIE-Harriet-legal-chief.html

 Last updated: February 27th, 2014 

The Harriet Harman 'paedophilia' scandal is a disaster of Labour's own making

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100261439/the-harriet-harman-paedophilia-scandal-is-a-disaster-of-labours-own-making/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10663580/Patricia-Hewitts-civil-rights-campaign-offered-legal-advice-to-adults-who-have-sex-with-14-year-olds.html

1 March 2014

What’s happened to Harriet Harman?

http://www.spectator.co.uk/life/status-anxiety/9148051/toby-young-whats-happened-to-harriet-harman/

Wednesday 26 February 2014 23.41 GMT

Lobbying by paedophile campaign revealed

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/26/lobbying-paedophile-campaign-revealed-hewitt

PUBLISHED: 01:36, 27 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:36, 27 February 2014

STEPHEN GLOVER: The Left argue that a sexual free-for-all in the 70s explains their tolerance of child sex abusers. What twisted bunkum

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2568920/STEPHEN-GLOVER-The-Left-argue-sexual-free-70s-explains-tolerance-child-sex-abusers-What-twisted-bunkum.html

*****

27/02/2014 

World at One 

"A good deal of sympathy for your objectives"

Duration: 09:06

"Shaun Ley reports on the efforts of the Paedophile Information Exchange to gain support from politicians and links between PIE and the National Council of Civil Liberties."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01t01rb

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

Vol. 2 No. 23: 4 December 1980

Young Love

"Paedophilia: The Radical Case by Tom O’Carroll Peter Owen, 280 pp, £14.95, October 1980, ISBN 0 7206 0546 6"

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v02/n23/mary-kay-wilmers/young-love
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)