If you have contacted us, particularly at theosc@gmx.com email account, please bear with us. Please avoid contacting, at that email account, at this time.
The current contact, is on the RHS, of this page.
We apologise, that we were unable to deal with you contact, during our 'downtime'.
The OSC
Showing posts with label OSC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OSC. Show all posts
Tuesday, 6 September 2016
Monday, 5 September 2016
What Goes Around ...
We are back, gentle readers. Reasons will always follow :)
For now, why not spread your wings :) ...
For now, why not spread your wings :) ...
Vigilante Banishment In The Age Of Post-Enlightenment
Sunday, 26 January 2014
The Ignorant And Dangerous Unite, Again (5) - It Appears, That Ms Thomas Is Electing To Learn, The Hard Way
https://twitter.com/EveThomas40/statuses/427137394916487169
*****
@MAMAAUK @EveThomas40 v sensible. Add my name.
— Eric Joyce MP (@ericjoyce) January 24, 2014
@ericjoyce @MAMAAUK very much :)) Thank you Eric I just cannot converse with him.
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 25, 2014
@ericjoyce @MAMAAUK Mr Oldfield sits at his computer all day & hounds anyone who converses with me, I'm afraid he doesn't like my work 1/2
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 25, 2014
@MAMAAUK Attention seeking man! This is who I raise awareness, sneaks in on tweets because he's stalking my TL. I've got him blocked
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 25, 2014
“@IanCampbell_: @EveThomas40 Nothing gives anyone the right to harm, attack or demean another, not ever.” Here here. X
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 25, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)*****
Addendum (27/1/14)
This information, is made available, in prelude, to what may occur, in the future.
The complainant will act, initially, as litigant in person.
The courts prefer, that all is done, so as to avoid proceedings needing to take place.
We advise, that Ms Eve Thomas, now seeks, competent, legal advice ...
Private prosecutions: an individual’s right
http://thejusticegap.com/2012/06/private-prosecutions-an-individual%E2%80%99s-right
A Guide To Private Prosecution Procedure In England And Wales
http://www.mccue-law.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/UK-guide-to-private-prosecution1.pdf
Private Prosecutions
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/private_prosecutions
27/1/14 - 1:45 am
If Ms Thomas fails to desist and fails to make her website posting legal, we will clarify what criminal offence she will be prosecuted with, and why, on February 10th, 2014.
An initial stage, will, of course, be to obtain her address, for legal communications.
*****
Online abuse 'outpacing' protection - it sure is, SW didn't know what OSC is, does now. http://t.co/xHwXVLZLnw
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@CheckAnEx I couldn't even get legal aid to help me fight my safe address exposure, I'm angry
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
Nigel Oldfield - OSC can try to get my address - I will happily go to prison to protect - been here before #pronow pic.twitter.com/sqIrSWoyx6
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@Zoompad yes but I shall look forward to this one with eagerness pic.twitter.com/AJxKUpLSgM
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@Zoompad he does not like me raising awareness about their presence - TOUGH! Children come before predators kids are off limits
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
Now anyone with even a degree of common sense will know that my SAFE address is just that SAFE.
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
The #OSC - grooming people to support them. Not on this feed. I will call them paedophile to their faces. @oscp1 @oscp2
— Siânnie (@crescentcolours) October 24, 2013
@markusj75 please don't include #OSC in tweets I have no wish to converse & Mr Oldfield is well aware of warnings issued to him
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@markusj75 lol a convicted child predator saying "trust me"
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 @markusj75 Are you not aware, what the legal implications, of calling someone, a 'convicted child predator' ...
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 @markusj75 ... incorrectly, in public are, Ms Thomas? Cease and desist, at once.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
IMPORTANT CHILD PREDATORS - http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 Cease and desist.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 State your intention for doing so, here, or in court. Final warning, today.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
Well whilst #OSC are harassing me they are at least leaving children & victims alone #jobdone
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 We are not harassing you. We are carrying out the Pre-Action Protocols (Criminal) -
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 in a manner that protects you, at this stage. We suggest you take advice, from your legal team, ASAP.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
@GillHeyes @ShyKeenan yes I know, he's a relentless bully & abuser but I'm in control not him :)
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@GillHeyes @ShyKeenan @TruthIzSexy can you please not include me in tweets with#OSC Thank you
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
Please be advised if you include me in tweets with #OSC I will ignore, if you persist I will block.
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@GillHeyes yes that is what he does http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 very sad, lonely attention seeking man
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@ChayalimBodedim He will attack men too from behind his computer screen, like all abusers - cowards at heart
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@ChayalimBodedim so before you know it you are responding to tweet & his name goes undetected / he is a child predator after all SLY :))
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@GillHeyes I don't think a job would help but that's a very good point - why doesn't he work? Too much free time
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@ChayalimBodedim he will continue 2 make you feel as if you owe him an answer GROSS MANIPULATOR, not playing he's had enough attention today
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
*****
@ChayalimBodedim I feel your loathing of child predators shines brightly :)
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 @ChayalimBodedim You are now causing Dr Oldfield, anxiety and distress. Cease and desist.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
@EveThomas40 @ChayalimBodedim Your dangerous lies, will not be tolerated.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 28, 2014
@paulrogers002 @stop1984 Hi Paul yes trying to intimidate but not succeeding :)
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
@paulrogers002 @stop1984 my job is to raise awareness & encourage safety, guidance, some wish to silence & one has to ask why :))
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
I think peace has been restored to @twitter #OSCP2 suspended - please keep it that way twitter- time to clean up
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 28, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)*****
29/1/14
The offending web page: http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-Phone-Safety-Advise.html
Good morning. Sending smiles & hugs :)))) x
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 29, 2014
Ok let's get this straight. Nigel Oldfield #OSC HAS been reported in media, the link is on the www so anyone can view http://t.co/qyh6fCwWhF
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 29, 2014
@EveThomas40 10/2/14 - That article has no bearing, on what you claim, on your website.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 29, 2014
@EveThomas40 You are the potential defendant. We will deal with others, when, if and how, we see fit.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 29, 2014
Therefore there is NOTHING wrong with my website. I strongly advise if you don't like it change your ways! Kids are off limits
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 29, 2014
@EveThomas40 We refer you, once again, to the MCA 1988, and to our comment, this morning. Cease and desist - TY.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 29, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)*****
30/1/14
UPDATED: #OSC http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 BE SAFE, BE PROACTIVE - keep you & your children safe! PLRT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 30, 2014
#OSC I don't care if you don't like my website http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS! I suggest they sue the media :))
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 30, 2014
#OSC have declared who & what they are, I'm merely raising awareness. The #police are fully aware of the man who runs the accts
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 30, 2014
I suggest if #OSC don't like people raising awareness to their #SocialMedia accts that they take #police advise and "come off twitter."
