Showing posts with label Attraction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Attraction. Show all posts

Wednesday, 21 May 2014

If It Wasn't For Those Sexy Kids ...



Wednesday 21 May 2014

Paedophiles' brains are 'abnormally tuned' [not for a MAP, it is not abnormal] to children's faces, new study claims

"Paedophiles’ brains are “abnormally tuned” to find the face of a child more attractive than that of an adult, according to a study published today.

The results mean that it may be possible in future to “diagnose” [sic] potential paedophiles [sic] at a young age by studying their responses to the faces of adults and children, scientists said.

Researchers at the University of Kiel in Germany studied the brains of 56 adults, 23 of whom were male paedophiles and the remainder either heterosexual or homosexual men. While their brains were being monitored by a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, they were briefly exposed to pictures of men’s, women’s, boys’ and girls’ faces.

In the individuals attracted to adults of either sex, the regions of the brain associated with facial processing and sexual desire lit up when the faces of adults were shown. But in the brains of the paedophiles, images of children’s faces prompted the same regions to respond.

The scientists said their findings, published in the journal Biology Letters, confirmed previous studies showing that human beings process faces according to the sexual orientation of the observer.

“The critical new finding is that face processing is also tuned to face cues revealing the developmental stage that is sexually preferred,” they wrote.

We found no evidence to suggest that paedophiles recruit a different brain network when exposed to faces of the preferred sex and age than individuals showing a normal preference for adults do… the same network is activated by the sexually preferred face, but the main difference is that in paedophiles that network is abnormally tuned [sic] to sexual immaturity [sic].”

Dr Jorge Ponseti of the University of Kiel’s Medical School, the study’s lead author, told The Independent his team now hoped to carry out further research into whether paedophilia could be detected using only a subject’s responses to children’s faces.

He added that if this works, it should eventually be possible to assess whether someone might be a paedophile based on their brain’s responses to studying children’s faces.

“We could start to look at the onset of paedophilia, which is probably in puberty at about 12 or 14 years [old],” he said.[ah, like any sexual orientation, then?]

The NSPCC welcomed the research. Jon Brown, the charity’s lead on tackling sexual abuse, said: “There is never any excuse for sexually abusing a child, but any research that could help improve child protection practice is welcome. [you tool - a wooooshh again].

“For example, understanding why some people have a sexual interest in children could help to develop new treatment programmes [sic] that aim to control and change a paedophile’s behaviour [sic]. It’s also important to remember that not everyone who has a sexual interest in children will go on to act on their impulses.” [and don't you forget it].

Previous research also involving MRI scans has suggested that paedophilia may be the result of faulty connections in the brain. In 2007, the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto reported that the brains of paedophiles contained much less “white matter” – responsible for wiring different parts of the brain together – than those of non-sexual criminals." [sic]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/paedophiles-brains-are-abnormally-tuned-to-childrens-faces-new-study-claims-9405707.html

Paedophiles' brains are abnormally tuned to be attracted to children's faces shocking [what?] study finds

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/paedophiles-brains-abnormally-tuned-attracted-3579446

Is paedophilia an illness? [eh, we keep telling you] Brains are wired differently in offenders [offenders? it says paedophiles], study claims

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2634045/Is-paedophilia-illness-Brains-wired-differently-offenders-study-claims.html

http://www.ablxboston.com/national/57505-is-paedophilia-an-illness-brains-are-wired-differently-in-offenders-study-claims.html

>>>>>We see no reference, to offenders, in this sample.<<<<<

Pedophiles: Another view on faces 

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.wissenschaft.de/home/-/journal_content/56/12054/3645194/P%25C3%25A4dophile%253A-Anderer-Blick-auf-Gesichter/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DbtO%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official

Discovered link between facial recognition and sexual age preference: Sexual Medicine

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.idw-online.de/en/news588116&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DbtO%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official

(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

*****

Published 21 May 2014

Human face processing is tuned to sexual age preferences 

J. Ponseti, O. Granert, T. van Eimeren, O. Jansen, S. Wolff, K. Beier, G. Deuschl, H. Bosinski and H. Siebner


"Abstract

Human faces can motivate nurturing behaviour or sexual behaviour when adults see a child or an adult face, respectively. This suggests that face processing is tuned to detecting age cues of sexual maturity to stimulate the appropriate reproductive behaviour: either caretaking or mating [are they mutually-exclusive?].

In paedophilia, sexual attraction is directed to sexually immature children [sic - you mean reproductively]. Therefore, we hypothesized that brain networks that normally are tuned to mature faces of the preferred gender show an abnormal tuning to sexual immature faces in paedophilia.

Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test directly for the existence of a network which is tuned to face cues of sexual maturity [sic - you mean reproductively]. During fMRI, participants sexually attracted to either adults or children were exposed to various face images.

