What Could Claire Perry's (and Cronies) New, Enlightening, Content, Of 21st Century Sex Education, Possibly Be?

10:00PM BST 02 Sep 2012

Children 'should be taught about porn on the net'

"Children should be taught about the “negative impact of online pornography” in the classroom, one of David Cameron’s main advisers has said as leading charities call for an overhaul of sex education."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/10282171/Better-sex-education-Children-should-be-taught-about-porn-on-the-net.html

MP Claire Perry welcomes the Telegraph's sex education campaign

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/10281971/MP-Claire-Perry-welcomes-the-Telegraphs-sex-education-campaign.html

TITLE: Prime Minister David Cameron: Bring sex and relationship education into the 21st century - Yas Necati

https://www.change.org/petitions/title-prime-minister-david-cameron-bring-sex-and-relationship-education-into-the-21st-century

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23bettersexeducation&src=typd

https://twitter.com/louisapeacock

https://twitter.com/Emmabarnett

https://twitter.com/TeleWonderWomen

https://twitter.com/claire4devizes

*****

Ah, Old-Age Feminism ... nothing new to see, here, move along ...

Except, who, exactly, can this www.change.org be ... 

https://www.change.org/users/21748526

https://twitter.com/YasNecati

http://yassayshi.blogspot.co.uk

http://feministcats.blogspot.co.uk

https://plus.google.com/102125041365703780082/posts

Schoolgirl Yas Necati: Sex education is outdated 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/better-sex-education/10276434/Schoolgirl-Yas-Necati-Sex-education-is-outdated.html 

Seems to be a cute, sorta-crazee, wee, lass, being exploited, by aging lesbians (just sayin').

We will be having a look at you lot (again).

More to follow - maybe - later.

The OSC

*****

The Telegraph needs a non-sexist approach to promoting sex-ed

http://www.newstatesman.com/lifestyle/2013/09/telegraph-needs-non-sexist-approach-promoting-sex-ed

Ten things more important than porn they need to teach in sex education

http://www.newstatesman.com/v-spot/2013/09/ten-things-more-important-porn-they-need-teach-sex-education

Update sex education guidance to schools, says Clegg

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-23975010

David Cameron: Children should be taught about 'dangers' of online porn in classroom

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/better-sex-education/10292169/David-Cameron-Children-should-be-taught-about-dangers-of-online-porn-in-classroom.html

Science

Read It And Laugh

The Clowns Were Sent In

Connectivity, content and consumers: Britain's digital platform for growth

"Organisation: Department for Culture, Media & Sport
"Page history: Published 30 July 2013
"Policies: Making it easier for the media and creative industries to grow, while protecting the "interests of citizens+ 1 other
"Ministers: The Rt Hon Maria Miller MP+ 1 other

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/connectivity-content-and-consumers-britains-digital-platform-for-growth

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/225783/Connectivity_Content_and_Consumers_2013.pdf

*****

July 31, 2013

Government wants default blocking to hit small ISPs

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/government-wants-default-blocking-to-hit-small-isps

David Cameron: Stop Sleepwalking the UK into Censorship

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/cameron-stop-sleepwalking

Posted on Jul 31, 2013

Sex & Censorship

"In the two years since Perry’s inquiry, well-funded morality campaigners, with the assistance of the mass media, have created an unrelenting series of panics over sex and sexuality.

According to the reports, which have become increasingly hysterical, our children are being “force-fed” a “torrent” of porn. Our high streets have become “sexualised” and our society has become “pornified”. Women are “objectified” everywhere, and “rape culture” abounds.

I’ve followed these reports with care for several years, and they are always infuriatingly free of any evidence to back them. They have become as prevalent in the normally liberal Guardian as the endlessly obnoxious Daily Mail.

Many of us have carefully reviewed the available evidence, and none of it backs the scare stories. Well-written books have dismantled the claims one at a time. But it is far easier to sell fear than reassurance, and generous grants are available to those who claim to be “saving women” and “protecting children”. "

http://www.rudemagazine.co.uk/culture/sex-censorship.php

CEOP - Once Again, We Challenge Your Lies

Posted: 09/06/2013 08:36 BST | Updated: 09/06/2013 09:27 BST

David Cameron Tells Google Child Pornography 'Pollutes The Internet'

"David Cameron has demanded [sic] Google do more to rid the internet of child pornography, warning that lives are being put at risk [sic].

The Prime Minister said he was "sickened" by the material available online [how does he know, from CEOP/IWF?] and told web search firms to stop making excuses [sic].

The companies have been summoned [sic] to a council of war [hahahaha] with Culture Secretary Maria Miller [oh dear], and Cameron's adviser on the issue Tory MP Claire Perry [oh dear], on June 17.

Research [sic] by the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) has suggested [has what?] that more than half [what, all?] of those who view child abuse images [sic] go on to commit abuse themselves [really?]."

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/09/david-cameron-child-pornography-pollutes-the-internet_n_3410305.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

Jim Gamble

https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE

https://twitter.com/Jgineqe

Comment:

Publish 'your' 'research', in full, for peer analysis - or stand accused of being liars.

