Showing posts with label Establishment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Establishment. Show all posts

Thursday, 2 February 2017

In Memory, Of A Noble, Great And Loved Man

(Embedded Tweet - click date)
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Because You Cannot Believe Something, Does Not Preclude You From Being Ignorant And/Or Stupid And/Or Incorrect




*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date) 

List of serial killers in the United States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_in_the_United_States

List of serial killers by country

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_by_country


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_killer

*****

22 January 2015

Lord Chief Justice questioned on 2014 report and related matters

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/justice-committee/news/lord-chief-justice-report-2014-evidence

Comments begin at 10:01:38.

*****

08:02, 28 January 2015

Internet porn is fuelling rape and murder, warns Britain's top judge

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/internet-porn-fuelling-rape-murder-5055856

Published: 20:34, 27 January 2015 | Updated: 08:56, 28 January 2015

Extreme internet pornography is driving people to inflict sexual violence and murder, country’s most senior judge warns

">The Lord Chief Justice says porn encourages perverts to enact fantasies,
>His comments add weight to the Daily Mail's Block Online Porn campaign,
>Campaigners warn that online pornography fuels violent sex offences."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2928864/Extreme-internet-pornography-driving-people-inflict-sexual-violence-murder-country-s-senior-judge-warns.html

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

16:37, 28 January 2015 

Internet porn has coincided with a huge FALL in violent crime


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/internet-porn-coincided-huge-fall-5056425

January 2004

Explanations for the Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases 


https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/199298.pdf

Published: June 28, 2012

Researchers See Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Rate 


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/us/rate-of-child-sexual-abuse-on-the-decline.html?_r=0

http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu

Dec. 22 2014 11:18 PM

The World Is Not Falling Apart

"Never mind the headlines. We’ve never lived in such peaceful times."


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2014/12/the_world_is_not_falling_apart_the_trend_lines_reveal_an_increasingly_peaceful.single.html

Accepted 10 April 2009; Available online 18 April 2009

The pleasure is momentary ... the expense damnable? The influence of pornography on rape and sexual assault 
  

http://www.christopherjferguson.com/pornography.pdf

http://mediaviolence.org/media-video-violence-addiction-research/research-archives/ferguson-c-j-hartley-r-d-2009-the-pleasure-is-momentarythe-expense-damnable-the-influence-of-pornography-on-rape-and-sexual-assault-aggression-and-violent-behavior-14/ 

September 21, 2014 4:00 AM

The Rape Epidemic Is a Fiction

"Sexual assaults today are a third of what they were twenty years ago."


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/388502/rape-epidemic-fiction-kevin-d-williamson/page/0/1

March 1, 2010

Porn: Good for us? 

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/28803/title/Porn--Good-for-us-/

 Date: 30 Nov 2010

Pornography and Sex Crimes in the Czech Republic 
 


http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-010-9696-y

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

December 9, 2014

The British BDSM Ban Is Just Like the Outrage Over 'Video Nasties'

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/video-nasty-frankie-mullin-045

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

11:57AM GMT 29 Jan 2015 

Does watching porn really turn people into violent criminals? 

"One of the most controversial studies of all time – one that is often quoted by pro-pornographers – is that carried out by Danish Professor of Criminology Berl Kutchinsky. He watched the effects of legalising porn in three countries – Denmark in 1969, Sweden in 1970 and Germany in 1973.

For two decades he charted sex crimes in these territories, and concluded that sex crimes of all natures – including child molestation – fell as men had a “release” for their sexual desires before they acted on them. He concluded that free availability of porn was the “direct cause of this decrease”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11376283/Does-watching-porn-really-turn-people-into-violent-criminals.html

 November 30, 2010

Legalizing pornography: Lower sex crime rates? Study carried out in Czech Republic shows results similar to those in Japan and Denmark

"Could legalizing pornography legal lead to lower rates of sex crimes?

A new study tackles this controversial question.

Results from the Czech Republic showed that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography.
 

In addition, the study finds that the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130111326.htm

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2010to2014/2010-czech-porn-abstract.html

18:45, 28 January 2015

Online pornography: Does it really make men more violent?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/online-pornography-really-make-men-5059505

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

4 th August 2011

Sexually Explicit Material and Video On Demand Services A Report to DCMS by Ofcom

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/internet/explicit-material-vod.pdf

*****

Oct. 30 2006

How the Web Prevents Rape 

"All that Internet porn reduces sex crimes. Really."