In individuals attracted to adults, adult faces activated several brain regions significantly more than child faces. These brain regions comprised areas known to be implicated in face processing, and sexual processing, including occipital areas, the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and, subcortically, the putamen and nucleus caudatus.

The same regions were activated in paedophiles, but with a reversed preferential response pattern."

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/5/20140200

http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/5/20140200.full.pdf+html

*****

Wednesday 21 May, 2014

EXPERT REACTION: Paedophiles brains prefer children's faces (Biology Letters*)

Professor James Ogloff is Director of the Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science and Legal Studies at Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria 

 "The results need to be treated with caution.

The sample sizes are small, and very little information is provided regarding the clinical characteristics of the sample or about the task used (number of trials etc.).

From a technical perspective, the findings are relatively minimal. There is little practical value of the results. As the authors note, because of the cross-sectional design, it is not possible to determine how any differences develop.

Moreover, as with other studies that investigate paedophilic preferences [sic], the fact that a person is sexually attracted by a person regardless of age does not mean that they will act on that preference.

I think the authors make too much of the data in the discussion given the significant limitations of the study.

The previous imaging study they reference re. sexual preference and fMRI activation to faces is also based on small sample sizes (10 in each group) and uncorrected data analysis."

* Human face processing is tuned to sexual age preferences, Ponseti et al., Biology Letters, 2014, <a href="http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/10/5/20140200">http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0200

http://www.smc.org.au/2014/05/expert-reaction-paedophiles-brains-prefer-childrens-faces-biology-letters

*****

Be careful what you look for, you may just find it.

Wednesday, 22 January 2014

On Feminism, Professional Victims, Vested Interests, Denial, Harm And Sexuality

(Embedded Tweet - click date).

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

No Man Is In Control Of Whatever It Is He Is Interested In

Mysteries of the Mind: The Pedophile's Brain


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2rOhcaqsBQ

The Agenda with Steve Paikin: Mysteries of the Mind: The Pedophile's Brain

http://ww3.tvo.org/video/199372/mysteries-mind-pedophiles-brain

http://theagenda.tvo.org/episode/199329/mysteries-of-the-mind-the-pedophiles-brain

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

Friday, 14 December, 2012

The dubious analogy of the ‘extra arm’

"So, where was I? Ah, yes, I said a neuroscientist had agreed with Susie Orbach and myself that there was good reason for skepticism over a theory that paedophilia is caused by “crossed wiring” in the brain. An MRI scanning study by James Cantor and his team into the brains of paedophiles and others had shown that paedophiles have less “white matter”, this being interpreted as a dysfunctional deficiency."

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2012/12/14/the-dubious-analogy-of-the-extra-arm

*****

January 2014

Dr. James Cantor, a leading expert on Pedophilia, explains the Pedophile's brain

http://www.reddit.com/r/psychology/comments/1vpubn/dr_james_cantor_a_leading_expert_on_pedophilia/#ceuseo7

*****

PUBLISHED: 13:56, 22 January 2014 | UPDATED: 14:19, 22 January 2014
  
'Paedophilia IS an illness': An abnormally-wired brain causes the predatory behaviour, claims expert

"Clinical psychologist James Cantor found 'huge differences in the white matter of paedophiles' brains, compared to typical men's."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2543933/Paedophilia-IS-illness-An-abnormally-wired-brain-causes-predatory-behaviour-claims-expert.html#comments 
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

See what happens, when you do not explain what the results actually 'mean', James?  

Persecution by sound bite. 

*****

Updated 12:59 pm, January 24th, 2014 8:25 pm, January 23rd, 2014

Pedophilia an orientation? 

"While legal challenges are only hypothetical at this point, could a non-offending pedophile - one who has not given in to his impulses - be legally protected to work near children?"

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/straighttalk/archives/2014/01/20140123-202500.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter#.UuM2TLyvs0c.twitter

*****

Wednesday, 22 January 2014

The ever continuing normalisation of paedophiia - not "orientation", not "disability", now it's an Illness!

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-ever-continuing-normalisation-of.html

Richard, the disability is the 'illness', and the orientation, is not the disability.

Just as it was for LGBT.

Saturday, 2 November 2013

There Are, At The Very Least, 372 Million People, Sexually-Attracted To 'Kids', In The World - Are You One Of 'Them'?

 


Wurtele SK, Simons D, & Moreno T (2013). Sexual Interest in Children Among an Online Sample of Men and Women: Prevalence and Correlates. Sexual Abuse PMID: 24215791

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215791

http://sax.sagepub.com/content/26/6/546.abstract

 Are One In Ten Men Sexually Attracted To Children? 

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2013/11/18/one-ten-men-sexually-attracted-children

*****

Sandy K. Wurtele, Ph.D.

http://www.uccs.edu/psych/people/faculty/sandy-wurtele.html

Dominique Simons (UCCS MA Alumnus)

http://www.uccs.edu/psych/archived-news/april-2012.html

*****

Here we go ...

