Oh dear, how wrong can one be? :( 2009 ... https://t.co/qSy1SVsNr6 pic.twitter.com/Ea6XbGoinn— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) November 19, 2016
(Embedded Tweet, click date)
Oh dear, how wrong can one be? :( 2009 ... https://t.co/qSy1SVsNr6 pic.twitter.com/Ea6XbGoinn— GhandiOBlocked (@GhandisOBlocked) November 19, 2016
@StopSO_UK https://t.co/Nem3gU9JLO and here Michael is where it all goes bad ... pic.twitter.com/hTeJcTB9Wk— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK Almost all image acquisition, these days, has no nexus to the original act, depicted in an image. pic.twitter.com/gKEclMYpIA— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK ... no nexus = no culpability = no harm = no victim. To keep selling your lie, to your clients and all involved is a sham.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK ... you are compelling them to jump through a false hoop/lying, so as to be 'cured'. Who would not agree with you under those circumstances.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK It is bad enough, clueless judges doing so ... https://t.co/dfmglEiKIG but as a rationalist, you should be above such populist false dogma.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK We all want reintegration, rehabilitation and 'normality' returning to the lives of predominantly good men (forlorn hope in many cases) ...— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@StopSO_UK .. but it cannot be built on obvious and evidenced lies. Carry on the good work but pls base it on reality, not dangerous false dogma. Peace— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
@themainmantom @LutherKongGood1 Unless the offender is able to explicitly endorse this propaganda the brainwashing will not succeed.— xeno (@xenopoesis3) April 25, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date).Why Lawyers/Judges (Counsellors/Therapists @StopSO_UK) Are Rubbish At Maths - The Voodoo Harm Claims (Updated) . https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) April 25, 2017
No ifs, no buts. Viewing indecent images of u18s creates demand for an industry which harms children. See something suspicious? Report it! https://t.co/nm4N6lICpP— onlinePROTECT (@online_PROTECT) May 10, 2017
@online_PROTECT You are lying. You do not understand the mechanism of image accumulation ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh - https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) May 10, 2017
— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) May 10, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date).@online_PROTECT p.s. show me the 'industry'.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) May 10, 2017
How can watching a recording of a crime be the same as committing that crime? https://t.co/vKlgtPcmFe— Dave Thompson (@fair1ife4a11) June 11, 2017
— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 11, 2017
How does watching a video of a crime repeat it? That logic doesn't work for anything else.— Dave Thompson (@fair1ife4a11) June 10, 2017
Perps often claim they're watching kid porn for "research," so it must be off limits for everyone. As a former victim, I'm glad for that.— Michelle Stevens PhD (@DrMStevens) June 11, 2017
— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 11, 2017
Try that "defense" as soon as FEDS find #ChildPorn on your Devices— ♿BuffBill Kevin 🐸🐼 (@Kevin_FTW) June 11, 2017
It is not a defence in law, statute/case law are only one small part of human experience ...— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 11, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date)What I state, is correct in reality, showing 'the law' to be faulty. Of course, there are such defences in law, as well i.e. mens rea.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) June 11, 2017
We’ve seen a 71% increase in visits from Scotland to the Get Help website from people seeking to stop themselves or another from viewing sexual images of children #StopChildAbuse https://t.co/s3v4WUyyHp— stopitnowuk (@StopItNowUK) December 15, 2017
(Embedded Tweets - click date)The brainwashing can work ... pic.twitter.com/aQNdZ3h1Kq— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) December 15, 2017
There you go, people! Children who were touched, raped and filmed / photographed for their nude images to be passed around should just snap out of it. Teens, getting bullied to the edge of suicide, people losing their jobs for nudes made 20 years ago... just snap out of it! https://t.co/EF2vcEb4Yk— Holden 🗺️ (@RaineyRebel) February 2, 2018
A Brand New 'Disorder', Requires A Brand New Term - Eikonophobia - The OSC ... https://t.co/YgScAW7T3b— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
Right. Let's deny all harm for passing around the video of some girl getting raped, because if the "victim" has issues with it or suffers from consequences, it's a disorder of her. This is a ridiculously pro-contact sociopath view.— Holden 🗺️ (@RaineyRebel) February 3, 2018
One deals with the (alleged) dysfunction, in the 'sufferer', not the, no-nexus periphery. Same for any mental disorder. Peace.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
There is no culpability, with no nexus. for there is no mechanism.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
I'm sorry, you don't seem to care at all that in order to make these "harmless" images, a child often gets sexually abused, or you don't consider it CSA, and I don't subscribe to that. You can't defend the material without defending the process it's made through.— Holden 🗺️ (@RaineyRebel) February 3, 2018