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2006/10/how_the_web_prevents_rape.html

 April 15, 2015

Ignore the puritan porn police - smut actually saves lives

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ignore-puritan-porn-police-smut-actually-saves-lives-1496507

*****



Is porn immoral? That doesn’t matter: It’s a public health crisis.

"The science is now beyond dispute." [sic]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/04/08/is-porn-immoral-that-doesnt-matter-its-a-public-health-crisis/?utm_term=.f4e8b58a4a54

March 10, 2016 


Dishonest or Ignorant - 'Rape Training'

Inquiry into the harm being done [sic] to Australian children through access to pornography on the internet 

"Submission by: Dr Michael Flood, University of Wollongong."

http://www.xyonline.net/sites/default/files/Flood,%20Senate%20submission%202016_0.pdf

Michael Flood @MichaelGLFlood https://twitter.com/MichaelGLFlood
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 1 January 2015

The 'Victim Community Hive Mind' - Fed By Unscrupulous Politicians And The Media, To Furnish The Pockets Of Charities




*****
(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

*****

Published: 14:00, 21 October 2014 | Updated: 23:51, 21 October 2014

Chair of historic child abuse inquiry urged to quit over revelations she is 'close friend' of top Tory accused of failing to act on paedophile [sic] allegations

">Fiona Woolf lives on the same street as the ex Cabinet Minister Leon Brittan,
>She invited former Home Secretary and his wife for dinner three times,
>Brittan rejects claims he failed to act on dossier of abuse allegations in 1980s,
>Theresa May appointed Mrs Woolf last month after her original choice quit,
>Lady Butler-Sloss stepped down because her brother was attorney general,
>Labour's Simon Danczuk said he had 'serious concerns' about Fiona Woolf."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2801621/chair-historic-child-abuse-inquiry-urged-quit-revelations-close-friend-tory-accused-failing-act-paedophile-allegations.html

21 October 2014 Last updated at 16:35

Abuse inquiry head Fiona Woolf defends Lord Brittan links

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29703282

Wednesday 22 October 2014 15.16 BST

Fiona Woolf faces new questions from MPs over links with Lord Brittan

"MPs ‘not totally satisfied’ with answers given by head of inquiry into abuse as details of new contact emerge."

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/oct/22/fiona-woolf-recalled-home-affairs-committee-links-brittans

Published: 21 October 2014 Updated: 11:20, 22 October 2014

Head of sex abuse inquiry Fiona Woolf defends links to Leon Brittan

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/fiona-woolf-i-will-lead-robust-inquiry-into-sex-abuse-9808657.html

 22 October 2014

Legal challenge to Woolf chairing abuse inquiry

"Former Law Society president Fiona Woolf today came under renewed pressure to stand down as chair of the inquiry into historical child sex abuse, as a solicitor-advocate began a legal challenge to her appointment.

Family lawyer David Burrows launched a judicial review application on behalf of an abuse victim, questioning’s Woolf’s independence and expertise in family law."

http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/legal-challenge-to-woolf-chairing-abuse-inquiry/5044537.article

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

*****

Published on Jul 6, 2014

 No Greater Evil, Satanic Abuse In Europe - Octopus Films, Sweden



"No Greater Evil was filmed in the U.K. in 1992 and showcased the 'evidence' which Geoffrey Dickens and Dianne Core had compiled in a four year campaign to prove that Satanic Ritual Child Abuse existed. These extracts are of interviews with Dickens (who was the parliamentary agent of Childwatch) , Dianne Core (the head of Childwatch), Jim Phillips, the doctor who created a tranche of SRA victim imposters in his private clinic (shown in these clips) but who then had a nervous breakdown and tried to kill himself and was subsequently struck of the medical register."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHrpD-xBjiE

Published on Aug 10, 2014 

GEOFFREY DICKENS MP ON SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE,BABIES MURDERED


 "IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY FILM CLIP-the clips are from the Swedish made film "no greater evil",made in 1992,and sadly is not the best quality,but is essential listening.Child abuse campaigner Geoffrey Dickens MP,who handed his dossiers on child abuse within the establishment to Leon Brittan,and others,(dossiers which all subsequently went conveniently missing-or did they?)died in 1995. Footnote-does any one have the rest of this documentary?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qz4NmDOOuTc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAzQwD6RcGY

Published on Oct 3, 2012

Dickens - Religious Zealot



"Geoffrey Dickens, ley preacher and MP for Saddleworth near Oldham misused his position in parliament to gang-up with fundamnetalist agitators to begin a sectarian crusade against paganism in order to suppress it."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pclkFM7wE8M