Population of the Earth = 7,162,119,434

Adult Population of the Earth (child = equal to or less than 14 (26%)) = 74% = 5,299,968,381

Given an approximate ratio ...

Men (50.4%) = 2,671,184,064

Women (49.6%)  = 2,628,784,316

*****

10% of Men =  267,118,406 (>267 million)

4% of Women = 105,151,372 (>105 million)

Estimated Total of Minor (equal to or less than 14) -Attracted Adults (MAAs) on the Earth  = 372,269,778 (>372 million)

*****

.... and that is based on self-reporting ...

We expect, that some children (MAMs) will be sexually-attracted to children too ;)

Then, drop in the 14-17.999999999 years olds.

Makes you think, eh?

(happy to correct any maths errors etc - just let us know :) ).

*****

also ...

Nov 21, 2009
 
Pedophile, Minor-Attracted Adult or Merely Human?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_iEKadpaKQ

(00:47 - ca. 396,000,000), from Brett Kahr, F is for fantasy.

*****

Spring 2011 Survey Results: B4U-ACT conducted an online survey of minor-attracted people over a six-week period in March to April, 2011

http://b4uact.org/science/survey/01.htm

Thank you Andrew Gilligan And The Telegraph - Paedophilia Is Not 'Normal' (As Though That Matters), But, Being A Minor-Attracted Person, Certainly Is

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/thank-you-andrew-gilligan-paedophilia.html

"Well Over 20% Of Normal Men Are Probably Pedophiles; The Majority Of Men Are Probably Pedophiles And Hebophiles"

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/well-over-20-of-normal-men-are-probably.html

September 24 , 2014

Every fifth boy and man is pedophilic or hebephilic

Abstract

"A meta-analysis of all seven relevant phallometric studies reveals that 22% of normal men show greater or equal sexual arousal to child stimuli (individuals up to 13 years old) than to adult stimuli.

Combined results of two of these studies reveal male prevalence rates of about 3% for pedophilia (mostly s exually aroused by prepubescents) and about 16% for hebephilia (mostly sexually aroused by pubescents).

Details of these studies are described, and implications of the results for sexual science and society are discussed."

https://www.ipce.info/sites/ipce.info/files/biblio_attachments/every_fifth.pdf

*****

30 July 2014 Last updated at 00:34

How many men are paedophiles?

"It's very common for regular men to be attracted to 18-year-olds or 20-year-olds. It's not unusual for a typical 16-year-old to be attractive to many men and the younger we go the fewer and fewer men are attracted to that age group," says Cantor.

He thinks that if we say that a paedophile is someone attracted to children aged 14 or less, then he estimates that you could reach the 2% figure.

"If we use a very strict definition and say paedophilia refers only to the attraction to pre-pubescent children [then it] is probably much lower than 1%," he says.

The term is often applied to a person who sexually abuses someone below the age of 16, but given that in some countries - and even some US states - you can marry below the age of 16 this definition would clearly not be universally accepted.

There is consensus on the clinical definition. Michael Seto and his colleagues agree that a paedophile is someone who has a sexual interest in pre-pubescent children, so typically those under the ages of 11 or 12.

But whether the prevalence using this definition is 0.5%, as James Cantor says or 1%, as Michael Seto says, you can be assured than in any large group of people - whether they be politicians, entertainers, or Catholic clergy - you are likely to find some paedophiles."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28526106

*****

http://web.archive.org/web/20150217085819/http://www.ilovechildren.net

http://www.virped.website

*****


http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2nh1nb/science_ama_series_we_are_alan_sanders_michael/cmds0hy

*****



Adaptive value of (some) paedophilic attraction? 

"Sorry in advance if this post offends anyone but I just want to look at the issue objectively. Paedophilic attraction is seen in all societies and its existence requires an explanation.

Paedophilic attraction is normally considered abnormal and maladaptive. The conventional argument runs something like "Girls under age X are infertile and incapable of reproducing. Therefore, any sexual attraction to girls under age X has no biological function and must be the result of brain abnormality, etc". The big problem with this argument is that it only considers a girl's CURRENT fertility but what would have mattered most to a man in ancestral times was a girl's FUTURE fertility.

In all societies most reproduction happens within marriages and long term relationships and we can presume it was the same for ancestral humans. Men must therefore have evolved to choose females on the basis of their ability to give them a supply of offspring over the long term. The females capable of giving men the most offspring would have been those who are at or just prior the beginning of their reproductive lifespan i.e. teenage girls. The overwhelming popularity of teenage girls in the sex industries confirms this prediction.

Girls before puberty wouldn't have been the best wife material since a man would have to wait some years before they could start providing him offspring, during which either partner may die. Reproduction at a later age (for the man) also contributes less to the future population.

