Paedophile David Mason (24) who raped girl aged 12yrs is handed job as a chef at Jamie Oliver's Fifteen restaurant. http://t.co/5jehLMaHAz
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) October 16, 2014
This guy thinks Jamie Oliver should be praised for employing a Paedophile. You have issues @EricHardcastle - your attitude is worrying.
— Stinson Hunter (@stinsonxhunter) October 17, 2014
@inkcredible82 certainly not working in close proximity of children that's for sure.
— Stinson Hunter (@stinsonxhunter) October 17, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
*****
Published: 17 hrs ago (17:52, 16/10/14)
Jamie chef raped schoolgirl aged 12
"A CHILD rapist has been taken on as an apprentice to celebrity TV chef Jamie Oliver."
Paedophile [not], 24, who raped 12-year-old girl [statutory] is handed [earned] a job as a chef at Jamie Oliver's Fifteen restaurant ahead of thousands of disadvantaged applicants [Hahahahaah, you mean Mr M is not?]
">Chef DM, 24, from [redacted], was convicted of raping a child,
>Initially said it was consensual but then admitted raping her when he was 19,
>Judge told him: 'You knew having sex with such a young girl was wrong',
>In 2010 he was sentenced to four years in a young offenders' institution,
>Now M has been chosen for Oliver's Fifteen apprentice programme,
>It 'helps young people stay out of trouble and make something of lives',
>Spokesman for the TV chef says: 'We decided that he deserved his chance."'
"Campaigners are snuffing out any dissent from the official rape narrative."
"The Evans case has caused a flurry of debate, but the atmosphere in which that debate has taken place has often been fevered and hysterical. Certain opinions about rape should not be dismissed as ‘too dangerous’ or patronisingly written off as ‘rape myths’, as if there exists some other category of ‘rape truths’ to which the enlightened have access.
We must ensure that we are free to question all the prevailing orthodoxies around rape, redemption and the role and responsibilities of victims. This principle of open debate on issues of public morality is of equal if not greater importance than where Ched Evans will eventually end up playing football."
Published: 11:42, 29 June 2014 | Updated: 16:30, 29 June
Outrage as Sidney Cooke gang paedophile [not] who raped and killed boy [manslaughter], 14, is back on the streets months after being jailed for letting children into his home
">Paedophile [not] RO 58, moved to bail hostel in [redacted], Surrey
>Served eight years in jail for killing [manslaughter, not a sexual offence] of Jason Swift, 14 [N.B. almost 15], in 1985
>Jailed again in July for letting children into his home using different name
>O was part of Dirty Dozen who drugged and raped boys at orgies"
One of Britain’s most notorious child sex killers is roaming the streets again, seen here mingling with families: http://t.co/Zu7JXNuk6H
— The Sun (@TheSunNewspaper) June 29, 2014
.@TheSunNewspaper "Using our children as tethered lambs for these monsters to exercise their vile inhuman rights is just wrong".
— Dr Sara Payne MBE (@DrSaraPayneMBE) June 29, 2014
What has this to do with 'Human Rights', it is domestic law.
@DrSaraPayneMBE@TheSunNewspaper ......whose parents will Gov Ministers be 'heartfelt apologising' to for letting this monster out AGAIN?
— Shy Keenan (@ShyKeenan) June 29, 2014
@DrSaraPayneMBE Hi Sara, could I get a couple of words w/ you about Robert Oliver being moved into a bail hostel? DM me your details if poss
— Mia de Graaf (@miadegraaf) June 29, 2014
Dangerous Child killer Robert Oliver (59) out of jail again - strolling around Guildford pic.twitter.com/BXl2Uul9p5
— Mark Williams-Thomas (@mwilliamsthomas) June 29, 2014
Sun quotes "Dr" Sara Payne views on offending: deceitful as she only has an Honorary PhD she's NOT an expert on this http://t.co/VXINk9amsP
— Joe Watch (@mcelderrytruth) June 30, 2014
Published: 18:51, 29 May 2014 | Updated: 08:07, 30 May 2014
Pervert [offensive, derogatory and inflammatory] with 250,000 child porn images goes free because he was depressed
>DI, 53, admitted making and possessing indecent images
>Spared jail and given suspended sentence, plus community service
>Court told I 'in a very dark place' as wife was undergoing cancer treatment
>MP Susan Elan Jones slams sentence as 'pitiful and inadequate'
"Ms Jones, Labour MP for Clwyd South, has asked the Attorney General for an urgent review of the sentence.