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 30, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)
The offending web page: http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-Phone-Safety-Advise.html - modified.
The person, Ms Thomas is now maliciously-harassing, causing anxiety and distress to, and lying about, may still be identified, from that web page.
Cease and desist.
All previous communications, stand, as is.
*****
31/1/14
IMPORTANT - How to report illegal images on @twitter http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 Also info on #OSC PLRT pic.twitter.com/wVDYkhOqx1
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 31, 2014
Parents do you know what #OSC Is? http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 Be safe, be proactive PLRT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 31, 2014
“@OCarroll54: @EveThomas40 @Cwtchs pic.twitter.com/naJFoITWac” very true Henry x
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 31, 2014
@Cwtchs I have a saying, cuts, broken bones & bruises heal, words scar deeply x
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 31, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date) Along with, the offending web page: http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-Phone-Safety-Advise.html
Once again, Ms Thomas, you have linked the person, to paedophiles, child predators and child abusers. Your claims about that person are incorrect and grossly-offensive.
You continue, to maliciously-harass, this person, causing anxiety and distress to him.
Your lies will not be tolerated.
Cease and desist.
All previous communications, stand, as is.
Labels:
Anxiety,
Communication,
Dangerous,
Defamation,
Distress,
Dr Oldfield,
Eve Thomas,
False Allegations,
Fear,
Harassment,
Hate,
Law,
Lies,
Malicious,
MCA 1988,
OSC,
PHA 1997,
Police,
Prosecution,
Vigilantism
Saturday, 18 January 2014
The Ignorant And Dangerous Unite, Again (4) - The Rewriting Of History, The Denial And The Squirming
Click to enlarge
http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Statements.html
*****
STATEMENT: http://t.co/DYKP4ScEFM 18.01.14 21.27 GMT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 18, 2014
@EveThomas40 Do it again and we will see just how much that is a lie, Ms Thomas.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 18, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)*****
Does Ms Thomas, really believe, that we do not keep archives or liaise with the police?
Labels:
Child Savers,
CPI,
Dangerous,
Defamation,
Denial,
Dr Oldfield,
Eve Thomas,
Fear,
Harassment,
Hate,
Law,
Lies,
Malicious,
Mic Wright,
OSC,
Police,
Profiteer,
Shy Keenan,
Squirming,
Vigilantism
Tuesday, 7 January 2014
The Ignorant And Dangerous Unite, Again (3) - That Pesky Report Button - The Finale
Eve Thomas @EveThomas40
https://twitter.com/EveThomas40
https://twitter.com/SmilesForXmas
https://twitter.com/EveOneVoice
https://m.facebook.com/eve.thomas.5836?v=timeline
*****
@EveThomas40 - my main account
@EveOneVoice - back up account
@OneVoiceBuddies - the OneVoiceBuddies account managed by Katie Bradshaw
@OneVoiceEve - campaign account
@BengaliEve - multi lingual victims education
@FrenchEve40 - multi lingual victims education
@GermanEve40 - multi lingual victims education
@PolishEve - multi lingual victims education
@SpanishEve40- multi lingual victims education
@EvesLaw - campaign account
http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Statements.html
*****
Speak the truth........ pic.twitter.com/pr5CaMQzen
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 7, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)*****
*****
I read a LOT, I listen a LOT, I watch a LOT. I learnt my lessons, I've done the time now let me share with you my research, my work
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 8, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)*****
@Lifeguard50 Just for your Info The OSCP ACCt You Follow is Run by http://t.co/DSi6wisYU2 Thought you should know for your peace of mind
— Henry O'Carroll (@OCarroll54) January 9, 2014
@OCarroll54 @Lifeguard50 Henry, we note that you have favorited tweets from @GrumpyukDwarf
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 9, 2014
@OCarroll54 @Lifeguard50 Are you agreeing, with the terminology and relationships, stated in those tweets, please?
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 9, 2014
@OCarroll54 @Lifeguard50 Are you also claiming, that the content that you are linking to, is truthful and correct?
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 9, 2014
@GrumpyukDwarf Well if that content is not truthful ref OSCP than I don't hear and Legal backlash from anyone The Truth Hurts #shame
— Henry O'Carroll (@OCarroll54) January 9, 2014
@OCarroll54 @GrumpyukDwarf Is that a reply to the OSC, Henry? - please be very clear.
— TheOSC (@OSCP2) January 9, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date)*****
Favorited by @OCarroll54, 11/1/14 -
@EveThomas40 Well done on getting Oldfield off Twitter, but he will be back. Did you know he has approx 10 fake profiles on Facebook as well
— Children have rights (@UKPaedos_Named) January 6, 2014
(Embedded Tweet - click date)
*****
@CraigHarper19 @glocalpolicing Why thank you Craig :) I love education, it is how we grow :)
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 11, 2014
@KatieJayneVale @PeggyCollection Can I ask you Katie do you know what #OSC is? X
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 11, 2014
@_kimrobinson_ @OTFAW yes a very long way. Can I ask you a question Kim please - do you know what #OSC Is? X
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 11, 2014
“@_kimrobinson_: @EveThomas40 @OTFAW can't say I do. Hazard a guess - Online Security Check? X” #SarahsLaw #ClaresLaw but should not be cont
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 11, 2014
@KatieJayneVale @PeggyCollection http://t.co/3EwL2kfgF8 #OSC Online sex community - child predators
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 11, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date) Link points to ...
http://m.evethomas.co.uk/Internet-phone-Advise.html
*****
@_kimrobinson_ @OTFAW Thank you :)) I'm sometimes on my soap box but I always do so in peace :) I'm a bit old fashioned manners :)) x
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 11, 2014
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS VICTIMS http://t.co/54i3Vpcp75 The Harassment Act, Criminal Justice & Public Order, Malicious comms, #police obligation RT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 12, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date).*****
Retweeted by Henry O'Carroll (13/1/14) ...