Although girls who haven't reached puberty wouldn't have been ideal wives they would still have been better than older females who have already used up some of their fertile years. A 30 year old woman, for example, would have been half way through her reproductive lifespan, whereas an 8 year old would still have had all of her fertile years ahead of her. Even if the "reproductive penalty" of waiting for the 8 year old to reach reproductive age reduced her expected reproductive contribution by 50% (which is a big over-estimate) she would still have given a man just as many offspring as a 30 year old wife. It would have made more biological sense for prehistoric men to chase after 8 year olds than 30 year olds.

Having some sexual attraction to girls before puberty would have been adaptive because it would have motivated men to acquire them as wives. It doesn't matter that having sex with them wouldn't have got them pregnant. As long as any sexual activity they did together didn't reduce a man's reproductive success there would have been no need for evolution to select these behaviours out. Forcible intercourse that injured a girl and compromised her ability to bear offspring would have clearly reduced a man's reproductive success and would have been strongly selected against. Minor sexual acts like kissing and touching wouldn't done any damage to a girl's reproductive ability and so there would have been no reason for evolution to select them out.

It's likely that all men have some paedophilic interest as it would have been adaptive in prehistoric societies. The men that identify as paedophiles probably just have more interest than normal, maybe due to random variations in brain wiring in the population.

Edit:

Instead of asking:

“What would have been the adaptive value in men mating with females before puberty?”

What should be asked is:

“What would have been the adaptive value in men being attracted to females before puberty?”

Then the answer’s simple. Girls before puberty have a high future fertility and being attracted to them would have motivated men to acquire them as wives."

http://www.reddit.com/r/evopsych/comments/33co5z/adaptive_value_of_some_paedophilic_attraction/

Friday, 1 November 2013

You Can Weasel The Words, But You Cannot Change The Reality - Rind All Over Again

Thursday, October 31, 2013

APA to correct [sic] manual: Pedophilia is not a ‘sexual orientation’ [the orientated decide that, not you - ask the LGBT community.]

"Pedophilia is not a “sexual orientation,” and erroneous [designed to be so] use of that phrase will be corrected soon in its new manual on mental illnesses [sic], the American Psychiatric Association said Thursday.

The APA’s statement came in response to media inquiries, including from The Washington Times, about an uproar on the Internet that the APA had designated pedophilia as a sexual orientation in its new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, known as DSM-5 or DSM-V.

About a week ago, a blog called NeonTommy, produced at Annenberg Digital News at the University of Southern California, said the APA had drawn a “very distinct line” between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder in its new manual.

According to the DSM-5, pedophilia [not 'Pedophilic Disorder'] “refers to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality,” NeonTommy wrote.

The item was picked up and circulated on countless other Internet sites. Many bloggers bashed the APA for “mainstreaming” deviance [mmmwwhahaha] and capitulating [reality is just that] to pro-pedophile [sic] groups. Others tied [reconnected] it to gay issues — one wag [?] wrote that it was “time to change the LGBT letterhead to LGBT&P.”

The APA said in its statement that “‘sexual orientation’ [legal term] is not a term used in the diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder and its use in the DSM-5 text discussion is an error [sic] and should read ‘sexual interest.’ [reality; and means 'sexual orientation', in reality]”

“In fact, APA considers pedophilic disorder [but, not Paedophilia] a ‘paraphilia,’ not a ‘sexual orientation.’ This error [sic] will be corrected in the electronic version of DSM-5 and the next printing of the manual,” the organization said. The error appeared on page 698, said a spokeswoman.""

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/31/apa-correct-manual-clarification-pedophilia-not-se/ 

October 31, 2013 

Statement of the American Psychological Association Regarding Pedophilia and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)

"A news release sent Oct. 30 on behalf of the American Family Association mischaracterized the position of the American Psychological Association with respect to pedophilia. The American Psychological Association does not classify mental disorders or publish the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, as the release incorrectly stated.

The American Psychological Association [science?] maintains that pedophilia is a mental disorder [psychiatry]; that sex between adults and children is always wrong [science?]; and that acting on pedophilic impulses is and should be a criminal act [science?]. The American Psychological Association has worked for many years to prevent child sexual abuse [science?] and will continue to do so."

http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2013/10/pedophilia-mental.aspx

AFA Reports Pedophilia Officially Classified as Sexual Orientation

http://www.charismanews.com/us/41571-pedophilia-officially-classified-as-sexual-orientation-by-american-psychology-association

Pedophilia Associated With ‘Sexual Orientation,’ But APA Claims It Was Their Error

http://www.charismanews.com/us/41605-pedophilia-described-as-sexual-orientation-but-apa-claims-it-was-their-error

Not All Pedophiles Have Mental Disorder, American Psychiatric Association Says In New DSM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/01/dsm-pedophilia-mental-disorder-paraphilia_n_4184878.html

*****

Sunday, 10 November, 2013

A plague on both your APA houses

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/a-plague-on-both-your-apa-houses

*****

10/31/2013 7:19 pm EDT  |  Updated: 11/01/2013 10:34 am EDT

Whopping Pedophilia 'Sexual Orientation' Error Sparks Right-Wing Freakout

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/31/pedophilia-sexual-orientation_n_4183482.html

Saturday, 2 November 2013

Whopping Pedophilia 'Sexual Orientation' Error Sparks Common Sense Freakout

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/whopping-pedophilia-sexual-orientation.html


*****

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(3):196-200. [Sexual disorders in the DSM-5].