2014

The Disappearing Dickens Dossiers 



(Embedded tweet - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

"Our Unique Dossier Timeline Reveals The Truth About What Went Where and When."

http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/dickens.htm 

Posted on July 2, 2014

Geoffrey Dickens: Child Abuse Claims and Satanic Panic 

"AUGUST 24 1988: Hull Daily Mail reports that Dickens’ claims his life is being threatened by vengeful satanists but that he pledges to carry on the fight against black magic rituals and is building up yet another file to present to the Home Secretary. “Evidence is growing of witchcraft & crimes against children” Dickens says but has in 13 months NEVER presented any evidence."

http://barthsnotes.com/2014/07/02/geoffrey-dickens-child-abuse-claims-and-satanic-panic

Geoffrey Dickens 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Dickens

 9 July 2014 Last updated at 06:49

Geoffrey Dickens: Tea dances and dossiers

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28213688

3 July 2014 Last updated at 19:16

Geoffrey Dickens 'said paedophile [sic] dossier was explosive'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28141531

Monday 7 July 2014 20.18 BST

Geoffrey Dickens: a clown whose campaign is finally taken seriously

"The former Tory MP's tendency to make gaffes made many dismiss his allegations of child abuse in high places."

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/07/geoffrey-dickens-mp-campaign-child-abuse-taken-seriously

*****

Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA)

"SRA is considered a moral panic and compared to the blood libel and witch-hunts of historical Europe, and McCarthyism in the United States during the 20th century.

Stanley Cohen, who originated the term "moral panic," called the episode "one of the purest cases of moral panic."

The initial investigations of SRA were performed by anthropologists and sociologists, who failed to find evidence of SRA actually occurring; instead they concluded that SRA was a result of rumors and folk legends that were spread by "media hype, Christian fundamentalism, mental health and law enforcement professionals and child abuse advocates."

Sociologists and journalists noted the vigorous nature with which some evangelical activists and groups were using claims of SRA to further their religious and political goals.

Other commentators suggested that the entire phenomenon may be evidence of a moral panic over Satanism and child abuse.

Skeptical explanations for allegations of SRA have included an attempt by "radical feminists" to undermine the nuclear family, a backlash against working women, homophobic attacks on gay childcare workers, a universal need to believe in evil, fear of alternative spiritualities, "end of the millennium" anxieties, or a transient form of temporal lobe epilepsy."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_ritual_abuse

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC)

"During the late 1980s and early 1990s, a moral panic emerged over alleged ritual satanic abuse. The NSPCC provided a publication known as 'Satanic Indicators' to social services around the country that has been blamed for some social workers panicking and making false accusations. The most prominent of these cases was in Rochdale in 1990 when up to 20 children were taken from their homes and parents after social services believed them to be involved in satanic or occult ritual abuse.

The allegations were later found out to be false. The case was the subject of a BBC documentary which featured recordings of the interviews made by NSPCC social workers, revealing that flawed techniques and leading questions were used to gain evidence of abuse from the children. The documentary claimed that the social services were wrongly convinced, by organisations such as the NSPCC, that abuse was occurring and so rife that they made allegations before any evidence was considered."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Society_for_the_Prevention_of_Cruelty_to_Children

CHILD SCARE INDUSTRY JUMPS ON GOVERNMENT'S WITCH-CHILDREN BANDWAGON Satanic Ritual Abuse is Back on the cards again ...

"The same people who fooled you with satanic abuse are making idiots of the public again."

http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/nspcc.htm

List of SRA Allegations (UK)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_satanic_ritual_abuse_allegations#United_Kingdom

Friday 03 June 1994

"Satanic abuse dismissed as 'myth' by government inquiry: Report blames Evangelical Christians and 'specialists' for the scare which led to investigations."

 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/satanic-abuse-dismissed-as-myth-by-government-inquiry-report-blames-evangelical-christians-and-specialists-for-the-scare-which-led-to-investigations-rosie-waterhouse-reports-1420013.html 

THE TRUTHS......AND THE TALES

"Shock-Horror Stock Cases used by Satan Hunters are completely undermined by the SAFF."

http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/truthtal.htm

*****

The Geoffrey Dickens, of today (in so many ways), is Simon Danczuck ...  
 

Is he selling a book? - oh, yes he is !!! 

This is what, this vote-mongering idiot, believes the impartial role of a chair, to be ...

"... and, I'm sure, that the survivors of child abuse will be disappointed,
that this woman is 'Their Champion', effectively ..." 

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click dates) 

 17:32, 5 June 2015 

Churchgoers accused of 'devil worship' as police are called to protest Rochdale MP 

"Simon Danczuk was among the dignitaries who attend the Christian Spiritualist Community Church’s first service."

