Showing posts with label Hash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hash. Show all posts

Friday, 22 November 2013

Expect No Privacy

November 21, 2013 5:58 PM

Google’s Role In Woodland Child Pornography Arrest Raises Privacy Concerns

"The FBI says the investigation began in March when Google’s hashing technology found two child porn pictures in his Picasa library. Picasa is a cloud-sharing platform for images owned by Google.

From there, the company notified the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, which says it found more images on a Tumblr account owned by G. That’s when the feds took over."

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/11/21/googles-role-in-woodland-child-pornography-arrest-raises-privacy-concerns/

PUBLISHED: 17:04, 24 November 2013 | UPDATED: 17:06, 24 November 2013 

Google technology catches out man accused of uploading over 3,000 child porn images and he is arrested by the FBI 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2512752/Google-technology-catches-man-accused-uploading-3-000-child-porn-images-arrested-FBI.html

Monday, 18 November 2013

The Day The Whole Internet Was Censored, Using 'CP' As The Excuse (Again)

*****

Here We Go Again - Bing, Bong, Google, Giggle

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/here-we-go-again-bing-bong-google-giggle.html

*****

Of course, anyone who is not lying, or has a modicum of knowledge and/or principles, knows, that these search terms would never bring up any potentially-illegal images, and have not been able to do so, for many years; knowing that, there is no intention, here or elsewhere, to do so. We do know, that they will be on 'the list'.

Bing, first. SafeSearch off. We could turn images off, but, we will take Microsoft's word for it, as a newbie will.

Web search ...

 


 Much as before, now image/videos/news search ...



We have no idea what the 100,000 possible search terms could be !!!

Now, the zealots, profiteers and simpletons, will be jumping up-and-down, for joy, about that result (not that it stops anything, that really matters, of course).

However, the bonafide researcher and Libertarian should be very concerned, indeed.

Image searches lead, often more rapidly, to very valuable (re)sources ... for example, court documents, media reports, related cases and issues etc. etc. etc.

This is, of course, the (predicted and usual) danger of knee-jerk, blanket, censorship.

This is a private company, Microsoft, throwing the baby out with the bath water, for popularity and profit.

This is the false flag, which is (and has been, for a long time) to be used, for all topics, which are, or will be, deemed to be unacceptable, for our consumption.

This is where we are in 2013 ... and it has little to no point (as suggested), at all.

Next time, Google.

*****




(Embedded Tweets - click date).

Published 18 November 2013

Internet safety summit at Downing Street: communiqué

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/internet-safety-summit-at-downing-street-communique

Published 18 November 2013

PM hosts internet safety summit

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-hosts-internet-safety-summit

***** 

Posted on November 18, 2013

Online child safety [sic] – big things [sic] happening 

"Pulling out the stops

Google and Microsoft have really pulled out the stops. This is a very impressive initiative. It is narrowing the spaces in which paedophiles [sic] and collectors of child abuse images [sic] can operate. The challenge now is to work out how to gauge the effectiveness of and learn from the various measures that are being put in place but I am sure there is a will so we can find a way.

The beginning of a new phase

This is unlikely to be the end of the story but there is no question we have reached an important milestone. There are still anxieties about the Darknet and the true extent to which it and the use of encryption may continue to frustrate law enforcement’s and everybody’s efforts. But we don’t always have to do the really hard stuff first. Dealing with the more open parts of the internet has to be a key priority precisely because it is so accessible and therefore has the greater potential to draw in new offenders. All the companies involved deserve a great deal of credit for their willingness to sail into these uncharted waters and so does Claire Perry MP and the Government as a whole for sticking with the issue in the way that they have. I await with interest to see how what is happening in the UK starts to roll out or impact other jurisdictions."

http://johnc1912.wordpress.com/2013/11/18/online-child-safety-big-things-happening

8:55PM GMT 18 Nov 2013

Child abuse: the net is closing

"Corporate promises to block child abuse images will not affect the 'deep web’, where most transactions take place. However, in this murky realm old-fashioned police work is starting to win against the criminals "