"BACKGROUND:

In DSM-IV-TR, the subject of 'sexual and gender identity disorders' was dealt with in one chapter; in DSM-5, however, the subject is divided into three chapters, namely sexual dysfunctions , gender dysphoria, and paraphilic disorders. AIM: To discuss the above-mentioned changes.

METHOD:

The one-chapter version in DSM-IV is compared with the three-chapter contribution in DSM-5 and the differing criteria are tested for their clinical utility.

RESULTS:

There are minor changes in the chapter 'sexual dysfunctions'. The content of the chapters on 'gender dysphoria' and 'paraphilic disorders' differs substantially from the content of the sections on these subjects in DSM-IV. In the section on gender dysphoria the term 'sex' has been replaced by 'gender' and the term 'identity disorder' has been dropped. With regard to paraphilias, a distinction is now made between a paraphilia and a paraphilic disorder. The DSM-5 makes a new distinction between pathology (paraphilic disorder) on the one hand and other unusual or unconventional non-pathological sexual behavior on the other hand. In the DSM-5 the highly relevant clinical concept 'hypersexuality' has still not been incorporated as a separate category.

CONCLUSION:

In the DSM-5 many parts of the chapters on sexual disorders have been substantially revised."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643831

http://www.tijdschriftvoorpsychiatrie.nl/en/issues/475/articles/10245

Monday, 28 October 2013

Labels, Labels, Labels - Paedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation - LGBTP

'Updated'

*****

October 25, 2013 | 4:08 a.m. PDT

Pedophilia Now Classified As A Sexual Orientation

"People can classify themselves as heterosexual, homosexual, asexual, metrosexual. There are endless sexual orientations under the sun, and now, pedophilia can be added to the list.

In the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM V), the American Psychological Association (APA) drew a very distinct line between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder. Pedophilia refers to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality.

APA's decision has given rise to numerous pedophilia-advocacy groups, the chief of them being B4U-ACT, a non-profit grassroots organization based in Maryland. Created in 2003 primarily as a means for “minor-attracted persons” to be open about their sexual preferences in a supportive atmosphere, B4U-ACT is now widening the scope of their organization.

According to spokesperson and registered sex offender Paul Christiano, the pedophilia-advocacy group is “working towards de-stigmatizing the mental health community.” Christiano explained that negative societal attitudes towards minor-attracted persons “trickle down to policy-making and the mental health community.”"

http://www.neontommy.com/news/2013/10/pedophilia-sexual-orientation

http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/582178.htm

October 27 2013 at 01:19:39am

"Such a fine line separates 'profession of sexual preference' and 'having a disorder'. So fine that no anti and most other 'normal' people will not see the difference. To 'equate' pedophilia to homosexuality in this psychosocial definition is much too premature.

but okay."

http://www.annabelleigh.net/messages/582181.htm

10.28.13 @ 2:48PM

Pedophilia: Orientation or Crime?

" ... the American Psychiatric Association (APA) drew a very distinct line between pedophilia and pedophilic disorder. Pedophilia refers to a sexual orientation or profession of sexual preference devoid of consummation, whereas pedophilic disorder is defined as a compulsion and is used in reference to individuals who act on their sexuality."

http://spectator.org/blog/2013/10/28/pedophilia-orientation-or-crim

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click the date).

*****  

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

APA and DSM-V Confirm Paedophilia as a "Sexual Orientation"

"Well, of course, as this has now officially been reclassified (in the US at least), can we now assume that as well as being LGBTP), that the same Human Rights concerned with sexual orientation that all people quite rightly have, will now be used by paedophiles as well? Can we assume, going forward, that there will one day be no discrimination against paedophiles, who for example, apply to be teachers? Can we assume, for example, that there will one day be no discrimination against paedophiles, who apply to work in any profession with children?"

