Showing posts with label Paul Beresford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Beresford. Show all posts

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Let Us Have A Look, At The Relevant Parts, Of The Second Reading, Of The Non-Sexual-Offenders Freedom Removal Bill (2013)

Monday 14 October 2013

Government moves to prevent sexual abuse of children in the UK and abroad

"ECPAT UK today expressed delight with new Government proposals to restrict the activities of anyone who poses a risk of sexual harm to children and adults, under new measures in the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill."

http://www.ecpat.org.uk/media/government-moves-prevent-sexual-abuse-children-uk-and-abroad

*****

14 October 2013 Last updated at 20:28

MPs approve measures to prevent child sexual abuse

"The government has lent its support to a campaign led by backbenchers to introduce new powers to prevent the sexual abuse of children.

Before the main debate on the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill got underway, several objections were raised to the timetabling of the bill. Labour forced a division on the programme motion, but lost the vote 227 to 294 .

An amendment was tabled at report stage of the bill on 14 October 2013 to enable courts to issue a "child sexual abuse prevention order"."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/house-of-commons-24526092 

*****

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill 2013-14

http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2013-14/antisocialbehaviourcrimeandpolicingbill.html

Library briefing paper on the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN06639

Commons remaining stages: Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2013/october/commons-remaining-stages-anti-social-behaviour-crime-and-policing-bill/

*****

14 Oct 2013 : Column 455

Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill (Programme) (No. 2)  

14 Oct 2013 : Column 468

Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill

"New Clauses and new Schedules relating to the protection of persons from harm of a sexual nature or relating to violent offender orders."

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm131014/debtext/131014-0001.htm#13101430000024.31 pm

*****

Following from here, we will give it a go, but, in the past decade, the sheer volume of lies and disinformation, from a number of MPs, irritated and angered us, so much, we often move onto matters which we may influence, more effectively.

So, who are the new, major, gamesters we need to watch?

*****

14 Oct 2013 : Column 472

Damien Green (Minister of State for Police and Criminal Justice) (Con): Goes without saying, far too much garbage, from him, to bother dealing with.

*****

14 Oct 2013 : Column 476


Diana Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North) (Lab)

Shadow Home Office Minister for Crime and Security

Senior, Labour, C'P'I, popular vote, stooge. 

"Diana Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North) (Lab): The amendments before us are the result of hard work and concern across the House. I want to pay tribute in particular to the hon. Member for Oxford West and Abingdon (Nicola Blackwood) for her sterling work. I pay tribute, too, to the hon. Member for Mole Valley (Sir Paul Beresford), whose new clause appears in this grouping; to my hon. Friend the Member for Stockport (Ann Coffey), who has done an enormous amount of work on this subject; and to my right hon. Friends the Members for Leicester East (Keith Vaz) and for Wythenshawe and Sale East (Paul Goggins)." 

Nicola Blackwood (Con) - Stooge, PR and activist, for the bill.

Sir Paul Beresford (Con) - Senior lobbyist for the police, MPS, in particular.

Ann Coffey (Lab) - Child 'Protection' Industry, popular vote, stooge.

Keith Vaz (Lab) - Multicultural, Labour Home Affairs, popular vote, stooge.

Paul Goggins (Lab) - Religious, Child 'Protection' Industry, popular vote, stooge.

"The Opposition support [really?] the need [sic] to amend the current law. The sexual abuse and grooming cases that occurred in Oxford shocked the country [only the ignorant], and the hon. Member for Oxford West and Abingdon has rightly gained huge respect from across the House for the serious way in which she has looked to address the issues with the Childhood Lost campaign. I know that she has worked with a number of charities, including the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, Barnardo’s, the Children’s Society, ECPAT UK, Action for Children, and many others."

*****

14 Oct 2013 : Column 477 

"The sad truth is that sex offenders, more than any other group of offenders, are prone to reoffend. "

Incorrect - lie or ignorance? 'sex offenders' have one of the lowest re-offending rate of any offender group.

*****


25 April 2013 

Proven reoffending quarterly - July 2010 to June 2011

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/proven-re-offending--2

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Few sex offenders commit new crimes

http://www.onlinesentinel.com/news/Few-sex-offenders-commit-new-crimes.html 

http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/me-few-sex-offenders-commit-new-crimes.html#.Ul6ODFNjeuo

Bearing in mind, it is harder to become a 'sex offender', in the USA, than it is, here.

***** 

"We must accept that most [weasel word - how many?] sex offenders continue to pose a threat to children after their initial offences."

Incorrect - lie or ignorance? Many (we are not privy, to the actual number) 'sex offenders' have never offended on minors (or adults), or ever posed a threat, greater than those presented by the general public - this is particularly true, for those related to IIOC.

"That does not, of course, mean that all offenders will reoffend, but it does mean that we should try to identify those who pose the greatest risks, and try to do everything possible to mitigate those risks [within the human and civil rights, of those people]. Labour introduced three distinct powers which were intended to control the risks posed by known sex offenders. [indeed, never to be forgotten]"

***** 

Strangely (not), as we started to highlight, these issues (replying to tweets, on our feed, from some of those, above), on Twitter, our primary account was falsely-suspended, for a period, much longer than is usual - it remains so.

*****

Monday, October 21, 2013

Mole Valley MP wants paedophile loophole closed

"A LOOPHOLE [sic] that allows paedophiles [sic] to legally possess written accounts [sic] of child abuse could be closed, thanks to Mole Valley's MP.

