Showing posts with label Offending. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Offending. Show all posts

Friday, 22 December 2017

Why Would You Not Be One?



Be One
*****


  


Listen To The Good Doctor


The OSC

*****

If you are affected, by any of the issues, raised, here ...

MAPs - you are not alone - very much, not alone ...

http://www.lucyfaithfull.org.uk - stopitnow.org.uk - circles-uk.org.uk - http://www.virped.org - http://b4uact.org - https://www.stopso.org.uk 

http://preventell.se/?lang=en - http://www.nemup.de/index_eng.html - https://1in6.org - www.boychat.org - www.annabelleigh.net

http://www.thepreventionproject.org - https://www.csaprimaryprevention.org - https://medium.com/@TNF_13 - https://medium.com/@enderphile - https://medium.com/@DaywalkerVirPed - https://medium.com/pedophiles-about-pedophilia

Tor versions, available, for most downlinks.

Thank you.

The OSC

Thursday, 19 October 2017

Sunday, 13 April 2014

Trending

Published online: 25 Mar 2014

Trends of indecent images of children and child sexual offences between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 within the United Kingdom

Michelle Ann McManus & Louise Almond

"Little is known about the trends of indecent images of children (IIOC) offences, as UK criminal justice figures are unavailable within official crime data.

This study aims to explore the rates of conviction and the relationship between IIOC offences and child sexual abuse offences from 2005/2006 to 2012/2013.

The results indicated a continuing increase in offences of take, permit, distribute IIOC, rape of a child under 13, sexual activity of child under 16 and abuse of children through prostitution or pornography.

Six out of a possible 17 correlations were significant, with the strongest correlation found between take, make, distribute IIOC and rape of a female under 13.

Explanations for the findings are discussed and the utility of comprehensive prevalence figures for different stakeholders involved in addressing this crime issue."

"Conclusions 

The results of this paper found that IIOC offences have been increasing between 2005/2006 and 2012/2013 for the IIOC offence of take, make, distribute, but not for possession of IIOC. In addition, there was a continued increase for child sexual offences of rape of a child under 13, all child sexual activity and abuse of a child through prostitution or pornography, with other child sexual offences indicating a fluctuating pattern across the 8-year time period.

When exploring the relationship between IIOC offences and child sexual abuse, significant positive relationships were found for the offence of take, make and distribute IIOC with child sexual abuse offences of rape of a child under 13 (for both males and females), all child sexual activity, particularly sexual activity with a child under 16, and abuse of a child through prostitution or pornography. All other comparisons were non-significant.

Potential explanations for these finding could be attributed in two key ways: first, due to the increased awareness and reporting of IIOC and child sexual abuse offences, along with increased success of child protection and law enforcement agencies. The development of specialist collaborative agencies such as Child Exploitation Online Centre, Virtual Global Task Force and most recently the European Cybercrime Centre have no doubt contributed to public awareness and increased detection of these offenders (CEOP, 2012).

Alternatively, these findings could be due to an increase in people actually engaging in these particular offences. Although a causal relationship cannot be inferred, whilst IIOC offences of take, make and distribute IIOC offences have increased, so have certain child sexual abuse offences. Further work is required to understand this relationship and whether the increase in IIOC has resulted in more child sexual abuse offences, or vice versa. These results are informative to law enforcement agencies and key stakeholders involved in criminal justice and child protection."

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13552600.2014.893031

http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/PKDq2Bn72gGCAauycqN8/full#.U2p8t3aa_sQ

*****
 (Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

More to follow.

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

When A Few Anecdotes Sell More BS

24 Jun 2013 12:27

Inside the mind of a murderer: Forensic psychology expert reveals key tools to solving crime

"DR Kathy Charles explains how analysing what's going on in suspect's head gives psychologists vital clues in the approach to securing a conviction.

Dr Kathy Charles has studied hundreds of brutal cases

UNDERSTANDING what makes a person commit murder or a sex crime is never an easy task but forensic psychologist Dr Kathy Charles knows exactly how their minds work [hahahahaha].

She has worked alongside police to profile criminals and dedicates her time to helping young offenders understand the reasoning behind their actions.

Now Dr Charles, 34, from ­Edinburgh, is passing on her expert knowledge to Scotland’s next generation of forensic psychologists. She is set to host a series of fascinating lectures detailing her experiences on a number of cases.

She said: “I’ve always wanted to know why some people commit crimes and others don’t.

“It’s important to know how the mind works, especially if the focus of a police investigation is a serial killer, rapist or stalker.

“I worked on profiling Ipswich prostitute murderer Steve Wright and have profiled rapists and stalkers, too.

“Committing the offence is one thing but understanding why is completely different.

“That’s where logic [hahahahahahaha] comes in and I often say it’s like piecing a jigsaw together.

