*****
How long should a person reasonably be allowed to ask to wait in limbo until a charge/wait for Forensics?— Valium Boy........ (@humanitystears) October 3, 2016
@humanitystears I would have thought 3 months would be a ceiling. Check bail act— Drew Scapegoat (@Drewscapegoat) October 3, 2016
@humanitystears oh, about two years !!!! https://t.co/W6tGB2Emy2— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@Drewscapegoat @humanitystears It will be 2 years for me in January 2017, rebail, rebail, until they get tired, when ...— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@Drewscapegoat @humanitystears ... call and say we will call you when we have something to tell you. That is often the reality ...— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
— 🌺Katy🌺 (@33ang3lcuddles) October 3, 2016
— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@GhandisOBlocked @Drewscapegoat @humanitystears exactly. And punishes not only the target but their loved ones too!!! 😢😢😢😢😡😡😡— 🌺Katy🌺 (@33ang3lcuddles) October 3, 2016
Dirty Tories 😡😡😡😡😡😡 https://t.co/ABZAsGjtJ5— 🌺Katy🌺 (@33ang3lcuddles) October 3, 2016
@33ang3lcuddles credit where credit due, at least they kicked it off !!!— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@GhandisOBlocked yes that's true!!— 🌺Katy🌺 (@33ang3lcuddles) October 3, 2016
*****
@Drewscapegoat @humanitystears Unfortunately, our illustrious PMs promise is not yet in operation ... https://t.co/EfCCnI9suo— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@33ang3lcuddles @GhandisOBlocked Be fair, we are talking about the Bail Act 76 and no Government since then has sought to impose a time cap— Gerard Francomb (@EnorMouseUK) October 3, 2016
— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
*****
@GhandisOBlocked thought your 'offence' was way back in 2003, was there more apart from the usual SO stamp?— Patrick Simmons (@petrolhead104) October 3, 2016
@petrolhead104 yes, there was another incident in Jan 2015, which I cannot yet report, ongoing legal etc, no charges at this time :) in time— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@GhandisOBlocked when you were attacked?— Patrick Simmons (@petrolhead104) October 3, 2016
@petrolhead104 No, unconnected - attack was August 2015— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@GhandisOBlocked ah ok— Patrick Simmons (@petrolhead104) October 3, 2016
@petrolhead104 my machines etc were taken, the day after the attack, but they were clean and it was NFAd - all returned— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@GhandisOBlocked they took your HD after you were attacked, how did they justify that?— Patrick Simmons (@petrolhead104) October 3, 2016
@petrolhead104 ah, a longer story, to be reported, quite soon ;) pic.twitter.com/Yy2zwm5SPK— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@GhandisOBlocked who is that?— Patrick Simmons (@petrolhead104) October 3, 2016
@petrolhead104 to follow :)— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
@petrolhead104 @GhandisOBlocked if I say what I think about those two...creatures...I think twitter will probably ban me, so I'll keep quiet— 🌺Katy🌺 (@33ang3lcuddles) October 3, 2016
— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) October 3, 2016
*****
September 30, 2016
The unintended consequences of bail reform
"What of those simply released but still subject to investigation? The police must start with a presumption that all suspects can be treated in this way, so we must expect a great number of people will find themselves in this position.
They include those the police do not fear fleeing or committing other offences. And these are likely to be the people that would find the delay and lack of information most distressing – the elderly, children, those with clean records and the most to lose. I fear they will end up suffering more from delay and lack of information, than even those bailed under our present system."
http://thejusticegap.com/2016/09/unintended-consequences-bail-reform
October 2016
Bail reform could lead to ‘endless investigation’
"According to the report by the College of Policing, there is a danger of investigations ‘without deadlines’. It reported that the average length of time individuals spent on pre-charge bail, including extensions, was 53 days; and that more than four out of 10 of all cases involving violence and sexual offences (41%) were bailed for more than 28 days.
Time allowed for forensic analysis was one of the main reasons for long periods of pre-charge bail with phone downloads being the most frequent type. The study found that six out of 10 cases involving suspects who were bailed for more than 90 days involved some form of forensic analysis."
http://thejusticegap.com/2016/10/13831
Policing and Crime Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/policingandcrime.html