Do you know what #OSC is? CHILD PREDATORS - http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 be safe, be proactive - Know who your children are talking to online! RT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 12, 2014
@seahorseHQ @ukbarrister Hi exactly one of my points on the petition - a child predator protected, a victim exposed http://t.co/gzyLkgkDbV x
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 13, 2014
@kriskuz62 it most certainly is. May I introduce @katiebr30184354 our @OneVoiceBuddies manager. http://t.co/GM0aedJ3iM x
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 13, 2014
@kriskuz62 @EveThomas40 Has @katiebr30184354 carried out any formal treatments on clients? - where is her practice based and registered?
— The OSC (@TheOSC1) January 14, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date).
*****
PARENTS do you know what #OSC is? CHILD PREDATORS http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 please educate yourself, be safe, be smarter than the abusers PLRT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 15, 2014
Retweeted by Henry O'Carroll (15/1/14) ...
IMPORTANT Do you know what #OSC is? Convicted CHILD PREDATOR Nigel Oldfield http://t.co/OU2bZWz5FQ http://t.co/f5ZD5kS3sH Be safe
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 15, 2014
IMPORTANT Do you know what #OSC is? Convicted CHILD PREDATOR Nigel Oldfield http://t.co/OU2bZWz5FQ http://t.co/f5ZD5kS3sH Be safe
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 15, 2014
@xmaseveevil1 yes he does, lives in well not a nice place & spends his days on PC trying to get attention, I won't give it.
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 16, 2014
@EveThomas40 I agree. Really upset me. Hope he doesn't know. He thought I'd been sexually abused. Imagine if I had? He must be stopped. x
— xmaseveevil (@xmaseveevil1) January 16, 2014
@xmaseveevil1 yes I agree he must. I would advice - evidence, report, block. To feed is exciting
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 16, 2014
Do you know what #OSC is? Child predators - be safe, be #proactive http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 PLRT
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 18, 2014
PARENTS do you know what #OSC is? Child predators http://t.co/4xHTBmM8l5 be safe, be proactive
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 18, 2014
@cmredgrave every word you type on #socialmedia can be linked back to you, forever there, even if deleted as long as captured :)
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 18, 2014
Advise - the #OSC accounts CHILD PREDATORS crave attention - block don't give it to him so he can spout that children can't be abused
— Eve Thomas (@EveThomas40) January 21, 2014
(Embedded Tweets - click date).*****
More to follow.
Labels:
Child Savers,
Chris Wittwer,
CPI,
Dangerous,
Defamation,
Dr Oldfield,
Eve Thomas,
Fear,
Harassment,
Hate,
Henry O'Carroll,
Law,
Lies,
Malicious,
Mic Wright,
OSC,
Police,
Profiteer,
Shy Keenan,
Vigilantism
Monday, 16 December 2013
The Discriminatory, Persecutory, Prejudiced Lies And Disinformation, From The Child 'Savers', Child 'Protection' Industry And Bandwagon-Jumpers Continue
@ShyKeenan
https://twitter.com/ShyKeenan
@JimGamble_INEQE
https://twitter.com/JimGamble_INEQE
@EveThomas40
https://twitter.com/EveThomas40
*****
We are no 'nest', we are legion, legal and open; millions of us, fighting for our civil and human rights, which you wish to remove - come stop us, if you think you are able.
BTW Jim, just like your career ...
*****
Today, we will leave you all, with one thought ...
Labels:
Child Savers,
CPI,
Discrimination,
Eve Thomas,
Fear,
Harm,
Hate Crime,
Hyperbole,
Hypocrisy,
Jim Gamble,
Mental Health,
OSC,
Persecution,
PIE,
Prejudice,
Professional Victim,
Profiteer,
Sexual Orientation,
Shy Keenan
Thursday, 21 November 2013
Why We Challenge Them
Labels:
Anti-Denial,
Cognitive Dissonance,
Danger,
Denial,
Disinformation,
Enlightenment,
Fear,
Freedom,
Harm,
Hyperbole,
Hysteria,
Knowledge,
Leon Festinger,
Lies,
Moral Panic,
OSC,
Psychiatry,
Psychology,
Wisdom
Wednesday, 7 August 2013
Ladies And Gentlemen - Please Meet, Mr Mic Wright (Part 1)
Yup, it's Mr Wright (Guinness-binging, canal-building, Catholic, thicko
- nah, not really, but we have adopted Mic's research and journalistic style)
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy
https://www.facebook.com/micwright
http://zerply.com/micwright
http://www.micwright.co.uk
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/author/micwright
http://www.theguardian.com/profile/mic-wright
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mic-wright
http://brokenbottleboy.tumblr.com
http://blogs.reuters.com/mic-wright
http://journalisted.com/Mic-Wright
http://thenextweb.com/author/micwright
http://www.newstatesman.com/writers/38670
http://about.me/micwright
http://www.thematerconsultancy.com
http://www.youtube.com/user/cigarettesigh/videos
http://vimeo.com/7174039
http://goodmenproject.com/featured-content/bully-surviving-school
http://brokenbottleboy.tumblr.com/post/19132638922/brokenbottleboys-statement-of-ethics-a-love-letter-to
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/micwright/100009614/blame-the-vile-bullies-not-ask-fm
*****
Last updated: August 7th, 2013
"Mic Wright
Mic Wright is the Telegraph's chief tech blogger [which says it all, really ;} ] and a journalist [ ;) ] specialising in technology, music and popular culture. He lives in Dublin. He is on Twitter at @brokenbottleboy.
A 13-year-old sexual predator? No. I encountered the real deal last night
Neil Wilson is 41 years old. He took a 13-year-old girl home, allowed her to strip and then engaged in what we must euphemistically refer to as a “sex act” with her. For this and other offences including the possession of eight images of child sexual abuse and eleven sexual images involving horses and dogs, he received an eight-month suspended sentence. But it’s not the lenience of the punishment [sic] that has pushed the case into the headlines. It's the comments of the prosecutor and judge.