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/10457423/Child-abuse-the-net-is-closing.html

October 5, 2013

Child abuse images – developments in the UK

http://johnc1912.wordpress.com/2013/10/05/child-abuse-images-developments-in-the-uk

*****

7:20am, Mon 18 Nov 2013

Search engines already block abuse images, says lawyer

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-11-18/search-engines-already-do-child-abuse-block

Google's block of child-abuse search terms is "hype"

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/security/385444/googles-block-of-child-abuse-search-terms-is-hype

David Cameron’s grand plan is actually a sham

http://bcm666.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/david-camerons-grand-plan-is-actually_18.html

Child abuse image policies risk looking like cynical manipulation

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2013/child-abuse-image-policies-risk-looking-like-cynical-manipulation

Net crackdown 'won't stop abusers' [sic]

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/net-crackdown-wont-stop-abusers-29762233.html

Google block will not stop child porn, experts warn

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/10456902/Google-block-will-not-stop-child-porn-experts-warn.html

Stopping child exploitation needs more policing

https://audioboo.fm/boos/1739478-stopping-child-exploitation-needs-more-policing

Making images of paedophilia [sic] harder to find on Google is no bad thing, but it doesn’t tackle the abuse itself

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/making-images-of-paedophilia-harder-to-find-on-google-is-no-bad-thing-but-it-doesnt-tackle-the-abuse-itself-8947575.html

Pornography filters on or off? That's a conversation couples will have to have, says David Cameron

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/pornography-filters-on-or-off-thats-a-conversation-couples-will-have-to-have-says-david-cameron-8947800.html

Search engines take on child abuse: The 'massive breakthrough' where little has changed

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/search-engines-take-on-child-abuse-the-massive-breakthrough-where-little-has-changed-8948583.html

Child porn predators [sic] will bypass new measures to stop paedophilia [sic] online, warn Scots experts

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/child-predators-bypass-new-measures-2806223

Google barriers ‘won’t prevent’ paedophiles [sic] downloading child abuse images

http://metro.co.uk/2013/11/18/google-barriers-wont-prevent-paedophiles-downloading-child-abuse-images-4191840/

Twitter accused by MPs of not doing enough to prevent online abuse and trolling

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/twitter-accused-mps-not-doing-2809733?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

*****

Addendum (23/12/13)

Published 23 December 2013 14:16

Cameron's internet filter goes far beyond porn - and that was always the plan

"Through secretive negotiations with ISPs, the coalition has divided the internet into 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable' categories and cut people off from huge swathes of it at the stroke of a key."

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2013/12/camerons-internet-filter-goes-far-beyond-porn-and-was-always-plan

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

Sunday, 17 November 2013

Here We Go Again - Bing, Bong, Google, Giggle

Talk About False Reporting 

*****

PUBLISHED: 00:02, 18 November 2013 | UPDATED: 00:49, 18 November 2013 

Google block on child porn: At last! Internet giant axes links to vile sex-abuse websites in stunning victory for Mail campaign [hahahahaha]

>World's biggest media firm has agreed to introduce changes to engine,
>Google will now prevent depraved images and videos from appearing,
>Company chairman Eric Schmidt says in today's Mail: 'We've listened',
>Restrictions are designed to apply in English-speaking countries,
>But they'll be expanded to cover 158 other languages over six months,
>David Cameron said move represents 'a really significant step forward',
>But the PM warns it was not enough – and more needs to be done.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2509036/Google-block-child-porn-At-Internet-giant-axes-links-vile-sex-abuse-websites-stunning-victory-Mail-campaign.html

*****

November 17, 2013 6:09 PM

Laboring In The Shadows To Keep The Web Free Of Child Porn

"Internet search providers like Google and Microsoft are also investing in similar programs."

"The Microsoft system, known as PhotoDNA, was co-developed by a team at Dartmouth and has since been donated to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Earlier this year, Twitter began using it to scan every photo that's uploaded to its site.

