Westminster Knows What 'You' Have Been Up To, Jim - It Just Cannot Afford To Say It - So It Applies A Different Approach

1 day ago

Jim Gamble former head of CEOP, Child Exploitation & Online Protection agency, on his concerns about National Crime Agency 

"Jim Gamble former head of CEOP, Child Exploitation & Online Protection agency, on his concerns about National Crime Agency."

http://audioboo.fm/boos/1391144-jim-gamble-former-head-of-ceop-child-exploitation-online-protection-agency-on-his-concerns-about-national-crime-agency-bbcnolan

Comment:

'Accountability', says Jim - how ironic.

The OSC

Ladies And Gentlemen - May We Present, To You, Mr Stephen Nolan (Part 1)

Mr Stephen Nolan
Fear-Mongering, Zealot, White Knight or Gullible, Principled, Investigative Reporter?

Dr Oldfield, once again, contacts Stephen, on behalf of The OSC ...

***** 
 
To: nolan@bbc.co.uk
Subject: Come on Stephen, get up-to-speed ...
4/3/13;19:48

*****

Stephen,

You are at it, again ... 

"... taking away the court's ability ... that sex 'offender' is walking back onto the streets, with no curfew, no, no restrictions, no probation around them, whatsoever ..." - Stephen Nolan sits in (3/4/13), http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01rlr62

You really are a tool, sometimes, Stephen ...

*****

"2. Notification Requirements

2.1 What the requirements are

The notification requirements for those convicted or *****cautioned***** for sexual offences (commonly referred to as the ‘sex offenders register’) were initially introduced to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland as part of the Sex Offenders Act 1997. This system, which applied retrospectively, was amended under Part 2 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 meaning that relevant offenders were required to notify certain personal details to the police in their area. These included:

>Name and any aliases;

>Date of birth;

>National Insurance number;

>Main address and any addresses at which they reside for more than 7 days in 12 months;

>Foreign travel plans of three days duration or more

>Any changes to the above details.

However, under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Notification Requirements) (England & Wales) Regulations 2012, since the August 2012 those subject to notification requirements are also required to:

>Notify the police of all foreign travel (including any period of less than three days);

>Notify weekly where they are not registered as regularly residing or staying at one place (i.e. where a registered sex offender has no sole or main residence and instead must notify the police of the place where he can regularly be found);

>Notify where they are living in a household with a child under the age of 18. Under the changes, those subject to the notification requirements will be required to notify when residing or staying in a relevant household for a period of at least 12 hours with a child who is under the age of 18;

>Notify bank account and credit card details. This has been explained by the Home Office as being necessary to tackle Internet child pornography. Whilst the legislation requires notification of bank accounts, credit and debit cards held by the offender or jointly, it does not require details of accounts, credit or debit cards held independently by family members to be provided.

*****

March 12, 2013

Solicitors to challenge to Sex Offenders Registration Rules 

http://www.factuk.org/solicitors-to-challenge-to-sex-offenders-registration-rules

*****

>Notify information about their passports or other identity documents at each notification. This provision has been put in place purportedly to stop individuals from seeking to avoid being on the register when they change their name.

These details must be provided in person at a nominated police station within 3 days of the conviction or caution and must be updated on an annual basis. For a list of the police stations which can accept notifications, click here. Individuals subject to the requirements are also routinely photographed when making a notification. Failure to comply with the notification requirements is a criminal offence punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment.

These requirements are reflected in updated guidance published by the Home Office, which provides useful and detailed information about how these requirements work in practice. It also has a useful FAQ document available to download."

http://www.unlock.org.uk/xoffenders.aspx?sid=125

*****

Sex Offenders' Register [sic]

"The sentence received is used to calculate the period for which the offender will be subject to notification requirements. These are set as follows:

>Life Imprisonment, Imprisonment for 30 months or more, imprisonment for public protection and admission to hospital under restriction order - INDEFINITELY

>Imprisonment for more than 6 months but fewer than 30 months - 10 YEARS

>Imprisonment for 6 months or less or admission to hospital without restriction order - 7 YEARS

>*****Caution - 2 YEARS*****

>Conditional Discharge - PERIOD OF CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE