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/apa-and-dsm-v-confirm-paedophilia-as.html

*****

4:30PM EDT 10/30/2013 

AFA Reports Pedophilia Officially Classified as Sexual Orientation

http://www.charismanews.com/us/41571-pedophilia-officially-classified-as-sexual-orientation-by-american-psychology-association

Posted: 11/01/2013 10:20 am EDT | Updated: 11/01/2013 10:31 am EDT

Not All Pedophiles Have Mental Disorder, American Psychiatric Association Says In New DSM

"In a move toward destigmatizing pedophilia, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in its updated Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), distinguishes between pedophiles who desire sex with children, and those who act on those desires."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/01/dsm-pedophilia-mental-disorder-paraphilia_n_4184878.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003 

Posted: 10/31/2013 7:19 pm EDT | Updated: 11/01/2013 10:34 am EDT

Whopping Pedophilia 'Sexual Orientation' Error Sparks Right-Wing Freakout

"A mainstream Christian news site and a number of smaller, right-wing blogs published stories this week alleging that the American Psychiatric Association, or APA, had classified pedophilia as a sexual orientation."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/31/pedophilia-sexual-orientation_n_4183482.html

Sunday, 20 October 2013

Internet Predators - “We Are Given To Believe That They Are Legion, But The Hard Evidence Is Small.”

Sat Oct 19 2013

Controversial U.S. professor James Kincaid slams critics who call him an advocate for pedophilia [sic]

"Kincaid told the Star he doesn’t think it’s a matter of rounding up “a few freaks and a few pedophiles [sic] and horrible monsters who regard young people as attractive.”

He said the real problem is that in the United States there is enormous attention paid to stranger kidnappings of children that draws the focus away from a higher incidence of children who are physically or emotionally abused."

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/10/19/controversial_us_professor_james_kincaid_slams_critics_who_call_him_an_advocate_for_pedophilia.html

*****

Tuesday, 22 October, 2013

What’s healthy about the selfie


"Looking through this long list across the entries for the last forty years, I see one truly great leap forward, in 1985, and two considerably more limited triumphs. The great leap was the establishment of Gillick competence, which I had occasion to mention last month in The heinous crime of truth-telling. The timeline entry puts it thus: the Gillick ruling “lays down that the authority of parents to make decisions for their minor children is not absolute, but diminishes with the child’s evolving maturity; except in situations that are regulated otherwise by statute, the right to make a decision on any particular matter concerning the child shifts from the parent to the child when the child reaches sufficient maturity to be capable of making up his or her own mind on the matter requiring decision.”"

https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/whats-healthy-about-the-selfie

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Don't Stand Too Close To Them

Monday 07 October 2013

"Anita Anand explores the taboo topic of teachers having relationships with their students. It should never happen but it does but the law is clear: teachers are in loco parentis and as such cannot have a relationship with a student under the age of 18. Not only is it a criminal offence, it is a fully recognised abuse of the position of trust that the teacher is in - it applies even if the pupil is over the age of consent and the relationship is consensual.

In this documentary Anita hears the views of teachers and head teachers on what happens when a relationship crosses the line to become "inappropriate". She asks what support, if any, is offered to individuals who find themselves involved with those they teach. And have modern teaching methods and a more informal approach made it harder to define the line which should not be crossed by students or teachers?"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03c30cm

*****

Posted on October 8, 2013

Teachers and sexual relationships with students aged 16+

"Sexual relationships between teachers and pupils aged 16 and over have been happening for a long time. Similarly, for a long time, there has been a feeling that, once at the age of consent, a sexual relationship between consenting adults – irrespective of the student/teacher relationship – is not one into which the law should intrude. Parliament has seen otherwise and since 2001, there have been specific ‘abuse of trust’ offences.

Some teachers get into sexual relationships with students who are under the age of 16. This post is not concerned with such cases and is not about revisiting whether sexual activity with children is wrong."

http://thesexualoffenceshandbook.com/2013/10/08/teachers-and-sexual-relationships-with-students-aged-16

Sunday, 21 July 2013

"If It Hadn't Have Been For You Damn, Sexy, Kids ..."


*****

Posted on 17 June 2013 - 05:14pm; Last updated on 17 June 2013 - 09:23pm

Children acting cute can invite criminal paedophile

"Children who put on a cute face and affectionate pose when taking photographs to be downloaded to the social networking site such as Facebook can invite criminal paedophilia.

A psychologist with the Educational Psychology and Counselling Department of the University of Malaya, Prof Madya Dr Mariani Mohd Nor said many children under 13 years of age, especially in primary school, now owned a Facebook account and enjoyed downloading their pictures in various action and style without realising that they could be observed by paedophiles.

"All (paedophile crimes) this not just the child's body, other parts too, sometimes the facial mimic, lip style, camera looking style can also spur the paedophiles.

"Not only girls, but boys with a cute face and baby-face are also prone to attacks by paedophiles," he said."

""Paedophilia patients are categorised as those who commit acts of rape on children several times, but if they only commit the crime once, it is not categorised as paedophilia," said Investigation Division of Sexual, Abuse and Children (D11) Assistant Director ACP Hamidah Yunos."

http://www.thesundaily.my/news/744468

*****


Thursday, 9 May 2013

Love Hurts

May 9, 2013 - 7:02AM

Child sex offender tells of struggle with temptation

"On Wednesday Pendleton's lawyer David McKenzie challenged Cs' intention to reoffend after undergoing two sex offender rehabilitation programs in prison, arguing the plan to build a new life in South East Asian had been a innocent one.