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/churchgoers-accused-devil-worship-police-5830487#ICID=sharebar_twitter

Here, is another small majority, getting in on the act ...

2:25 pm, Wed 22 Oct 2014

Manchester MP piles pressure on abuse inquiry chief

"South Manchester MP John Leech has submitted a parliamentary motion calling on the Chair of the Historic Child Sex Abuse inquiry Fiona Woolf to stand down."

http://www.itv.com/news/granada/story/2014-10-22/pressure-on-abuse-inquiry-chief-to-quit

 John Leech (politician)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Leech_%28politician%29

... so it continues ...
(Embedded Tweets - click dates) 

*****

Oct 21, 2014 22:39 
 
Head of abuse inquiry faces calls to quit over 'establishment' ties and links to Leon Brittan

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/head-abuse-inquiry-faces-calls-4479384

3 hours ago (22/10/14; 18:31)

Labour MP Simon Danczuk on Fiona Woolf inquiry role

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29724783

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

*****

(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click dates)

10:11PM GMT 28 Oct 2014

Labour MP is condemned for linking Leon Brittan to child abuse

"Jim Hood MP is accused of misusing parliamentary privilege after making 'serious accusations against a noble lord."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11194280/Labour-MP-is-condemned-for-linking-Leon-Brittan-to-child-abuse.html

Published: 01:18, 30 October 2014 | Updated: 09:01, 30 October 2014

Backing for MP who linked Brittan to sex claims in Commons: Colleague defends Jim Hood over comments saying he is right to speak out 

">Jim Hood used miners' strike debate to accuse Lord Brittan of improper conduct,
>Remarks were branded disgusting by business minister Matthew Hancock,
>But fellow Labour MP has defend the accusations made by Mr Hood,
>Simon Danczuk says that the MP was right to speak out about the claims,
>MPs comments are protected from slander and contempt of court laws."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2813472/Backing-MP-linked-Brittan-sex-claims-Commons-Colleague-defends-Jim-Hood-comments-saying-right-speak-out.html

Published: 23:59, 31 October 2014 | Updated: 06:52, 1 November 2014

Are the vile paedophile allegations against Leon Brittan a sinister MI5 smear plot?

">Private Eye claimed MI5 targeted Leon Brittan after he planned 'shake-up',
>Claims Brittan wanted to reform MI5 after WPC Yvonne Fletcher was killed,
>Brittan told a journalist at the time that abuse allegations were 'all lies',
>Labour's Jim Hood this week linked Brittan to abuse in Commons debate,
>Lord Tebbit said Mr Hood should have bravery to speak outside Parliament."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2816508/Are-vile-paedophile-allegations-against-Leon-Brittan-sinister-MI5-smear-plot-Labour-MP-uses-Commons-privilege-link-Tory-abuse.html 

Published: 00:47, 13 July 2014 | Updated: 17:32, 13 July 2014 

MI5 spies blamed for spreading 'lurid sex scandal' rumours about Leon Brittan 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2690141/MI5-spies-blamed-spreading-lurid-sex-scandal-rumours-Leon-Brittan.html

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

7:56PM BST 24 Oct 2014

Our Establishment is running scared about historic sex abuse 


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11185442/Our-Establishment-is-running-scared-about-historic-sex-abuse.html

Wednesday 2 July 2014 13.42 BST 

Ex-minister Lord Brittan under scrutiny over 1980s dossier of sex abuse claims 

"Lord Brittan says he asked officials to look into claims of Westminster paedophile [sic] network, as MPs call for inquiry."

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jul/02/lord-brittan-1980s-dossier-sex-abuse-claims

*****

.... and another one....

Posted: 22/12/2014 15:06 GMT Updated: 23/12/2014 08:59 GMT 

John Mann Calls For 'Suspicious Deaths' Of Westminster Child Abuse Whistleblowers To Be Re-Investigated

"A campaigning MP has called for the reinvestigation of the suspicious deaths more than 20 years ago of two whistleblowers who he believes had significant information relating to organised child abuse by a group with alleged links to Westminster.

Labour's John Mann made the comments after he handed Scotland Yard a dossier that includes allegations about the involvement of 22 politicians - some of them apparently still serving - in paedophile [sic] rings.

He told Sky News: "What I want to see is both those suspicious deaths reinvestigated because what links them together was both were people who in essence were blowing the whistle on child abuse."