Google image 'dead maimed children' and tell me you condone or have a nexus to what you see. Now we are done, on this, TY— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
Yeah, that's your favorite phrase, but it's bs. There's plenty of ramifications from images like that.— Holden 🗺️ (@RaineyRebel) February 3, 2018
The correct facts will never change, so why waste your time ? Bye— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
Please do not reply, I have no time for it. You will either agree with what has been provided, or not, and that is fine. Peace.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims - The OSC ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
One deals with the (alleged) dysfunction, in the 'sufferer', not the, no-nexus periphery. Same for any mental disorder. Peace.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
I'm not viewing shit like that, it can give most people nightmares. Just because there are examples of something it doesn't mean that it should be regarded healthy.— Holden 🗺️ (@RaineyRebel) February 3, 2018
(Embedded Tweets - click date).Sigh . goodbye— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
How about the simple economic axiom of "demand creates supply"? If there is a demand for CP, there will be people willing to supply it. In order to supply it, children must be harmed.— Jenna (@FemmefishDesu) February 3, 2018
No nexus, in nearly every a case, you not know how it works (thankfully) ... Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims - The OSC ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh now please learn before coming back to me. TY— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
Google image 'maimed and dead kids' and tell me about supply and demand and image possession culpability, or or do not. I do not care. TY— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
(Embedded Tweets - click date).That is the problem with being 'simple'. Bye.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 3, 2018
Another victim of feminism. Mark Salling was about to go to prison for 4-7 years for the victimless crime of child porn, but instead killed himself? It is time to wake up, gentlemen, and join the pro-male-sexuality movement. https://t.co/PrQYNSswrx— Eivind Berge (@EivindBerge) January 30, 2018
(Embedded Tweets - click date).There is nothing like debating child porn law for waking one up to the incredible gullibility of the masses and the ease with which the police state can control the population by claiming it is protecting children. At least I can thank my lucky stars that I am not like them.— Eivind Berge (@EivindBerge) February 5, 2018
So, just to be clear: steal some sweets and get put in prison till you hang yourself. Get convicted on child porn, pick up some litter. pic.twitter.com/Tohagtm368— Wings Over Scotland (@WingsScotland) February 20, 2018
Stealing is theft, victim loses goods. Looking at a picture, harms no one.— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 21, 2018
Let me explain with this 'thought experiment' (1) I am now looking at one of these images (2) No one knew until I told you (3) There is no nexus between me and the original act depicted (4) How does the 'victim' know I am? (5) How is there any harm - what is the mechanism?— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 21, 2018
Now, please do expand, on your proposition of 'dissociation' ... Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims - The OSC ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 21, 2018
The picture of a child being sexually abused is itself being party to the abuse. Looking at a picture of a child being abused supports the abuse through clicks. Otherwise they wouldn’t do it to the child, who of course has no volition. Which is the crime! https://t.co/Rg0S1zL1A6— Kev R 🏴 (@kwr66) February 21, 2018
(Embedded Tweets - click date).Incorrect. You do not understand the mechanisms. Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims - The OSC ... https://t.co/KaeQKlZ4Zh pic.twitter.com/EV7Ij29hCN— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 21, 2018
You support Nigel, the guy who claims child porn is not damaging to the child and an adult having sex with a minor is not abuse.— Jamie 🐻🔨 (@jamie2181) February 22, 2018
I don't trust a word that comes out of your mouth.
I find that allies often have opinions that I disagree with, & my opinion on cp can be seen in the flashcard. In my view, images can't be reduced to collections of pixels since people identify with their own images, making them symbolically harmful as per https://t.co/vv88HGalbr pic.twitter.com/EtcpcqjXbx— Kamil Beylant (@Securityconcern) February 23, 2018
I have always made it clear, the perception of the viewer exists, even though, it may be irrational and faulty and, therefore, should have no influence, on the freedom (perception) of any other viewer ;) If so for one image, then for any image - right?— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 23, 2018
Google image 'dead maimed children', become a harmer/killer and perpetuate their abuse :( ... right? ;) Why Lawyers And Judges Are Rubbish At Mathematics - The Voodoo Harm Claims - The OSC ... https://t.co/KaeQKlHtAH— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 23, 2018
(Embedded Tweets - click date).Not looking for debate, just making my position clear :)— GhandisKongGood (@LutherKongGood1) February 23, 2018
My letter to editor of @TorontoStar on need for primary prevention of child sexual abuse. http://t.co/4ojYzdeCKe
— Ainslie Heasman (@AinslieHeasman) May 4, 2015
@AinslieHeasman @KBabchishin @TorontoStar Collection of myths, lies, disinformation and unproven rabble-rowsing ... must try harder.