“In some cases there is no obvious suspect and that’s where profiling becomes useful.

“By looking at the type of crime, the way it happened and the timeline, you can profile the type of person likely [figures?] to be responsible.

“In many cases [and there lies the proof of your errors - mere chance], when the suspect is caught the profile is almost spot-on.”"

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/real-life/inside-mind-murderer-forensic-psychology-1987828

*****

Dr Kathy Charles

http://www.napier.ac.uk/fhlss/slsss/staff/pages/kathy_charles.aspx

http://napier.academia.edu/KathyCharles

http://www.beltanenetwork.org/discover-beltane/fellowship-programme/beltane-fellows/dr-kathy-charles/

Facebook stress linked to number of ‘friends’

http://www.napier.ac.uk/media/Pages/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=187

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-12479660

Friday, 24 May 2013

Same Old Quotes, Same Old Lack Of Evidence

May 24, 2013

Most child sex offenders have multiple victims

"An astounding [sic] 93 per cent of child sex offenders [sic] have more than one victim, while 23 per cent abuse 10 or more children, psychologist Sandra Ifrah told parents attending workshops on ‘Parenting Safe Children’ held recently in Melbourne.

Presenter Sandra Ifrah and events coordinator Lauren Gabrie

The workshops were run by Tzedek (Hebrew for Justice), Australia’s only dedicated advocacy and support group for Jewish victims/survivors of child sexual abuse, in conjunction with CASA, Victorian Centres Against Sexual Assault.

These statistics [sic] underscore the importance of reporting all cases of child sexual abuse to the police as abusers are extremely likely [sic] to repeat their crimes and/or to have abused other children in the past. “The seven per cent with only one victim is mainly because they got caught the first time,” Ms Ifrah said.

Studies [which?] have found that approximately one in three girls and one in six boys will be sexually assaulted before they turn 18, with a quarter of all victims aged under nine and 37 per cent aged 9-12. Eighty per cent of offenders are known to victims – a family member, family friend or other person of trust – and they are of all ages, academic levels and socio-economic statuses. Many [sic] are charismatic and seek out employment and activities that provide them with easy access to children, Ms Ifrah said. The over-whelming majority (98 per cent) are male but it is important to note that some abusers are female. Up to 50 per cent are minors, under the age of 18"

http://www.jwire.com.au/news/most-child-sex-offenders-have-multiple-victims/34609

Tzedek

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Tzedek/216632805145320

Parenting Safe Children Workshop

http://www.tzedek.org.au/events/past-events/parenting-safe-children-workshop/

Workshops on safety for children

http://www.jwire.com.au/news/workshops-on-safety-for-children/34347

Parenting Safe Children

"Sandra Ifrah is a Registered Psychologist and holds a Masters Degree in Educational and Developmental psychology. She is currently employed at the Centre against Sexual Assault, specializing in working with children and adolescent survivors of sexual abuse."

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:H3rfy7mkWtYJ:img2.tapuz.co.il/forums/1_161764147.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

Monday, 20 May 2013

A Greater Contribution In Keeping Children Safe And Healthy

Published on May 14, 2013

Most Sex Offenders Against Children Are Family Members

"The news media's misrepresentation of offenders of sex crime against children

There has been extensive media coverage of the recent rescue of three kidnapped female victims in Cleveland, two of whom were teenagers when they were abducted. Although the event represents a tragic yet inspiring story with significant interest to the public, however, this type of sex offense does not epitomize the reality about sex crime against children. Unfortunately, the media’s lack of attention to those typical sex offenses against children often perpetuates the myth that “Don’t talk to strangers” as the preventive method to keep children safe.

The fact is, most sex and other offenders against children are not strangers. According to the Child Maltreatment 2011 report published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), CPS (child protective services) agencies in the 50 States and 2 regions (including District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) screened in, responded to and disposed more than 2 million instances about child abuse (including 676,569 unique child abuse victims) during Federal fiscal year 2011."

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-justice-and-responsibility-league/201305/most-sex-offenders-against-children-are-family-mem

Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 11:32 AM

Ariel Castro Showed Typical [sic] Sex Offender Behavior [beware, advert]

"Sex offenders prove difficult to profile. There is no specific race, gender, education level, income level, or religion that indicate sex offender behavior."

http://www.netnanny.com/blog/ariel-castro-showed-typical-sex-offender-behavior/

Friday, 26 April 2013

Would You Have Thunk It? ... The Wonders Of 'Science', Mind You ...

12 hours 2 minutes ago

Paedophiles identified accurately with implicit association tasks

"A combination of two tasks for implied sexual associations has distinguished – with more than 90 per cent certainty – a group of paedophilic men from a group of men with a sexual preference for adult women. In the long term this could lead to a diagnostic test, for example for men who have applied to work with children. (ah, so people who are attracted to people, should not be allowed to work with people - we see, because, tastes cannot develop (or be quenched), or be shielded (or repressed), can they? ..oh, and self-control does not exist, does it?]