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/12/22/westminster-childabuse_n_6366080.html

 Published: 01:11, 23 December 2014 | Updated: 09:12, 23 December 2014

VIP child abuse whistleblowers were 'murdered': MP says men were poised to lift lid on scandal.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2884471/VIP-child-abuse-whistleblowers-murdered-MP-says-men-poised-lift-lid-scandal.html

John Mann, Labour MP Exposed

Posted on November 3, 2014

"John Mann is typically what we would describe as a ‘grief vulture’. Whenever a tragic incident occurs then John Mann can be found attempting to involve himself and direct media attention towards something he’s doing in concern to the incident.

After the 1400 children were paedophilically groomed in Rotherham due to the Labour Party’s negligence and political correctness, John Mann instantly jumped on this paedophilic [sic] tragedy and attempted to exploit press attention in his direction as he publicly called for an inquiry – just as he did with the expenses scandal.

More recently in the case of Garron Helm V Luciana Berger, the Jewish Labour Party Mp we saw John Mann attempting to once again exploit press attention and declare himself as a victim of online trolling after he publicly attacked free speech and jumped to the aide of traitor Luciana Berger."

http://dailybalenews.com/2014/11/03/john-mann-labour-mp-exposed

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

November 2014

LATEST REVELATIONS: WE TOLD YOU SO! 

"Therefore it is now clear that Dickens 'Westminster' Dossier is, like his dossier on Satanic Ritual Abuse, a wicked compilation of bigotry from his Christian evangelical friends who are willing to misuse the police and the democratic process to further their prejudice against minority religions and different sexual genders.

It was seized upon in 2014 by the Child Scare Industry in an attempt to stampede parliament into enacting further laws to expand it's own remit and gain more funds for chasing phantom abusers using worked-up cases of  Historical Sex Abuse.

They thought you, the British public, would be dim enough not to notice what they were up to, but the SAFF has once again saved the day and brought you the unvarnished TRUTH."

http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/dickens.htm#brittanletter

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****

Always is ...


That's you fucked, Tom - these people take no prisoners :(

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

https://twitter.com/IanMcFadyen1966/status/530866666427936768

******
  
The Work of Satan?

 *****
 
  

*****

11 November 2014 Last updated at 19:19

'No cover-up found' in abuse review by Peter Wanless

"Peter Wanless Peter Wanless is chief executive of the NSPCC and the report's co-author.

A review of the handling of allegations of child abuse by prominent figures has found no evidence that records were deliberately removed or destroyed.

Ministers asked the head of the NSPCC to examine how the Home Office dealt with files alleging abuse from 1979-99."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30002908

....but, no, still they bang on, logic and facts, to the wind ...


Will Black - 12 November 2014

***** 

13 November 2014

Secretary of state for conspiracy theories

"How Theresa May is fuelling unfounded rumours about ‘VIP paedos’.

It is now the likes of Theresa May who openly invite whispers and finger-pointing about her own class, her own set of people. It is now often politicians themselves who set in motion politician-demonising canards. Conspiracy theorists are no longer the barbarians at the gates; they’re inside the gates, running the show."

 http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/theresa-may-secretary-of-state-for-conspiracy-theories/16192#disqus_thread

*****


*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

The circus moves on ....

(Embedded Tweets - click date) 

https://childsexualabuseinquiry.independent.gov.uk

http://www.thepeoplestribunal.org.uk/home

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

12:01AM, January 1 2015 

Abuse inquiry is now a fantasist’s playground David Aaronvitch 

"The vitriol aimed at Dame Fiona Woolf shows how detached from reality the self-appointed victims’ champions are."

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/columnists/article4310967.ece 

1 January 2015

Busman’s Holiday

"We owe it to everyone involved – victims [complainants] and perpetrators [defendants] alike – to calmly and forensically examine allegations to establish their accuracy and to weed out the few that do not withstand scrutiny.

Otherwise, if every allegation is treated as de facto, what is the point of an inquiry? And what, frankly, is the point of a trial?"

http://www.pinktape.co.uk/rants/busmans-holiday/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=busmans-holiday 

*****

***** 
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

21:17, 4 June 2015

Paedophile Information Exchange: Leon Brittan 'opposed banning pro-child sex campaign group'

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile-information-exchange-leon-brittan-5825108#ICID=sharebar_twitter

*****

The OSC
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 11 April 2014

You See, It Is Confirmed, 'Liberty' Have Totally Forgotten What Liberty Means


Liberty? ... don't make us laugh

*****
Eh?

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

11 April 2014 Last updated at 12:05

Paedophile's [sic] images of abuse victim cannot be deleted, police say

The paedophile's [sic] laptop contains images of the girl he abused

Dorset Police officers have said it would be "unlawful" to delete photos of an abuse victim from a paedophile's [sic] laptop.