'I urge you to take action on this matter and to review this case in depth. On behalf of the victims involved in Mr I's 'collection' and the local community which I represent, I ask that you take whatever action is available to you to see that justice is done in this case ...'
She later added: 'I have heard from many constituents in B over the weekend and they are all as horrified as I am. It's relatively unusual for an MP to ask the Attorney General to review an individual case but I will not let this matter rest.'
Ms Jones said she was horrified that the same judge recently gave a two-year custodial sentence for a currency scam, which she said seemed to be a discrepancy."
@susan.jones.mp@parliament.uk Do not know if you are here, or not - do not care, you are a no-mark - but, FTR ... http://t.co/2bduxZqVl0
— The OSC (@OSC12_o) May 31, 2014
@susan You should be aware, that Mr I has no victim names, on his charge sheets - that is because, there are no victims to Mr Igo.
— The OSC (@OSC12_o) May 31, 2014
@susan You are an ignorant, insensitive, vote-mongering, Child Saver - not grasping the mental, social and legal issues, even is she tried.
— The OSC (@OSC12_o) May 31, 2014
@susan If you ever wake-up, you know where we are.
— The OSC (@OSC12_o) May 31, 2014
PUBLISHED: 23:20, 20 February 2014 | UPDATED: 04:53, 21 February 2014
Surprise, surprise, the BBC has ignored our expose [sic] of Labour's [sic] links to a child sex scandal [sic]. QUENTIN LETTS imagines its reaction if those involved were Tory
PUBLISHED: 00:25, 21 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:27, 21 February 2014 Inexcusable: Leading abuse charity [sic] demands [really?] apology from Labour trio with links to vile [sic] paedophile [sic] group
PUBLISHED: 02:18, 22 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:19, 22 February 2014
Apologists for paedophilia [sic]: As the Mail exposes more links between senior Labour figures and a vile paedophile group [sic], one man who was abused as a child asks them: why won't you admit you were wrong?
PUBLISHED: 02:18, 22 February 2014 | UPDATED: 13:19, 22 February 2014
Apologists for paedophilia [sic]: As the Mail exposes more links between senior Labour figures and a vile paedophile group [sic], one man who was abused as a child asks them: why won't you admit you were wrong?
@guyadams In regards to your 'questions' - not much remains, when the straw men of faulty logic are removed ...
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 22, 2014
@guyadams as for the other content, go read the literature and research, of the time (and now, for that matter) ...
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 22, 2014
Quentin Letts re Labour Peado sex scandal [sic] which BBC has ignored (but if it was Tory it would go MAD)
http://t.co/m01GPpJcSP
.
— Ian Puddick (@ianpuddick) February 22, 2014
@guyadams Yes they can Guy ... you know when you are walking down the street, and someone with 'special needs' shouts at you?
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 23, 2014
@guyadams You and your like, are equivalent to the poor folk with 'special needs' - see?
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 23, 2014
Rod Liddle asks BIG question in @thesundaytimes "imagine how BBC would react if 3 current senior Tories were linked to a Paedophile group?"
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 23, 2014
@veniviedivici@thesundaytimes Anyone, EVERYONE, involved in helping supporting promoting excusing Paedos or supporters should be exposed!
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 23, 2014
Is @ostercywriter right? Does no-one care that three senior Labour politicians aided and abetted Paedophile supporters? @_TheGMan
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 24, 2014
Miliband bites on Mail's Labour paedophile campaign for first time says he 'sets no store' in allegations against Harman, Dromey and Hewitt
— Matthew Bayley (@MattBayleySky) February 24, 2014
(Embedded tweets - click date)
Feb 22, 2014 20:00
Senior Labour figures have serious questions to answer about past links to vile paedophile support group
I see no point in responding, as anything I say would merely serve as another angle to keep the story going.
Not that they need my help. They have already run the story in various versions before, and will no doubt do so again at the slightest excuse, whether they have anything new to say or not. They know what keeps their punters happy, so they cannot be accused of incompetence in terms of generating sales. However, so far as this particular repetitious saga is concerned they are beginning to resemble the Daily Express, which constantly recycles a handful of stories (death of Princess Diana, disappeared toddler Madeleine McCann, miracle cure for arthritis, stormy weather ahead) to its elderly readership, who are presumably so far gone in senility they cannot remember they read the same thing only a few days before.