>Any other - 5 YEARS"

http://www.yourrights.org.uk/yourrights/privacy/spent-convictions-and-the-rehabilitation-of-offenders/retention-and-disclosure-of-information-about-your-convictions-and-other-involvement-with-the-police/sex-offenders-register.shtml

*****

"Sexual Offences Prevention Orders (SOPOs)

>Legislation Sexual Offences Act 2003 s 104-113

>Maximum length Indefinite (SOA 2003 s 107(1)(b))

>Minimum length 5 years (SOA 2003 s 107(1)(b))

>Which court can make an order? Youth Court, Magistrates’ Courts, Crown Courts

The basics

These orders are civil behaviour orders or ‘preventive orders’ imposed upon conviction (‘post-conviction orders’) or upon complaint (‘stand-alone orders’). The former are by far the most common.

The orders specify terms which prohibit the person subject to the order from doing certain things. The orders are targeted at sexual offending and are designed to prevent the commission of acts or offences which would cause serious sexual harm to another person.

SOPOs are from the same family as ASBOs. A SOPO operates in a similar way to an ASBO in that it is preventative in nature, targeted at the behaviour of the person subject to the order. Consequently, many of the principles are the same.

Power to order

Stand-alone orders

The power is a discretionary power.

A Chief Officer of Police may by complaint make an application if a) it appears that that the defendant has been convicted of a Schedule 3 offence (list here) or a Schedule 5 offence (list here), or if he has been *****cautioned***** for such an offence, and b) the defendant has acted in a way as to give reasonable cause to believe that an order is necessary.

(SOA 2003 s 104(1) and (4))"

http://ukcrime.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/sexual-offences-prevention-orders-sopos/

*****

The system can [and does] easily place many odious restrictions, if it so chooses (or, more to the point, if they are 'needed').

Can you see how you spread unwarranted fear and disinformation? Naughty lad ...

... get some knowledge (but, not from your 'expert' barrister buddy ;) ).

Will have your piece up, soon. Will let you know.

Nigel.
p.s. please confirm that you received this email.

*****

The OSC

Perhaps Not Everything, Maura

16 February 2013 Last updated at 23:03

Sex case defendants 'should get anonymity'

"Maura McGowan - When a defendant is convicted "everything [sic] should be open" says Maura McGowan

Suspects in sex cases should have their identities protected until they are convicted, a senior lawyer has said.

Maura McGowan QC, chairman of the Bar Council of England and Wales, said defendants should get the same right to anonymity as complainants.

She wants the change because sexual allegations carry "such a stigma".

But the charity Rape Crisis said anonymity for defendants would discourage people from reporting sex crimes and "victimise victims [sic] further".

Ms McGowan told the Stephen Nolan Show on BBC Radio 5 live: "Until they have been proven to have done something as awful as this, I think there is a strong argument in cases of this sort - because they carry such stigma with them - to maintain the defendant's anonymity."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21487266

Sex suspects 'should not be named'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/feb/17/sex-suspects-should-not-be-names-lawyer?CMP=twt_fd

Alleged rapists should be given anonymity, head of Bar Council says

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9875761/Alleged-rapists-should-be-given-anonymity-head-of-Bar-Council-says.html

Anonymity: Why Sexual Offences?

http://mamaauk.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/anonymity-why-sexual-offences.html

Has Jim Gamble Grown Balls, At Last? - We Doubt It

Jgamble

https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE

https://twitter.com/Jgineqe

You had all better believe it, Jim.

Even "geeks, freaks and morons" [name calling, Jim ... best you got?], were able to take you out of circulation, and we will do it again, if you ever recover any importance or credibility.

We look forward to your book, with relish.

*****

Just for the record, you will see all the usual suspects, still in cahoots, doing the keercchinggg ...

BTW, who is Philip Porter? Looks like a promotional sock, to us.

Oh ... and, as for your lunch buddy, Sean ...

*****

21Mar12 – 12:48 pm

Times crime editor warns of “chilling effect” of Leveson Inquiry

"The crime editor of the Times has said the “chilling effect” of the Leveson Inquiry and the Metropolitan police’s “internal clampdown” has led to there being “virtually no social contact with officers”.