The man, a family member, was jailed in 2013 for nine years after admitting a string of sex offences, including assaulting a child under the age of 13.

He has now formally requested a laptop and a mobile telephone are handed back.

Liberty, which represents the victim's family, said photos of the girl in swimwear and leotards were on the PC.

"It would be unlawful for police officers to alter the computer and phone's memories by removing the disputed photographs before returning them”

Dorset Police

Dorset Police said they could not delete the family pictures as they were not legally classified as indecent or prohibited.

As a result, the sex offender, who is in his 50s but cannot be named to protect the identity of his victim, will have access to photos of the girl and her family when he is eventually released from jail.

The victim's mother said the family had been "traumatised" by the abuse.

"I am appalled that the man who abused my child can ask the police to hand over our family photos for him to keep for the rest of his life.

"My daughters struggle every day with the devastating consequences of his abuse and this will only make them feel more humiliated and degraded.

"Why should we continue to be traumatised further?"

'Violation of dignity' [sic]

Liberty argued that the return of the computer and mobile would breach articles three and eight of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect against inhuman treatment and invasion of privacy, respectively.

In a letter to Dorset Police, Liberty said the prospect of having the photos returned to the abuser was "causing the girls a significant amount of distress" and would be "an enormous violation of their dignity and personal integrity".

The abuse has caused the victim to suffer "enormous psychological harm" and she eats very little, self-harms frequently and is at risk of suicide, Liberty said.

Rosie Brighouse, legal officer at the organisation, said: "We urge the police to protect these victims' dignity.

"It's surely common sense that these vulnerable girls aren't degraded further?"

'Fundamental error'

In a reply, Dorset Police said "present options" were limited as the legislation used to seize the phone and computer required officers to return the property.

The force added: "Furthermore it would be unlawful for police officers to alter the computer and phone's memories by removing the disputed photographs before returning them."

The county's Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC), Martin Underhill, said it was not the fault of the police and has set up an e-petition to lobby to change the "fundamental error" in the law.[ah, a loophole, again]

He said: "How can we protect victims of sexual abuse if current legislation allows perpetrators to keep images of them?

"Think of the trauma this causes to the victims. And think of the control and power this gives the abuser.""

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-26979187

Anger over paedophile [sic] laptop move

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/national/anger-over-paedophile-laptop-move-1-6555028

Outrage as paedo [sic] to be given back laptop containing images of girl he abused

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/373903/Paedophile-to-be-given-back-laptop-containing-images-of-girl-he-abused

 Outrage as paedophile [sic] set to have photos of stepdaughter victim returned to him - and there's nothing the law can do

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/11141667.Outrage_as_paedophile_set_to_have_photos_of_stepdaughter_victim_returned_to_him___and_there_s_nothing_the_law_can_do/ 

Police set to return child images to paedophile [sic]

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-04-11/police-set-to-return-images-of-children-to-paedophile

Sex offenders 'must not be allowed to be given sick images back', says Dorset police chief Martyn Underhill

http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Petition-stop-sex-offenders-keeping-images/story-20947183-detail/story.html

Attorney General to investigate case of paedophile [sic] who wants pictures of victim returned

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/11144636.Attorney_General_to_investigate_case_of_paedophile_who_wants_pictures_of_victim_returned/?ref=twt

*****

Martyn Underhill @Tosh599 https://twitter.com/Tosh599

PCCDorset Verified account @PCCDorset https://twitter.com/PCCDorset

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martyn_Underhill

http://www.keeppoliticsoutofpolicing.co.uk

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/10054468.Concerns_after_Dorset_police_commisioner_poll

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-20639034 

*****

Stop sex offenders retaining photo's of their victims

11/04/2015 09:35

"Responsible department: Ministry of Justice

I have come across a case which highlights how victims of sexual abuse are being let down. This case involves a man convicted for sexual abuse. When he was arrested, his laptop was seized by the Police. Now the man is convicted, the case is over, the man is asking for his laptop back.

The laptop contains images of his victims which were not deemed indecent. 

The law states that the police have to return the equipment in its original condition.

This is a Dorset case. Question? Should an abuser, be allowed to retain images of his victims? Think of the trauma this causes to the victims? And think of the control and power this gives the abuser? This is not the fault of the police. The legislation is wrong. It is double jeopardy for victim’s photos to be viewed by their abuser – it opens old wounds. Victims need better protection, Government should legislate to stop all victim images being retained by sex offenders."

