Wednesday, 28 January 2015

Comrade Hoski Has Got A Newish High-Flying Position




*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

12:01AM GMT 28 Jan 2015

Sex therapy in prisons does not stop rapists reoffending, warns expert

"David Ho, a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, said there was no evidence to show that therapy prevented further offending."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11372442/Sex-therapy-in-prisons-does-not-stop-rapists-reoffending-warns-expert.html

Last updated: Today at 12am PST 

Sexual offending treatment programmes in prisons and hospitals are ineffective 

"The majority of offenders released back into society still pose the same level of risk as they did before the treatment programme, and this fails victims and the public, he argues.

"Professional pride or political embarrassment cannot justify persisting with a programme that leaves the public at risk of further sex offending," he adds.

He calls on doctors to take responsibility for the treatment of sexual offenders.

Rehabilitation could involve mandatory detention in mental health hospitals under the Mental Health Act 1983 and only proven treatments should be used to rehabilitate offenders effectively, he argues. Treatments must be supported through robust research to demonstrate efficacy, which the current treatment programme clearly lacks, he adds."

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/288522.php

Jan 27, 2015 10:38 PM EST 

 Sex Therapy In Prison Does Not Deter [sic] Some Offenders 

"New research on sex offenders in prison shows that since 1991, sexual offenders in prisons and psychiatric hospitals are not benefiting from treatment."

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/articles/21688/20150127/sex-therapy-in-prison-does-not-deter-some-offenders.htm

Published 27 January 2015 

Ineffective treatment of sex offenders fails victims

"Sexual offending therefore consists of a heterogeneous group of acts, which may not include but are likely to include at least some elements of paraphilia.

Considering this heterogeneity, the question of whether sex offending is even a disorder in need of treatment is another debate. And the reality is that society and policy makers look to doctors for answers."

http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h199 

http://press.psprings.co.uk/bmj/january/sexoftreat.pdf

*****

David Ho

http://www.sept.nhs.uk/about-us

david.ho@nhs.net
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Because You Cannot Believe Something, Does Not Preclude You From Being Ignorant And/Or Stupid And/Or Incorrect




*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date) 

List of serial killers in the United States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_in_the_United_States

List of serial killers by country

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_serial_killers_by_country


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_killer

*****

22 January 2015

Lord Chief Justice questioned on 2014 report and related matters

http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/justice-committee/news/lord-chief-justice-report-2014-evidence

Comments begin at 10:01:38.

*****

08:02, 28 January 2015

Internet porn is fuelling rape and murder, warns Britain's top judge

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/internet-porn-fuelling-rape-murder-5055856

Published: 20:34, 27 January 2015 | Updated: 08:56, 28 January 2015

Extreme internet pornography is driving people to inflict sexual violence and murder, country’s most senior judge warns

">The Lord Chief Justice says porn encourages perverts to enact fantasies,
>His comments add weight to the Daily Mail's Block Online Porn campaign,
>Campaigners warn that online pornography fuels violent sex offences."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2928864/Extreme-internet-pornography-driving-people-inflict-sexual-violence-murder-country-s-senior-judge-warns.html

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

16:37, 28 January 2015 

Internet porn has coincided with a huge FALL in violent crime


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/internet-porn-coincided-huge-fall-5056425

January 2004

Explanations for the Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Cases 


https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/199298.pdf

Published: June 28, 2012

Researchers See Decline in Child Sexual Abuse Rate 


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/us/rate-of-child-sexual-abuse-on-the-decline.html?_r=0

http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu

Dec. 22 2014 11:18 PM

The World Is Not Falling Apart

"Never mind the headlines. We’ve never lived in such peaceful times."


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2014/12/the_world_is_not_falling_apart_the_trend_lines_reveal_an_increasingly_peaceful.single.html

Accepted 10 April 2009; Available online 18 April 2009

The pleasure is momentary ... the expense damnable? The influence of pornography on rape and sexual assault 
  

http://www.christopherjferguson.com/pornography.pdf

http://mediaviolence.org/media-video-violence-addiction-research/research-archives/ferguson-c-j-hartley-r-d-2009-the-pleasure-is-momentarythe-expense-damnable-the-influence-of-pornography-on-rape-and-sexual-assault-aggression-and-violent-behavior-14/ 

September 21, 2014 4:00 AM

The Rape Epidemic Is a Fiction

"Sexual assaults today are a third of what they were twenty years ago."


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/388502/rape-epidemic-fiction-kevin-d-williamson/page/0/1

March 1, 2010

Porn: Good for us? 