Psychologists at Radboud University Nijmegen will publish their findings in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior (online from 24 april).

This study was the first to work with paedophilic men who were not imprisoned or confined for involuntary psychiatric treatment in a clinic.

It reported a highly significant effect: the tests distinguished the paedophile group from the controls with more than 90 per cent accuracy.

Furthermore, in both groups of subjects (paedophiles and heterosexual non-paedophiles [how do you know?]) one of the tasks (the Picture Association Task, see below) indicated positive as well as negative associations with sex with either children under twelve or adult women.

Stated another way: the test showed that paedophiles not only have positive associations with children and sex, but also negative associations with adult women and sex. In the control group, this was the exact opposite."

"in paedophiles (people with a sexual preference for children) and paedosexuals (people who act according to this preference)? [ah, yet another definition]"

http://www.healthcanal.com/public-health-safety/38023-paedophiles-identified-accurately-with-implicit-association-tasks.html

April 2013

Assessment of Implicit Sexual Associations in Non-Incarcerated Pedophiles

Abstract

"Offences committed by pedophiles [sic] are crimes that evoke serious public concern and outrage.

Although recent research using implicit measures has shown promise in detecting deviant sexual associations, the discriminatory and predictive quality of implicit tasks has not yet surpassed traditional assessment methods such as questionnaires and phallometry.

The current research extended previous findings by examining whether a combination of two implicit tasks, the Implicit Association Task (IAT) and the Picture Association Task (PAT), was capable of differentiating pedophiles from non-pedophiles, and whether the PAT, which allows separate analysis for male, female, boy and girl stimulus categories, was more sensitive to specific sexual associations in pedophiles than the IAT.

A total of 20 male self-reported pedophiles (10 offender and 10 non-offenders) and 20 male self-reported heterosexual [wink] controls completed the two implicit measures.

Results indicated that the combination of both tasks produced the strongest results to date in detecting implicit pedophilic preferences (AUC = .97).

Additionally, the PAT showed promise in decomposing the sexual associations in pedophiles.

Interestingly, as there was an equal distribution of offenders and non-offenders in the pedophile group, it was possible to test for implicit association differences between these groups. This comparison showed no clear link between having these implicit sexual associations and actual offending."

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-013-0094-0

Sunday, 14 April 2013

It's Time For Change - In Law

Posted Yesterday 8:07 PM (GMT +1)

The Facts - Listen Up Employers

">Most people commit a crime but are not caught. One estimate is that only three per cent of crimes result in convictions.

>Home Office research shows that one in three males has a criminal conviction. Drawing on the same research, the report on the Review of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, Breaking the Circle, indicates that overall 25% of the population of working age has a conviction.

>More recent research has indicated that 17% of the population between the ages of 18 and 52 have a conviction.

>Half of male offenders and three quarters of female offenders have just one conviction.

>55% of men and 80% of women convicted have an offending history, which last’s less than a year.

>By the age of 25, 43% of men who had offended were classified as ‘desistors’ meaning that they had not offended for five years.

>Research by Working Links confirms this, showing that over 80% of employers who have employed ex-offenders say that they have ‘settled into work well with colleagues performed well’ and have ‘proved to be reliable’.

>60% of employers said ex-offenders ‘perform as well or better than those with no conviction’

>CRB checks have soared from around 1.4million in 2002-3 to over 3.8 million in 2008-9. Since the inception of the bureau, 19 million checks have been completed.

>An estimated 11% of CRB disclosure checks are technically unlawful.

>A 2009 study from the Chartered Institute of Personnel Development found 36.6% of employers would exclude all ex-offenders from their recruitment process. [much worse for 'sex offenders']

>58% of women and 53% of men in prison identified unemployment and lack of skills as issues contributing to their offending.

I would like all those employers that have doubt's about employing ex-offenders to read the information above, it's time for change !"

http://forum.unlock.org.uk/default.aspx?f=33&m=21400

Thursday, 29 November 2012

Thank Goodness For The Free Availability of 'CP' - Possibly?

Updated 11:24 a.m., Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Sources for data showing child sex abuse decline

"NEW YORK (AP) — Researchers at the University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center say data from a half-dozen sources suggest child sex abuse cases have dramatically declined since the 1990s. Here are details on data from the report, written by UNH professors David Finkelhor and Lisa Jones and published in the center's October 2012 bulletin."

http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Sources-for-data-showing-child-sex-abuse-decline-4073964.php

Child sex abuse cases dramatically decline in US, says report

http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2012/1130/Child-sex-abuse-cases-dramatically-decline-in-US-says-report?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+feeds%2Flearning+%28Christian+Science+Monitor+|+Learning%29