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/63590 

 *****
 (Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

A father cannot own legal photos of his child?

Little wonder, that they will not reply to our communications.

 We may correct, all the glaring falsehoods and lies, later.

 The OSC

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 14 January 2014

Ms Paedofinder General Calls

*****
(Embedded tweet - click date)
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 12 December 2013

Treacy Hatchet Job - More Draconian, Populist, Disinforming, Lying, Establishment, Unaccountable, Mission Creep



Who elected you to think on my behalf, laughing boy?

*****

12 December 2013

New sentencing guideline gives greater focus to impact [when there are none?] of sex offences [sic] on victims [when there are none?]

"The Sentencing Council has published a new sentencing guideline for sexual offences [sic] which will help ensure appropriate and consistent sentences for sex offenders [sic] .

The guideline covers more than 50 offences including rape, child sex offences, indecent images of children [N.B. not the same], trafficking and voyeurism, and brings significant changes to how offences are considered by the courts.

It marks a step forward in how courts take into account the impact [when none?] of sex offences [sic] on victims. As well as physical harm, the new approach will reflect more fully the psychological and longer term effects on the victim, enabling courts to take into account the true extent of what the victim has been through [because this cannot be proven].

The guideline also takes an expanded approach to how courts assess offenders, looking at the full context of offending behaviour and motivation in committing any offence. This means giving more significant emphasis to important aspects like grooming activity by both individuals and gangs, the targeting of vulnerable victims such as those in care and offenders’ abuse of trust and positions of power or status so that these are clearly reflected in sentence levels.

The guideline makes it clear that victims are not responsible for what has happened to them. [not 'responsible in law', but, often, participatory] This is particularly emphasised in relation to offences committed against children. In the previous guideline there were child sex offences labelled as involving ‘ostensible consent’ – that is, where a child over 13 has apparently agreed [apparently?] to sexual activity. The Council believes that this is the wrong way of looking at these offences [you mean, as the truth? - BTW, who are you to decide what is 'wrong' or 'right', in this context?] as children do not consent to their own abuse [abuse - you mean pleasure? Of course, many (likely to be the majority) consent to their participation]. The new guideline therefore looks more at the offender’s actions and behaviour towards the victim.

The new guideline also brings increases in sentencing starting points and sentencing ranges for some offences. For example, in relation to rape, the new guideline allows top category sentences with a starting point of 15 years. The previous guideline only allowed sentences with this starting point for multiple rapes. Sentences of 20 years and above are also now recommended for campaigns of rape. In addition, the worst cases of assault by penetration can now receive the same sentences as rape.

The guideline simplifies the system for assessing indecent images of children which will make analysis of imagery much easier when evidence is being compiled against someone being prosecuted. The new guideline moves away from concentrating on just the number of images [which it never did] and gives more emphasis to what the offender is doing with the images – possessing, distributing or creating – to help assess the offending behaviour and appropriate sentence level.

The guideline also takes account the increased use of technology in offending since the previous guideline was issued in 2004. In relation to many of the offences, a new aggravating factor in the guideline is of recording the crime ['taking', yes? Not 'making'] as filming and photographing victims has become more common since the previous guideline was produced.

Due to the growth in online offending, the Council has ensured that guidelines, such as for sexual activity with a child, cover offending committed remotely such as via webcam. It also takes into account aspects like offenders lying about their age, grooming via social media or asking children to share indecent photos of themselves. Factors like the encryption of imagery and recording of an offence, which is increasingly common, will also increase sentence length.

While the guideline covers the ways these crimes are committed today, it remains flexible enough to deal with future technological evolution.

Public protection is central to the guideline which reinforces the importance of proper punishment and the prevention of reoffending, either through significant custodial sentences or rigorous treatment programmes that will address the offender’s behaviour.

This is the largest and most complex guideline the Council has produced and it was created after a very substantial period of consultation with criminal justice professionals and research with victims and judges. It was also subject to a public consultation, and responses were received from a very wide range of people including groups representing victims, judges, magistrates, lawyers, the police, NGOs, the Government, academics, medical practitioners as well as the wider public. The Council has made many changes to the guideline as a result of their views, for example, to the factors that should be considered in relation to harm and culpability, sentence levels and mitigating factors. Changes include:

>allowing proper consideration of the vulnerability of the victim such as through age or disability or a background of physical or emotional abuse;

>broadening the wording of various aggravating factors to ensure they cover the great range of offending, for example in relation to abuse of trust where an offender has abused the trust that may come with status or image;

>ensuring good character can now be an aggravating factor [what???!!!] when it has facilitated an offence – such as when it leads a child to trust the offender, makes it harder for them to report an offence or be believed; and

>adding various new aggravating factors. In relation to exploitation offences, ‘threats of exposure’ to family or others is now included to cover situations where this is used as a further means of controlling victims.