The Mail can take the downmarket Express route if they wish. It may be successful in sales terms, but it is hardly a recipe for respected journalism."
BBC will now cover this by attacking the press! "Milibland rejects claims Labour trio linked to paedophile campaign http://t.co/jbihEbPeZS”
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 24, 2014
(Embedded tweet - click date)
*****
24/02/2014
NCCL Statement
"In recent days I have been the subject of a politically-motivated smear campaign by the Daily Mail.
They have accused me of being an apologist for child sex abuse, of supporting a vile paedophile organisation, of having a relaxed attitude to paedophilia and of watering down child pornography laws. These are horrific allegations and I strongly deny them all of them.
This is not the first time the Daily Mail has made this horrible and untrue allegation. And, this is not the first time the Daily Mail has attacked me. The editor and proprietor of the Daily Mail are entitled to their political views and they are of course entitled to oppose what I stand for but they are not entitled to use their newspaper to smear me with innuendo because they disagree with me politically and hate my values.
I sincerely hope people won't believe these smears - I suspect even the Daily Mail doesn't believe them to be true. But given the seriousness and the aggression with which the Daily Mail are pursuing me, I feel that I need to put the facts in the public domain.
1. Allegation that I supported the lowering of the age of consent to 10
This is not true. I supported the equalisation of the age of consent (as set out in NCCL document “priorities and strategy for the executive committee June 1981") by making the age of consent the same for homosexual as well as for heterosexual sex.
2. Allegation that I opposed the law on incest
This is not true. The document they refer to was written by NCCL in 1976 before I started to work there.
3. Allegation that I was seeking to water down a proposed ban on child pornography.
This is not true. I supported the Protection of Children Bill 1978. At the start of the document it makes clear that “The NCCL deplores the exploitation of children whether in the form of use in commercial pornography or as victims of sexual assaults"
The submission argued for some amendments to guard against unintended consequences including:
- Parents being criminalised for taking pictures of their children on the beach or in the bath
- The use of pictures in sex education being criminalised
- We also proposed that the definition of indecent was too wide and instead proposed "obscene" as indecent was very broadly defined and could include Page 3 of the Sun.
The Mail have tried to make me guilty by way guilt by association.
NCCL was an organisation which anyone could apply to join and indeed any organisation could apply to be "an affiliate" on payment of a fee. When I was at NCCL there were around 6,000 members and nearly 1,000 affiliated organisations of which PIE was one.
Members and affiliates decided the organisation's policy at the AGM from year to year.
I was aware that because NCCL opposed censorship and supported gay rights, paedophiles had sought to exploit that and use NCCL as a vehicle to make their arguments. But by the time I came to work for NCCL this vile organisation had already been vigorously challenged within the organisation. Jack Dromey was instrumental in that challenge when he took over the chair of NCCL in 1976
The reason I decided to go to work for NCCL was because I actively supported the work they had done and in particular the work of their women's rights committee on the Equal Pay Act, on the introduction of the Sex Discrimination Act and for greater protection of victims of domestic violence and against race discrimination.
Since being elected to the House of Commons in 1982 and during my times in Ministerial Office I have always championed the rights of those subjected to sexual abuse - especially women and children.
I hope The Daily Mail will stop this campaign of smear and innuendo against me. I have done nothing wrong and am guilty of none of their grotesque allegations."
Harman finally come out today to challenge paedophile smears. Essentially, a muddle over PIE/NCCL links.
— Prof Chris Ashford (@lawandsexuality) February 24, 2014
"Harriet Harman has
condemned "horrible&untrue" allegations re historic involvement in
paedo rights" So BBC will cover it now...as a smear!