“In the current climate, if you arranged to meet an officer you’d be looking over your shoulder the whole time,” Sean O’Neill told the Inquiry this morning.

He expressed his fear that building up a relationship of trust with contacts would be “seriously inhibited” if it were impossible to meet them for coffee, noting that he had “bought officers and staff cups of coffee, pints of beer, lunches and evening meals”."

http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2012/03/21/sean-oneill-leveson/

Held on Wednesday 21 Mar at 10:00

Transcript of a hearing of the Leveson Inquiry

"Q: In terms of your career, Mr O'Neill, after working as a reporter in Northern Ireland, you moved to the Daily Telegraph in 1992, you joined the Times in 2004 and you became its crime editor in 2007; is that correct?"

http://fullfact.org/leveson/hearings/120321-am

Last updated at 10:15PM, January 9 2011 

Child safety merger condemned as ‘dangerous’

"Sean O'Neill Crime Editor"

"Theresa May’s plans to shake up Britain’s world-renowned child protection squad have been condemned as potentially dangerous.

The Home Office said yesterday that the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) would investigate the scandal of street grooming gangs exposed by The Times last week.

But Jim Gamble, who quit [oh yes, quit ;) ] recently as head of Ceop, and other prominent supporters of the unit in Britain and abroad, said that the Home Secretary’s plans to subsume it into a new FBI-style agency were ill-informed, politically motivated and potentially dangerous for child safety."

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article2868696.ece


*****

You see ... it all starts to fit together.

The OSC.

Chris Wittwer - A Sometimes Honest Vigilante

http://www.facebook.com/stylz123

“I am in fear for my safety and in a state of constant anxiety as I believe if this material continues to be published it will only be a matter of time before the threats materialise into an attack on me or my home. The defendants are publishing comments intended to vilify me, some of which are directly threatening.” - The paedophile [sic] known as XY"

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/paedophile-seeks-damages-for-facebook-harassment-16246284.html

http://www.facebook.com/stylz123

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Children-have-rights-in-society/223544744395572

Your cognitive distortions do make us giggle, Chris. All we do, is in The Public Interest.

So It Goes

3 December 2012 Last updated at 17:02

Convicted paedophile [sic] seeks damages from Facebook

"A convicted child sex offender, who won a landmark court case forcing Facebook to take down a website page monitoring paedophiles [sic], is now seeking damages.

On Friday, Facebook was given 72 hours to take down the page 'Keeping our kids safe from predators', which had focused on paedophiles [sic] in Northern Ireland.

The man took the case after discovering that his photograph and threatening comments were posted on the page.

Facebook complied with the order, but a similar page appeared within hours.

The High Court judge who ordered the removal of the original page, Mr Justice McCloskey, held that the contents of the original version amounted to prima facie harassment of the man and risked infringing his human rights."

"When he issued the proceedings against Facebook, the man claimed harassment, misuse of private information, and a breach of his right to privacy and freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment.

Mr Justice McCloskey's written judgment discloses that one of the remedies being sought is a claim for damages against Facebook Ireland Ltd.

That issue has not been determined, with the ruling only on interim relief.

The court heard the man suffers from ill health and fears being attacked or burnt out of his home.

In a statement filed as part of his case he said: "I am in fear for my safety and in a state of constant anxiety as I believe if this material continues to be published it will only be a matter of time before the threats materialise into an attack on me or my home.

Hatred

"The defendants are publishing comments intended to vilify me, some of which are directly threatening.

"By publishing this material about me, the defendants are providing a vehicle for others who may have criminal intent to gain information about where I live and to stir up hatred against me.""

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-20585862
  
Paedophile [sic] seeks damages from Facebook

http://www.u.tv/News/Paedophile-seeks-damages-from-Facebook/c928f3b9-86d3-4f47-b91e-dbed7aafbe90

December 5, 2012

*****

English Judge strikes down Facebook page “Keeping our Kids Safe From Predators”

http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2012/12/05/judge-strikes-down-facebook-page-keeping-our-kids-safe-from-predators/

X v Facebook Ireland Ltd [2012] NIQB 96 (30 November 2012)  

http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIHC/QB/2012/96.html

Let's Party, Stephen

On this issue ...

nolan@bbc.co.uk

"Dear Stephen,

Just listened to the Audioboo.