The Crown Prosecution Service has disavowed the words used by prosecutor Robert Colover at Snaresbrook crown court as “inappropriate”. That’s far too mild, almost offensively so. Colover told the court: “The girl is predatory in all her actions and she is sexually experienced.” His Honour Judge Nigel Peters said in his judgment: “On these facts, the girl was predatory and was egging you on. That is no defence when dealing with children but I am prepared to impose a suspension.” This should go without saying, but in an encounter between an adult man and a girl of 13, the child is not the predator. Regardless of whether she has been sexualised, she is a victim.
I hadn't thought a great deal about this case before I came into contact with a real predator last night. Popping up in the middle of a conversation on Twitter about my bullying piece, someone called “the OSC” revealed himself (or, less likely, herself) to be a fervent defender of paedophiles [sic]. Not only does this individual have a Twitter account dedicated to obsessively pushing distorted views about children, he also has a blog. One which has been relentlessly updated since April 2012. I've since discovered that OSC stands for "Online Sex-Offender Community".
I’m flagging up this particular example not because it is rare or unusual but because there is a whole network of these sites and accounts across the web. Those who identify themselves as part of the Online Sex-Offender Community are brazen. Their behaviour justifies the scepticism I and many others have shown towards David Cameron’s internet filtering proposals.
One of the measures put forward the Prime Minister and his dotty surrogate on the issue, Claire Perry, is a pop-up to tell those who seek child abuse images that they risk their jobs, their lives and their families by doing so. The existence of sick individuals such as the OSC, operating in the open on social networks, puts paid to the notion that these people can be shamed. Among the OSC’s messages about the Wilson case there are several references to the girl as a “Lolita”.
The existence of these dangerous individuals is the reason we need to spend more money on traditional policing and investigations. It’s also why charities such as The Lucy Faithful Foundation, which works to prevent abuse and deal with offenders and potential offenders, are so important. The brashness of the OSC is yet more evidence that desperately clutching at technical solutions is not the way to deal with this evil."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/micwright/100009639/a-13-year-old-sexual-predator-no-i-encountered-the-real-deal-last-night/#disqus_thread
[sorry for not having the comments, we were busy on something]
Nige gets mentioned in dispatches
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/uk.legal/W9hz_DNpDMI
"The Real Deal"
http://jerseyric.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/the-real-deal.html
*****
Comment:
Mic is small fry, and it was a rush job, but, he does deserve a full and frank response - when we have finished with bigger and more essential issues - Watch This Space, Mic !!!
*****
Addendum (8/8/13)
Keep plugging, lad. 'Promoting Paedophilia' ;)
'Paedo Blogger' ;) - Please, 'The Real Deal'.
Bless his Neoliberal, Progressive, socks.
*****
Addendum (8/8/13)
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy
*****
Dr Nigel Oldfield, is, indeed, the 'public face' of The OSC. Posts, and links to the right, make that very clear.
Now, to your incorrect, dangerous and potentially-illegal claims:
(1) "... that OSC stands for "Online Sex-Offender Community".
Does it, how do you know this? Where is your evidence?
You stated, above, that The OSC 'is' ("one guy") Dr Nigel Oldfield.
You claim (by the ability to identify a given individual), therefore, in the public media:
(2) that Dr Nigel Oldfield is "... a real predator",
(3) that Dr Nigel Oldfield is "... obsessively pushing distorted views about children",
(4) that Dr Nigel Oldfield is a "... sick individual[s]" (twice),
(5) that Dr Nigel Oldfield is a "... dangerous individual[s]",
(6) by agreement/omission, that, Dr Nigel Oldfield is a 'Paedophile'.
Please confirm, on your twitter feed, that these are your allegations and your stated position.
If they are, what was your intention, in making these claims?
TY.
The OSC
(updated 22:33)
*****
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy
There are a few things you can do, Mic. Start with some investigation and research - is that not what you are supposed to do? Then, "get writing".
Behave like a rational, humane, intelligent, educated, free thinker ... for a while - it will come, to you - we promise.
*****
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy
Our request, was for you provide your intention, perhaps 'they' are good and not malicious - are you able to do so or not?
So that you know, as a newbie, our threats are always crystal-clear and direct.
Yes, Mic, unequivocal.
*****
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy
Yep, such things are not your strong point, Mic.
*****
Addendum (9/8/13)
Last updated: August 9th, 2013
"Mic Wright
Mic Wright is the Telegraph's chief tech blogger and a journalist [ ;) ] specialising in technology, music and popular culture. He lives in Dublin. He is on Twitter at @brokenbottleboy.
The sex offender so brazen he's sharing a link to my blog post about him
"Nigel Leigh Oldfield is a convicted sex offender. He is the worst kind [jeez]. An unrepentant one. He is the man behind The OSC (Online Sex-Offender Community) the Twitter account and blog I wrote about earlier this week. He served 12 months in jail for downloading over 11,000 indecent images of children including babies in 2002. Though there are nests of pro-abuse activists online, Oldfield is isolated. He runs a “community” in name only. I am told by those who have studied this sick subculture that even some paedophiles consider him an embarrassment.
The pseudo-intellectual Oldfield is a former chemistry teacher. He styles himself as “Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield” and has popped up several times on national radio and television. His most notable appearance was on Newsnight in 2007 pompously defending his repellent views. Over and over again he made excuses for viewing images of children being abused. He is the ugly agony uncle of the online child sexual abuse community giving tips on avoiding prosecution and defending the indefensible.
After I wrote about Oldfield and his activity on Twitter, he posted information about me on his latest blog. It is not the first he has run on the topic of defending child sex abuse. Previous sites have been shut down by ISPs. However, he currently has at least three up and running. A quick search also throws up numerous forum posts in which Oldfield defends child sexual exploitation. Here’s one example from a Google Group where he expresses disbelief that a convicted sex offender should be stopped from photographing children in the street. On YouTube, he has posted videos where he complains about the persecution of sex offenders, “isolated and poverty-stricken for no good reason”.
Now, on his OSC blog, where he obsessively documents media reports on child sexual abuse, he has posted: my picture, links to my Twitter account, my personal blog, my online CV and screen grabs of my original article shared on Facebook. The post assures me that I am “small fry” but that I can expect a “full and frank response – when we have finished with bigger and more essential issues”. Given his past record, I won’t pause to imagine what those could be. He’s certainly had time to boast about his renewed notoriety on yet another Google Group.