"Really it was your intention whilst you were in custody to not offend against children," Mr McKenzie said, to which C responded, "That was my hope, that I would be able to do that."

"It's one thing to come out of the program with a strong motivation," he said.

"But as things change, I found out (ex-wife) wanted a divorce, my mother died, I was losing what I saw as a normal life on the outside and old habits were starting to re-emerge."

Mr McKenzie said C was to testifying against the other two men to carry out his end of a plea bargain, but had not really intended to offend.

"You wanted to live the lifestyle over there, you wanted to have relationships with women over there, you wanted to run a business over there," Mr McKenzie said.

C said the lifestyle was only "part of the plan", while the opportunity to offend against children was also included in the trio's designs.

"There were some times I felt I was going to offend again and other times when I thought I didn't," he said.

"When depressed it's easy to go back to a comfort zone, which I felt at that time was offending.

"Thinking about children, interacting with them, looking at their photos, did bring me closer to wanting to offend.

"It's something that comes and goes, depression, what goes on around me, whether I feel strong enough not to offend.""

http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/child-sex-offender-tells-of-struggle-with-temptation-20130508-2j7ye.html

Sunday, 24 March 2013

Better Get Working It, Then, Girls

Sunday 17 Mar 2013 11:35 am

Girls ‘being pressured to look like porn stars’ by boys growing up on pornography

"Pressure: Girls feel like they have to resemble porn stars [yuk]

Girls are under increasing pressure to look like porn stars due to the negative impact pornography has had on boys’ idea of what the opposite sex should look like, it has been claimed.

Young women are trying to live up to unattainable ideals of boys who want their girlfriends to look like XXX stars, Helen Porter, a member of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), argued.

‘The desirable body image has become more extreme, they are all trying to have a narrow waist, long, slim legs and big boobs. That’s the desirable thing,’ she said."

http://metro.co.uk/2013/03/17/girls-being-pressured-to-look-like-porn-stars-by-boys-growing-up-on-pornography-3545701/

Girls 'feel under pressure to look like porn stars': Teacher urges MPs to tackle online filth [what?]

">Teacher at girls school said desirable body image has become 'extreme'
>Young girls are rated on looks and given scores out of ten by peers, she said
>Policies needed on sexual activity between pupils and sex acts in school"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2294797/Girls-feel-pressure-look-like-porn-stars-Teacher-urges-MPs-tackle-online-filth.html

Schoolgirls want porn star looks, teachers told

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9936103/Schoolgirls-want-porn-star-looks-teachers-told.html

Pornography in schools: Warn pupils of the dangers [sic], says teacher

http://metro.co.uk/2013/03/26/pornography-in-schools-warn-pupils-of-the-dangers-says-teacher-3560215/

Train us to deliver lessons on dangers [sic] of pornography, demand teachers 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/train-us-to-deliver-lessons-on-dangers-of-pornography-demand-teachers-8549755.html

Young children becoming 'desensitised to pornography' [i.e. learning how to be more effective sexual beings]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/9954300/Young-children-becoming-desensitised-to-pornography.html

Pupils 'should be taught about risks [sic] of pornography'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-21938823

Amazon Still Featuring Porn as "Teen Books for Girls"

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Four-Months-Later-Amazon-Still-Features-Porn-as-Teen-Books-for-Girls-199629171.html

Girls as young as 12 having bikini waxes and vajazzling in pressure to look like porn stars 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/girls-having-bikini-waxes-vajazzling-1787328

Girls of 13 pressured [sic] to pose for home-made blue movies: Teachers warn pornography is becoming part of everyday life [!]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299633/Girls-13-pressured-pose-home-porn-films-frequent-exposure-depraved-online-content-desensitises-young.html

‘Teenagers know porn isn’t real – but they still need decent sex education’ 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/9960041/Teenagers-know-porn-isnt-real-but-they-still-need-decent-sex-education.html 

Porn and pressure: the teen sex scene 

http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/porn-and-pressure-the-teen-sex-scene-1.1343235

*****

ATL Conference 2013 

" 25 The effect of pornography on pupils - carried

BERKSHIRE BRANCH

THAT Conference is very concerned about the effect that readily available pornography is having on children and asks the Executive Committee to:

(i) conduct a survey of members to investigate the problem

(ii) produce guidance for members on how best to deal with sexting and other consequences of pupils' exposure to pornography, and how to proceed when discovering sexual activity taking place on education premises

(iii) consider working with other unions or professional associations to provide training for members on how to deliver age appropriate SRE lessons on the dangers of pornography.

