Showing posts with label Prosecution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Prosecution. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 January 2014

The Ignorant And Dangerous Unite, Again (5) - It Appears, That Ms Thomas Is Electing To Learn, The Hard Way


https://twitter.com/EveThomas40/statuses/427137394916487169

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

Addendum (27/1/14)

This information, is made available, in prelude, to what may occur, in the future. 

The complainant will act, initially, as litigant in person. 

The courts prefer, that all is done, so as to avoid proceedings needing to take place.

We advise, that Ms Eve Thomas, now seeks, competent, legal advice ...
  
Private prosecutions: an individual’s right

http://thejusticegap.com/2012/06/private-prosecutions-an-individual%E2%80%99s-right

A Guide To Private Prosecution Procedure In England And Wales

http://www.mccue-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/UK-guide-to-private-prosecution1.pdf

Private Prosecutions

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/private_prosecutions


27/1/14 - 1:45 am


If Ms Thomas fails to desist and fails to make her website posting legal, we will clarify what criminal offence she will be prosecuted with, and why, on February 10th, 2014.

An initial stage, will, of course, be to obtain her address, for legal communications.

***** 
 *****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

29/1/14

The offending web page: http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-Phone-Safety-Advise.html 


(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

30/1/14

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

The offending web page: http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-Phone-Safety-Advise.html - modified.

The person, Ms Thomas is now maliciously-harassing, causing anxiety and distress to, and lying about, may still be identified, from that web page.

Cease and desist.

All previous communications, stand, as is.

*****

31/1/14

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

Along with, the offending web page: http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-Phone-Safety-Advise.html

Once again, Ms Thomas, you have linked the person, to paedophiles, child predators and child abusers. Your claims about that person are incorrect and grossly-offensive.

You continue, to maliciously-harass, this person, causing anxiety and distress to him. 

Your lies will not be tolerated.

Cease and desist. 

All previous communications, stand, as is.

Sunday, 27 October 2013

You Engaged With The 'Trolls'

23 October 2013 Last updated at 21:20 BST

No charges following 'troll' probe

"The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) told Ms Brookes: "You engaged with the 'trolls' contrary to the specific advice given to you by Sussex Police on at least three occasions.""

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-24646850

Thursday, 29 August 2013

On The Up

May 2013

Our Reference: FOI 82152

"Freedom of Information Request

You ask for the following information from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ):

1. Figures relating to convictions for offence classification 86.2 (taking, permitting to be taken or making, distributing or publishing indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of children); data from 2007 to 2010 by year

2. Figures relating to convictions for offence classification 86.10 (possession of indecent photograph of a child); data from 2007 to 2010 by year.

Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).

I can confirm that the department holds the information that you have asked for, and that I am able to provide this to you.

The number of offenders found guilty at all courts for the requested child pornography offences, in England and Wales, in each year from 2007 to 2010, can be viewed in the attached table." (click to enlarge)

 *****


*****

CrimeLine.info®

http://www.crimeline.info

@CrimeLineLaw

https://twitter.com/CrimeLineLaw

https://t.co/HY5ESGsq1O (response - doc)

https://t.co/e6hm1e2n0S (table - xls)

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

I Had Never Been Formally Arrested

28/08/2013

A view from…the Magistrates’ Court dock

"My purgatory was to last for nine months. A week after I was interviewed by the police, I received a phone call from the WPC who had interviewed me. She requested that I sign a form authorising the police to make further enquiries. If this turned out as I had relayed the story in my statement, then there would be what is known as, an NFA (No further action) I arranged to go into the police station the following week to sign the form.

Here’s the thing. As any conscious offender will tell you, I use the word ‘conscious’ for a reason. This is because I was now beginning to wrestle with my conscience. One of the allegations was false, of this there was no doubt. (It’s a long shot asking people to believe me, I mean come on – I’m a criminal right?) The other allegation was true. I made sure the sand was keeping my ears warm for sure. I was planning my wedding and nothing was going to stop that, least of all a criminal charge. Here’s a picture of my rings. Beautiful eh?

After signing the form at the police station, life moved on and as I watched my phone each and every day and shook every time it rang, I began to relax as the weeks went by and I heard nothing from the police.

On the 27th August, I was hanging out the laundry as the postman walked into the garden and handed me that day’s mail. I saw this envelope and it was then, call it a sixth sense, I knew what was inside the envelope. The Crown Prosecution Service was charging me. I was summonsed to appear before the local Magistrate Court to answer the charges put before me. I had never been formally arrested. There’s no need for that in today’s modern-day provision of ‘services’"

http://ukcriminallawblog.com/2013/08/28/a-view-from-the-magistrates-court-dock

Thursday, 4 April 2013

Helping 'Litigants-In-Person' Through Their Legal Journey

Representing yourself in court

"LASPO - will you now have to represent yourself in court?

On 1 April 2013, the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) came into force. It means that fewer people now have access to free legal representation than at any time since legal aid (state funding for legal advice and representation) was introduced. This means that if you have a legal problem there is now more chance that you will have to represent yourself.

A Guide

The Bar Council represents all barristers in England and Wales. We believe that access to justice matters. Whether people use barristers' services or not, we think we have a responsibility to explain and demystify the legal system to anyone who comes into contact with it. We have produced a Guide - click here - to help you on your legal journey, which has been written by barristers, who have lots of experience in all kinds of different courts and understand how the system works.

The number of people who do not qualify for legal aid, but equally cannot afford representation, is growing. These people are called 'litigants-in-person' (LIPs) or, as they were previously known; 'self-representing litigants' (SRLs). They will have to go to court (to 'litigate') without a lawyer, and will have to represent themselves.

This Guide looks to help 'litigants-in-person' through their legal journey, which can be a very daunting, complicated and expensive experience."

http://www.barcouncil.org.uk/instructing-a-barrister/representing-yourself-in-court/