Richard Bougeard Confuses (Purposefully, Of Course) Logic, Facts, Sexual Orientation, Mental Health, Crimes etc etc To Very Poor And Dangerous Effect

Saturday, 26 October 2013

The Continued Attempted Grooming of Society [sic] to Normalise Paedophilia [sic]

"Why also, are these views being allowed to be aired in public, by those who are known sex offenders? People like Paul Christiano, spokesperson for B4U-ACT and known sex offender. Known sex offenders who are allowed to share their distorted views on public platforms like Blogs, Facebook and Twitter. Sex offenders who try to legitimise what they do. Sex offenders who try to justify, for example, that IIOC is a victimless crime. Sex offenders who are more than happy to try to groom us into believing that everyone has an element of paedophilia in them. Sex offenders who promote all the above, knowing that it is a criminal offence to abuse children. Should sex offenders who try to normalise crimes like this, who try to justify crimes like this by trying to decriminalise their acts, be allowed to speak so freely like this?

Would we allow for example, adult rapists to organise conferences to try to justify and legitimise their acts? Would we let them have a free speech on public platforms like Blogger, Facebook & Twitter to spread their views and argue that they have some sort of mental disorder or that what they have is a sexual orientation that makes them unable to control what they do.. (aaah poor rapists, it's not their fault, it's just the way they are, they can't help it) ?

Of course we wouldn't, so why exactly are we allowing paedophiles and child sex offenders such a public platform?

Isn't it about time that we stopped allowing paedophiles and child sex offenders to have this free-reign public voice to make pathetic excuse after excuse about why they do what they do? After all, no-one puts a gun to their head and tells them to abuse a child, or to download/distribute IIOC, they have self-control like everyone else does. Free speech is one thing, but when it is making up excuses to promote or justify the sexual abuse of children and the actions of the people who abuse them, (either physically or by IIOC), this goes too far."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/the-continued-attempted-grooming-of.html

Where to start? - nowhere, the persecutory rant speaks for itself.

Now that is real prejudice and discrimination.

*****

Saturday, 2 November 2013

Whopping Pedophilia 'Sexual Orientation' Error Sparks Common Sense Freakout

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/whopping-pedophilia-sexual-orientation.html

Child Sexual Activity (CSAc; Minor - MSAc, is more correct), With A Minor-Attracted Person (MAP)

Friday, 16 August 2013

Media AVP again - Male & Female Paedophiles

Woman 'had an eight-month sexual relationship with son, 11, of family friend'

"A 35-year-old woman has been charged with 20 counts of rape and sodomy after she allegedly had an eight-month sexual relationship with an 11-year-old boy, it emerged today."

The media, (rightly or wrongly), describes anyone who sexually assaults or sexually abuses children under the age of consent as a paedophile. Ignoring the literal translation [literal, where, Richard?] - which we all [sic] know, relates to pre-pubescent children - I have no issues with this."

http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/media-avp-again-male-female-paedophiles.html

So, what do YOU mean by a 'paedophle', Richard? 

What do YOU have no issues with?

*****

"Words are powerful. Be careful how you use them because once you have pronounced them, you cannot remove the scar they leave behind."   Vashti Quiroz-Vega