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/28803/title/Porn--Good-for-us-/

 Date: 30 Nov 2010

Pornography and Sex Crimes in the Czech Republic 
 


http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-010-9696-y

(Embedded Tweet - click date)

December 9, 2014

The British BDSM Ban Is Just Like the Outrage Over 'Video Nasties'

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/video-nasty-frankie-mullin-045

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

11:57AM GMT 29 Jan 2015 

Does watching porn really turn people into violent criminals? 

"One of the most controversial studies of all time – one that is often quoted by pro-pornographers – is that carried out by Danish Professor of Criminology Berl Kutchinsky. He watched the effects of legalising porn in three countries – Denmark in 1969, Sweden in 1970 and Germany in 1973.

For two decades he charted sex crimes in these territories, and concluded that sex crimes of all natures – including child molestation – fell as men had a “release” for their sexual desires before they acted on them. He concluded that free availability of porn was the “direct cause of this decrease”.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/thinking-man/11376283/Does-watching-porn-really-turn-people-into-violent-criminals.html

 November 30, 2010

Legalizing pornography: Lower sex crime rates? Study carried out in Czech Republic shows results similar to those in Japan and Denmark

"Could legalizing pornography legal lead to lower rates of sex crimes?

A new study tackles this controversial question.

Results from the Czech Republic showed that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography.
 

In addition, the study finds that the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130111326.htm

http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2010to2014/2010-czech-porn-abstract.html

18:45, 28 January 2015

Online pornography: Does it really make men more violent?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/online-pornography-really-make-men-5059505

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

4 th August 2011

Sexually Explicit Material and Video On Demand Services A Report to DCMS by Ofcom

http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/internet/explicit-material-vod.pdf

*****

Oct. 30 2006

How the Web Prevents Rape 

"All that Internet porn reduces sex crimes. Really."

http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/everyday_economics/2006/10/how_the_web_prevents_rape.html

 April 15, 2015

Ignore the puritan porn police - smut actually saves lives

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/ignore-puritan-porn-police-smut-actually-saves-lives-1496507

*****



Is porn immoral? That doesn’t matter: It’s a public health crisis.

"The science is now beyond dispute." [sic]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/04/08/is-porn-immoral-that-doesnt-matter-its-a-public-health-crisis/?utm_term=.f4e8b58a4a54

March 10, 2016 


Dishonest or Ignorant - 'Rape Training'

Inquiry into the harm being done [sic] to Australian children through access to pornography on the internet 

"Submission by: Dr Michael Flood, University of Wollongong."

http://www.xyonline.net/sites/default/files/Flood,%20Senate%20submission%202016_0.pdf

Michael Flood @MichaelGLFlood https://twitter.com/MichaelGLFlood
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, 24 January 2015

Tatel Tattle - If One Is Older, Wiser or Knowledgeable ... Little Of This Is New, News Or Worthy



Good Riddance, To Bad Rubbish



*****

When The News of the Word died, a whole host of amateurs, zealots, wannabes and vested interests found the WWW ...  grasping their sad, tiny, opportunities ...

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

Children for the Devil: Ritual Abuse and Satanic Crime 

http://www.weiserantiquarian.com/cgi-bin/wab455/43958.html

Desperately Seeking Satan

http://magonia.haaan.com/2009/seeking

Court Pulp Tate's Devil Book 

http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/tatecole.htm

Child sex & porn allegations against former Tory Home Secretary Leon Brittan 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdCDnF19eOM&feature=youtu.be

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

More to follow.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 22 January 2015

On Proximity, Harm, Culpability and Potentially-Dangerous Offenders


*****

 
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/indecent_images_of_children

(Dangerous provision changes - http://www.onepaper.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/N10_Sentencing-dangerous-offenders.pdf)

R v Terrell [2007] EWCA Crim 3079

"26. The serious harm [sic] thus relied on here is the harm to children through the perpetuation of the market [sic] or distribution networks for indecent images. This puts children at risk of being forced to participate in the activities leading to such images [sic], or causes psychological harm to a child who realises either at the time or later that images of him or her are being used as objects of perverted sexual gratification [do we have some verifiable, peer-reviewed, research, on this claim?]. There is no suggestion here however that the Appellant has any contact with children whom he might seek to photograph or to commission others to photograph, for himself, for sharing or for using as a means of gaining access to a network.

27. In all these circumstances, the re-offending which is at risk would make a direct [sic] but small contribution to the market or distribution of such indecent images [and if one makes none, as most do?]; that in turn would make an indirect but small contribution to the risk that indecent images of children would be taken [no risk then]. A child groomed or made to participate in sexual acts for those purposes may suffer serious harm of one sort or another, depending on the activity [fine, they are offences, perhaps worth having [and exist], in the puritanical regime we have, presently]. A child who becomes aware that he or she has been photographed for the sexual gratification of an adult, who may not even be known to them, may suffer serious psychological harm [see above].