The OSC

*****

Addendum (12/6/13)

We quite like Richard Bougeard, at present. He seems a nice guy, keen and pleasant, but, he is just another dangerous, clueless, newbie ... here we go …

*****

Tuesday, 11 June 2013 

We are far too lenient with online sex offenders [sic] (JEP 11/06/2013)

"Whilst reading through todays online edition of the JEP, I happened on an excellent [seriously flawed, on most counts] article by Richard Heath, that impressed me so much I thought I'd include this in my newly started blog.

In this piece Richard refers to the link between viewing child abuse images/videos [sic], and the sexually motivated murders of children, following the convictions of Stuart Hazel and Mark Bridger. To any normal person [sic], it seems perfectly plausible [sic] that someone who has a sexual "fetish" (for want of a better word) [indeed] for children and looks at such images online, will, quite probably [sic], eventually get bored of merely viewing these vile images or films [sic], and go to the next step of actual sexual abuse of children [sic]."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/we-are-far-too-lenient-with-online-sex.html

Richard Heath

http://www.thisisjersey.com/comment/richard-heath/

... and so it goes on. Read the articles, for yourself, because a big hit will come.

*****

This, of course, ties in with this tosh ...

Published: 09th June 2013

We need web cops to keep our kids safe

"They went online and searched for images because of their deviant [sic] sexual interest in children. Abusers caught viewing images will argue they would never [never say never] progress to contact abuse. I bet Bridger would have used the same defence if he’d been caught with images earlier [and would he have been correct, or not?].

But a study was carried out on 155 US prisoners jailed for viewing child abuse images [sic].

At the beginning, 26 per cent admitted a physical contact offence with 75 children [already a skewed cohort].

By the end of the study, which used a lie detector test [ah], 85 per cent had admitted to contact offences with 1,777 children.

So what can internet giants such as Google do? [little, to nothing] Contrary to popular belief, Google DOES block abuse images [we know].

When we were setting up CEOP (Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre), Microsoft, Google and others gave us plenty of help [wonder why?]. Now, more than ever, we need that spirit of partnership and shared responsibility.

Internet service and search engine providers could consider the British Transport Police model — a fully-fledged police service paid for by the rail, freight, passenger and infrastructure businesses that they make safe [The Unaccountable Internet Police (UIP) - Yes, we know what you were employed to do, Jim].

It is a model that could be funded by a levy from the internet giants, many of whom enjoy beneficial tax breaks.

They could and should sponsor safer search initiatives, warning and deterring people who search for images that are blocked. [nice, but, essentially, irrelevant]"

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/justice/4961482/child-safety-chief-on-making-internet-safe-from-paedos.html

Jim Gamble

https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE

https://twitter.com/Jgineqe

... and this ...

Oh Dear Jim, You Are Getting Sloppier And Sloppier, In Your Old Age - The Butner Myth?

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/oh-dear-jim-you-are-getting-sloppier.html

Enjoy.

The OSC

Stupid, Politician Or Profiteer? Whomever, Whatever, Just Play The Paedocard

Sunday 9 June 2013 11.08 BST

Google must fight spread of online child abuse images [sic], says David Cameron

"Internet companies summoned to 'council of war' by prime minister to battle proliferation of 'sickening' pictures on web"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/jun/09/david-cameron-google-child-abuse

Cameron Calls For ‘More Action’ Against Online Child Abuse Images [sic]

http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/cameron-online-child-abuse-118579

Mothers of April Jones and Sara Payne campaign against internet child abuse images [sic]

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/mothers-april-jones-sara-payne-4282240

April's mum calls for new law to block online child abuse images [sic]

http://www.cambrian-news.co.uk/news/i/32592/

April Jones parents make web child abuse [sic] clampdown call

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-22779374

PM wants web firms 'action' on child porn

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22831219

Government demands action on web safety [sic]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22794498

Only one in 15 online child porn suspects is arrested [we think you will find you are orders of magnitude out]: Chief constables accused of treating offences as a 'low priority' [evidence-based, good, decision-making, at last]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2338613/Only-15-online-child-porn-suspects-arrested-Chief-constables-accused-treating-offences-low-priority.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490

Join our battle to beat net perverts

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/justice/4961199/april-jones-and-sarah-payne-campaign-to-rid-interent-of-indecent-child-images.html

David Cameron Tells Google Child Pornography 'Pollutes The Internet'

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/09/david-cameron-child-pornography-pollutes-the-internet_n_3410305.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

Comment:

Of course, the grid which 'supplies' the internet, trafficks CSAcI (Child Sexual Activity Images), along with every other image. We have been making it clear, for years, that, this is the primary reason why the IWF was created, so as to protect the financial interests of the owners of nodes on the grid (e.g. the ISPs (i.e. main members of the IWF), not peripheral content providers, which is the greatest red herring of all), as 'common carriers'.

We will be interested to see, just how far they will all now go, so as to assist the establishment, in further removing our fundamental freedoms on the internet.

Those with a modicum of knowledge know how this will go.