I don’t believe in naming and shaming sex offenders [ ;) ] or in vigilante actions. I don't want these individuals pushed underground and out of sight. However, Oldfield names and shames himself. Across the internet, he is active in promoting abuse and attempting to dismiss the harm it causes. I have seen the flabby banal face of evil in a YouTube video. This is who the Prime Minister is trying to combat with his current proposals, the kind of offender so thoroughly certain that it is he who has been wronged. Oldfield thinks he is the one sane man in society. He luxuriates in being written about. Ultimately he is “small fry” himself but deeply unpleasant all the same. I know Nigel intends me to feel threatened but I’m not in his usual demographic."
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/micwright/100009678/the-sex-offender-so-brazen-hes-sharing-a-link-to-my-blog-post-about-him
;)
Nige rattles Telegraph blogger
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en-GB#!topic/uk.legal/DO7-7yVNQCk
Comment:
Oh, Mic ... the reason we are spending some time, on you, is because we thought you may be a worthy opponent (also, that you write, pretty well, sometimes), however, your logical fallacies and incorrect claims, teem with 'youthful' indignation and uninformed bias. We happily-tolerate free speech, even when it is incorrect, offensive and/or potentially-illegal, for it is a valuable vehicle, for us to identify, expose and diminish the credibility of liars, charlatans and zealots; thank you.
Thank you, once again, for distributing some of our knowledge, to the world. We will combine your pieces (and any other, that you choose to write, in the near future), in our forthcoming response.
The OSC [19:34]
*****
https://twitter.com/brokenbottleboy
Mic, Dr Oldfield cares little what you think about him, as we have alluded to, above.
To have any value, in debate, or intellectual discussion (heck, even to understand the world around us), we must challenge the issues, not the person (we know you must be aware of this truth).
If you disagree, as you suggest, then bring those issues to the table. We would be delighted to discuss them with you (or anyone).
Remember, you are entitled your own opinions and beliefs, but not your own facts.
p.s. let Lady A know, we are legion and everywhere :).
*****
Part 2, here.
Labels:
CPI,
Daily Telegraph,
Dr Oldfield,
Freedom,
Human Rights,
Ignorance,
Law,
Lies,
Lolita,
MAA,
MAP,
Media,
Mic Wright,
Newbie,
OSC,
Paedophilia,
Predator,
Twitterati,
Vested Interests,
White Knight
Monday, 29 July 2013
Ooooooooooo - So Frigging What? You Think They Did Not Already Know?
Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21 pm
If you search for child abuse on Bing - Microsoft will know
"Microsoft’s Bing search engine has become the first in the world to introduce pop-up notifications for those who decide to seek out child abuse content including child pornography. The system will be launching in the United Kingdom first.
The new system will first notify users that they are searching for illegal content and offer details on available counseling services.
Yahoo, which uses Bing search results, says it may also be implementing a similar technology in the future. Google on the other hand, states that it will continue to report material, but has no plans to use pop-up notifications."
http://www.wpcentral.com/if-you-search-child-abuse-bing-microsoft-will-know-0
29 Jul 2013
Microsoft's Bing adds child abuse pop-up search warnings
"According to Microsoft, users whose searches "can only indicate they are looking for illegal child abuse content [evidentially incorrect]" will receive a pop-up notification ..."
http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2285343/microsofts-bing-adds-child-abuse-popup-search-warnings
Bing! That’s Illegal and You’re Sick and Probably Going to Prison
http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2013/07/bing-thats-illegal-and-youre-sick-and-probably-going-to-prison/#comment-235827
Labels:
Bing,
CEOP,
Civil Rights,
CPI,
Dangerous,
Disinformation,
False Security,
Freedom,
Hypocrisy,
IIOC,
Images,
Law,
Lies,
Microsoft,
OSC,
Profiteer,
Research,
Social Control,
Social Engineering,
Technology
Microsoft Bing - The Epitome Of 'Illegal' Search Engines
We showed you, how Microsoft's Bing's claims were incorrect and dangerous profiteering.
Now, here is what Microsoft likes to offer users, in the image search option (no 'pop-ups' there, images turned off, click to enlarge) ...
We apologise, for the nature of some of the link terms, but, that is all Microsoft's doing.
It is all very reminiscent, of the Windows file delete (not) process.
There is only one thing more dangerous than no security, and that is a false sense of security.
The OSC
Labels:
Bing,
CEOP,
Civil Rights,
CPI,
Dangerous,
Disinformation,
False Security,
Freedom,
Hypocrisy,
IIOC,
Images,
Law,
Lies,
Microsoft,
OSC,
Profiteer,
Research,
Social Control,
Social Engineering,
Technology
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
Thursday, 6 December 2012
The OSC Responds To The Right Honourable Lord Justice Treacy
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
An open communication ...
"Dear Sir or Madam,
Re: Sexual Offences Guideline: Indecent images of children (although it could apply to a number of your present projects)
We do not participate in consultations, such as yours (including directly-governmental), as they are, invariably-based, on false, misleading and establishment social control methods; we will not give credence to, by participation in, such farces.
For example, in this case, the incorrect obiter dicta, in Beaney (now, essentially, superseded by Terrell), is a typical example of biased and ill-informed myth (some would say, lies), within such a consultation; for now, we stopped reading, there.
These are the 'facts of the matter', based on actual evidence and research:
*****
1 The Propositions
In this piece, I will work from a number of propositions. Of course, they are much more than that, as they are based on almost 10 years (at least) of thorough research and personal experience.
The propositions, are as follows (others may be added, as I proceed):
(1) Viewing an image, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(2) Owning an image, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(3) Taking of an image of someone, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(4) Selling of an image of someone, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(5) An image is a digital representation of an act, which may, or may not, have occurred,
As such, as a collection of dots, it is not a victim of anything; it is not even a valid proof of reality,
(6) An image is only indecent, by the perception of the viewer,
(7) Indecency does not equate to harm (seriously or otherwise), directly or indirectly.
The first stage, for anyone who wishes to challenge (or support) these propositions (or any of the response), is to provide evidence, at this email. The evidence will then be considered and incorporated, if relevant (and credited, as such).
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/making-every-child-matter-everywhere.html
*****
Feel free to email me, here, if you have ***any*** evidence, to the contrary.
Please feel free to use this communication, if you so desire; it really does not matter to us.