Chairman of the Sentencing Council, Lord Justice Treacy [Establishment Stooge] said:

“This guideline will make real changes to the way offenders are sentenced for these very serious, sensitive and complex offences. It will help judges and magistrates sentence in a way which protects our communities from this kind of offending and the suffering it causes.

“We have taken on board the views of victims, criminal justice professionals and the wider public to produce an approach to sentencing which people can understand and have confidence in. This approach will enable sentences that reflect what the victim has been through and take in a full profile of what the offender has done, such as grooming victims or abusing trust.

“No one wants more people falling victim to offenders who come before the courts, and public protection is central to this guideline, whether this is by jailing offenders or, where appropriate, imposing a rigorous treatment order and other restrictions to prevent reoffending.”

National Policing Lead for Violence and Public Protection Chief Constable David Whatton said:

“The new guidelines from the Sentencing Council show how well the Council listened during its consultation. The guidelines complement the new CPS and College of Policing guidance and are indicative of the move across the criminal justice system to ensure that police, prosecutors and judges take a victim-centred approach when dealing with sexual offences while still ensuring the integrity of the justice system.

“Across the justice system, changes have been made to ensure that the alleged offenders’ behaviour and the context and circumstances of the incident are scrutinised, rather than the credibility of the victim. These changes are intended to ensure that across the board our response to sexual offenders is robust and victims get the support they need. The new Sentencing Council guidelines will ensure offenders who are brought to justice are dealt with appropriately.”

Barnardo’s deputy director of strategy Alison Worsley, said:

“It is difficult to imagine the torment experienced by the vulnerable victims of crimes such as these. The publication of this new sentencing guideline will help to ensure the focus is on the perpetrator and not the victim.

"As the guideline emphasises, it is plain wrong to imply in any way that the experiences of sexually exploited children are something they bring on themselves. Barnardo’s Remember They are Children campaign showed that no child can ever truly agree to their own abuse. “If we are to turn the tide in the fight against these awful crimes it is vital that victims feel they will be taken seriously and dealt with sensitively at all levels of the justice system.”

The guideline will come into force in courts in England and Wales in April 2014 and replace existing guidance which was issued by the Sentencing Council’s predecessor body following the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Sentencing levels for sexual offences have been increasing since the Act, and existing sentencing guideline, came into force, and the new guideline reflects these increases. They do not include any reductions in sentences from current sentencing. [what a surprise, there is the unaccountable mission creep]

The new guideline covers 54 very varied offences and aims to ensure appropriate sentences are given for the wide spectrum of offending that takes place. However, where judges feel that they are dealing with an exceptional case, they can sentence outside the guideline ranges and up to the maximum permitted by law.

They will apply to all adult offenders, regardless of when offences took place, so while offenders will be subject to the law at the time of the offence, the guideline will bring a modern [regressive] and victim-focused [not rights-focused] approach to how historic offenders are dealt with by the courts."

Sentencing Council launches new definitive guideline for sexual offences; 12 December 2013

"Today, the Sentencing Council is publishing a new guideline for judges and magistrates on the sentencing of sexual offences.

The new guideline, which has been issued following a public consultation [sham], will come into effect on 1 April 2014."

http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk

The Guidelines 

http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/guidelines/forthcoming-guidelines.htm

http://www.crimeline.info/uploads/clc/sentencing/sexualapril2014.pdf

 Guidelines to download 

http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/guidelines/guidelines-to-download.htm

*****

Sex offences sentencing overhaul: More emphasis on long-term impact on victims as celebrities have fame used against them

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/sex-offences-sentencing-overhaul-more-emphasis-on-longterm-impact-on-victims-as-celebrities-have-fame-used-against-them-8999451.html

Fresh sex offences guidance published

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25339511

Sex offences sentencing guidelines overhaul

http://www.itv.com/news/story/2013-12-12/sex-offender-celebrities-stronger-sentencing/

Courts to give tougher sentences to sex offenders

http://www.bedfordshire-news.co.uk/News/Courts-to-give-tougher-sentences-to-sex-offenders-20131212060000.htm

 Celebrities who use fame to commit sex offences face severer sentences

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/dec/12/celebrities-fame-sex-offences-sentences-guidelines?CMP=twt_fd 

*****

More to follow.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)