Sir Paul Beresford said such writing "fuels the fantasies" of offenders [sic] and could lead to the abuse of children [sic] – but it is not currently illegal under laws that ban photographs and videos."

"Sir Paul said his amendment would be carefully written to include nothing except material "that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced principally for the purpose of sexual arousal" [mind-reading in court, again]."

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/Mole-Valley-MP-wants-paedophile-loophole-closed/story-19943391-detail/story.html#axzz2iPRX7le6

*****

Saturday, 2 November, 2013

Freedom stolen by a thief in the night

"No, the real reason it is a bad week for freedom of expression here has come much more stealthily, like a thief in the night. The threat in question is a brief measure which has passed entirely under the radar so far. I am referring to the Coroners and Justice (Amendment) Bill, which you have probably not heard about even if you live in the UK.

It is a Private Member’s Bill sponsored by Sir Paul Beresford, a Conservative Party MP, who has a track record of quietly sneaking nasty, freedom-slashing measures into law while his fellow legislators are shagging their secretaries or propping up the numerous bars in the Houses of Parliament.

Or so it seems, judging by the lack of any hue and cry over his dark deeds. Or perhaps it is just Beresford’s tactical cunning that fools them, because he presents himself not as a thief of freedom but as – this will be no surprise – a protector of children, and of decency."

http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/freedom-stolen-by-a-thief-in-the-night

*****

To be continued. 

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

The Disinforming Dentist Strikes Again

12 September 2012 Last updated at 16:18

Outlaw possession of written accounts of child abuse says MP

"Sir Paul introduces his bill in the Commons

"A Conservative MP is seeking to change the law to close a loophole [sic] which allows paedophiles [sic] to legally possess written accounts of child abuse.

Sir Paul Beresford, the MP for Mole Valley, said such writing "fuels the fantasies" of offenders and could [?] lead to the physical abuse of children.

For some child abusers "the written word is more powerful than the pictures", he told the Commons [?].

The MP has campaigned for a decade to tighten the law on child pornography.

Sir Paul wants to amend existing legislation so that written material is treated in the same way as indecent images, for which possession carries a maximum three-year prison term.

He told MPs a recent report by the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop) had mentioned the possession of graphic written accounts of abuse by some offenders.

I believe that we crack down on any form of indecent material in the written form so that real children can be safe from abuse” [sic]

"Some offenders not only possess and distribute and produce photographs, they possess graphic notes or writings of child abuse," he said.

"For some, the written word is more powerful than the pictures. For some, the written word promotes a graphic image in their mind." [oh, please]

Sir Paul said he had long been aware of a correlation "between those who possess or distribute indecent printed material of children and those who commit horrific contact offences against children". [what would that be, then, Paul, and what is your point?]

"This written material fuels [sic] the fantasies of paedophiles [sic] which is the key factor in their offending behaviour [?]" he added."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19574487
 
MP seeks ban on written child porn 

http://www.westsussextoday.co.uk/news/regional/mp-seeks-ban-on-written-child-porn-1-4253235  

Thursday September 13, @12:30AM

MP Seeking To Outlaw Written Accounts of Child Abuse

"Something this fool of a politician should read ..."

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/09/13/0113224/mp-seeking-to-outlaw-written-accounts-of-child-abuse?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2FslashdotYourRightsOnline+%28Slashdot%3A+Your+Rights+Online%29

MP Paul Beresford wants ban on written child porn 

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/story-16944578-detail/story.html

Thursday, November 15, 2012

MP calls for change in law in sex abuse cases

"MOLE Valley's MP has called for stricter laws requiring people to speak out if they know about sexual abuse of children.

At the House of Commons on Tuesday, Sir Paul Beresford spoke to suggest an amendment to the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act, which he put forward as a Private Member's Bill two years ago.

As of July this year, the act enables prosecution of people who cause or allow serious physical harm to a child, including those who stay silent.

But Sir Paul now wants the law extended to cover sexual abuse.

He said: "Perhaps we should consider making a tiny change to that legislation to include sexual abuse, so that those who observe and stand by, or know and stand by, are duty bound by law to speak up for the victims."

Sir Paul also called for longer sentences for child abusers, claiming "a lot of people have been sentenced and, to my mind, not gone away for long enough"."

http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/story-17329285-detail/story.html

Saturday, 7 July 2012

Mr Beresford's Cognitive Distortions

Saturday, July 07, 2012

Mole Valley MP's child abuse law comes into force

""A LEGAL loophole [sic] which allowed abusive parents to evade justice has been closed by Mole Valley's MP.

Two years ago Sir Paul Beresford put forward a Private Members' Bill to stop abusers escaping punishment by claiming ignorance – and the law came into force on Monday.

Under the old legislation, parents or guardians could deny knowledge of how children came to be injured – or simply blame each other – and legal action could not be taken unless courts could prove which person had caused the injuries.

In cases of child deaths, the law said legal guardians were jointly responsible, so could both be prosecuted even if evidence could not be found to prove which of them caused injuries, and that law has now been extended to non-fatal cases.

Sir Paul told the Advertiser: "I've [sic] now changed it so it says 'death and physical harm', and anyone who knows about it is as much to blame about it than the person doing it."

Last week the Advertiser reported on another Private Members' Bill put forward by Sir Paul, which would allow prison authorities to jam signals to stop inmates using mobile phones.

The MP told the Advertiser he also plans to propose a law blocking mobile phone signals in schools, and another amending current laws on written child pornography."


*****

Comment:

The policeman's friend has been quiet, recently, but, we see he is still at it.

*****