We deal in evidence-based approaches, and do not hide behind populist myth, bad cases and law, and incorrect and disproportionate obiter dicta, so as to approach the truth and natural justice, and then attempt to deal with the terrible results, of their draconian outcomes.
You messed it up so very badly, last time, contributing to the death and suffering of many, many good men, and ruining thousands of lives and families; please do not do so again.
Yours,
Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk
http://criticalestoppel.blogspot.co.uk "
*****
Some moments later ...
*****
"Postmaster@justice.gsi.gov.uk via mail204.messagelabs.com
15:28 (20 minutes ago)
to me
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system.
Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 ."
*****
OK, let's try again (direct copy and paste, check no spaces etc) ...
Some moments later ...
*****
"Postmaster@justice.gsi.gov.uk via mail204.messagelabs.com
15:44 (1 minute ago)
to me
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system.
Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 "
*****
Reported to info@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
Email is, consultation@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk, apparently
Email sent and received.
The OSC
An open communication ...
"Dear Sir or Madam,
Re: Sexual Offences Guideline: Indecent images of children (although it could apply to a number of your present projects)
We do not participate in consultations, such as yours (including directly-governmental), as they are, invariably-based, on false, misleading and establishment social control methods; we will not give credence to, by participation in, such farces.
For example, in this case, the incorrect obiter dicta, in Beaney (now, essentially, superseded by Terrell), is a typical example of biased and ill-informed myth (some would say, lies), within such a consultation; for now, we stopped reading, there.
These are the 'facts of the matter', based on actual evidence and research:
*****
1 The Propositions
In this piece, I will work from a number of propositions. Of course, they are much more than that, as they are based on almost 10 years (at least) of thorough research and personal experience.
The propositions, are as follows (others may be added, as I proceed):
(1) Viewing an image, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(2) Owning an image, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(3) Taking of an image of someone, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(4) Selling of an image of someone, never harmed anyone (seriously or otherwise),
(5) An image is a digital representation of an act, which may, or may not, have occurred,
As such, as a collection of dots, it is not a victim of anything; it is not even a valid proof of reality,
(6) An image is only indecent, by the perception of the viewer,
(7) Indecency does not equate to harm (seriously or otherwise), directly or indirectly.
The first stage, for anyone who wishes to challenge (or support) these propositions (or any of the response), is to provide evidence, at this email. The evidence will then be considered and incorporated, if relevant (and credited, as such).
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/making-every-child-matter-everywhere.html
*****
Feel free to email me, here, if you have ***any*** evidence, to the contrary.
Please feel free to use this communication, if you so desire; it really does not matter to us.
We deal in evidence-based approaches, and do not hide behind populist myth, bad cases and law, and incorrect and disproportionate obiter dicta, so as to approach the truth and natural justice, and then attempt to deal with the terrible results, of their draconian outcomes.
You messed it up so very badly, last time, contributing to the death and suffering of many, many good men, and ruining thousands of lives and families; please do not do so again.
Yours,
Dr Nigel Leigh Oldfield
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk
http://criticalestoppel.blogspot.co.uk "
*****
Some moments later ...
*****
"Postmaster@justice.gsi.gov.uk via mail204.messagelabs.com
15:28 (20 minutes ago)
to me
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system.
Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 ."
*****
OK, let's try again (direct copy and paste, check no spaces etc) ...
Some moments later ...
*****
"Postmaster@justice.gsi.gov.uk via mail204.messagelabs.com
15:44 (1 minute ago)
to me
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
consultations@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system.
Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 "
*****
Reported to info@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk
Email is, consultation@sentencingcouncil.gsi.gov.uk, apparently
Email sent and received.
The OSC
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
Who's Zooming Who?
9:59AM BST 30 Sep 2012
School bans parents watching sports day without criminal record check
"A reminder that parents wishing to spectate at our sports fixtures MUST be in possession of an up to date Swindon Borough Council CRB check.
If you wish to spectate at a sports event the following procedures apply. Parents wishing to come and spectate regularly at fixtures need to contact Miss Carter.
Miss Carter will send you the relevant links to the CRB site or ask for proof of your current CRB if it is from Swindon Borough Council. (Getting this is free but may take 2-4 weeks)
Once your CRB has been granted you will be able to enter and leave school signing in via reception if you wish to attend a sporting fixture.
Unfortunately if you do not follow these procedures we will be unable to grant you access to the school."
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/E7x16HkgmpI
Tue Oct 2 2012
Press Statement - CRB Checks
"In light of the recent press coverage regarding CRB checks on parents wishing to watch their children play in sports fixtures we would like to issue the following statement:
Parents are more than welcome to attend to watch sports fixtures at Isambard Community School. However, there is no access to the sports pitches through the main school building. Parents are requested to use the Tadpole Lane entrance where there is ample parking. There have previously been issues with parents and other visitors arriving at the Isambard Way entrance and being annoyed to be asked to drive to Tadpole Lane. However, we are unable to allow visitors access through the school during the normal school day, which includes the enrichment time between 3:15pm and 6pm. We hope this clarifies the school’s position."
http://www.isambard.swindon.sch.uk/page_viewer.asp?page=Home&pid=1
School demands CRBs to let parents watch sports matches
http://www.manifestoclub.com/node/971
September 2012
Swindon Advertiser » News » Comment
"As a professional body and lead signatory for the Criminal Records Bureau we do not normally comment upon newspaper articles such as this one however, if the report is fully accurate, we believe it is only right to comment upon apparent misconceptions held by both employers and public regarding the issue of CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) Disclosures ..."
For more current information relating to Regulated Activities have a look at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/agencies-public-bodies/crb/about-crb/crb-pofa-2012/ra-children/ "
http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/9956891.School_wants_CRB_check_to_let_dad_watch_rugby_match/?action=complain&cid=10807606
School wants CRB check to let dad watch rugby match
http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/9956891.School_wants_CRB_check_to_let_dad_watch_rugby_match/?ref=mr
PUBLISHED: 18:24, 4 October 2012 | UPDATED: 19:12, 4 October 2012
Sports college bans parents from watching competitive matches because of ‘child protection rules’
"In a letter to parents from Laura Hunt, the director of physical education at the comprehensive school, she said that parents and carers were banned from the school grounds during home matches against other schools.