28. In our judgment it cannot reasonably be said, in the context of these particular statutory provisions, that there is a significant risk of this Appellant's re-offending occasioning harm to a child or children whether through perpetuating the market, or through further indecent images being taken, or through a child becoming aware of the indecent purposes to which photographs might be put. The link between the offending act of downloading these indecent images and the possible harm which might be done to children is too remote to satisfy the requirement that it be this Appellant's re-offending which causes the serious harm. At worst there would be an indirect and small contribution to a harm which might or might not occur, depending on whether further photographs were taken in part as a result of the Appellant's contribution to the market [and if none?], or depending on whether a child found out about the uses to which they were put as a result [proximity to/culpability of, the non-contributory, unknown, offender?]. The imprisonment for public protection provisions of the CJA do not apply in the circumstances here, where simply as a matter of generalisation, a small, uncertain and indirect contribution to harm may be made by a repeat of this offender's offending. No significant risk of serious harm of the requisite gravity, occasioned by a repetition of the offending in this case by this offender can reasonably be said to exist."

"34. The potential utility of a SOPO in a case such as this does not mean that the tests of section 104 are necessarily satisfied. A sentencing judge however, could have been satisfied in these circumstances that a SOPO was necessary, but would not have been driven to such a conclusion.

Perpetuating the market [sic; the trouble is, that is not what we have, in the main] or distribution network for indecent images encourages [sic] others to commission, take or create indecent images [fine, they are offences, perhaps worth having [and exist], in the puritanical regime we have, presently] of a level which may [?] be capable of causing "serious" harm to children [see above], and the child or children who might be photographed could well become aware of the use to which those photographs would be put [and?].

The indirect and uncertain harm arising from the contribution to the harm which any downloading of indecent images may have does not necessarily fall outside the scope of the SOA provisions, as discussed in Beaney and Collard." [legal logic, stretched to its farcical and failing limits]

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2007/3079.html

(R v Beaney [2004] EWCA Crim 449

http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2004/february/r-v-beaney

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2004/449.html

 R v Collard [2004] EWCA Crim 1664

http://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2004/may/r-v-collard

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2004/1664.html)

 

http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/1883134.child_porn_man_has_sentence_overturned

http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/1802271.child_porn_student_challenges_sentence


http://trixresources.proceduresonline.com/nat_key/keywords/a_potential_danger_pers.html


http://www.dyfed-powys.police.uk/media/117392/management-of-potentially-dangerous-persons-policy.pdf

*****

March 1st, 2015 

  

103B Section 103A: supplemental

"“sexual harm” from a person means physical or psychological harm caused—

(a) by the person committing one or more offences listed in Schedule 3, or

(b) (in the context of harm outside the United Kingdom) by the person doing, outside the United Kingdom, anything which would constitute an offence listed in Schedule 3 if done in any part of the United Kingdom;"

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/12/schedule/5

*****  

More to follow.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 14 January 2015

More Dirty Tricks From Keenan and Co



Oh Dear, Do Keep Up !!!

 


*****
(Embedded Tweet - click date)

*****
(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

No, Mr Paul Farmer, Is Still Not Being Mindful

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Paul%20Farmer

*****

The harassment, lies and gross offence continue ...

(Embedded Tweets - click date)

*****

All You Have To Do, Is Show Us The Tweets, With Associated IPs

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/all-you-have-to-do-is-show-us-tweets.html

 When Survivors Attack (Part 5): It Took You Enough Time To Get It Up

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/when-survivors-attack-part-5-it-tookyou.html

When Survivors Attack (Part 4): Lies, Lies, Lies - So Many Pants On Fire

http://therealosc.blogspot.ch/2014/06/when-survivors-atack-part-4-lies-lies.html
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 8 January 2015

We Bet The Church Will Not Be Very Broad




*****


Vigilantes - Why Jack Marshall Died

*****
(Embedded tweets - click date)

No, Mr Paul Farmer, Is Still Not Being Mindful

http://therealosc.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Paul%20Farmer

*****

Joe Miller, the suffering, family man ...


Danny Latimer, the, deceased, love interest ...


Jack Marshall, persecuted and hounded, for being a good man ...


*****

Broadchurch 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadchurch

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2249364

https://twitter.com/BroadchurchTV

https://twitter.com/hashtag/broadchurch?f=realtime&src=hash

*****

If you are affected, by any of the issues, raised, here ...

MAPs - you are not alone - very much, not alone ... www.annabelleigh.net

http://www.lucyfaithfull.org.uk - stopitnow.org.uk - circles-uk.org.uk - http://www.virped.org - http://b4uact.org

http://preventell.se/?lang=en - http://www.nemup.de/index_eng.html - https://1in6.org - www.boychat.org
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)