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 4, 2015
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 4, 2015
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 4, 2015
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 4, 2015
@AinslieHeasman @TorontoStar ... although, we do support the acceptance and help, for those with a troubling sexual orientation.
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 4, 2015
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@OSC________P @AinslieHeasman Convenient semantics, educate yourself on what these images do to real people: http://t.co/JuqXgSbZTz
— NextGenForensic (@NextGenForensic) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman We do not believe confused, allegedly dysfunctional (but working quite happily in Aus) people, we 'cure' ..
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... them - right? Then we find out, the very 'experts' which sustain these lies/confusions, are those ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman .. which provide 'evidence' in the very same kangaroo courts which perpetuate lies/myths ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... it is all a fraud, based on no rational or present scientific theory or proof. Only, bad law, vested ..
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... greedy lawyers and 'experts', PC and lack of integrity - unless, of course, you can prove otherwise?
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman TY for your reply, when you are able to tackle the issues we have provided, with proof, we will be ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... delighted to consider it - TY :)
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@OSC________P @AinslieHeasman I didn't quite see a direct response to my tweet, but you are in agreement images can harm real people?
— NextGenForensic (@NextGenForensic) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman You did not read what was on my images, did you? you will see my full responses, on my TL ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... in the next 0.5 hours, I will give you a compilation link to our blog.
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman No image has ever harmed a person, anywhere. If you believe one has, provide your source and rationale - TY
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@OSC________P @AinslieHeasman Your claim sounds a little bit "all swans are white, there are no black swans", no?
— NextGenForensic (@NextGenForensic) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman All swans were white, until it was proven there were black swans - can you prove your black swans?
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@OSC________P @AinslieHeasman And I did provide you a case study in the NYT piece, if you consider Nicole trustworthy about her feelings
— NextGenForensic (@NextGenForensic) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman 'Feelings' (actually beliefs) are not reality, they are perceptions, often incorrect, particularly ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... where money and attention are involved ... and, no, we have little trust in FBI-trained poster girls.
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... and where I say 'prove', I mean scientifically, not in the words of judges/shysters.
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman 'Nicole' is, as one should know, if they are aware, Ms Freeman - having seen descriptions of the videos ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ...and her later publicity work, I would not trust her testimonies as far as I could throw you Ian !!!
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... and there lies much of the problem. Being unable to truly explore, in a rational manner, what is ...
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... really going on in these cases. In the meantime, many thousands are really damaged and dying :(
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman ... and incarcerated, for little to no reason.
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
@NextGenForensic @AinslieHeasman Support Your Local Eikonophobiacs Today !!!
— The OSC (@OSC________P) May 12, 2015
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
Convicted paedophile Jonathan King claims Savile was innocent .Not content with traumatising his own victims,he wants to distress others .
— Liz Dux - S&G (@LizDuxLawyer) March 6, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)
Maybe #MailOnline is right and a person is presumed guilty unless or until they can prove themselves innocent http://t.co/ZMqqiHUNgR
— Jonathan King (@KingOfHits) March 5, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)
Possessing 'Child Porn'/IIOC - What Harm? What Blame? - http://t.co/xJrkSTwvOg
— The OSC (@TheOSC1) January 23, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)
"Individuals who possess child pornography violate and exploit their victims by viewing a record of..." Pt. 1 of 2 http://t.co/nTbhvQLGu9
— NCMEC (@MissingKids) January 23, 2014
"... the child’s sexual abuse for personal gratification, thereby causing permanent injury to the victim" Pt. 2 of 2 http://t.co/nTbhvQLGu9
— NCMEC (@MissingKids) January 23, 2014
@MissingKids ... and yet, you have so little empirical evidence. That which exists, is from dubious professionals.
— The OSC (@TheOSC1) January 23, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)Pete will be on @BBCNews south west tonight after the main news at 6.00pm re: Graham Ovenden
— NAPAC (@NAPAC) October 9, 2013
into our 3rd week of the London Support Group, HMP Styal in 2 weeks and HMP Manchester in January. #empowerment #NAPAC
— NAPAC (@NAPAC) October 10, 2013
Our supportline will be here taking your calls until 9pm tonight #survivors #support #youarenotalone #no2abuse
— NAPAC (@NAPAC) October 10, 2013