She said: “We appreciate that parents/carers may wish to come along and watch and support their children. 'However, as a school staff, we have a duty of care to our students and have to ensure that appropriate safeguarding and children protection policies are adopted, implemented and monitored.
'As such, for our students’ safekeeping, we must state that we cannot permit parents/carers or other adults on site at these times, and hope that you will understand and support us in this decision.'"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212944/Sports-college-bans-parents-watching-competitive-matches-child-protection-rules.html#ixzz28PGcEYKG
Head teacher defends ban on 'energised and aggressive' parents watching school sports
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/education/head-teacher-defends-ban-on-energised-and-aggressive-parents-watching-school-sports-8201661.html
Mother banned from watching school sport
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/mother-banned-from-watching-school-sport-8197039.html
School bans parents watching sports day without criminal record check
"A reminder that parents wishing to spectate at our sports fixtures MUST be in possession of an up to date Swindon Borough Council CRB check.
If you wish to spectate at a sports event the following procedures apply. Parents wishing to come and spectate regularly at fixtures need to contact Miss Carter.
Miss Carter will send you the relevant links to the CRB site or ask for proof of your current CRB if it is from Swindon Borough Council. (Getting this is free but may take 2-4 weeks)
Once your CRB has been granted you will be able to enter and leave school signing in via reception if you wish to attend a sporting fixture.
Unfortunately if you do not follow these procedures we will be unable to grant you access to the school."
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/uk.legal/E7x16HkgmpI
Tue Oct 2 2012
Press Statement - CRB Checks
"In light of the recent press coverage regarding CRB checks on parents wishing to watch their children play in sports fixtures we would like to issue the following statement:
Parents are more than welcome to attend to watch sports fixtures at Isambard Community School. However, there is no access to the sports pitches through the main school building. Parents are requested to use the Tadpole Lane entrance where there is ample parking. There have previously been issues with parents and other visitors arriving at the Isambard Way entrance and being annoyed to be asked to drive to Tadpole Lane. However, we are unable to allow visitors access through the school during the normal school day, which includes the enrichment time between 3:15pm and 6pm. We hope this clarifies the school’s position."
http://www.isambard.swindon.sch.uk/page_viewer.asp?page=Home&pid=1
School demands CRBs to let parents watch sports matches
http://www.manifestoclub.com/node/971
September 2012
Swindon Advertiser » News » Comment
"As a professional body and lead signatory for the Criminal Records Bureau we do not normally comment upon newspaper articles such as this one however, if the report is fully accurate, we believe it is only right to comment upon apparent misconceptions held by both employers and public regarding the issue of CRB (Criminal Records Bureau) Disclosures ..."
For more current information relating to Regulated Activities have a look at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/agencies-public-bodies/crb/about-crb/crb-pofa-2012/ra-children/ "
http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/9956891.School_wants_CRB_check_to_let_dad_watch_rugby_match/?action=complain&cid=10807606
School wants CRB check to let dad watch rugby match
http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/9956891.School_wants_CRB_check_to_let_dad_watch_rugby_match/?ref=mr
PUBLISHED: 18:24, 4 October 2012 | UPDATED: 19:12, 4 October 2012
Sports college bans parents from watching competitive matches because of ‘child protection rules’
"In a letter to parents from Laura Hunt, the director of physical education at the comprehensive school, she said that parents and carers were banned from the school grounds during home matches against other schools.
She said: “We appreciate that parents/carers may wish to come along and watch and support their children. 'However, as a school staff, we have a duty of care to our students and have to ensure that appropriate safeguarding and children protection policies are adopted, implemented and monitored.
'As such, for our students’ safekeeping, we must state that we cannot permit parents/carers or other adults on site at these times, and hope that you will understand and support us in this decision.'"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212944/Sports-college-bans-parents-watching-competitive-matches-child-protection-rules.html#ixzz28PGcEYKG
Head teacher defends ban on 'energised and aggressive' parents watching school sports
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/education/head-teacher-defends-ban-on-energised-and-aggressive-parents-watching-school-sports-8201661.html
Mother banned from watching school sport
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/mother-banned-from-watching-school-sport-8197039.html
Labels:
CRB,
Disinformation,
Freedom,
Hyperbole,
Hysteria,
Lies,
Media,
Moral Panic,
OSC,
OSC Response,
Paedocard
Saturday, 11 August 2012
Which Is It To Be?
https://twitter.com/ThePhoenixPost
http://www.tpcauk.com/
http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/when-survivors-attack-1.html
*****
Comment:
We have, recently, come to realise, apparently, you cannot even remember what you thought a few months ago, Ms Keenan.
You are now failing, in a way, that could never be imagined - stop, before you do any more damage, to you or others.
*****
Addendum - 19/8/2012
https://twitter.com/ThePhoenixPost
Labels:
Fear,
Harassment,
Harm,
Mental Health,
MHA 2007,
OSC,
Persecution,
Prejudice,
Sara Payne,
Sexuality,
Shy Keenan,
TPCA,
TPP,
Vigilantism
Tuesday, 31 July 2012
The Fraudulent, Dangerous, Nattering, Collective Have 'News' - Part 3
http://www.tpcauk.com
Sponsoring Phoenix
http://www.thephoenixpost.com/?p=1
Anti-Victim Prejudice – AVP
http://www.thephoenixpost.com/?page_id=21
*****
Comment:
Oh, so much here, we need a little time to respond, appropriately, so that there can be no doubt and we may give it full justice.
Watch this space.
*****
The OSC
Labels:
Civil Rights,
Discrimination,
Disinformation,
Fraud,
Harassment,
Harm,
Human Rights,
Nattering,
OSC,
OSC Response,
Power Trips,
Professional Victim,
Sara Payne,
Shy Keenan,
Survivors,
TPP,
Vested Interests
The Fraudulent, Dangerous, Nattering, Collective Have 'News' - Part 2
http://www.tpcauk.com
*****
Comment:
(1) There has never been a 'better time', for 'victims', in this country,
(2) 'You' do not have the monopoly on grief, despair, fear, suffering, suicide, etc etc etc,
(3) There is no such thing as a 'Paedophile Crime', unless, there is such a thing as a 'Child Prostitute' - is there such a thing?
Keep your dangerous and incorrect propaganda coming, it is all grist to the archive mill.