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 24, 2014
Harriet Harman refuses repeatedly to apologise under fierce forensic @BBCNewsnight questioning over her NCCL succour for paedo campaigners
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 24, 2014
@waynesmith1971 couldn't give a toss about their politics - I curse all paedos & want them crucified. But vital word is publishable EVIDENCE
— Neil Wallis (@neilwallis1) February 24, 2014
Tom O Carroll, formerly of PIE, tells BBC NCCL didn't do much to challenge him as didn't 'want to rock the boat'
— Laura Kuenssberg (@bbclaurak) February 26, 2014
(Embedded tweets - click date)
24/02/2014
Including Harriet Harman on the tabloid paedophile row, Ukraine, and Cameron in Scotland
PUBLISHED: 22:41, 24 February 2014 | UPDATED: 08:14, 25 February 2014
But they still won't say sorry: Labour's Harman and Dromey finally break their silence over links to paedophile group
Harman’s attempt to pass paedophile story off as Daily Mail “smear” is a political mistake. Post for @TelepgraphBlogs http://t.co/ejRXvwQsCX
— Toby Young (@toadmeister) February 25, 2014
@toadmeister@guyadams The answer to your q, is - no, it was not a mistake, it was (and still is) all a learned and principled civil rights
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 25, 2014
@toadmeister@guyadams group should do (cf ACLU/NAMBLA, now) - unfortunately, Liberty are far from that, to society's and truth's loss.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 25, 2014
When it comes to decency and sexualisation of children, would you take lessons from the Daily Mail? pic.twitter.com/MXmWhOILKQ
— Harriet Harman (@HarrietHarman) February 25, 2014
Harman tweet response to Mail allegation seems v.badly judged. "They do sleaze too" is v.poor defence + sleazy pics v.diff from PIE links
— Toby Harnden (@tobyharnden) February 25, 2014
According to Labour PO, @EmilyThornberry is the only Labour MP publicly defending Harriet Harman. Looking forward to talking with you, Emily
— Julia Hartley-Brewer (@JuliaHB1) February 25, 2014
New Blog by me: Harman & the NCCL: What Has the BBC Really Learnt?: One of the most irritating phrases you wil... http://t.co/ujpCT1GET5
— Iain Dale (@IainDale) February 25, 2014
(Embedded tweets - click date)
*****
February 25, 2014 at 08:23AM
Harriet Harman, the NCCL: Smear Or Legitimate Story?
"Iain takes the Daily Mail to task.
One of the most irritating phrases you will ever hear on television is “the BBC has learnt”. You’d think it meant that due to an original piece of journalism, the BBC has found out something nobody else has. Invariably it means the BBC has switched on Sky News.
Sky use a similar technique by using the phrase “Sky sources have told us.” But in each case it gives the broadcaster cover to hype up a story that might otherwise be considered a little pedestrian. And it perverts the news agenda. But this sort of thing happens every day. Take the current furore about Harriet Harman, the Daily Mail, and the NCCL.
Over the last few days both the BBC and Sky have studiously ignored the front pages of the Daily Mail, which has accused Harriet Harman of, well, I’m not totally sure exactly. It seems they think that because she was legal officer to the NCCL she must have somehow sympathised with the aims and objectives of one of its thousands of members, the Paedophile Information Exchange. It’s a ‘guilt by association’ smear which upon any reasonable examination doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. But day after day the Daily Mail demands that Harman, her husband Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt say ‘sorry’. It’s the same kind of tactic they used on Ed Miliband back in September.
Conservatives have up to now attacked the BBC for not even mentioning the issue, understandably believing that if three Tory politicians had been accused of something similar the BBC might not have been so coy. We’ll never know. However, the BBC could defend its position by pointing out that these allegations are nothing new and were first aired back in 2009. That would be a sustainable editorial position.
But yesterday the game changed when Harriet Harman decided to break cover and respond to the allegations by giving the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg an interview. It turned out to be a bad move. Instead of saying that it was a clear mistake for the NCCL to allow the PIE to be an associate member, she prevaricated and appeared a little shifty. Not only that she compounded her error by accusing the Daily Mail of being hypocritical because it publishes pictures of bikini-clad young women on its website. Women, not girls. So instead of closing down the story, it has merely given all other media outlets the excuse to cover it on the basis that if Harriet Harman has spoken about it, it becomes a legitimate story.
Cue BBC overkill. It’s now leading bulletins on the Today Programme and 5 Live. I haven’t seen Sky News yet this morning, so I can’t comment on what they are doing but as it’s the lead story on their website it’s probable that it is leading their bulletins too.
I’ve steered clear of the story on my LBC show, not because of any desire to be politically correct, but because I genuinely don’t see this as a massive story. I see it as a politically-motivated smear by a newspaper which is besmirching its own good name by running it day after day after day.