The program works by scanning known images of child pornography and giving them a unique signature that goes into a database. If that image appears on another site, it is instantly flagged and removed. Google has its own proprietary tagging system that works in a similar way.

But in order for an image to be identified as child pornography in the first place, a person has to review it. The people who do that work for tech companies are employed all over the world, and very little is known about them, says Sarah Roberts of Western University in Ontario, Canada."

http://www.npr.org/2013/11/17/245829002/laboring-in-the-shadows-to-keep-the-web-free-of-child-porn

Google to 'block' child abuse [that would be quite a trick - it was altered, later]

http://www.itv.com/news/story/2013-11-18/search-engines-google-child-porn-child-abuse-images

Google and Microsoft agree measures to block abuse images 

"As many as 100,000 [hardly any?] search terms will now return no results that find [potentially] illegal material [hahahahahahaha], and will trigger warnings that child abuse imagery is illegal [potentially, but, not all]."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24980765

UK newspaper review: Google child abuse block in headlines

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-24981864

Child abuse videos will be wiped from web

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article3924816.ece

Google says it WILL block child abuse search results

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/google-block-child-abuse-search-2803690

Google, Microsoft ramp up fight against online child pornography

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57612735-93/google-microsoft-ramp-up-fight-against-online-child-pornography

Google Agrees To Block Child Abuse Images

http://news.sky.com/story/1169994/google-agrees-to-block-child-abuse-images

Google and Microsoft take steps to block Internet search results linked to child porn

http://thenextweb.com/google/2013/11/18/google-and-microsoft-take-steps-to-block-internet-search-results-linked-to-child-porn

Google removes child sexual abuse search results, global roll out in the next six months

http://www.engadget.com/2013/11/17/google-stop-child-sexual-abuse-results-in-search/?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=Feed_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget&ncid=rss_semi

Google and Microsoft to Block Abuse Images

http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/google-and-microsoft-to-block-abuse-images-18-11-2013

Google targets 100,000 terms linked with online child sexual abuse

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/18/uk-us-dark-web-online-child-abuse-internet

Google and Bing to block online child abuse searches

http://www.channel4.com/news/google-bing-child-abuse-images-internet

Child abuse: the net is closing

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/10457423/Child-abuse-the-net-is-closing.html

Filtering CAM

http://www.childwatch.ie/blockingcam.php

Child porn sites blocked as Irish drive prompts new war on abuse

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/child-porn-sites-blocked-as-irish-drive-prompts-new-war-on-abuse-29764914.html

Google to warn users of 13,000 [dropping in number, as we type] search terms associated with child pornography

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2064520/google-to-warn-users-of-13000-search-terms-associated-with-child-pornography.html

*****



(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****  

Posted on October 29, 2013

Efforts to end child pornography have been ineffective

"In continuing this internet blockade against child pornography, Google has also proposed a solution, a database of “encrypted” child porn images that is said to enable some companies and law enforcement to further collaborate on detecting and removing these photos from the possession of predators.

Google uses technology known as “hashing,” which is similar to Facebook’s photo tagging capabilities.

The software allows the company to tag images with an identification code that is reported and blocked by other companies when locating a duplicate image elsewhere on the web.

Ironically, Google, which is in the business of making news and information widely available, is creating a content blockade."

http://www.dailytitan.com/2013/10/efforts-to-end-child-pornography-have-been-ineffective/

*****

Monday 18 November 2013

UK and US target 'dark web' in joint crackdown on online child abuse

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/18/uk-us-dark-web-online-child-abuse-internet

Monday 18 November 2013 

David Cameron wins FBI support for 'dark web’ war on paedophiles [sic]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10456108/David-Cameron-wins-FBI-support-for-dark-web-war-on-paedophiles.html

Monday 18 November 2013 20.09 GMT

Online child abuse [sic] monitor to tackle peer-to-peer networks

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/18/online-child-abuse-peer-to-peer

i.e. The actual Problem: Reaction: Solution ... and it is has nothing to do with 'paedophiles', images or the like, at all.