*****
The OSC
Labels:
Civil Rights,
Discrimination,
Disinformation,
Fraud,
Harassment,
Harm,
Human Rights,
Nattering,
OSC,
OSC Response,
Power Trips,
Professional Victim,
Sara Payne,
Shy Keenan,
Survivors,
TPP,
Vested Interests
Sunday, 29 July 2012
The Fraudulent, Dangerous, Nattering, Collective Have 'News' - Part 1
http://www.tpcauk.com
*****
Comment:
As The OSC gets a mention, it is our legal and ethical responsibility, to report the developments at TPP, so that the authories and the vulnerable may be aware.
As usual, even though they have committed themselves to being public figures, they fear open and balanced, challenge and scrutiny, only allowing login access, to their tiny, groupthink, cabal ... we are only able to archive and report what surfaces in public.
We have little doubt, that they will not be able to resist 'going public', in the future; for now, this will suffice.
*****
The OSC
Labels:
Civil Rights,
Discrimination,
Disinformation,
Fraud,
Harassment,
Harm,
Human Rights,
Nattering,
OSC,
OSC Response,
Power Trips,
Professional Victim,
Sara Payne,
Shy Keenan,
Survivors,
TPP,
Vested Interests
Tuesday, 19 June 2012
Careless Talk, Loses Many Things
19 June 2012
SOCA sued over Sun 'paedophile leak'
"A retired musician who won damages from The Sun after being branded a paedophile is now taking on the Serious and Organised Crime Agency.
GG says The Sun wrongly claimed he was a paedophile [really?] who had been deported from Thailand after SOCA supplied the paper with his name and passport photo.
The article led him to fear for his life, he says, claiming the allegation was untrue and that he was deported from Thailand in July 2010 after being convicted of remaining in the country without a valid visa.
Sun publisher News Group Newspapers (NGN) later accepted the allegation was untrue and agreed to publish a correction and pay “substantial” damages to G.
He is now suing SOCA for damages of £50,000 and wants to make a statement in open court claiming the organisation breached his human rights.
The March 2011 story – headlined “Smashed: World’s biggest paedo ring” [sic] – claimed he had been arrested by the Operation Rescue investigation into child sex offences.
G, 67, says SOCA’s actions caused him significant distress, anxiety and humiliation.
In a High Court writ, he claims a police officer from SOCA acted without checking the accuracy of the claims and that the body failed to appropriately respond to his complaint.
SOCA replied to his solicitors in March 2012 saying he had recently been charged with possessing indecent images, and querying how these criminal proceedings would impact on his civil claim.
G says he had not been charged with any offence, and that the suggestion he had been was extremely upsetting and distressing. SOCA, he argues, has never apologised or retracted the allegations."
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=49514&c=1
Sun pays damages to musician over 'paedo ring' story
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48231&c=1
The Sun pays damages over false child sex offence claim
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/11/sun-damages-false-child-sex-claim
The Sun pays out over paedophile slur
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/the-sun-pays-out-over-paedophile-slur-16076481.html
The Sun newspaper fined after wrongly calling Liverpool musician a paedophile
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2011/11/12/the-sun-newspaper-fined-after-wrongly-calling-liverpool-musician-a-paedophile-100252-29762307/
Published: 06 Jan 2012
"GG - apology
ON 17 March, 2011, we wrongly reported that GG was deported from Thailand for child sex offences as part of an international investigation.
We sincerely [sic] apologise to him for this error and the distress caused."
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4042556/GG-apology.html
*****
Comment:
Guess who the architect of this story was?
Yes, of course, Mr Anthony France, again, with Ms Keenan's assistance (yes, The OSC gets a mention).
*****
SOCA sued over Sun 'paedophile leak'
"A retired musician who won damages from The Sun after being branded a paedophile is now taking on the Serious and Organised Crime Agency.
GG says The Sun wrongly claimed he was a paedophile [really?] who had been deported from Thailand after SOCA supplied the paper with his name and passport photo.
The article led him to fear for his life, he says, claiming the allegation was untrue and that he was deported from Thailand in July 2010 after being convicted of remaining in the country without a valid visa.
Sun publisher News Group Newspapers (NGN) later accepted the allegation was untrue and agreed to publish a correction and pay “substantial” damages to G.
He is now suing SOCA for damages of £50,000 and wants to make a statement in open court claiming the organisation breached his human rights.
The March 2011 story – headlined “Smashed: World’s biggest paedo ring” [sic] – claimed he had been arrested by the Operation Rescue investigation into child sex offences.
G, 67, says SOCA’s actions caused him significant distress, anxiety and humiliation.
In a High Court writ, he claims a police officer from SOCA acted without checking the accuracy of the claims and that the body failed to appropriately respond to his complaint.
SOCA replied to his solicitors in March 2012 saying he had recently been charged with possessing indecent images, and querying how these criminal proceedings would impact on his civil claim.
G says he had not been charged with any offence, and that the suggestion he had been was extremely upsetting and distressing. SOCA, he argues, has never apologised or retracted the allegations."
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=49514&c=1
Sun pays damages to musician over 'paedo ring' story
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=48231&c=1
The Sun pays damages over false child sex offence claim
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/11/sun-damages-false-child-sex-claim
The Sun pays out over paedophile slur
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/uk/the-sun-pays-out-over-paedophile-slur-16076481.html
The Sun newspaper fined after wrongly calling Liverpool musician a paedophile
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2011/11/12/the-sun-newspaper-fined-after-wrongly-calling-liverpool-musician-a-paedophile-100252-29762307/
Published: 06 Jan 2012
"GG - apology
ON 17 March, 2011, we wrongly reported that GG was deported from Thailand for child sex offences as part of an international investigation.
We sincerely [sic] apologise to him for this error and the distress caused."
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4042556/GG-apology.html
*****
Comment:
Guess who the architect of this story was?
Yes, of course, Mr Anthony France, again, with Ms Keenan's assistance (yes, The OSC gets a mention).
*****
Labels:
Anthony France,
CEOP,
Civil Rights,
Dangerous,
Disinformation,
Freedom,
Harassment,
Human Rights,
Hyperbole,
Hysteria,
Law,
News Corporation,
OSC,
Privacy,
Rupert Murdoch,
Shy Keenan,
Simon Hughes,
SOCA,
The Sun,
TPP
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