Bob did a great a job (particularly in challenging your reliance on 'The Other'), against your denial, illogical mindset and lack of correct knowledge (no offence, but it is true).

I expect you believe a lot of what you say, but, that is because you 'will not' face (or even find) the realities of the issues, and believe that your moral position to be the only acceptable version.

CEOP are liars and disinformers, consistently, and I can prove it - they are empire-mongers and spooks, little else.

Stephen, I understand your position and thank you for your work, but, you appear to have swallowed the lies and myths, hook, line and sinker; a position unworthy of your integrity.

If you REALLY want to deal with these issues, positively (and I believe you really do), then let us have an extended discussion.

It does not need to be in public (yet or ever), emails/pms/skype are fine.

e.g. you could make 5-10 statements, which you believe, in advance, I will then respond to them, in detail.

I will leave it with you.

All the best.

Nigel."

It Will End In Tears, Chris

4:29pm UK, Friday 30 November 2012

New Paedophile [sic] Monitoring Page On Facebook

"Just hours after a challenge from a convicted sex offender sees one page shut down a new version can be found online.

Facebook was told to remove the offending page

A new Facebook page which claims to be an information service on the whereabouts of paedophiles has been set up just hours after a judge ordered a similar one be removed.

A convicted paedophile, known only as XY, started court proceedings in Northern Ireland against the social networking site after discovering his photograph and threatening comments had been posted on the page called Keeping Our Kids Safe From Predators.

He claimed harassment, misuse of private information, and a breach of his right to privacy and freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment.

High Court judge Mr Justice McCloskey ruled his human rights had been breached and said Facebook must take down the page within 72 hours.

However, during the afternoon a new page with the title Keeping Our Kids Safe From Predators 2 could be found on the site.

"Back 2 the start i go everything i shared from the last page is gone grrrrrrrrrrrr :( just not far (sic) at all...., " the creator posted shortly after setting the new page up."

http://news.sky.com/story/1018963/new-paedophile-monitoring-page-on-facebook

Convicted paedophile [sic] wins Facebook injunction to shut down 'keeping our kids safe from predators' page as judge rules it infringes sex offender's human rights - but second page appears within hours

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/convicted-paedophile-wins-facebook-injunction-to-shut-down-keeping-our-kids-safe-from-predators-page-as-judge-rules-it-infringes-sex-offenders-human-rights--but-second-page-appears-within-hours-8372078.html

Facebook Ordered to Remove Paedophile Monitoring Page - But Second One [third, actually] Appears

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/410160/20121130/facebook-remove-pedophile-monitoring-page-children-safe.htm

Convicted paedophile wins Facebook injunction to shut down 'keeping our kids safe from predators' page as judge rules it infringes sex offender's human rights - and yet within hours a second page appears

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/convicted-paedophile-wins-facebook-injunction-to-shut-down-keeping-our-kids-safe-from-predators-page-as-judge-rules-it-infringes-sex-offenders-human-rights--and-yet-within-hours-a-second-page-appears-8372078.html

Sex offender wins Facebook case but new site springs up within hours

http://www.independent.ie/national-news/sex-offender-wins-facebook-case-but-new-site-springs-up-within-hours-3311504.html

30th November 2012 19:47 GMT

Sex offender wins case against Facebook vigilantism 

"These pages are the hunting grounds of vigilantes, and as we've seen before in the UK, this sort of thing does more harm than good. A naming and shaming campaign started by then–News of the World editor (and now possible jailbird herself) Rebekah Brooks in 2000 led to five families being forced to flee their homes after being mistakenly identified as former sex offenders."