Proposer: Helen Porter, St Gabriel's School, Newbury Seconder: Seconder: James Schlackman, Crosfields School, Reading"

http://www.atl.org.uk/policy-and-campaigns/conference/2013/conference-2013-tuesday-am.asp

St Gabriel's Indepedent Day School For Girls

"Helen Porter, a science teacher at St Gabriel's School, Newbury, Berks"

http://www.stgabriels.co.uk/page/default.asp?title=Home&pid=1

*****

TODAY10:53a.m. EDT April 1, 2013

Study: Sexual activity is rare among young adolescents

"Contrary to popular belief [?], sexual activity among very young adolescents is not more prevalent today than in the past, says a report in Pediatrics magazine.

The study also finds that sex among the same group is frequently involuntary.

In spite of public perception, sexual activity is exceedingly rare among the youngest adolescents, ages 10 to 12, a new report shows. Among older teens, however, sexual activity remains common."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/01/sex-teens-adolescents-young/2029113/

Monday, 28 January 2013

Leggy Beauty - No Sex ... In What World?

PUBLISHED: 23:46, 27 January 2013 | UPDATED: 00:22, 28 January 2013




Who's the model now? Little Leni steals the show as her mother Heidi Klum wears dowdy outfit to take her to gym class

"It looks like Heidi Klum's daughter might be hoping to become a model just like her mother.

The 39-year-old tagged along her bodyguard-turned-boyfriend Martin Kristen as she picked up her daughters from their weekly gymnastics class on Sunday morning in Culver City, Los Angeles.

Heidi's eldest Leni clearly stole the show with her workout attire, proving that she could easily follow her mum's footsteps into the world of fashion."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2269261/Little-Leni-steals-mother-Heidi-Klum-wears-dowdy-outfit-to-gym-class.html

Thursday, 25 October 2012

All In The Mind

Posted October 24, 2012

The neuroscience of sexual attractions

"A recent edition of radio programme KERA Think has a fantastic discussion on development and the neuroscience of sexual attraction in its many forms.

The programme is a discussion with Simon LeVay, a neuroscientist who raised a lot of eyebrows by finding differences in the brain structure of gay and straight men in a 1991 study.

The science has massively advanced since then and LeVay gives a fascinating and lucid account of what know about the biology of the rainbow of sexual attraction – and where the mysteries still lie.

Link to programme page with streamed audio. mp3 of podcast."

http://mindhacks.com/2012/10/24/the-neuroscience-of-sexual-attractions/

October 26, 2012

Neurotransmitters linked to mating behavior are shared by mammals and worms

"When it comes to sex, animals of all shapes and sizes tend behave in predictable ways. There may be a chemical reason for that. New research from Rockefeller University has shown that chemicals in the brain—neuropeptides known as vasopressin and oxytocin—play a role in coordinating mating and reproductive behavior in animals ranging from humans to fish to invertebrates."

http://phys.org/news/2012-10-neurotransmitters-linked-behavior-mammals-worms.html

Nov. 09, 2012

Neuroscientist Larry Young on Sex, Drugs & Love Among Voles

"He doesn’t claim to have the answer for why fools fall in love, but psychiatrist Larry Young hopes studying prairie voles will help.

The Emory University professor studies the differences between species of voles with very different sexual preferences: the montane voles are the serial daters and cheaters of their world, engaging primarily in promiscuous relationships, while prairie voles are more monogamous.

By studying their brain chemistry, Young is hoping to expose the biology of fidelity and cheating, and the role that the so-called love hormone oxytocin plays in the way the voles make and break romantic relationships. TIME talked with him about his new book, The Chemistry Between Us: Love, Sex and the Science of Attraction."

http://healthland.time.com/2012/11/09/qa-neuroscientist-larry-young-on-sex-drugs-love-among-voles/#ixzz2Bltg5de9

*****

Securing Real Love: Three Chemicals That Make Us Feel We’re In Love, 1 of 3

"The science of couples love is a fascinating study of human nature – perhaps at its best and worst.

Human beings get unhinged about a lot of things, yet nothing seems to compare to the actions of desperation, and the emotional roller coasters in the dance of romance."

http://blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2013/10/securing-a-love-relationship-three-chemicals-that-make-us-were-in-love-1-of-3/

*****

October 19, 2013

Love and lust have distinct but interlocking brain signatures

">Brain imaging is revealing the distinct but interlocking patterns of neural activation associated with lust and love.
>Lust is most likely grounded in the concrete sensations of the given moment. Love is a more abstract gloss on our experiences with another person.
>Imaging is also helping to decipher the disorders of lust, including anorgasmia. Dozens of discrete regions across the brain fire at the point of orgasm—suggesting many different ways to develop anorgasmia.

People often think of love and lust as polar opposites—love exalted as the binder of two souls, lust the transient devil on our shoulders, disturbing and disruptive. Now neuroscientists are discovering that lust and love work together more closely than we think. Indeed, the strongest relationships have elements of both."

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=lust-sexual-desire-forges-lasting-relationships