Does anyone seriously believe Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt have any paedophile sympathies? No, of course not. They worked for a ramshackle organisation which was run in an anarchic way. Just as anyone with dubious views can join a political party, anyone or any organisation with dubious views could join the NCCL. Does anyone seriously think that Harman, a lowly junior legal officer, had the power to expel a member who had legitimately joined? Presumably to do so would have meant changing the NCCL’s constitution. Perhaps she and her husband tried to do that. Who knows? But remember that one of the NCCL’s aims was to promote freedom of speech for everyone, no matter how vile their views.
The biggest mistake Harriet Harman has made was to give that interview to Newsnight. All it succeeded in doing was fanning the story’s flames and giving other media organisations and newspapers to excuse they needed to cover it. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but the overblown and blanket coverage it is getting is so out of proportion to the lack of coverage it got yesterday, that editors all over the place, but especially the BBC, would do well to examine why they are doing what they are doing. Are they doing this because it is such an important story or because of their collective feeling of guilt that maybe they should have given it some coverage well before today?
When I go into LBC today and we start planning my Drive programme, it will be interesting to see how the story has developed during the day. If I cover it at all – and at the moment my feeling is that I’d rather not – it will be looking at the behaviour of the Daily Mail, more than the behaviour of Harriet Harman. No doubt I will get a shedload of abuse for it, but hey – broad shoulders and all that."
http://www.lbc.co.uk/iain-dales-blog-30195/entry/120/9927
*****
Yet another Tory smear from the, er, Mirror...
There is a paedophile elephant in the corner of Labour’s living room http://t.co/lsAlxqZQCE
— Julia Hartley-Brewer (@JuliaHB1) February 25, 2014
(Embedded tweet - click date)
Feb 25, 2014 17:05
There is a paedophile elephant in the corner of Labour’s living room
PUBLISHED: 10:55, 26 February 2014 | UPDATED: 11:48, 26 February 2014
Harman and Hewitt 'never tried to kick me out - they didn't want to rock the boat to protect their careers' claims child abuser ex leader of Paedophile Information Exchange
Wow Lawrence Gostin ex Gen Sec NCCL has astonishing views on freedom of speech and promotion of paedophilia on #newsnight
— EVAW Coalition (@EVAWhd) February 25, 2014
Former NCCL director general Lawrence Gostin: "The Paedophile Information Exchange was about information, not about the act" #newsnight
— Ian Katz (@iankatz1000) February 25, 2014
Former NCCL general secretary says paedophilia is "unconscionable" but the right of speech can't be condemned #newsnight
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) February 25, 2014
Paxman/@BBCNewsnight adding to the hysteria by referring to 'act of paedophilia'. It's sexual interest - the 'act' is child abuse #newsnight
— Craig Harper (@CraigHarper19) February 25, 2014
PIE member Tom O'Carroll challenges idea the group was sidelined from NCCL in 1976 in 1st comments in Harman row http://t.co/imhsEttPKU
— Rowena Mason (@rowenamason) February 25, 2014
@OSCP2@CraigHarper "Paedophilia" has become a word of normal usage with different meaning to its psychiatric use. Won't get it back in bag
— Zen o'Poesis (@XenoPoesis) February 25, 2014
(Embedded tweets - click date)
Tuesday 25 February 2014 20.59 GMT
Harriet Harman demands apology for Daily Mail's paedophile 'smears'
Uncle Tom still playing his silly little games ...
PUBLISHED: 23:10, 25 February 2014 | UPDATED: 23:36, 25 February 2014
Labour MP calls for probe into state cash for Paedophile Information Exchange after claims files that prove it received taxpayers' money have been shredded
Labour MP Tom Watson admits he would not have touched paedophile rights group PIE 'with a bargepole' http://t.co/o6Xn5DmypW
— TheIndyPolitics (@IndyPolitics) February 26, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)
Feb 25, 2014 19:16
Tories must say sorry for 'covering up child sex abuse' before Harriet Harman has to apologise
Professor Roy Greenslade declares Harriet Harman's recent efforts at crisis management: "wholly inept" http://t.co/zPlghJeWEQ
— Guy Adams (@guyadams) February 26, 2014
@StigAbell One story, Stig, one story... but I agree about the expert bit, of course
— Roy Greenslade (@GreensladeR) February 21, 2014
Prof now on #newsnight not really helping Harriet Harman's case
— Jonathan Freedland (@Freedland) February 25, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
Tuesday 25 February 2014 20.22 GMT
Harriet Harman's handling of the Daily Mail 'smear' has been wholly inept
PUBLISHED: 23:32, 26 February 2014 | UPDATED: 00:08, 27 February 2014
Harman's pressure group advertised for members in magazine for paedophiles: New evidence links NCCL to PIE while Harriet was legal chief
PUBLISHED: 01:36, 27 February 2014 | UPDATED: 01:36, 27 February 2014
STEPHEN GLOVER: The Left argue that a sexual free-for-all in the 70s explains their tolerance of child sex abusers. What twisted bunkum
"Shaun Ley reports on the efforts of the Paedophile Information Exchange to gain support from politicians and links between PIE and the National Council of Civil Liberties."