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/30/facebook_vigilante_page/ 

Facebook ordered to remove paedophile [sic] monitoring page

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9714265/Facebook-ordered-to-remove-paedophile-monitoring-page.html

Facebook given 72 hours to remove paedophile [sic] monitoring page

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-20556775

Facebook ordered to remove anti-paedophiles [sic] page

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/news/a442097/facebook-ordered-to-remove-anti-paedophiles-page.html

Facebook paedophile [sic] page must close

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland/facebook-paedophile-page-must-close-16244860.html

Facebook Must Remove Page Outing Sex Offenders, Says UK Judge

http://www.webpronews.com/facebook-must-remove-page-outing-sex-offenders-says-uk-judge-2012-11

Sex Offender Wins Facebook Case

http://www.4ni.co.uk/northern_ireland_news.asp?id=154917

Child-molester wins court case against Facebook

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2012/11/30/20397886.html

Facebook gets 72 hours to remove paedophile [sic] monitoring page

http://memeburn.com/2012/11/facebook-gets-72-hours-to-remove-paedophile-monitoring-page/

UK judge orders Facebook to take down sex offender awareness page

http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/30/3710140/facebook-sex-offender-page-removal

Facebook ordered to remove page exposing paedophiles [sic]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/nov/30/facebook-remove-paedophile-page

Facebook Paedophile Page Closed After Court Rules It Breaches Offenders' Human Rights

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/11/30/facebook-paedophile-site-_n_2219100.html?

Paedophile [sic] wins Facebook injunction bid

http://www.u.tv/News/Paedophile-wins-Facebook-injunction-bid/83e7aaf7-c308-4faa-add1-aee27f7f4306

Facebook paedophile [sic] page must close

http://www.argus.ie/breaking-news/national-news/facebook-paedophile-page-must-close-3311195.html

Facebook pedophile [sic] page removed

http://www.news24.com/Technology/News/Facebook-pedophile-page-removed-20121201

Facebook loses paedophile [sic] page

http://news.iafrica.com/worldnews/830504.html

Facebook page tracking sex offenders infringes human rights, says Irish judge

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/30/facebook-page-tracking-sex-offenders-infringes-human-rights-says-irish-judge/

UK High Court orders Facebook to remove paedophile [sic] monitoring page within 72 hours

http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2012/11/30/high-court-orders-facebook-to-remove-paedophile-monitoring-page/

Belfast's Johns Elliot defeated as sex offender wins case against Facebook

http://www.thelawyer.com/belfasts-johns-elliot-defeated-as-sex-offender-wins-case-against-facebook/1015835.article

December 3, 2012 1:52 PM GMT

Facebook to Track ‘Keeping Our Kids Safe From Predators 2’ Paedophile [sic] Monitoring Page

"The second page has gained over 3,500 Likes since it appeared online

Facebook said it will track the content of a paedophile [sic] monitoring page after it was forced to remove an identical predecessor page by a high court order.

The page "Keeping our kids safe from predators" was removed after a convicted sex offender who appeared on the page won a court order against it. A judge ruled that some of the content amounted to harassment and breached the man's human rights.

Almost immediately, however, a second Facbook page, "Keeping our kids safe from predators 2", appeared on Facebook. Again, it features the names and pictures of convicted sex offenders.

The second page, which has gained over 3,500 "likes" carries a warning that rude or threatening comments will lead to the removal of the commentator.

A spokesman for Facebook told IBTimes UK that the page was not violating the company's terms and conditions but that it would be monitored.

A spokesman said: "Consistent with the court order, the [first] page is unavailable. We will be studying the text of the order before deciding on [our] next steps.""

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/410718/20121203/facebook-paedophile-monitoring-page-keeping-kids-safe.htm

*****

Chris Wittwer [admin of 'Keeping our kids safe from predators 2"', at the time of writing - 3/12/12]

http://www.facebook.com/stylz123

Children have rights in society

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Children-have-rights-in-society/223544744395572 

Keeping our kids safe from predators 2"

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Keeping-our-kids-safe-from-predators-2/388709557873383

Still keeping our kids safe from predators

http://www.facebook.com/kuksfp

A registered sex offender tells Stephen that websites shouldn't name and shame paedophiles

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01p0s6s

The Stephen Nolan Show

http://www.facebook.com/TheNolanShow

Convicted sex offender

http://audioboo.fm/boos/1091728-convicted-sex-offender

BOYCOTT THE NOLAN SHOW, COZ HE GAVE A PLATFORM TO PAEDO'S

http://www.facebook.com/groups/442463942483408/