The OSC

Addendum (13/6/13)

Google shamed [hahahahaha, a member of the IWF] into donating £1million for the fight against child porn online but government insists it is only a first step [why, what else you got?]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2340367/Google-shamed-donating-1million-fight-child-porn-online-government-insists-step.html

Google gives £1m to child abuse charity [hahahahaha - keercchinnggggg] ahead of web porn Whitehall summit

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-06/13/google-donates-child-abuse

Labour to demand action over child pornography [welcome onto the paedowagon]

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-06-12/labour-piles-pressure-on-government-over-child-porn/

Labour says coalition being 'strung along' by internet firms

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22871371

*****

Internet Watch Foundation given powers to police child porn

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10127862/Internet-Watch-Foundation-given-powers-to-police-child-porn.html

The battle over who should police the web

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22942164

*****

24.07.2013

Cameron ‘Porn’ Advisor’s website ‘hacked’ – Threatens/Libels Blogger

"I’m perhaps one of the last people you’d expect to see stepping up to defend Paul Staines (aka Guido Fawkes) but you’d be wrong because there are principles that come into play whenever a blogger, even one as notorious as Guido, is subjected to an unjustified, hectoring attack by a bullying politician for reasons that have never been better expressed than by the playwright Robert Bolt ..."

http://www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2013/07/24/cameron-porn-advisors-website-hacked-threatenslibels-blogger/#comments

Claire Perry’s Website Hacked By Porn Prankers

http://order-order.com/2013/07/23/claire-perrys-website-hacked-by-porn-prankers/ 

Should Guido Sue Claire Perry?

http://order-order.com/2013/07/24/should-guido-sue-claire-perry/

Claire Perry Concedes Guido Didn’t “Sponsor” Hacking

http://order-order.com/2013/09/05/claire-perry-concedes-guido-didnt-sponsor-hacking-her-website

Lydia Does Not Yet Fancy The Idea Of Penises

 Oh Lydia, Lydia ... education scars you for life - how odd.

PUBLISHED: 00:36, 30 March 2013 | UPDATED: 00:36, 30 March 2013

Children of 12 exposed to explicit conversations on webcam chat sites

">Up to [?] 50 per cents [sic] of live video streams on chat sites contain porn.
>Most internet porn filters do not block online chat rooms.

Children as young as 12 are being subjected [sic] to obscene images and explicit conversations on free video chat websites, child safety [sic] experts [sic] warn.

The Daily Mail found up to [?] 50 per cent of the live video streams on these websites contain nudity or graphic acts.

Parents are often unaware of this danger [sic] in their own homes because most internet filters fail to block the sites."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301398/Children-12-exposed-explicit-conversations-webcam-chat-sites.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Comment:

Maybe Lydia never will.
Maybe Lydia is a (proto)lesbian.
Maybe Lydia is a bit of a wimp, who needs to shape up or ship out.
Maybe the story, as given, is BS.
Maybe, in essence, Psychotherapy is BS.
 
What are facts, is that there is no danger, no harm, no trauma ... only learning, some frowns and giggles, and, maybe, a few orgasms (if, perhaps, a little one-sided).

There are many more possibilities, than Omegle, Streamberry and ChatRandom ... and, guess what? .... the kids choose to go and watch and play.

Such are the glorious wonders of the internet; now time to repeal some laws.

If you do not like it, control your childrens' access to adult domains .... and make a few more Lydias, in doing so.

The OSC

*****

Sunday 31 March 201

The day my 11-year-old son found violent porn on the web

"Children have always found ways to discover the world on their own and that’s essential and it’s important that adults don’t interfere with that discovery and self-education ..."

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/features/the-day-my-11yearold-sonfound-violent-porn-on-the-web-8555595.html?google_editors_picks=true

Sunday 31 March 2013 

Editorial: Child pornography [article nothing to do with IIOC] is a menace [sic] the law can't prevent 

"However unpopular it makes them, parents have to be vigilant – intrusive even – about what information their children are sharing with others.

They have to get tough in insisting on the constant use of strict filters on smartphones and computers.

For the most part children are several steps ahead of adults in computer technology, so monitoring what children are looking at is always going to be hard.

The unpalatable alternative is just to give up, and abandon the hope that we can make more of a collective effort to protect children from this insidious menace [sic]."

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-child-pornography-is-a-menace-the-law-cant-prevent-8555691.html 

*****

April 2013

Parenting and Pornography

"As pornography becomes more available to youngsters through the internet and mobiles, Mariella Frostrup and guests discuss how we can best equip the next generation to deal with it.

Reports show that the numbers of children accessing explicit sexual images are growing. There's increasing concern that youngsters who watch pornography regularly may be tempted to act out scenes of abuse on other children, and that many kids' ideas about relationships and bodies are being affected by the images they are watching."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01rlnhw

Should we Make Love Not Porn to improve sex education for children?

http://metro.co.uk/2013/04/12/should-we-make-love-not-porn-to-improve-sex-education-for-children-3589836/

Make Love Not Porn

http://makelovenotporn.com