It needs to be stressed - no intrinsic link between gay rights and paedophilia - rather, paed campaigners tried to hijack gay rights mvts
— Ian Pace (@ian_pace) February 27, 2014
@ian_pace Needs to be stressed .. total intrinsic link, in many cases. There are LGBT Ps, there are P LGBTs - In fact, there is only LGBTP.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) February 27, 2014
PIE was primarily a male gay paed organisation (with a few lesbian members), and used that fact to appropriate language of identity politics
— Ian Pace (@ian_pace) February 27, 2014
PUBLISHED: 00:03, 3 December 2013 | UPDATED: 00:55, 3 December 2013
For 25 years, Rachel was haunted by the teacher who sexually abused her at 13. Then she decided to make him pay for his crimes by taking him to court
By Rachel Rounds
"Vulnerable: Rachel, pictured aged 13, was abused for three years by her teacher GW.
The man standing in the dock of the crown court cut a pathetic figure.
Middle-aged with thinning hair [maybe that is why she likes Tom?] and a paunch, he wore shabby clothes and cheap shoes. I didn’t recognise him at all.
‘That’s him,’ said my mother. But I couldn’t quite believe that the man sitting a few feet away was GW, the once-trusted teacher who had abused me for three years from the age of 13."
"Revival-Wiltshire Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre is available only to people living in Wiltshire. They can be contacted on 01225 358 568. For national inquiries, visit www.thesurvivorstrust.org/national-helplines."
Nice touch, of the cameras, attempting to catch crocodile tears.
*****
Ex-'girlfriend'? ...
*****
PUBLISHED: 11:03, 27 November 2013 | UPDATED: 11:07, 27 November 2013
'I warned police that Lostprophets singer was a paedophile [sic] four years ago': Former call girl who dated IW claims officers did nothing after he shared horrifying secret with her
>Joanne Majic, 38, had two-year on-off relationship with IW, 36,
>Former call girl says he told her his fantasy was to have sex with a child,
>His lover then went to police in 2008 who she says refused to investigate,
>Detective sergeant being probed after allegedly failing to act in W case,
>Singer admitted he attempted to rape a baby and plotting to rape another.
Joanne, we believe,that you are a vicious, dangerous, revengeful, money-grabbing, economical-with-the-truth, media and real whore (nothing wrong with that last bit) - but, we may be incorrect.
*****
So I'm also being trolled and written about by dangerous convicted paedophile Dr Nigel Oldfield too I'm told. Bring it sicko @OSCP2
— Jo Mjadzelics (Majic (@Joanne_Nikita) December 13, 2013
Piss off you odious little prick, haven't you your paedo support site to run? "@OSCP2: @Joanne_Nikita What would you like us to 'bring' Jo?"
— Jo Mjadzelics (Majic (@Joanne_Nikita) December 23, 2013
U call that bringin it? Ha pathetic "@OSCP2: @Joanne_Nikita You really are a potty mouth, Jo ... you asked us to 'bring it' - here we are."
— Jo Mjadzelics (Majic (@Joanne_Nikita) December 23, 2013
@Joanne_Nikita@OSCP2 that's why there's a block button, use it & carry on as if they don't exist; it'll piss them off even more :D
— Gordon Sinclair (@ThistleWeb) December 23, 2013
Btw everyone don't give @oscp2 anymore attention he is convicted paedo Dr Nigel Oldfield, he wrote a lovely article on me, sad little man
— Jo Mjadzelics (Majic (@Joanne_Nikita) December 23, 2013
was "potty mouth" part of his excuses in court? "sorry, my mouth was so close to the potty that my tongue accidentally slipped" #Watkins
— Gordon Sinclair (@ThistleWeb) December 23, 2013
